the assessment tool used and data collected.Entrepreneurial Mindset ExercisesThere were eight activities used throughout the semester to introduce the EM in the freshmanengineering course. The activities were active-learning based and designed to have studentswork in teams and to move around the classroom instead of remaining in a traditional seatedlecture. Outcomes of the activities were focused on creative problem solving skills and criticalthinking skills. Many of the activities were from traditional entrepreneurship and team-buildingfocuses and have been adapted to have an engineering focus. As follows each activity is brieflydescribed with anticipated outcomes.Puzzle-QuiltThis is an active exercise which involves multiple rooms and team
literature is the work of Frenkle-Brunswik [6], [7] thatdiscusses intolerance of ambiguity. Understanding how a person reacts to an ambiguous situationcan be helpful when assessing personality [7]. Frenkle-Brunswik [7] demonstrated that childrenwho are more rigid in their responses to ambiguous stimuli tend to have a more ethnocentricpersonality and demonstrate authoritarian characteristics. They also tend to reject the unusual,need order, and lack the understanding of how good and bad can exist in one person. In the earlyliterature, the term ambiguity became synonymous with the terms authoritarian and prejudice [8].The psychology of reading is another area of research that that operationalizes ambiguity [9] -[11]. Reading comprehension theories
Paper ID #26324Making Inspired by Nature: Engaging Preservice Elementary Teachers andChildren in Maker-centered learning and BiomimicryDr. Douglas C Williams, University of Louisiana Douglas Williams, Ph.D., is Director of the Center for Innovative Learning and Assessment Technologies (CILAT) at UL Lafayette and a professor of educational technology in the College of Education. Dr. Williams holds bachelors and masters degrees in computer science and a Ph.D. in educational technology. He has more than 30 years’ experience as a programmer, was a member of the team that developed Rig- glefish, a web-based game for engaging
Paper ID #25547Creating National Leadership Cohorts for Making Academic Change Hap-pen: Sharing Lessons Learned Through RED Participatory Action Research(REDPAR) TipsheetsDr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Dean of Cross-Cutting Programs and Emerging Opportunities and Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of
this course, under different titles and at different institutions, but with the samecourse objectives, at least once per year from the 2013-2014 academic year to the (current) 2018-2019 academic year. I have tracked student levels of performance with each offering, with theaim of continuous quality improvement (CQI) for the course. Normally, I would have consideredCQI initiatives in the areas of sequencing of topics, lesson plans, assessment tools (exams,exercises, and projects), and general teaching techniques. I have presented the tracking of thisperformance in Figure 1. With some variability to be considered based on some of the CQIapplications, as well as changes in institutions, enrollment numbers, and ABET outcomes, thereis still a
) ∑(Solution−related issues) ∑(𝐵𝑠,𝑆)Correspondence analysis (Husso, Le & Pages, 2011) is a form of principal component analysisapplied to categories rather than individuals. It produces a semi-qualitative representation of therelationships between the categories from which qualitative assessments can be made. Table 3. Mapping Design Issues and Design Processes onto Problem and Solution Spaces Problem/Solution Space Design Issue Design Processes Requirement (R) 1 Formulation Reasoning about Problem Function (F) 8 Reformulation II Expected Behavior (Be) 7
Paper ID #25278Board 34: Use of Big Data Analytics in a First Year Engineering ProjectDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Nidhal Carla
. [Accessed: 18-Apr-2018].[8] N. McCarthy, “The countries with the most STEM graduates,” Forbes, 02-Feb-2017.[9] F. Falcone, E. Glynn, M. Graham, and M. Doorley, “Engineering Ethics Survey for Faculty : An Assessment Tool Engineering Ethics Survey for Faculty : An Assessment Tool,” 120th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Atlanta, June 23-26., 2013.[10] M. J. Murphy, “Ethics Education in China: Censorship, Technology and the Curriculum,” Teach. Ethics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 233–241, 2016.[11] I. Van de Poel and L. Royakkers, Ethics, Technology, and Engineering: An Introduction. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.[12] “Engineering Ethics | Engineering Systems Division | MIT OpenCourseWare.” [Online]. Available: https
is much easier toimplement, manage and assess programs at the collegiate level. Several research studies however havealso suggested that the best predictor of academic success at the college level is the rigor of academicinstruction at the K-12 level [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Unfortunately, under-represented minorities in STEM,particularly those from low income households, are more likely to be in programs with insufficientacademic rigor [2, 5, 6, 7].Universities and colleges, partially in response to these studies, have also introduced programs at the pre-college level, designed to enhance STEM success among under-represented minorities and low incomestudents. Hill [8] described a program applied to Detroit area schools in 1976 which included
is to generate transferable tools which can be used to teach andevaluate undergraduate engineering students’ metacognitive skills in the context of anengineering classroom. To accomplish this, we are working through a three-phase project inwhich we pilot a metacognitive intervention in one context, translate the intervention to a newcontext, and share the intervention and provide training on how to use it. This paper reports onthe outcomes from Phase 1, which is focused on the development and pilot implementation of ametacognitive intervention for a sophomore engineering course at a small undergraduate-focusedengineering school and assessing student’s metacognitive development. The intervention ismade up of six modules containing paired
Paper ID #14707Challenges and Benefits of Introducing a Science and Engineering Fair inHigh-Needs Schools (Work in Progress)Dr. Joni M. Lakin, Auburn University Joni M. Lakin, Ph.D. from The University of Iowa, is Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology at Auburn University. Her research interests include educational assessment, educational evaluation methods, and increasing diversity in STEM fields.Ms. Mary Lou Ewald, Auburn University Mary Lou Ewald is the Director of Outreach for the College of Sciences and Mathematics at Auburn University. She is also the Co-PI for AU-AMSTI and the
economic development resources (Program Areas). 5. Develop an analytical approach for evaluating alternatives that address resource deficiencies. 6. Develop quantified criteria to assess relative project impact potential.III. Organizational Platform for Regional DevelopmentThe UCTN-REDI leadership team consisted of the ECD Regional Director, UCDD ExecutiveDirector, TVA Regional Representative, USDA Rural Development Regional Representative, anda Tennessee Tech Representative. Advisory groups to UCTN-REDI were Regional EconomicDevelopment Stakeholders, REDS, and Regional Economic Development Council, REDC. REDSmembers are recognized regional economic development leaders with a strategic role to: 1. Strengthen the shared commitment across the
difficult obstacles.A standard 100-point grading system for a class is a natural fit for XP. It is relatively easy totake the normal grade distribution for a class and multiply every assessment by a factor and thenhave the students earn XP instead of getting a percentage. For instance, we used a factor of 200to make the maximum score in the class to be 200,000 XP. A typical test was worth 15,000-20,000 XP, or around 10% of the overall grade which is close to what it was without using XP.While this change may seem trivial and simply obfuscates a student’s grade, the difference is inthe student mentality toward XP and how XP is presented by the instructor. For example, atypical student might view a test as starting with a grade of 100 and then
tours, we were able to have the girls meet people working in STEM careers. Figure 9. Girls meeting role models in STEM during tours Program Evaluation The surveys during the program evaluation were designed to assess the positive andnegative benefits of the GiSLC and GiSWA program tracks. Question 1 provided a baseline forthe participants’ perception of herself as a science student. Table 2 presents the perception of theparticipants for their ability as a science student. As indicated in Table 2, less than half (35 – 45%)of the GiSWA and 20 – 54% of the GiSLC students classified themselves as very good sciencestudents. This suggested the
the nonregulated pole of thecontinuum, characterized by the individual’s perception of lack of control over events,incompetence and absence of purpose10.Assessing Learning MotivationThere exist several survey tools which evaluate learning motivation. The Academic MotivationScale (AMS-C 28) (College version)11 was selected as the tool most appropriate for theinternational dimension of this study and was consistent with the self-determination concept.11This scale was originally developed and written in French and later translated to English and itsefficacy was thoroughly evaluated by Vallerand et al.11. This survey reflexes the three self-determination attitudes with seven subscales aligning with the prime attitudes: • three subscales for
satellite systems infrastructure isbeing integrated into the backbone of the Internet and communicating using protocols familiar toIT professionals. We now have television, phone, GPS and internet services provided via satellitelinks. In addition, ground stations which are crucial to the relaying of satellite signals to theirproper destinations are also connected to the internet. This integration of technologies is drivingsatellite networks into the broader global network of systems which puts them at risk of attackfrom external entities. Unless cyber-security professionals are willing to take on theresponsibility of assimilating these networks into their cyber-security risk assessments satellitelinks may become a great weakness in our ability to
. Thegeneralpublicgenerallydescribesengineersasintrovertedandanti-social–“nerdy.”AmongmanyK-16 STEM students, communication and other soft skills are perceived as secondary to contentknowledgeskills.Clearlyeducators,industryandABETdisagree–STEMprofessionals,eventhoseincomputing,needabalanceofcontentandsoftskills.Developingsoftskillscanoccurindifferentforms, but assessment of these skills in non-intrusive yet authentic scenarios is only starting tooccur. Studying the communication patterns of multiple capstone teams, given different types ofproblemstosolve,allowsustodevelopinsightintohowrealworldproblemscanmotivateateamwhileincreasingcollaborationandcommunicationeffectiveness. Finally
year project activities including the Faculty ProfessionalDevelopment workshop on Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) and ARM-basedmicrocontrollers, assessment results and lessons learned, the summer outreach activity happenedat partner institutions, and finally, the undergraduate research internship experience. I. IntroductionIn general Programmable Logic Devices and FPGA-based re-programmable logic design becamemore attractive as a design media during the last decade, and as a result, industrial use of FPGAin digital logic design is increasing rapidly. Considering the following technology trend inindustry, the need for highly qualified logic designers with FPGA expertise is increasing rapidly.According to the United States Department
section. These two coursesections share the same hybrid structure, the same material, assignments, activities, assessments,course schedule, meeting times, and the same instructor. The only difference is the deliverymethod for live material. Students in the HF2F section are physically present for the classmeeting, and students in the HSOL section are digitally present for the class meeting. HSOLstudents interact in real time with HF2F students and with the instructor. Studies support thisneed for peer and instructor interaction, and suggest that it helps to overcome social andacademic isolation common with purely online courses13, 14.There is some technology required for the converged classroom. It is necessary to have a coursemanagement system
Design Projects for the Simulation Based Design CourseAbstractThe course MECH625-simulation-based design in our program was mainly to conduct FEA(Finite Element Analysis) on components and assemblies to provide stress/strain information.Through our program assessment, it was found that students who performed excellently in theprevious MECH625 course had some difficulties incorporating FEA simulation correctly andefficiently on their senior design projects. In fall 2014, we decided to modify the course andcreated two projects to improve student skills in running FEA simulations on projects. The firstproject was an individual project in which students were mainly asked to use different simulationskills to run FEA simulations and then compare the
classes and was the first person to introduce problem- based learning in the department of agricultural and biological engineering at MSU. James is also the Adjunct Director for training and instruction in the professional development department at ABET. In this role, Warnock oversees the development, planning, production and implementation of the ABET Program Assessment Workshops, IDEAL and the assessment webinar series. He also directs activities related to the workshop facilitator training and professional development.Ms. Vemitra M White, Mississippi State University Vemitra White, a native of Crawford, Mississippi, is currently a doctoral candidate at Mississippi State University where she will receive her PhD in
of two international EU-FIPSE funded grants. His scholarship agenda focuses on techno- logical innovation, technological literacy, workforce development, and international dimensions of these fields. Increasingly, he has turned his attention to the field of technological innovation and the assessment of technological capability, understanding and innovation. Internationally he has worked in Germany, South Africa, Poland, the USSR, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Ire- land, Scotland, England, France, Czech and Slovak Republics, Finland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Taiwan His early experience involved teaching in Alberta and at universities in North Dakota and New Jersey. Immediately before coming to Purdue, he
saving behaviors. Dr. Lang’s current research interests focus on identifying, assessing, and developing key skills, knowledge, attitudes, and other intrinsic and extrinsic factors required for engineers to effectively lead others, particularly other engineers and across cultures.Mr. Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University Andrew M. ”Mike” Erdman received his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State and his M.S. from USC. At Rocketdyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Re- actor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL (Lockheed Martin), he conducted research for Naval Reactors. He currently serves as the Walter L. Robb
becoupled to the departmental capstone courses to promote quick adoptions of multidisciplinarycapstone projects without sacrificing discipline specific rigor. Two student surveys and one end-of-quarter grading rubric are used to assess the merits of the coupled course design through thefirst quarter of a three quarter capstone series. Results of the surveys show that the SMCCcourse structure resolves student meeting scheduling problems by mandating attendance andretains departmental rigor by having advisors directly assigned in the departmental capstonecourse. We found that highly motivated teams with defined projects thrive with this model butthat industry-defined projects require increased communication for all involved faculty andindustry
face-to-face to a hybrid (or blended) to acompletely online structure, and reports various findings and struggles faced during the process.Detailed description of the engineering course chosen for the study and multi-disciplinary natureof the course with respect to projects, team work and departments is explained in themethodology section. Outcomes of various assessments and surveys conducted during the coursetransformation are discussed in the results and discussion section. Recommendation andimplications of online e-learning system in engineering education are included in Section 5.2. MethodologyTransition of a project-based course from traditional methods to hybrid to Internet based e-learning systems is discussed in this paper
highenrollment, with 150 to 200 students per year over two semesters, CE 355 was identified as apromising course for conversion to a “flipped” classroom environment for the Fall 2015semester. This flipped classroom approach involved delivering approximately 25 percent ofdirect instruction through online videos and other media. The in-class time was then used toengage students in collaborative, hands-on activities. This format allowed for increased one–on–one interaction with students and better short–term assessment of student learning outcomes,addressing two anecdotal concerns with respect to the existing structure.Prior to the Fall 2015 semester, a series of ten video lectures were recorded, each of whichprovided an introduction to a specific
. Striking an optimal balance between extrinsic and intrinsic motivators iskey in educational game design, for it is the intrinsic motivators that drive continued mastery ofthe learned skill in non-game contexts(22) and in the absence of extrinsic motivators(22).In recent years, numerous digital and non-digital game-based learning implementations have (18, 23-26)been reported in library contexts , in physical and digital forms. A University ofMichigan team developed Bibliobouts(24), an online tournament style game which introducesplayers to a specific set of information literacy skills needed in a research workflow, fromfinding journal articles to assessing their relevance and managing references
skills15. The ethicalcodes listed by many engineering societies are a good reference for ethical teaching withinengineering programs. However, they cannot be used to train students entirely in recognizingand resolving ethical dilemmas that they may face in their day to day jobs16.Research Methodology:Problem Objective: The objective of this research is to understand the students’ perception of ethics byconducting the survey on certain ethical factors among the students of three differentcountries. The main purpose of the study is to improve the ethical behavior students byincluding ethics education in engineering curriculum. This study is performed by certainhypotheses mentioned below.Hypotheses:To assess the ethical standards of students
accreditation standards. While the importance of an effective laboratory experience has been acknowledged bymany in the academic community, it has frequently been an under researched topic. Wankatindicated that from 1998 to 2002 only 5.2% of all published articles in the Journal ofEngineering Education used laboratory as a keyword [5]. Much of the concentration has beenplaced on teaching methods and curricula; therefore, interest in laboratory research has becomestagnate as a result. While the authors realize the importance of objectives and assessments to evaluate theeffectiveness of instructional laboratories [6], this paper is primarily concerned with the relativeadvantages and disadvantages of different laboratory methods that can be
ethics classes are often avoided by engineering students due to lackof perceived importance2. There remains a critical need for an efficient, systematic means forintegrating substantial training in ethical decision making within engineering curricula. The goal of this work was to develop tools for engineering professors to efficiently andeffectively integrate ethics modules into their engineering courses. These tools are designed to betailored for an across-the curriculum model, in which multiple engineering courses incorporateethics modules as part of the assessed subject matter. A two-year study was conducted atWorcester Polytechnic Institute with two distinct phases conducted by different undergraduatestudent teams which developed