in educational testing, factor analysis, and modern missing data handling methods. Page 24.1290.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Understanding How Students’ Value the Behaviors of Individuals in Engineering TeamsIntroductionOur engineering program incorporates a strong focus on engineering design, which begins duringthe students’ sophomore year with two sequential design courses—Engineering Design I taken inthe fall semester and Engineering Design II taken during the spring semester. 1-3 During thisyear-long sophomore design course
Practice Professionals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Hybrid Method for Enhancement of Structural Understanding in Architecture StudentsAbstractThis paper is focused on the use of educational exercises for architecture students in order to enhancetheir understanding of structural engineering principles. Hybrid method refers to the use of educationalmodels that target both qualitative and quantitative understanding of structural analysis. In particular, inthis study, a series of hands-on activities were designed and incorporated into the ArchitectureStructure classes to provide students with a deeper level of understanding of structural behavior. Theoverarching
pedagogy and wereinformed by the cognitive sciences. One interesting arena for analysis is whether studentseffectively transfer knowledge in one STEM discipline to applications or problem solving inanother discipline, or more likely, in an engineering design setting. Venville et al. havedocumented elements of this phenomena on students designing a solar-powered boat15,16. Theirfindings suggest that while students did draw on their prior content knowledge in completing anintegrated STEM task, they often did not draw on the most relevant ideas, they tended to do soonly at the beginning of the design process, and not iteratively to modify or revise their designlater. They also did not show capacity to deepen their understanding of a concept through
communication representan essential dimension of the engineering profession. Modern engineers not only need to producetechnically appropriate designs, but to communicate these designs in written, oral, and graphicalform to multiple audiences ranging from their technical peers to the general public (Troy, Essig,Jesiek, Boyd, & Trellinger, 2014).In order to understand the current industry’s expectations of engineering communication skills,verifying how these expectations confirm the current body of knowledge, or if there are newinsights that potentially could reshape communication instruction in engineering programs, thefollowing research questions were established for this study:1. How are the specific communication skills expected from practicing
often longer; and they are designed to becompatible with the understanding of the university as a complex ecosystem governed by a rangeof stakeholders and competing interests. The recent report on systemic change to STEM post-secondary pathways by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicinereferenced this work and highlighted PLCs as reflecting these important features (NationalAcademies of Sciences and Medicine, 2016). This report also indicated the importance ofsimultaneously addressing incentive practices and the values of the academy in order to ensurethe institutionalization of the instructional shifts. In designing our PLC, we ensured each of theseelements were present and will expand on each in turn
Paper ID #21079An Integrated Active Learning Approach for Understanding Fatigue TheoryDr. Xiaobin Le P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor, Ph.D, PE., Department of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA 02115, Phone: 617-989-4223, Email: Lex@wit.edu, Specialization in Com- puter Aided Design, Mechanical Design, Finite Element Analysis, Fatigue Design, Solid Mechanics and Engineering Reliability.Prof. Richard L Roberts, Wentworth Institute of Technology Associate Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, College of Engineering and Technology
AC 2012-5102: UNDERSTANDING THE SYSTEM: SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTSINCREASE STUDENT INTEREST AND LEARNINGDr. Noel E. Bormann P.E., Gonzaga University Noel E. Bormann is a professor and Chair, Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA 99258.Dr. Mara London, Gonzaga UniversityMr. Andrew Douglas Matsumoto, Gonzaga University School of EngineeringMs. Melanie Ruth WalterMr. Spencer Joseph Fry Page 25.1399.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Understanding the System: Sustainability projects increase
Paper ID #24745Safe Zone Deep Dive into Supporting Transgender Students and Colleagues(90-minute Workshop)Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA). Prior to 2016 she was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at Rowan. Dr. Farrell has contributed to engineering education through her work in inductive pedagogy, spatial skills, and inclusion and diversity. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineering Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal
AC 2008-646: ENHANCING STUDENT UNDERSTANDING OF AND INTEREST INMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGAleksandra Vinogradov, Montana State University Dr. Aleksandra Vinogradov has extensive academic and industrial experience in mechanical engineering. Her academic career has been dedicated to teaching and research. She has taught a variety of courses in materials engineering, engineering mechanics, mechanical vibrations, engineering analysis, and finite element analysis. She has supervised award winning student projects in mechanical design. Dr. Vinogradov’s research interests are in the area of materials. Her recent research focuses on the performance and properties of piezoelectric polymers, durability of
biomedical engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 94:207–213, 20048 Newstetter, W. C. (2006). Fostering integrative problem solving in biomedical engineering: The PBL approach. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 34(2): 217–2259 Shimazoe, J., & Aldrich, H. (2010). Group work can be gratifying: Understanding & overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. College Teaching, 58(2), 52-57.10 Stewart,G. L. (2006). A meta-analytics review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1):29-55.
parts on-demand, 6,7 AM education is ofcritical importance. Engineering and engineering technology students need to understand theperformance of parts manufactured from AM processes.The Strength of Materials course is a critical course in typical engineering and engineeringtechnology curricula where students acquire the fundamental principles and develop problemsolving skills for stress analysis and mechanical design of structural and machine elements.8,9Often, laboratory exercises are designed to demonstrate the basic principles and abstractconcepts through a series of experiments. Students perform experiments to characterize thetensile behavior of steel, aluminum, or plastic samples. They also test the mechanicalperformance of specimens
PracticesThe Engineering Mechanics Dynamics 8 was adopted as the textbook for the dynamics course atSDSM&T. There are four chapters discussing the dynamics concepts and principles aboutparticles. The topics included curvilinear motion, work and energy and impulse and momentum.Following the book design, a reasoning practice was conducted after every two chapters. Thereasoning practices in this pilot study focused on conceptual understanding of the kinematics andkinetics of a particle. Five to ten questions were provided for each reasoning practice.To engage students with different learning styles, the reasoning practice questions kept a balanceof concrete information and abstract concepts 9. Each question in the practice starts with astatement
Paper ID #7109Using Animations to Enhance Understanding of Energy System ConceptsDr. B. K. Hodge, Mississippi State University B. K. Hodge is Professor Emeritus of Mechanical Engineering at Mississippi State University (MSU). Prior to retirement, he served as the TVA Professor of Energy Systems and the Environment and was a Giles Distinguished Professor and a Grisham Master Teacher. Since retirement, he has continued to be involved in teaching and research at MSU. Hodge has served as President of the Southeastern Section of the ASEE and Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Division of the ASEE. He is a Fellow of the American
Paper ID #26918Quick Understanding Our Engineering Faculty Research Needs Using TopicModelingMs. Qianjin Zhang, University of Iowa Qianjin (Marina) Zhang is the Engineering & Informatics Librarian at the Lichtenberger Engineering Library, The University of Iowa. As a subject librarian, she manages collection and provides instruction, reference and consultation services for the engineering faculty and students. Her work also focuses on data management education and outreach to engineering students through presenting Data Management topic to an Engineering Ethics course and library workshops. She holds a MA in
. Prior to this, he worked in the areas of software measurement and software process improvement methods for software projects. Dr. Paulish is a co-author of Software Metrics: A Practitioner's Guide to Improved Product Development, published by IEEE Press, and the author of Architecture-Centric Software Project Management, published by Addison Wesley. Dr. Paulish holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Polytechnic University in Brooklyn, NY. Page 11.257.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Asynchronous collaboration: achieving shared understanding
Paper ID #34720Online Sharing Platform for Course Modules: Understanding Materials Useand EffectivenessDr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu earned her BEng in Engineering Mechanics from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and her Ph.D. in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University, with a focus on computa- tional solid mechanics. Dr. Zhu is a Senior Lecturer of the freshman engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU) and the recipient of the Ful- ton Outstanding Lecturer Award. In this role, she focuses on designing the curriculum
apprenticeships, capstone design projects, andinternships, are offered as part of the ADVANCE model. The ultimate goal of the degreepathway model that ADVANCE offers is to ensure that students are prepared for post-baccalaureate employment and success in the workplace. ADVANCE seeks to ensure that whatstudents learn and experience in their educational journey reflects workforce realities. Mappeddegree pathways that integrate industry-defined credentials and standards will leave noambiguity for students regarding desired workforce competencies. By building in immersiveexperiential learning opportunities, students will better understand workplace expectations andprepare to transition successfully upon graduation.As ADVANCE students progress through their
State’s College of Education. She teaches courses on learning and problem solving. Her research areas include the study of how students learn and the design of educational interventions to support that learning.Dr. Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkMs. Carla M Firetto, The Pennsylvania State University Carla Firetto is a Ph.D. candidate in Educational Psychology at Penn State. She is interested in applying principles of educational research to develop interventions that facilitate undergraduate students’ learn- ing, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. She can be contacted at cmf270@psu.edu
study that measured current IE students’ interestin solving operations research problems in different industry sectors and their perceptions aboutindustrial engineering careers. The aim of the study is to gain greater understanding about theinterests and perceptions of current IE students at Kansas State University (KSU). While thespecific results are most directly applicable to the institution where the study was conducted, wecomment on broad insights of interest to the industrial engineering education community.The pilot study described here is part of a planned long-term effort to understand the perceptionsof prospective (pre-college) students and those of students at multiple stages in the curriculum.The overarching objective is to design
Paper ID #16630Exploring Conceptual Understanding in Heat Transfer: A Qualitative Anal-ysisMs. Amy L. Hermundstad, Virginia Tech Amy Hermundstad is a doctoral student and Graduate Teaching Assistant at Virginia Tech. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University and is currently pursuing a Master of Engineering degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education.Dr. Thomas E. Diller, Virginia Tech Tom Diller was a Hertz Fellow at MIT, which culminated in a Doctor of Science degree in 1977. Af- ter working at Polaroid Corporation for several years, he has been teaching
describes the types and sources of units confusion students can have,explores the ways in which units calculations are abused, analyzes the ways in which studentattitudes about units intersect with instructor and industry attitudes, discusses strategies formotivating students to appreciate the importance of units, and makes the case for how theadoption of a methodical problem solving and units cancellation approach can remove confusionand establish a solid groundwork for understanding fundamental engineering physics.Units in mechanical engineering disciplinesMechanical engineering is typically broken down into three areas: mechanical design,manufacturing, and thermal-fluids. Usually one of the first “hard core” engineering courses isstatics. Given
Paper ID #21642Hands-on Activities to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Wa-ter HardnessDr. Brenda Read-Daily, Elizabethtown College Dr. Brenda Read-Daily is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Elizabethtown College in Pennsylva- nia. She holds a BS in Civil Engineering from Bradley University, and a MS and PhD in Environmental Engineering from the University of Notre Dame. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Hands-on Activities to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Water HardnessAbstractHardness removal is a topic typically
human body movement characteriza- tion especially as related to normal and perturbed (slipping) gait. Dr. Moyer earned a BS in mechanical engineering from Carnegie Mellon in 1993, a MS in mechanical engineering from the University of Pitts- burgh in 1996, and a PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2006. Brian teaches courses in computer programming for engineers, design, measurements, and dynamics.Dr. Randy Dean Kelley P.E., University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown Dr. Kelley is an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. He recieved his doctorate in Nuclear and Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University in 2010. Dr. Kelley’s expertise and research interests are in
. Page 15.751.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Instructional Algorithms Enhance Student Understanding Of PLC Ladder Logic ProgrammingAbstractThis paper presents two techniques that helps students transition from relay ladder logic conceptsto programmable logic controller (PLC) ladder logic programming. The first technique presents avery structured algorithmic process for the selection of PLC ladder logic input contactconfigurations for a given control problem. The second technique describes the use of ladderlogic building blocks for the commonly used ladder logic instructions in the development oflarger PLC ladder logic programs.Students, familiar with relay ladder logic (RLL) control, know
Paper ID #24982Leaders Like MeDr. Kyle F Trenshaw, University of Rochester Kyle Trenshaw is currently the Educational Development Specialist at the University of Rochester’s Cen- ter for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Missouri in 2009, and his M.S. (2011) and Ph.D. (2014) in chemical engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include science, technology, engineer- ing, and mathematics (STEM) education; supporting diversity in STEM fields with an emphasis on les- bian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer
series editor, contributed to trade publications, and facilitated workshops all related to higher education administrators’ work experiences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Understanding the Professional Formation of Engineers through the Lens of Design Thinking: Unpacking the Wicked Problem of Diversity and InclusionIntroductionThree broad issues have been identified in the professional formation of engineers: 1) the gapbetween what students learn in universities and what they practice upon graduation; 2) thelimiting perception that engineering is solely technical, math, and theory oriented; and 3) the lackof diversity (representation of a wide
Paper ID #31028A Situative Understanding of the NGSS Science and Engineering Practices(Fundamental)Mr. Richard J. Aleong, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Richard J. Aleong is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his M.A.Sc. and B.Sc.E in Mechanical and Materials Engineering from Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada. His research interests are focused on integrative thinking and design, interdisciplinary collaboration, and educational development to support students’ personal and professional learning and growth.Dr. Robin Adams
Paper ID #24706Sustainable Research Pathways: Collaborations across Communities to Di-versify the National Laboratory WorkforceDr. Mary Ann E Leung, Sustainable Horizons Instittute Dr. Leung is a nationally acclaimed leader in the design and implementation of innovative programs aimed at developing the next generation of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) leaders. As an accomplished scientist, Mary Ann honors and treasures the process of scientific discovery. As the director of major STEM-focused educational programs, Dr. Leung nurtured her passion for connecting students and science by
Physics and Astronomy and Director of the CASTLE Center for Advancing STEM Teaching, Learning & Evaluation at Rochester Institute of Technology. His educa- tion research includes projects on the development of identity and affiliation in physics majors throughout their undergraduate career, and, separately, how physicists express conceptual meaning in mathemati- cal formalism. He has co-directed the PEER faculty development program for four years, integrating emerging research projects into ongoing programmatic activities that seek to improve the retention of first-generation and deaf/hard-of hearing students in STEM disciplines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Improving
personal desire to broaden partici- pation of women and other underrepresented students, including students in rural areas and those who learn differently, in STEM education from pre-K through graduate studies. Her current work focuses on supporting and evaluating the construction of collaborative communities and building evaluation capacity within organizations and large-scale programs. In all efforts Adrienne works to (a) truly understand the purpose and needs for the evaluation or research undertaking, (b) develop feedback cycles that support continuous program improvement, (c) make implementation and impact data available and interpretable for program implementers, and (d) select the most rigorous, yet feasible