high school. In the caseof the former population, our robotics camp research shows that boys need “confirmation” tocontinue strongly in engineering, whereas girls need “confirmation” after “affirmation” and“visualization.” Based on the above finding, we believe that the approaches to encourage middleschool boys to proceed towards STEM careers and the approaches to encourage middle schoolgirls to proceed towards STEM careers must have some similar elements and yet be necessarilydifferent.A study that shows the difference between boys and girls was done very early in ourcollaborative project. Collin College asked questions of Allen ISD students that were judged tobe “good” in 7th and 8th grade math by test scores and teachers. The simple study
begins with an assignment to carry out one or more designs and arrive atone final design. For compositions of PBL, the classroom roles shift from teacher focused tostudent-centered learning models that more self-directed [20]. In both cases, studies have shownthat PBL has led to improved student performance, higher quality of peer interactions, and morepositive student attitudes [6].Many researchers such as Snyman and Kroon [21], Barragán et al. [22], Mativo et al. [17] andBalkos et al. [4] have found that a more broadly scoped “comprehensive” projects can provide aninnovative mechanism for learning. Most projects in PBL typically require students to analyze aproblem, evaluate design alternatives and apply a collective team knowledge to arrive
). As an instructor of a large enrollment envi- ronmental science course, Dr. Sandrin is also interested in how a better understanding of environmental issues influences student behaviors in terms of their water and energy use. Her educational background includes a B.S. in Biochemical Engineering from Rutgers University, a M.S. in Hydrology from the University of Arizona, and a Ph.D. in Soil, Water and Environmental Science from the University of Arizona. During her graduate work, she studied contaminant fate and transport of organic contaminants in groundwater systems.Dr. Connie M Borror, Arizona State University West Connie M. Borror is a Professor in the School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences. She received
manner, that suits the receiver’soptimum learning style. The author also strongly recommends and encourages students to utilize the resourcesthat are readily available at the university, such as University Library, Divisional Documents,Departmental Research Reports, Computer Laboratory, Writing Center, etc. 1. The procedure followed by the author while conducting this study is shown in a symbolic form in Appendix A. The author has used a similar approach in many of his other research publications and has found the procedure to be very effective. 2. Analysis of data utilized Washington State University’s Critical Thinking Rubric. This rubric has helped the instructor effectively address and assess the discovery approach
Paper ID #38119Manufacturing Engineering as a Multi-Campus ProgramCasey James Keulen (Assistant Professor of Teaching) Dr. Casey Keulen is an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. He obtained his PhD from the University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada in 2012. He currently teaches in the Manufacturing Engineering Program where he is an undergraduate student advisor. Dr. Keulen's research interests are in multi-campus instruction, and composite materials education.Christoph Johannes Sielmann (Assistant Professor of Teaching) Assistant Professor of Teaching in
Paper ID #36905Works-in-Progress: Introducing Active Learning inSemiconductor Device CourseHansika Sirikumara Hansika Sirikumara, Ph.D., is an Assistant professor of Physics and Engineering at E. S. Witchger School of Engineering, Marian University Indianapolis. She completed her MS and PhD degrees from Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Her research expertise/interests are in engineering material properties for semiconductor device applications using computational methods. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
Paper ID #36527Increasing Students’ Group Processing Ability in a First-YearEngineering Design Course Through Scaffolded TeamReflection ExercisesChamille Lescott (Graduate Student) Chamille Lescott is finishing her Ph.D. in Materials Science at Northwestern University in June 2022. In July, she will start as an Assistant Professor of Instruction at Northwestern University, teaching a first-year design course. Her research interests include teamwork and first-year learning experiences. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by
Mathematicians Empowerment) at WVU Tech. She is actively involved in community outreach with a goal of increasing the number of women in STEM and creating effective methods for introducing young children to CS concepts and topics. Dr. Coffman- Wolph’s research interests include: Artificial Intelligence, Fuzzy Logic, Software Engineering, STEM Education, and Diversity and Inclusion within STEM. While growing up in Michigan, she was a dancer (ballet, tap, and jazz) until she graduated high school and a competitive figure skating through her senior year of college. Her hobbies include: reading mystery and fantasy books, knitting, shopping (especially to add to her shoe collection), yoga, and disc golf
Borgaonkar works as Asst. Professor of Engineering Education at the New Jersey Institute of Technology’s Newark College of Engineering located in Newark, New Jersey. He has developed and taught several engineering courses primarily in first-year engineering, civil and environmental engineer- ing, and general engineering. He has won multiple awards for excellence in instruction. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as preparing students for the rigors of mathematics. His research interests include engineering education, integration of novel technologies into engineering classroom, excellence in instruction, water
AC 2008-2307: RAPID PROTOTYPING IN THE DESIGN METHODOLOGYSerdar Tumkor, Stevens Intitute of Technology Serdar Tumkor is affiliated with Design and Manufacturing Institute at Stevens Institute of Technology as a Research Scientist. He has been an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Istanbul Technical University since 1996. Dr. Tumkor received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Technical University in 1994. He has taught Machine Design, Engineering Design, and Computer-Aided Technical Drawing courses. His current research interests include systematic design, design for sustainable products, design for disassembly and recovery, computer aided design &
detailed study of real options analysis is not appropriate for an undergraduate Page 14.1008.8course. Real options requires an understanding of sensitivity analysis and decision trees, andthese should be taught at the undergraduate level; however, options analysis should probably belimited to making the student aware of its existence. We believe that real options does have arole to play in advanced graduate courses. While the use of options analysis remainscontroversial, it is a subject that the advanced engineering economics student should understand.If engineers are to take part in the debate, then we must first understand the methodology and
cannot be gained through simulation studies. Thisincludes how to deal with noise and non-ideal characteristics of devices. Also, students will learn to worktogether as a team which can be a valuable lesson for them as they graduate and join the engineering workforce. The remainder of this paper is organized in the following way. We start in section II with a briefdescription of the robot’s environment--the maze. In section III, we present the motion control module of therobot which uses a pulse-width modulation scheme to move the robot forward, backward, and turning.Section III describes how an IR system is implemented to detect walls of the maze, followed by a descriptionon the “brain” part of the robot in section V. In this section, we
project.Bibliography1. Said El-Rahaiby, A., Tovar, A., "Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Robotic Football Players by Under- graduate Students from Multiple Science and Engineering Programs." Proceedings of the 121st ASEE annual conference and exposition, Indianapolis, IN. U.S.A., June 15-18, 2014.2. Rios-Gutierrez, F., Alba-Flores, R., "An Interdisciplinary, Team-based Mobile Robots Design Course For Engineering Technology", Proceedings of the 118th ASEE annual conference and exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada June 26-29, 2011.3. Maxwell, Bruce A., and Lisa A. Meeden. "Integrating Robotics Research with Undergraduate Education." Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, IEEE 15.6 (2000): 22-27.4. Yadav, Aman, et al. "Problem‐Based
researchers in engineering education,both technical knowledge and metaskills (such as critical thinking and problem solving skills, theability to innovate, the ability to work in a team, and the ability to communicate effectively), areof great importance in today‟s workplace. In order to graduate engineers with such skills,instruction must take all aspects of learning into consideration1,2,3. Consequently, instructors facechallenges such as How to engage students in deep learning? How to strengthen the link between theory and practice? Page 25.750.2 How to encourage critical thinking, problem solving and teamwork skills within the
January 1, 2004, at: http://www.publicationshare.com/docs/faculty_survey_report.pdf7. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Survey, (2003). The Role of e-learning and Student Success: The Research Study of Faculty Perceptions of Technology and Student Success, 4th ed.,Whitby, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.8. Bonk, C.J., (2002). Online Training in an Online World, Bloomington, IN: CourseShare.com. Accessed January 1, 2004, at: http://www.publicationshare.com/docs/corp_survey.pdf9. Palmer, P.J., (1998). The Courage to Teach, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.10. Stice, J. E., Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R. & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education IV: Learning how to teach. Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 118-127
potentially embarrassing manner.While the potential of computer-assisted instruction to enhance learning is unarguable, rigorousdemonstrations of its true effectiveness are in short supply, and the results of most studies thathave been carried out have not been conclusive. For example, a group at Purdue Universityevaluated the use of computer-simulation experiments in a senior-level chemical engineeringcourse.1 They found that the computer-simulated experiments led to better learning for somestudents, while others got more out of a traditional lab experiment. The authors caution againstusing instructional technology without evaluating its effectiveness.The effectiveness of any instructional software for a given student depends on a variety offactors
, classroom activities are targeted specifically to prepare students forinterviews and to help them draft a resume. As upperclassmen currently going through the jobinterview process, ELAs often have the best grasp of what sorts of activities employers aresearching for. Students are highly encouraged by their ELAs to pursue internships, study abroadexperiences, extracurricular activities, and research opportunities, not only as ways to strengthentheir resumes, but as an important means for developing leadership skills and expanding theireducation. In pursuit of these activities, students have a powerful resource in their ELA, as he or Page 5.565.2she
conducting undergraduate research and independent study, andpublishing theses and technical papers. The enhanced CMM systems have also been used in pre-college programs for junior/senior high school women and minorities. More experimentalexperiences, progress and results of this project will be presented when they become available inthe future.AcknowledgementsThe equipment purchase for this project has been supported in part by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF-ILI: DUE-9851082). Dr. Tom Howell is the NSF Program Director for thisproject. A matching fund is provided by Kettering University. Additional support has beenreceived from Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company, MTI Corporation, and the Society ofManufacturing Engineers. The author
K-12education remains in the forefront of today’s society. Even with years of inclusion, engineeringremains an enigma to many pre-college students. The 2008 National Academy of Engineering’sreport, Changing the Conversation, stated the case that many Americans do not truly understandwhat engineering is.11 Even with hundreds of millions of dollars annually spent on increasingunderstanding of engineering, efforts to promote engineering have been numerous and wide-spread yet there has been minimal impact.3,12 K-12 students can readily identify with writers,doctors, scientists, and other careers from their exposure to these fields yet struggle withengineering. Despite all these efforts, research has shown that K-12 students and teacherscontinue
, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Transportation Research Board, Northrop Grumman, Mississippi Development Authority, Army Corp of Engineers, and Depart- ment of Health and Human Services among others. Sulbaran founded the Center for Logistics, Trade, and Transportation, and all of his projects have supported and benefit from talented graduate and/or un- dergraduate students from a variety of academic units in the university. Sulbaran has been very prolific in the area of scholarship and research. He has authored more than 60 peer-reviewed national/international publications, written several books, and made more than 100 professional presentations nationally and internationally. Sulbaran’s manuscripts have been
Engineering degree fromthe University of Karachi and a Masters and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Rojiani is a registered professional engineering in the state of Virginia. Dr. Rojiani is involved inresearch in the areas of computer applications in civil and structural engineering, application of object-orientedprogramming in structural analysis and design, programming methodologies and structural safety and reliability.YONG KIMYong Kim is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering at VirginiaPolytechnic Institute and State University. He received a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from SouthernIllinois University in Carbondale, Illinois. Yong Kim
the distance that the IR sensor measures. The ball is set to bein the middle of the beam and the position of the ball and the speed of the servo can be manipulatedbased on the feedback from the distance sensor. The students were asked to study the roles ofproportional (Kp), derivative (Kd), and integral (Ki) gain parameters in controlling the systemdynamics. This paper presents various gain values derived from the designs of each group. Thishands-on experiment gives the student a basic understanding of PID control principles and itsapplication in real-world situations.KeywordsBall and Beam, PID, Control, Graduate Student PaperIntroductionA ball and beam system is an example of a dynamic, nonlinear system requiring precise control.It is a
International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), Chengdu, China, 2021, pp. 252-2567. W. Grzechca, "Cycle Time in Assembly Line Balancing Problem," 2011 21st International Conference on Systems Engineering, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2011, pp. 171-1748. Adalberto Sato Michels, Thiago Cantos Lopes, Celso Gustavo Stall Sikora, Leandro Magatão, The Robotic Assembly Line Design (RALD) problem: Model and case studies with practical extensions, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Volume 120, 2018, Pages 320-3339. Nils Boysen, Philipp Schulze, Armin Scholl, Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years? European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 301, Issue 3, 2022, Pages 797-81410. Guido Hüttemann
teams were tasked with crafting a singleslide using the Heilmeier Catechism method tailored for an executive-level audience. Thisexperience aimed to provide students with the chance to discern crucial data, emphasizing theimportance of considering the audience's perspective during information presentation. Theworkshop played a pivotal role in instilling a high-level presentation approach, contributing tothe instructors' confidence in entrusting students with the evaluation of their own presentations.Results:The fall 2023 semester accommodated three cohorts totaling 120 students in the senior capstonedesign course. As this course sequence is a graduation requirement, a case study wasimplemented to assess the students' receptiveness to the new
must return to a previous phase: · defining the problem; · developing concepts or solutions; · evaluating, and choosing among, solutions; and · implementing and communicating the design.2. Accumulating and Articulating Design Knowledge in the Curriculum Design has been strengthened in the engineering curriculum over the last decade. Itsmain functions in the curriculum are the motivation and retention of students in lower divisioncourses, as well as the use of capstone design courses to show students applications ofengineering knowledge and to prepare them for the applied and collaborative workplace mostwill enter on graduation. Pressure from ABET, government agencies, and industry has driventhis renewal of interest in
Engineering award, and the 1999 College of Engineering Outstanding Engineering Educator Award.Dr. Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University Bill B. Elmore, Ph.D., P.E. is the Interim Director and Hunter Henry Chair for the Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering, Mississippi State University. His teaching areas include integrated freshman engineering and chemical engineering courses through the curriculum including ChE Problem Analysis and Unit Operations laboratories. His current research intersts include engineering education reform, enzyme-based catalytic reactions and bioengineering applied to renewable fuels and chemicals
test methods or subject matterstudents can use context clues to successfully match each caption to the proper visual. Once thematching is complete the students alert the TAs who provide them with the abstract, introduction,and experimental methods sections of the paper.With the additional information provided in the abstract, introduction, and experimentalmethods, groups are asked to arrange the figures and tables into the order in which they wouldexpect them to appear in the body of the paper. The goal of this task is to have students perform aclose read of the abstract and introduction of a scientific paper and observe how researchers usethese elements of the paper to lay out the motivation for the study, the key results, and theimportant
Paper ID #20048Modification and Assessment of a Residential Summer Program for HighSchool Women (Evaluation)Aimee Cloutier, Texas Tech University Aimee Cloutier is a Ph.D. student studying Mechanical Engineering at Texas Tech University. She earned her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Texas Tech in 2012. Her research interests include biomechan- ics, rehabilitation engineering, prosthetic limb design, and STEM education.Mr. Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University Guo Zheng Yew is currently pursuing his doctorate in civil engineering at Texas Tech University with a focus on finite element analysis and glass mechanics. Prior
shown in Figure 7. Via peak picking they can determine the naturalfrequency and using half-power bandwidth method they can calculate the damping ratio. Detailson this process can be found in the full research project report.14 Figure 7. Experimentally determined dynamic amplification curveAs a note, the University Consortium of Instructional Shake Tables (UCIST) has many moreshake table experiment teaching modules that utilize the Quanser Shake Table II to addressstructural dynamics concepts at the K-12, undergraduate, and graduate level. The modules,necessary equipment are described at the UCIST project webpage.17Multiple Degree of Freedom System: Rigid Diaphragm (Physical Model)One type of multiple degree of freedom (MDOF
Paper ID #45146Best Overall Zone Paper: Zone IV - Innovations in Remote Teaching of EngineeringDesign TeamsSoyoung Kang, University of Washington Soyoung Kang (she/her) is an assistant teaching professor and Clary Family Foundation early career professor in the mechanical engineering department at the University of Washington (UW). She is also the executive director of the Engineering Innovation in Health (EIH) program that partners teams of multidisciplinary undergraduate and graduate students with health professionals to develop technical solutions to pressing health challenges. Dr. Kang works closely with faculty from