studentsshould be able to receive certificates and degrees awards as early as Fall 2022.Initial Results and Future WorkIn the Fall of 2021, a preliminary pre/post comparison assessment was developed to evaluate theskills and resources related to students’ readiness for career and degree completion. Incollaboration with Patiste Marcel Gilmore, Education Research Analyst at Mt. San AntonioCollege, and Dr. Adriene Celaya, Senior Evaluator at the Mark USA Inc., we implemented aparticipant survey to self-reported outcomes for program participants. Preliminary dataundergoing parametric tests (using paired sample t-tests) were tested for normality via theShapiro-Wilk test and skewness to check for normal distribution. Across all student respondents(72) there
% of graduating ECSScholars will find career related employment or enter graduate studies.Engaging interested ECS Scholars undergraduate research opportunities is a year 2 activity. Firstyear scholars have received encouragement to explore research topic areas with faculty in theirmajor.Project Objective 5: Investigate and establish best practices for collecting and analyzing studentdata using the SSC dashboard to inform intervention strategies, produce predictive analytics,and assess the impact of student support and career preparation activities.Within Navigate, we set-up an ECS Scholars Care group that allows our project team to monitoractivities such as participation in student success activities (including tutoring), progress
mixed researchmethodologies, using a longitudinal design with formative and summative assessments tocompare outcomes over time for participating leaners and instructors/faculty. Our large-scalemulti-institutional evaluation and dissemination plan will also allow our teams to contribute toand advance current conversations in engineering education around low-resourcemaking/tinkering practices, valuing individual and community ingenuity, and project-basedlearning.ContributionsThe ultrasound educational system and associated teaching methods developed in this project arebeing designed with broad accessibility in mind. It will be low-cost so that engineering educators(ranging from K-12, technical colleges, and professional schools) around the world
Paper ID #37768Revising the Requirements of a Cross-Departmental Project-Centric Undergraduate Engineering Program and Launchinga new Sustainability and Climate-themed TrackRea Lavi Rea Lavi is Lecturer and a Curriculum Designer with the NEET undergraduate program in the School of Engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. He received his Ph.D. from the Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. His research interests in STEM higher education involve the fostering and assessment of thinking skills involved in complex problem
), 179–211.[14] V. Vankatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis, (2003). "User Acceptance of InformationTechnology: Toward A Unified View," MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.[15] V. Vankatesh, J. Thong, and X. Xu, (2012). "Consumer Acceptance and Use of InformedTechnology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," MISQuarterly, 36(1), 156-178.[16] S. R. Wright, (2018). "Mobile Technology Adoption: Assessing Faculty Acceptance Usingthe Technology Acceptance Model," Dissertation Manuscript. Northcentral University, School ofBusiness and Technology Management. San Diego, California. 98 pages. .[17] N. Wingo, N. Ivankova, and J. Moss, (2017). "Faculty perceptions about teaching online:exploring the Literature Using the
than they had ever been exposed to before inthe U.S., which enabled them to have gain a broader understanding of the world. Developing thisbroader understanding will aid in developing the student participants as individuals, as a group,within their communities, within society, and as globally-engaged citizens.2. Educational Development in EngineeringStudent participants gained new knowledge and engineering-based skills in 11 learning areas.Proficiency in the 11 learning areas were assessed formatively throughout the program byassembling and practicing on the metering device. A summative evaluation was also conducted byensuring the students were able to use and explain device operation.1) Understanding the control for air pressure sensor
recruitment and selection.After participating teachers were identified, the team conducted a pre-assessment. An onlinesurvey was sent to them and asked them questions related to their demographics, priorknowledge in computing and engineering, and STEM teaching experiences. The team analyzedthe survey responses, identified participants’ existing knowledge/skills, and conducted trainingfor faculty mentors & graduate students (GAs).OrientationThe six-week summer program began with an orientation day for all RET participants. Ice-breaking activities were conducted to help participants, PIs, faculty mentors, and GAs know eachother. Drs. Na Gong and Shenghua Zha gave an overview of the program and addressed logisticsissues, such as lab access, pandemic
, “Clinical Immersion for BiomedicalEngineers: Pivoting to a Virtual Format,” Biomed Eng Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 175–179, Jan.2021, doi: 10.1007/s43683-020-00032-x.4. M. Kotche, “Clinical Immersion Internship Introduces Students to Needs Assessment,” in2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 2016,p. 26503. doi: 10.18260/p.26503.5. S. Stirling and M. Kotche, “Clinical Immersion Program for Bioengineering and MedicalStudents,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, Jun.2017, p. 28041. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28041.6. A. Felder, M. Kotche, S. Stirling, and K. Wilkens, “Interdisciplinary Clinical Immersion: fromNeeds Identification to Concept Generation,” in 2018 ASEE
. 4. label the toolbox, hardware, and any tool boards for ease handling. 5. Establish a safe charging station for all the power tools hence minimize electrical hazard. 2.1 Before 5S Implementation Current state analysis of the garage workspace focuses on the current conditions of thegarage. Disorder, clutter, garage structure, and infrastructural hazards were used to assess thecurrent state of the garage workspace. The walkways to/from the vehicles to/from the house werenarrowed by clutter serving as potential trip hazards. Two free-standing shelves were disorganizedand overflowing with clutter, serving as potential spots for falling objects. Miscellaneous hardwarewas scattered randomly about the garage space. The toolbox was also
empirically assess the performance of the proposed gamified solution? 6- Did the research base the proposed gamified solution on a theoretical learning framework?Step 6: Synthesizing the extracted information: In this step, we synthesize the extracted data fromthe documents to map and summarize the extent of the existing research in this area and identifythe limitations, gaps in knowledge, and potential future directions for research and scholarlyworks.Preliminary resultsSo far, we have extracted a wide range of data from the identified relevant publications in thiswork-in-progress study. We briefly review some parts of the synthesized information in thissection. In terms of publication year, the oldest study was published in 2007. The evident
or signed extension can be easily observed and understood. Students can place a bus wire in the schematic diagram and the bus is a cluster of nets such as 8-bit bus or 16-bit bus. In a bus, each net inside the bus must be defined with a name. The concatenation process simply arranges different sources of nets to merge into a bus and can be intuitively understood through the use of Multisim. 5. Student learning assessment The assessment was done with four project based learning. The first project was a two- digit calculator and purely based on a combinational logic design. Students used TERASIC DE0-nano boards to implement with a schematic design entry. The second project was based
, it would be of value, moving forward, to develop direct assessment measures to identify ifthe objectives of this STEM outreach program are being met. Such measures could includeprospective and current student, alumni, parent, Mason STEM-outreach program participant, andfaculty surveys to identify if the podcast played a role in naval STEM outreach programparticipation, career pathway decisions, or influenced the pursuit of internship or fundingopportunities. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section ConferenceAcknowledgementsThis work has been supported by the Office of Naval Research under grant N00014-18-1-2587 overseen by Anisur Rahman and
still allowing for specialization within the track. For this M.Eng. program the electives could have been reduced from two to one course and consequently the core can be increased to 12 credit hours, to include all four core courses offered, which would have helped with the enrollment in the respective courses. • A more detailed plan for incorporating assessment of aggregate student performance and closing the loop in the program development process and ongoing improvement of the program should have been developed and communicated to the university leadership. • This proposed graduate program is an example of outcomes based curricular design developed to fit very local needs, goals, and constraints
will be developed and the students will be asked to complete itbefore and after they complete this assignment. This will help assess the attainment of thelearning outcome of creating EJ, SJ, and EE awareness.ConclusionIn conclusion, infusing SJ, EJ and EE discussions into the classroom is essential for creatingresponsible, empathetic, and ethical members of society. This process can be challenging, but itis essential in preparing students to be socially and environmentally conscious professionals. Bycreating awareness, establishing class norms, and providing practical skills and knowledge,instructors can facilitate meaningful discussions, engage students for a deeper understanding ofthe complex issues involved in justice and ethics, and equip
indicated on the syllabus, there are two group projects in this course. Students will be paired up with students in another country (groups may have 3-4 students). Building on the case studies they worked on (to provide scaffolding for this assignment and get the students working on the project as early as possible) they will create a short report and a short presentation. All students will be expected to contribute to all parts of this activity. The instructors will assess how the students shared the work, how much they interacted to prepare the report and presentation, who did they seek help from (ideally almost all faculty being involved in the course). 4- Reflections: Students will be asked to reflect
Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 8 Sept. 2021, https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm.[2] José, María, et al. “Interest in STEM disciplines and teaching methodologies: Perception ofschool students and preservice teachers.” Educar, July 2020, pp. 1-18.[3] Tian, L., So Winnie, W. M., Wan, Z. H., & Li, W. C. (2021). STEM stereotypes predictstudents’ STEM career interest via self-efficacy and outcome expectations. International Journalof STEM Education, 8(1) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00295-y[4] Wei-Cheng, M., Chen, S., & Chi-Chau, L. (2019). Assessing high school Student’s STEMcareer interests using a social cognitive framework. Education Sciences, 9(2)doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020151[5
. ● Demonstrate the ability to learn and develop competencies in specialized or emerging computer science fields. ● Demonstrate the ability to read, analyze, and discuss research papers in computer science.Student learning objectives are assessed in a variety of ways, including (i) courseworkperformance, which includes faculty in individual courses monitoring student progress on coursematerial; (ii) early and frequent check-in meetings with students during their first semester, endof semester evaluations, and evaluation of student engagement in the cohort-based learningmodel; and (iii) presentations and mentor feedback on individual study projects.Holistic Graduate AdmissionsOur graduate admissions process encourages applicants to provide a
savialab program,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 32206.[17] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. Los Angeles, California: Sage, 2009.[18] FABIDI, “Escuela de Fabricación: una guía sobre el qué, cómo y por qué,” Santiago, Chile, 2019.[19] U. Flick, An introduction to qualitative research. sage, 2018.[20] A. Strauss and J. Corbin, “Grounded theory methodology: An overview.,” 1994.[21] J. Beebe, Rapid assessment process: An introduction. Rowman Altamira, 2001.
contexts of engineering. Blog Posts (30%)and Presentations (15%) were used as intermediate learning assessments to address the breadthof student learning on a variety of topics. An independent Project (40%) allowed each individualstudent to explore a topic of interest with more depth. Finally, Engagement (15%) was assessedas part of the grade because participation was considered a significant aspect of this immersivecourse experience. A summary of all assignments and the learning objectives they addressed isincluded in Table 4. An “unofficial objective” of cultural awareness is included because it wasalso intended that, as a study abroad course, the students would gain a sense of culturalawareness during their experience abroad.Table 4
taught in one of the upper-level courses orlaboratories. One example of chemical engineers using 3D printing is additive manufacturingtechniques for scaffold fabrication using biomaterials [4,5,6]. The skill of 3D printing and thechemical engineering principles to solve problems in the biomaterial and material industry is oneonly example of why learning rapid prototyping is important.Methods/assessment – This research project was approved by Vanderbilt’s IRB # 191344. Thehands-on activities developed in the summer before the course. Rising junior students workedwith the instructor to develop and create the activities that can fit in a 50-minute class session.This step took numerous iterations and ideas that did not fit into the boundaries of the
video. Then, respondents answered a series of questions abouttheir interest and knowledge of several STEM topics, both before and after watching thevideo(s). This retrospective pre/post questionnaire technique helps to alleviate response-shift biaspresent in self-assessed changes in learning attitudes. Our findings show that collaborativepresentation videos increased self-reported audience interest in engineering, and perceptions ofdisciplinary relatedness more than the non-collaborative, individual presentations made by thesame researchers. These results suggest a beneficial role for collaborative communicationstrategies to foster interest in engineering among public audiences, even among people without abackground in STEM. Further
evidence-based teaching practices. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student miscoDr. Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon Jenefer Husman, Professor in the Education Studies department at the University of Oregon. Her research focuses on students’ motivation for learning in engineering contexts
Certificates from Virginia Tech in Engineering Education and Future Professoriate and from USFQ in Structures for Construction Professionals. MiguelAndres’s research includes Architectural and Civil Engineering Project Management, Sustainable and Resilient Urban Infrastructure, and the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but the social awareness and agency to address global humanitarian, environmental, and social justice challenges. For him, social justice is a concept that should always be involved in discussions on infrastructure. Related to STEM education, Miguel Andres develops disruptive pedagogies for STEM courses as a tool for innovation, and assessing engineering
areas in which you need help to accomplish your research goals? • Describe your overall progress for this week? • How would you rate your progress on a scale from 0 to 10, where 10 is the highest amount of progress. • What is your plan for next week? • Paste pictures below of graphs or pictures or anything else you want to share from this week.The progress reports were reviewed by the co-Directors and the REU faculty advisors. The progress reportscombined with the weekly group meeting presentations allowed the students to self-assess and gauge theirprogress. The progress reports evolved over the course of the 10 weeks and indicated growth and learningfor all students: both those that participated virtually in year 1
-related pursuits in connected learning,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2017.[20] D. Brandt, “Sponsors of Literacy,” College Composition and Communication, vol. 49, no. 2, p. 165, May 1998, doi: 10.2307/358929.[21] D. L. DuBois, N. Portillo, J. E. Rhodes, N. Silverthorn, and J. C. Valentine, “How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 57–91, 2011.[22] R. Spencer, T. Tugenberg, M. Ocean, S. E. O. Schwartz, and J. E. Rhodes, “‘Somebody Who Was on My Side’: A Qualitative Examination of Youth Initiated Mentoring,” Youth & Society, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 402–424, May 2016
the goals of the three-year project funded by NASA. This is thefirst year of the project and therefore, the assessment of the project would be completed by theend of summer 2023. The authors will produce a report describing the details of the assessmentand outcomes of the project and publish the findings in the proceedings of the American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE) 2024 conference.ConclusionOverall, the new modules introduced in each course along with mini projects would helpstudents develop essential skills to achieve useful and practical manufacturing competencies thatinclude understanding the design of products, selecting the equipment and tooling managementprocedures, validating the parts for their reliability and safety, and
held for students to learn about companies and graduate schoolprograms from leaders outside of the region.The spatial visualization curriculum was taught in a flipped format, as had been done theprevious year. Students were provided access to videos of the lessons, and students had access tofaculty assistance for questions about the content. Students were given multiple attempts tosubmit homework, and the spatial visualization assignments were assessed throughmastery-based grading. Most students performed well on their initial homework submissions, buta few students did occasionally take advantage of the resubmission opportunity. All otherprogram elements described above were implemented over the two credit hour professionaldevelopment course
success, allowing our design team tokeep focus on the end-user and their experience the moment they stepped foot into our buildingdesign. It also reminded us that every product needed a purpose, every building detail needed tomeet some industry standard or best practice, and we constantly were looking to answer thequestion WHY.Figure 4.0 Evidence Based Design DiagramThe Design Team was comprised of students from three different programs, some workingwithin the constraints of a course, others working independently, and some participating in bothlanes. All student work was shared via MS Teams and reviewed weekly, then each team metweekly with the faculty team lead to synthesize thoughts, task, and assess the success of theenergy efficient design
installations. The use of the term became more widespread followingadoption in the 1960s by NASA managers when used to refer to small teams of experts taskedwith solving difficult and pernicious issues; ‘tiger team’ in NASA was defined as: "a team ofundomesticated and uninhibited technical specialists, selected for their experience, energy, andimagination, and assigned to track down relentlessly every possible source of failure in aspacecraft subsystem or simulation" [1]. For example a tiger team was formed during the Apollo13 emergency to get the astronauts of the damaged module back to earth. As with the originalusage, tiger teams are still used for security assessments by testing an organization's defensesagainst spying, industrial espionage, or its
importanceof the capstone projects is reflected in Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) criteria and assessment protocols. [7]2. EMET Senior Projects at Penn State - FayetteAt Penn State – Fayette EMET program the senior project coursework is based on requiredEMET 403 and EMET 440 courses. The EMET 403 is a one-credit course on design projectpreparation that includes the selection of the topic and initial design work that involves planning,creation of design schematics or blueprints, and design specifications, and culminates in thePreliminary Design Report (PDR) with a budget and schedule of all activities includingimplementation stage. Since the EMET program does not provide a separate course on projectmanagement principles with