to remote learning necessitated by the Covid-19 pandemic gave rise to new educationallearning methods. Starting in 2020 and for an extended period of time, students were unable toattend class in person and relied on virtual learning. Panopto has been used since 2021 as a videomanagement system allowing instructors to record lectures live and post them for students towatch later. Despite mandates being lifted and students returning to class, students routinely askfor lecture videos to continue being posted to aid in study and reinforce comprehension. Thisstudy looks at the effectiveness of Panopto through the lens of engagement interaction with thevideos.This research looks at data for the Fall 2022 semester of an undergraduate
Paper ID #45817Enhancing Student Engagement in Electrical Engineering: The Impact ofHands-On Learning Tools on Student EngagementDr. Shobhit Aggarwal, The Citadel Dr. Aggarwal earned his Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication from Kurukshetra University, India in 2014, a Masters of Science and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2018 and 2023 respectively. After graduation, he served as an Embedded Firmware Engineer in an IoT-based Engineering organization in Charlotte and held a position as a Senior Embedded Software Engineer at a Fortune 500 electrical
of real-world project considerations [13].This study investigates the impact of project-based learning compared to the traditionaldemonstration-based method in a biomedical engineering laboratory course. Project-basedlearning, where students work on a semester-long project that incorporates multiple courseconcepts, may better simulate the iterative processes found in real-world research anddevelopment. Our goal is to evaluate how each teaching approach influences student outcomes,including self-efficacy, teamwork, collaboration skills, and knowledge communication. Bycomparing the learning outcomes of both approaches, this research aims to provide valuableinsights into effective teaching strategies for biomedical engineering laboratories. It
to master during the camp. This approach placed an additional cognitiveburden on students during the activity, detracting from its intended impact. To address this, futureiterations of the camp should integrate more practical, skill-focused instruction earlier in theprogram. Collaborating with the programming course to incorporate instruction on programmingand Arduino could make the BB84 QKD activity more interactive and less reliant onpre-assembled tools. This change would empower students to engage with the materials moredeeply and confidently. Introducing small-group collaborations or gamified elements could alsoincrease and enhance the collaboration among students. Finally, as this was my first experienceteaching a workshop of this kind
(SWE), the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), and the Society of HispanicProfessional Engineers (SHPE). This paper explores the impact of EngineerFEST on studentengagement, describes the logistics of planning the event, and presents feedback fromparticipants to demonstrate its effectiveness in shaping a vibrant engineering community.1.0 Introduction and HistoryDr. Jack Byrd introduced the “Freshman Social,” an engineering-focused student organizationfair, to our college in the early 2000s to introduce new engineering students in the newly formedengineering first-year seminar course (ENGR 191) to the wealth of opportunities available tostudents through participation in career-relevant student organizations, many of which arestudent
engineering education and practice, while also reinforcing foundational disciplinaryknowledge for students [2]. Devices that enhance instructional delivery include augmentedreality (AR) which provides immersive simulations for construction management education [16]and 3D hologram projectors that improve the presentation of STEM concepts in classrooms [17].These technologies collectively aim to enhance engagement by fostering active learning andmaking complex subjects more accessible and interactive [14] - [17].2.2. EdTech integration definitionTo facilitate the integration of EdTech into engineering education and support the assessment ofits impact on students' technical and professional skill development, it is essential to establish aclear
for the study was obtained from our Institutional ReviewBoard (protocol #IRB-FY2024-10). Shared survey data is only for students who filledout an IRB signed consent form at the beginning of the semester.ResultsSurvey Questions and Student Responses to Measure ImpactTable 1 outlines the survey questions designed to measure the impact of the bonus pointself-assessment rubric and peer evaluations on various aspects of student engagement,learning, anxiety alleviation, and overall course performance. The student responses inFigure 1 provide valuable insights into how these alternative grading practicesinfluenced their motivation and academic outcomes. Question Impact Area Survey
to providing hands-on learning experiences that enhance engineering education. As a student leader, I actively promote collaborative initiatives that empower my peers to engage in meaningful projects, fostering a deeper understanding of engineering principles and their impact on society.Dr. Redahegn Sileshi, University of North Georgia, Gainesville Dr. Redahegn Sileshi, University of North Georgia, Gainesville, GA. Dr. Redahegn Sileshi is an associate professor of engineering at University of North Georgia, Gainesville. His research experiences and interests are in the areas of water quality analysis and stormwater management, largely focusing on small and large-scale infiltration studies. He has done extensive
Engineering Education, 2025 Impact of an Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Project on First Year StudentsAbstractIncreasing student interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)continues to be of significant importance in order to satisfy the increasing demand forprofessionals in these fields. The First Year Scholars program at Kennesaw State University(KSU) aims to introduce first-year students to the undergraduate research experience. Studentsare encouraged to apply for projects they find interesting, regardless of whether the projects arein their majors. This program helps students gain early research experience, which sets them on apath for future success. In this study, an
communitycollege voices and perspectives while promoting the mission of the AG, the importance ofSociety membership for community college students and institutions, and the impact of CCASEfunding on broadening engagement and participation in the community college space. Two- tothree-minute videos were submitted by community college faculty, students, and alumni andjudged by a panel of judges. The CCASE Program funded prize money for winners.At SWE’s annual conference in 2023, the AG hosted an interactive presentation called “BuildingCommunity Around the Community Colleges AG”. This presentation celebrated communitycolleges and community college women in engineering while brainstorming ways in which theAG could promote them within SWE. The CCASE Program
and 5 representing Strongly Agree.We expect that the closer the averages are to “5,” the more likely the program is demonstratingstrength in relation to the goal.ConclusionsThese LLPs illustrate the meaningful impact that well-structured, community-centeredliving-learning programs can have on undergraduate engineering students. Through theirintegrated model, which combines community, support, and inclusion, these programs supportstudents holistically during a critical period of their educational journey. As evidenced byretention outcomes, positive student feedback, and deep engagement in co-curricularopportunities, the programs foster belonging, confidence, and persistence.Students benefit from close peer relationships formed through shared
supervisors in the VM setup exist on thesame machine and the communication delay between them is little compared to having twodifferent Raspberry Pi’s to communicate. This communication and processing delay add up tothe latencies and we can see these reflections in Figure 3a and Figure 3b. a) Virtual Machine (VM) b) Raspberry Pi Testbed Figure 3 Workload Distribution ComparisonConclusionFrom the overall experience of iEDGE, we conclude that such an initiative for engaging next-generation engineers and scientists in hands-on implementation plays a pivotal role in bridgingthe disconnect between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Our REU student
J. Shryock, PhD, is the Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Professor in Multidisciplinary Engineering and Affiliated Faculty in Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She is also a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. She is an experienced educator specializing in student engagement and development of innovative educational practices with a focus on preparing the engineer of 2050. Her research encompasses helping educators understand and integrate strategies that enhance student success, particularly in response to rapid disruptions in education, such as the impact of generative AI. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Lived Experiences
Paper ID #45197Gendered Impacts of Code Critiquers on Self-Efficacy in First-Year EngineeringStudents.Mary Benjamin, Michigan Technological University PhD Student in the Dept. of Civil, Environmental, & Geospatial Engineering at Michigan Technological university.Laura Albrant, Michigan Technological University After completing a bachelor’s degree in computer science, Laura Albrant decided to challenge how she viewed software development, by switching departments. Currently working towards a master’s degree in human factors at Michigan Technological University, Laura pursues interests on both sides of the fence
practices do exist [3]. Although such research isabundant, research on how engineering students perceive instructors’ beliefs and behaviors isscarce. It is important to explore this side of the research domain because learning and teachingare interactive activities that involve a community [4], [5], and centering student voices in thedynamic between students and instructors is crucial in advancing a student/learner-centeredphilosophy and efforts in engineering learning and teaching [5]. In our study, we engage withstudent perception research by having current engineering students conduct secondary dataanalysis on an existing data set on instructors’ beliefs on test usage in fundamental engineeringcourses. The process involves having the
creation, andconnections, the three pillars of EM.[5] Similarly, Caplan et al.[6] used jigsaw techniques inengineering courses, finding that approximately 50% of students demonstrated behaviorsassociated with curiosity and entrepreneurial thinking. By providing only partial information, theactivity required students to seek out additional knowledge and fostered independent learningand engagement.[6] Another hands-on jigsaw activity by Tabrizi[8] used jigsaw activities in adigital systems course, where students were given circuit components and workedcollaboratively to build functional systems. This interactive approach promoted curiosity,creativity, and system-level problem-solving, reinforcing KEEN’s entrepreneurial outcomes.These examples
Using Student Posters to Investigate the Impact of Inquiry-Based STEM Learning on Rural K-12 Students Alexander Aronov1, Daniel Knight1, Angela Bielefeldt2, Joseph Polman3, and Fabiola Palomar1 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder2Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder 3School of Education, University of Colorado BoulderAbstractThis study examines student posters produced as part of the Colorado SCience and ENgineeringInquiry Collaborative (SCENIC) program, which engages rural K-12 students in inquiry-basedSTEM projects. SCENIC leverages low-cost, portable sensor pods that enable students
in problem- AI’s predictive analytics help educators identify students solving abilities [12].who are at risk of falling behind, providing timelyinterventions. A study by The Bill & Melinda Gates Case Study in AR/VR: ClassVR implemented in a middleFoundation [6] found that predictive analytics systems school classroom showed a 50% improvement in studentimplemented in community colleges helped improve student engagement compared to traditional teaching methods,retention rates by 10-20%. Statistics: In a study by the especially in subjects like history and science.Education Advisory Board (EAB), institutions thatimplemented predictive analytics to monitor student progressreported a 15% increase
Paper ID #45424Understanding the Impact of an International Service-Learning Trip to Belizeon Mental Health: A Case Study of Students and FacultyDr. Amro Khasawneh, Mercer UniversityMs. Abby Anne McDowell, Mercer UniversityDr. Sarah K. Bauer, Mercer University Dr. Sarah Bauer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering at Mercer University. Her primary research interests include water and wastewater treatment and renewable energy technologies. Her work focuses on developing techniques for the production of clean energy and clean water. She has also worked on a variety of projects to enhance
the mentioned tutor, the AI-based model will be implemented inthe club that is designed to boost students’ employment opportunities and engagement in STEMdisciplines. Therefore, in this club, both social-oriented mentorship and an AI-based efficiencycalculator will be employed to evaluate their effectiveness on the given subject – increasingstudents’ interest in STEM fields and their choices of a STEM career further in life.2. Introduction The popularity of automation, robots, and coding clubs among students all over the globe isgaining momentum with each passing day (Ayeni, Unachukwu, Hamad, Chisom, & Adewusi,2024). The activities in these clubs give an insight into the career pathways of STEM-related fieldsand help them explore their
., “The Role of Attendance in Student Engagement in Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., 2020.[5] S. Kumar et al., “Attendance and Performance in Laboratory Courses: A Case Study in Environmental Engineering,” J. Eng. Technol., 2019.[6] M. Davis et al., “Impact of Hybrid Course Delivery on Student Attendance in Engineering Programs,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 2021.[7] T. Robinson et al., “Teaching Quality vs. Attendance: Which Has a Greater Impact on Student Performance?,” J. High. Educ. Res., 2022.[8] M. A. Karim, “Hybrid and Online Synchronous Delivery of Environmental Engineering During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study on Perception, Attitude, and Assessment,” Eur. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 01–11, Feb. 2021.[9
2025 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, March 22, 2025, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT, USA. Hands-On, Practice-Oriented Approach to Teaching Communication Systems Uma Balaji Electrical and Biomedical Engineering Fairfield University Fairfield, CT ubalaji@fairfield.edu Abstract— A Communication Systems course, offered as a engagement, a practice-oriented approach is essential,major elective for Electrical Engineering students
Undergraduates (REU)program has been a pivotal initiative aimed at enhancing undergraduate education in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. The REU program provides studentswith opportunities to engage in hands-on research experiences, which are critical for fostering adeeper understanding of scientific inquiry and enhancing retention rates among undergraduates inSTEM disciplines (Alaee & Zwickl, 2021). The program has been instrumental in addressing thehigh attrition rates in STEM fields, particularly among students from diverse backgrounds, therebycontributing to a more inclusive and innovative workforce (Rodenbusch et al., 2016). One of theprimary benefits of REU programs is their positive impact on students' decisions
impact students’ major selection. Effective recruitmentemphasizes personalized outreach and career-focused messaging that highlights job stability andlong-term opportunities [7],[8]. Incorporating multimedia content, such as brief instructional andtestimonial videos, can further strengthen engagement with prospective students [9],[10].Mentoring supports the development of essential life skills - such as communication, networking,and professionalism - while boosting confidence and encouraging persistence in academic andcareer paths [11]. Participation in subject-based organizations and competitions enhances studentsatisfaction, campus engagement, academic motivation, and commitment to future careers [12].Social and professional events with peers
offering an immersive and interactive learning tool, this study seeks to bridgethe gap between theoretical instruction and practical comprehension, aligning with moderneducational approaches that prioritize experiential learning and technology integration toincrease cognitive engagement [8]. The study involved engineering students at various levels ofexperience to assess the application’s impact across a range of backgrounds. This researchemploys a quantitative survey to assess spatial ability and gather feedback on the application’susability and effectiveness. The findings will guide iterative improvements to the application,ensuring it meets educational needs and aligns with pedagogical best practices. Although thefocus is on rebar
Paper ID #45237From Barriers to Bridges: The GEES Program’s Impact on Low-IncomeMaster’s Students’ Success and Professional DevelopmentXiming Li, University of PittsburghDr. Sylvanus N. Wosu, University of Pittsburgh Sylvanus Wosu is the Associate Dean for Diversity Affairs and Associate Professor of mechanical engineering and materials science at the University of Pittsburgh. Wosu’s research interests are in the areas of impact physics and engineering of new compositKeith Trahan, University of PittsburghTagbo Herman Roland Niepa, Carnegie Mellon University ©American Society for Engineering Education
MOM Belize programefforts, ensuring that the program continues to meet the needs of CJC and its community.Key Wordsneeds assessment; focus group; service-learning project; international partner; buildingcommunity partnershipsIntroductionDeveloping and participating in service-learning projects at the college level has the ability tofoster cross-cultural understanding, build capacity, and provide opportunities for faculty,students, and other participants to address real-world challenges through collaborative andeducational frameworks. Service-learning projects allow students and participants to engage inhands-on learning while working directly with communities to support locally-driven initiatives,often in areas such as infrastructure
as the Coordinator of Pre-College Programs at Virginia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity. She also worked as a global engagement specialist in the Office of Global Engineering Engagement and Research at Virginia T ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Pre-college, Race/Ethnicity, Gender, EngineeringRevisiting Assessment Tools Used to Measure the Impact of Summer Program Interventions on Perceptions and Interest in Engineering Among Underrepresented Pre-College Students – A Work in ProgressAbstractStudents start their education in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)fields with the aim of having STEM-related careers. However, many
learn, teach,project management practices. and interact in academic environments. From online collaboration platforms to advanced simulation tools, Analysis: Ethical considerations are a critical aspect of AI technology enables students to access diverse resources,implementation. While AI can enhance efficiency and develop new skills, and engage with complex problems indecision-making, it also introduces risks related to bias, innovative ways. One of the most impactful recenttransparency, and accountability. This assignment challenges advancements in technology is Artificial Intelligence (AI
classroomsize on student engagement, academic achievement, and overall learning experiences has becomea topic of increasing interest and significance. This research paper embarks on a journey tocomprehensively investigate the relationship between classroom learning and smaller classroomsizes. Wang et al. [1] explored the impact of class size on student engagement and satisfaction byutilizing a comparative analysis of small and large classes, revealing that smaller class sizessignificantly enhance teacher supportiveness and overall student satisfaction. By delving into themultifaceted effects of class size reduction, we aim to shed light on the potential benefits andchallenges associated with this critical dimension of the learning environment. Benton