-reviewed publications. She has recently enrolled in the Human Social Dimensions PhD program in Arizona State University’s School for the Future of Innovation and Technology in Society (Fall 2020).Ms. Elaine L. Craft, Florence-Darlington Technical College Elaine L. Craft (Florence-Darlington Technical College, Florence, SC-retired) holds a baccalaureate de- gree in chemical engineering from the University of Mississippi and a MBA from the University of South Carolina with additional graduate studies in mathematics at Francis Marion University. Her experience includes working as an engineer in industry as well as teaching and administration at community col- lege and state levels. She served as Director of the South
” program. The program isstructured in a 2+2 model; students participate in a 2-year foundation curriculum that includes arange of courses across engineering disciplines, the sciences, mathematics, design andcomplementary studies. This is followed by a 2-year specialization curriculum, during whichstudents take one of 8 (at publication time) Majors. Curriculum integration and multidisciplinarythinking are emphasized as program goals.The Majors have a focus, although not exclusively, on emerging and rapidly developing areas ofspecialization within engineering. Some of the Majors that are offered within the EngineeringScience program are also offered in other institutions/programs (like Aerospace Engineering,Biomedical Engineering and Electrical &
error.Program Climate from Junior/Senior Year (JSY) Student InterviewsWhere the first year students focused primarily on academic survival as key to developing abelief they belong in engineering, more senior students had a broader view of their programenvironment and engineering culture. Most undergraduate engineering programs in the UnitedStates are dominated by white, middle class, straight male students (and faculty) so they arethe main contributors to the social dynamic of the school’s climate. Those that are part of thedominant culture are better prepared to navigate through the social spaces and sometimes donot see the inequalities present [24]. For example, one JSY white male student described hisclassmates in the engineering program: it is
broader sector of the student population comprising students who are still in search of theircareer focus and objectives. Undergraduate research has received strong support from the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) through the development and funding of many research opportunities,including Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU), Research in UndergraduateInstitutions (RUI), Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program(HBCU-UP), and Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Program. Whilethese programs provide serious avenues for research preparation for students seeking furthereducation at the graduate level, there is a need, as outlined above, for broader-reaching programs.Thus, many
institution, fostering a moreintellectually stimulating academic environment. This can help enhance a university's reputationas a center for research and learning and attract high-achieving students and faculty, therebyraising the overall academic profile of the institution. Furthermore, these programs can lead toexternal funding opportunities and collaborations with industry and other universities,expanding the institution's reach and impact [8]. The research conducted in these programsoften leads to publications and presentations, further contributing to the scholarly community[9].Finally, URPs contribute to student retention and success in STEM fields. Russell et al. [10]found that students who participate in undergraduate research are more likely
experiments; and opportunities to present the researchoutcomes to the broader community at professional settings.The REU participants will spend a total of 10 weeks in the program. In the first two weeks, thestudents are at the academic institution receiving training for the upcoming research activities.During weeks 3-9, the students will spend the first two days (Monday and Tuesday) at theacademic institution and the next two days (Wednesday and Thursday) in industry partnersworking on the research projects. On Friday, they will come back to academic institution forprogress reports and extracurricular activities. The participants will be back at the academicinstitution in week 10 to wrap up the program. Supplemental activities including student
manydifferent campus efforts. Feedback from companies to faculty informs curriculum developmentand promotes industry relevance [3]. In some cases, sponsorships from partnering companies canprovide direct financial support for project materials and equipment. Additionally, industrypartners can act as a part of the institution’s broader professional network to connect graduatesand alumni to employment opportunities. For partnering companies, capstone sponsorship can provide a meaningful way to engagewith the future of engineering. Their participation can serve as an investment in their futureworkforce, as well as an opportunity to access unconventional solutions from students andfaculty. In some cases, partnering companies can provide meaningful
Paper ID #34273Engaging Women Engineering Undergraduates as Peer Facilitators inParticipatory Action Research Focus GroupsDr. Susan Thomson Tripathy, University of Massachusetts Lowell Dr. Susan Thomson Tripathy received a Ph.D. in Anthropology from Harvard University in 1989. Her doctoral research was funded by a Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation grant, and utilized ethnographic fieldwork in rural Bihar, India, to analyze the politics and artistic development of a local dance form. From 1995-2007, Tripathy taught behavioral sciences at Middlesex Community College (MCC), where she was an active participant and
Paper ID #11157WHY DO UNDERGRADUATE WOMEN PERSIST AS STEM MAJORS?A STUDY AT TWO TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITIESDr. Ronald Brandt, Seton Hall University Ronald Brandt teaches physical science at the high school level, emphasizing Project Based Learning and inquiry based lab activities. Brandt seeks to inspire his students, especially young women, to develop a passion for STEM studies and consider a career in science and technology. Prior to entering the education profession, Ronald Brandt was an executive in the chemical industry serving as senior vice president at two multinational firms as well as President & CEO of an
self-authorship in their undergraduate years.In this paper, we share an educational framework built on the theories of adult development self-authorship and self-determination, as well as our curriculum which is designed to build capacityfor self-authorship in our students. We outline the innovations that this has introduced to ourprogram including creating an honors program that does not use GPA or standardized test scoresfor admission or retention, but rather emphasizes immersive experiences and reflective practicethat challenge students to develop their own internal voice and interpersonal relationships. Weshare our rubric for assessment of self-authorship using reflection assignments and offer casestudies of engineering students who reveal
(STEM) field. Involvingundergraduate students in research will make them take more interest in studies and motivate them topursue graduate degrees. The undergraduate students at Pennsylvania State University where I teach getinvolved in research usually conducted in the summer period for an 8-week or 10-week duration. Thename of the program is “Multi-campus Research Experience for Undergraduates” (MC-REU) and it isadministered by the College of Engineering at Penn State.Similarly, there are many academic institutions in the United States that got involved with researchundertaken by undergraduate students. The goals of the undergraduate research programs are (1) topromote undergraduate students participating in research early in their academic
. Students who learn aboutsocial entrepreneurship through different programs grow to engage themselves more deeply insocial and civic matters while developing a broader global perspective.Innovation competitions and programs may impact aspects of a student’s academic, business,and personal development. Some students develop their program experiences to formulate abusiness venture. Other students participate in these programs to join a team, learn about moderntechnologies, or for pure enjoyment. These experiences for students play an influential role informing an entrepreneurial ecosystem as students develop complex business ideas and createtheir own network of critical thinkers, problem-solvers, and entrepreneurial minds.Providing student teams with
, andsupport youth in strengthening their life skills. The MFYC was initially established as a sportfocused youth development center, but as it matured, the MFYC began to offer academicprograming in partnership with other units within and external to the university. Thesepartnerships resulted in much broader programming including the Everyday Engineering, KillerAsteroids, Discovery Dentistry, Creative Writing Unleased, Picture Perfect Health, Art as a Storyto name a few. These programs provided fun, challenging and creative explorations on a varietyof in-depth experiences in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics, and HealthSciences. Participants could choose a morning and afternoon class or one that met all day.Classes were taught by
announced in June 2012. The federal and state agencies providedinfrastructure funding, which was augmented by funds from NYIT and the support ofnumerous industry partners.The ETIC is an illustration of the SoECS’ core beliefs and mission. The School’s high-quality undergraduate and graduate programs prepare students for advanced studies andchallenging positions in business, government, and industry. The SoECS is guided in thismission by the three tenets embraced by NYIT: 1) professional preparation of students; 2)applications-oriented research; 3) access to opportunity for all qualified students. Toaccomplish its mission, the SoECS offers a broad range of outstanding, accreditedacademic programs; supports faculty members who are effective teacher
. Data for the EFA analysis were collected over atwo weeks in summer 2019 with students enrolled in an online undergraduate engineeringprogram at a large, southwestern public university. Recruitment emails to participate in theonline survey were sent to students by the chair of the program. Participants were instructed toconsider one particular online course when responding to the items on the survey. (Notably, mostparticipants were only enrolled in one course.) The order in which items were shown on eachscale was randomized to reduce the participant bias that can result from the order in which itemsare presented. Students could choose to enter a drawing for one of 250 $10 Amazon gift cards asa thank you for participating in the survey upon
on effective practices for integrating computing into theircourses. Two of the FLC participants tested an APEX module in their biology course, and bothagreed that the module was appropriate for students with no prior programming experience. Theyalso solicited student opinions regarding the module, and across 31 students surveyed, a majorityrecommended that their instructors use the APEX module again (68%) and further indicatedinterest in learning more about bioinformatics (52%).Building upon these pilot efforts, we are actively expanding adoption of the APEX program inseveral ways. First, we continue to form new partnerships with community colleges and offertraining workshops for interested faculty. Second, we are refining and improving the
qualitativedata collection over time and across locations.SampleIn the Spring 2016 semester, 12 mechanical engineering seniors were recruited to participate in alongitudinal study of workplace learning. Mechanical engineering was selected for two keyreasons. First, the dominant industry focus of mechanical engineering makes it a useful site forexploring the school-to-work transition of new graduates. Second, ME is one of the largestengineering fields nationally and the largest department at the study university, providing anopportunity to obtain a larger and more diverse sample. Table 2 summarizes participantdemographics by race and gender. Given the potentially small number of potential participants incategories other than white male, race and gender
Paper ID #40014Opportunities and Barriers to UDL-Based Course Designs for InclusiveLearning in Undergraduate Engineering and other STEM CoursesSujit Varadhan, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Sujit Varadhan is a Junior at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign majoring in Computer Sci- ence. He is an undergraduate research assistant as well as a frontend developer on ClassTranscribe.Xiuhao Ding, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Xiuhao Ding is a Math and CS senior student at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Delu Louis ZhaoAnanya Agarwal, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignDavid Dalpiaz
meeting and used discussion questions to stimulate students’ critical thinking,problem-solving, engineering design, teamwork, and communication. At the end of the program,all eight students participated in the Undergraduate Research Showcase hosted by the GraduateSchool of the University of Louisville with a poster presentation. Faculty and graduate studentsnot involved in the site events were invited as judges. Awards were given to the top three posterswho received the highest scores. Fig. 1 Project list for student selection TABLE 1. Engineering Fundamental Modules for Mentoring Theme Approach Wee
; and • addressing STEM workforce development by building effective, mutually beneficial academic-industry partnerships [2].Participants were asked to collect baseline data from prior S-STEM (if applicable) and/or otherinitiatives on campus to inform their proposals. As noted by Pearson, Crosby, et al, “... projectsshould seek to couch locally identified problems and needs in the larger context of educationalresearch to help the broader STEM education community determine what interventions workbest with scholars in their environments” [3]. Therefore, PIs were strongly encouraged to seekinformation on program and institutional challenges they could address and study as part of theirS-STEM projects and share what they learned
• deliver relevant and challenging educational programs to attract an outstanding diverse student body • prepare graduates for rewarding careers in their chosen professions and encourage graduates to extend their level of knowledge through lifelong learning • conduct leading edge research advances engineering science and stimulate the intellectual development and creativity of both students and faculty, • extend exemplary engineering service and transfer knowledge that contributes to the well- being and betterment of society. In order to broaden participation in engineering, UNL COE will broaden the admission reviewprocess to deemphasize student test scores and to
students the opportunity to altertheir perceptions of climate change (NAS, 2017).ENGINEERING FOR HUMAN RIGHTS The College of Engineering at the University of Connecticut launched a new major inMultidisciplinary Engineering (MDE) and has developed corresponding human rights andsustainability required courses, including “ENGR/HRTS 2300: Engineering for Human Rights.”This 3-credit seminar enrolls undergraduate students interested in the broader socialimplications of engineering and technology. The faculty who designed and teach this coursedefine engineering for human rights as “a paradigm that draws on a universal set of principlesto shape individual ethical obligations and the norms of the profession to mitigate risk, enhanceaccess to the
Paper ID #11746Assessing the Spectrum of International Undergraduate Engineering Educa-tional ExperiencesDr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is an Associate Professor and Fulton C. Noss Faculty Fellow in Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She is the Director for the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, and serves as a Center Associate for the Learning Research and Development Center. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Ed, Sloan, EIF
method that has proven fruitful in helping to retain thesegroups, especially women, is to utilize a service-learning approach, which demonstrates theapplicability of course content and the ways that it can positively affect others4-7. Manyprograms, such as Engineers Without Borders, target service opportunities for engineers in a Page 26.649.2developing country. Other programs, such as the EPICS program founded at Purdue University,focus on service opportunities in the community around the institution. Regardless of the venue,these programs typically attract a higher percentage of female and minority participants than thenational averages for
Director of the Space Engi- neering Institute and in 2010 she accepted a position with the Academic Affairs office of the Dwight Look College of Engineering where she oversaw outreach, recruiting, retention and enrichment programs for the college. Since 2013, she serves as the Executive Director for Industry and Nonprofit Partnerships with responsibilities to increase opportunities for undergraduates engineering students to engage in experiential learning multidisciplinary team projects. These include promoting capstone design projects sponsored by industry, developing the teaching the Engineering Projects in Community Service course, and developing curricular and co-curricular programs at the Engineering Innovation
waysto Support their Scholar. As some of the scholars are first-generation college students and othershave parents unfamiliar with RIT, having information about support services available, allowsthem to assist us in encouraging their scholar to take advantage of their individualized supportnetwork. The orientation concluded with a list of other financial aid resources and time forquestions and answers. The participants expressed appreciation for the information about thescholarship program and for getting an opportunity to meet other supporters.The final initiative that we started this year was industrial networking. Due to restrictions because of thepandemic, the students were not able to tour local facilities to see engineering in action
; Urbano, 2012).The influence of public policy, incentives, resources, culture and institutional mission areimportant factors when examining the motivation of researchers to participate in academicentrepreneurship. They comprise many elements and initiatives beyond TTOs, that supportacademic entrepreneurs. These include business incubators and accelerators which provide talentand financial support to university startups, as well as education and training programs designedto develop intellectual and tactical knowledge that can help bring innovations to market.Although there is increasing value being placed on university-industry collaboration andcommercialization, in addition to traditional academic work, a significant challenge is gettingmore
capstone design experiences(Froyd & Ohland, 2005), first year computer programming experiences (Brannan & Wankat,2005), community service learning (Coyle, Jamieson, & Oakes, 2005), active learning (Borrego,Froyd, & Hall, 2010; National Research Council, 2012; Fairweather, 2008; Handelsman et al.,2004; Seymour, 2002; Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the ResearchUniversity, 1998), and design-based learning (Puente, Van Eijck, & Jochems, 2011; Reynolds,Mehalik, Lovell, & Schunn, 2009). Most of these, however, are institutionally or individuallyenacted—the goal of the RED program is to build these efforts at a broader scale with radicallydifferent approaches which will result in disruptions in engineering and
Achievement for the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Holding dual positions, Dr. Walton’s responsibilities range from the recruitment and retention of a talented and diverse graduate student population to the management of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) programs, like the NSF-funded Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP), aim- ing at increasing the number of underrepresented minority students successfully completing high quality degree programs in STEM disciplines. A product of one of the very programs that she currently directs, LSAMP, Shannon holds a bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering, a master’s degree in Safety Engineering, and a doctorate in
demands of employers, but how do schools respond? A report from theNational Research Council [32] cites a disconnect between colleges’ response to the industry-demands for STEM qualified workers and prescribes recommendations. While the report focuseson the business-university disconnect, we can use the information to ask what universities seekin incoming students. Meanwhile, Johnson & Johnson partake in a world-wide outreach programto analyze how well minority/disadvantaged students are prepared for STEM jobs in theirBridge-to-Employment (BTE) program [33]. The results are mixed, but the partnershipestablishes a relation where business/industry guides career-training for disadvantaged youth anda broader impact is potential with a shared