Paper ID #44201Building Better Engineers: Teaching Chemical Engineers to Troubleshoot inthe LaboratoryDr. George Prpich, University of Virginia Dr. Prpich is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Virginia. His primary pedagogical interests include professional skills development and laboratory safety training and culture. He has a B.Sc. from the University of Saskatchewan and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Queen’s University. Beyond his pedagogical research, Dr. Prpich has expertise in bioprocess engineering, environmental engineering, and environmental risk management. Outside academia
Paper ID #43351A Novel Laboratory-Scale Pilot Plant StudyDr. Robert P. Hesketh, Rowan University Robert Hesketh is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. in 1982 from the University of Illinois and his Ph.D. from the University of Delaware in 1987. After his Ph.D. he conducted research at the University of Cambridge. Dr. Hesketh has demonstrated an enthusiasm for engineering education and has contributed to the improvement of engineering education in many ways. Robert is a highly motivated professor in both undergraduate and graduate education and has received 12 education and 2
Paper ID #41217How We Teach: Chemical Engineering ElectivesDr. Laura P. Ford, The University of Tulsa Laura P. Ford is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Tulsa. She teaches process control and chemical engineering senior labs. She advises research in the delayed coking refinery process and TU’s Engineers Without Borders - USA chapter.Dr. Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis Janie Brennan is a Senior Lecturer of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. She earned her BS in Agricultural and Biological Engineering from Purdue
Paper ID #37520How We Teach: Capstone DesignDr. Laura P. Ford, The University of Tulsa LAURA P. FORD is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Tulsa. She teaches engineering science thermodynamics and fluid mechanics, mass transfer/separations, and chemi- cal engineering senior labs. She is a co-advisor for TU’s Engineers Without Borders - USA chapter and is a co-PI for the Refining Technologies Joint Industry Project.Dr. Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and
Paper ID #41284Prioritizing Learning Outcomes for Chemical Engineering Laboratory Courses:Student PerspectivesDr. Chris Barr, University of Michigan Dr. Christopher Barr is the Instructional Laboratory Supervisor in the Chemical Engineering Department at University of Michigan. He obtained his Ph.D. at University of Toledo in 2013 and is a former Fellow in the N.S.F. GK-12 grant ”Graduate Teaching Fellows in STEM High School Education: An Environmental Science Learning Community at the Land-Lake Ecosystem Interface”. His main responsibilities are supervising and implementing improvements to the undergraduate labs. He also
the course setting, water gas shiftlaboratory experiment, the survey, and the observation methodology in turn.Course Setting and ParticipantsThe fourth-year chemical engineering laboratory course in this study teaches students the basicsof experimentation and experimental design, teamwork, technical communication, and safety byhaving students complete three four-week experimental studies focused on chemical andbiological reaction systems. Students choose which chemical engineering systems they want tostudy (out of four possible options), spending four hours each week in the laboratory and onehour each week in lab-lecture. Each experiment involves multiple unit operations, which leads tosome variation in the student experience due to division
chemical engineering curricula in line with professionalconcerns [1], many laboratory experiments have remained relatively unchanged. One reason forthis is the high cost of laboratory equipment that prevents most departments from purchasingnew equipment unless necessary. As much of the laboratory equipment is fixable by replacingparts, it is not uncommon for teaching laboratories to have the same equipment for decades. Forexample, in one of our study sites, the valve used for an experiment on level control on a watertank is being replaced, which is not an uncommon occurrence. However, that particular valvewas manufactured in 1947 and has been used on that exact experiment since 1952 (Figure 2).Likewise, a set of packed-bed columns have been used
Paper ID #38836Process Control Laboratory Projects: Technical Training, TeamDevelopment, and Global CollaborationDr. Joaquin Rodriguez, University of Pittsburgh 2018+ University of Pittsburgh. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department. Assistant Professor. Teaching track. 1999-2018. Universidad Monteavila (Caracas, Venezuela). Founder, Academic Coordinator (1999-2004), Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs (2004-2005), Chancellor (2005-20015), President of High Studies Center (2015-2017) 1983-1998. Petroleos de Venezuela. Research Center (Caracas, Venezuela). Professional Engineer (1983- 87). Project Leader
Safety and ChemicalEngineering Education (SACHE) certificate program), and a third common approach has beenincluding chemical process safety education into laboratory or design courses. However,regardless of the preferred approach, few studies have detailed the use of hands-on experimentalexperiences to teach the practice of process safety in engineering at the undergraduate level [3],[10]. We have previously reported on the utilization of problem-based learning (PBL) andproject-based learning (PjBL) tools in our undergraduate chemical engineering laboratories topromote self-directed learning and contribute to the formation of skills required by the modernengineering work environment [11]. In this study, we expand on the use of our laboratories
tomitigate those critical emergency situations. A propylene (C3H6) storage tank is considered forthis analysis to learn hazard involve from its leaks. The analysis reveals using the software theextent of damage to nearby neighborhoods and surroundings. This analysis also leads toscientific strategies for propylene storage leak safety management. This software is used in theclassrooms for this study over the years to teach chemical spill. Students’ comments andresponses indicate that they like this software as it is easy to use and has very user-friendlyGraphical User Interface (GUI). Classroom and training class discussions using this softwarewill save money to do chemical spill mitigation and control in house with expensive devices.Furthermore, to
. Errington is a Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University at Buffalo (UB), The State University of New York. He also serves as the Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs for the UB School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.Dr. David A. Kofke, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. David A. Kofke is SUNY Distinguished Professor and holds the Walter E. Schmid Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University at Buffalo. He is the Department’s Director of Undergraduate Studies.Dr. Maura Sepesy, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. Maura Sepesy is an Assistant Teaching Professor at the University at Buffalo where she teaches
-370.660-129820[5] A. Elkhatat and S. A. Al-Muhtaseb, "Fostering Engineering Laboratory Course Teaching by Embedding an Inquiry-Guided Learning Approach Using Computer-Aided Learning Packages: Evaluation of Learning Outcomes in a Cooling Tower Experiment in the Unit Operations Lab," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 190-198, 2022, doi: 10.18260/2-1-370.660-129133.[6] L. M. Mataka and M. G. Kowalske, "The influence of PBL on students' self-efficacy beliefs in chemistry," Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 929-938, 2015, doi: 10.1039/C5RP00099H.[7] V. K. Kolil, S. Muthupalani, and K. Achuthan, "Virtual experimental platforms in chemistry laboratory
Education and Practice, University of Toronto.3 Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University. *Corresponding Author.Abstract As outlined in the Paris Agreement, the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by2050 necessitates a multifaceted approach encompassing clean energy initiatives and carbon taxation.Higher education institutions, recognizing their role as key contributors to sustainability, are increasinglyfocusing on reducing their carbon footprint. The teaching laboratories, essential for various disciplines,contribute significantly to the university's carbon footprint. In this study, we applied the common practicesof Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) in the industry to the Unit Operations Laboratory, which resembles
courseAbstractRecent years have shown increased success in the use of undergraduate students as teachingassistants or supplemental instructors in core chemical engineering courses. While typicallyutilized in traditional lecture-based courses, there is significant promise in utilizingundergraduate students as a peer resource in a lab-based course. This paper summarizes howundergraduate teaching assistants, referred to at Louisiana State University as coaches, wereintegrated into a junior level lecture/laboratory course. The course is designed to teachexperimental statistics in the lecture component (two days a week) with the students performingexperiments on three different unit operations (one day a week) for 3 four-week experimentalcycles. The main
interests are community-based learning, open-ended laboratory experi- ments, teamwork, collaborative and active learning, and Transport Phenomena computational modeling.Kelly Bohrer, University of Dayton Kelly Bohrer is the Executive Director of the ETHOS Center, a community engagement center connecting students, faculty, and staff with NGOˆa C™s around the world for technical projects as part of immersions, teaching, and scholarly activity. She also is thDr. Matthew Dewitt, University of Dayton Matthew DeWitt is a Distinguished Research Engineer at the University of Dayton Research Institute. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from The Ohio State University and his Ph.D. in chemical engineering from
key information the studentswere to convey and course objectives. Additionally, considerable thought went into what wouldcause the students to not meet expectations and lose points for each of the constructs in therubrics. Well-designed rubrics can help faculty set clear expectations for students, providefeedback and assess technical writing skills[10]. Additionally, it is important for rubrics to bereliable across instructors in team taught courses or when instructors change.This study aimed to evaluate the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the technical report rubricdeveloped in collaboration with the Writing Center across instructors teaching laboratory courseswithin the chemical engineering curriculum. We present the results of this
professor of chemical engineering at The Cooper Union in New York City. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Introduction of a Carbon Dioxide Capture Experiment in a Senior Chemical Engineering Laboratory CourseAbstractWith the severity of climate change impacts increasing, it is imperative to educate students aboutclimate change and potential technologies that may be used to mitigate it. To teach studentsabout climate change and an emerging industry in carbon dioxide removal (CDR), a carbondioxide capture experiment was included in a senior chemical engineering laboratory course. Theexperiment was iteratively scaled-up and student-designed in one rotation of a single
Paper ID #39766Design, Construction, and Analysis of a Chemical Engineering UnitOperations Laboratory Pumping ExperimentDr. Andrew Maxson, The Ohio State University Andrew Maxson is an associate professor of practice in chemical engineering at The Ohio State University where he teaches Chemical Engineering Unit Operations. He earned his B.S. in chemical engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and his M.S. and Ph.D. in chemical engineering at Ohio State. Having worked as a manufacturing process engineer for ten years, his focus is on optimizing the process of teaching at scale, as well as hands-on, practical
Paper ID #39388Board 32: Work in Progress: A Laboratory Platform for Learning forChemical EngineeringBenjamin Miles Phillips, Baylor University Ben Phillips is a PhD Candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University, working as a Research Assistant in the Baylor Energy And Renewable Systems (BEARS) Lab. His research interests are in Energy Storage and Renewable Systems, with projects focused in Concentrated Solar Thermal Energy Storage. He aspires to become a lecturer in the field of Chemical or Mechanical Engineering.Dr. Anne Marie Spence, Baylor University Clinical Professor Mechanical
go beyond the effort of asingle faculty teaching the same lecture course. This choice could conceivably add a small butindeterminable overestimation of faculty teaching loads.If a professor taught multiple sections of the same class, the faculty was attributed credit for theclass multiple times. In contrast, faculty who taught multiple laboratory sections were onlygiven credit for one section. It was found that some departments offer many laboratory sectionsattributable to multiple faculty members, where it’s unclear how workload is divided. So, if eachlab teaching professor was given credit for each lab course they would have a significantlyhigher credit count than their lecturing peers. These choices could respectively overestimate
disciplines. The College ofEngineering and Computer Science (ECS) amended the ECS bylaws in 2020 to specify thatpromotion from Assistant to Associate teaching faculty must have demonstrated both “very high-quality teaching” and secondarily “high quality service,” and for Associate to Full, demonstrationof “excellence” in teaching and “very high quality service” in addition to leadership whereopportunities exist. The bylaws note that teaching may encompass various professionalactivities relating to undergraduate or graduate education, including classroom effectiveness,lecture and laboratory course development, and adoption of more effective teaching practices,whereas service includes program administration, committee participation, student and
semi-controlled learning environment thuspracticing critical thinking, knowledge integration, and application skills.Laboratory teaching is resource intensive, especially in chemical engineering Unit Ops Lab(UOL) courses where projects, equipment and expectations often resemble industrial operationalenvironments. The Unit Operations Laboratory is a place where students gain hands-onexperience while applying fundamental chemical engineering concepts and principles to solveand investigate problems associated with pipe, pump and valve systems, chemical reactorsystems, heat and refrigeration management, water treatment, solid-liquid/vapour-liquidseparation, and process equilibrium. Due to large size and complexity in design, there are usuallyonly
Paper ID #41758Climate Change and Kinetics in an Undergraduate Laboratory: Injectionand Tracking of CO2 in a 7 Gallon TerrariumDr. Clint Guymon, Brigham Young University Clint Guymon is a new Associate Teaching Professor in the Chemical Engineering Department at Brigham Young University. There he has developed multiple educational modules for undergraduate chemical engineering students. He previously worked for 15 years as an engineering consultant in the defense industry.Joseph R Tuft ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Climate Change and Kinetics in an Undergraduate Laboratory: Injection
’ performance in concept tests more than any other form of instruction[3]. This has encouraged further creative hands-on active learning solutions for the field ofengineering education. Hands-on learning modules have been developed and have been shown to engageinterest, teach concepts, and improve knowledge retention for students [4, 5]. These modulesmake concrete what may have been abstract concepts, allowing students to connect theory withexperience. This paper describes the concept, design, implementation and results of a novel HeatExchanger Module (HEM) used in a junior-level thermal/fluids laboratory course.Concept The HEM is designed to enable students to experiment with, and to validate heat transferconcepts in a portable and cost
surpassedthose experienced by undergraduate, master’s and PhD/postdoctoral trainees completing our morecomplex IBL bioadhesives module [29], which was expected since middle school students wouldlikely have never been exposed to bioadhesives before. Moreover, these learning gains werecomparable to those experienced by freshman engineering students [41,42] and middle schoolstudents [28] completing IBL laboratory modules. These significant learning gains demonstratethat this IBL bioadhesives outreach module effectively teaches students principles of bioadhesives.Pre/post-surveys demonstrated that students did not experience significant improvements in theirattitudes towards STEM from participating in our IBL bioadhesives outreach module. Theseresults were
Chemical Engineering at L.D. College of Engineering for 5 years before pursuing a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Imperial College London. Umang has developed surface preferential ap- proaches for nucleation and crystallisation of biological and complex organic molecules. More recently, he has worked as a Research Associate investigating the role of surface properties on particle-particle in- teraction and developed approaches for decoupling contribution of different surface attributes on powder cohesion. In 2012, as recognition to his contributions to Undergraduate laboratory teaching, he was been nominated for the Graduate Teaching Assistant Awards for the Faculty of Engineering. Umang currently has a role in leading
[2] including case studies in the unit operations laboratory course [3] or thechemical reaction engineering course [4]. The most common approach has been to incorporatelearning modules on ethics in the context of process safety [5]. The way in which process safetyis taught to students depends on the department (and university), with some schools having adedicated process safety course while others teach it as part of the senior design course. Teachingstudents about the concepts of ethical decision making in the context of process safety makes sensefrom an educational perspective, in part, due to the ongoing efforts to instill a culture of safety inall young chemical engineers [5]. Through informal discussions with students, the
used to teach key chemistryconcepts to undergraduate students in the chemistry discipline at an Historically Black University (HBCU).To assess whether ECP achieves a lasting increase in undergraduate student curiosity and engagement in thechemistry discipline, ECP was implemented from Fall 2021 to Fall 2022 using an inexpensive, safe, andportable electronic instrumentation system usable in both classrooms and laboratories. The MotivatedStrategies for Learning Questionnaire developed by Pintrich, Smith, García, and McKeachie in 1991 was usedto measure the key constructs associated with students’ curiosity and engagement. The classroom observationprotocol (COPUS) was used to assess instructors’ effectiveness, and signature assignments were used
instructors; these random team assignments try to best simulate the typical teamformation conditions in postgraduation experiences [15].The projects laboratory is divided in two interdependent sections: (a) students complete fourpilot-plant type laboratory experiments for which they produce different report types (referred as“standard experiments”), and (b) they simultaneously develop a research project (referred as“class projects”) that is self-directed which is the focus of our teamwork training. During thecompletion of class projects, students propose their own research, create individual and groupproposals, build their own theory, and complete their experiments in their proposed scheduled; inaddition, they report to a teaching assistant who acts
Chemical Engineering at Penn State University. He earned a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from North Carolina State University and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Prior to joining Penn State in 2018, Dr. Aurand was on the faculty in the Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering at the University of Iowa for over two decades. In addition to teaching chemical process safety, Dr. Aurand has extensive experience with all aspects of teaching and managing undergraduate chemical engineering laboratory courses. He also has taught design, thermodynamics, and energy courses multiple times.Dr. Chris Barr, University of Michigan Dr. Christopher Barr is the instructional laboratory