Open Education Resources (OER): She is Chair of the Colorado Department of Higher Education’s Open Educational Council and has received three state grants for developing OER programs at Mines.Ms. Brianna B. Buljung, Colorado School of Mines Brianna is the Teaching and Learning librarian at the Colorado School of Mines. She collaborates with faculty to design and implement information literacy throughout the curriculum. Prior to her work at the School of Mines, she was the Engineering and Computer Science librarian at the United States Naval Academy and a contract Reference librarian at the National Defense University. She earned her MLIS from the University of Denver in 2011.Mr. Alexander Luis Odicino, Colorado
Paper ID #32907Desperately Seeking Standards: Using Text Processing to Save Your TimeMs. Halle Burns, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Halle Burns is the Data Librarian at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas University Libraries. In addition, she is certified as an instructor with The Carpentries. Her current research interests include data literacy, digital humanities, and improving the accessibility of data science and technology education.Ms. Susan B. Wainscott, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Susan Wainscott is the Engineering Librarian for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas University Li- braries. She holds a
. & Mintz, S. “The Curricular and the Co-Curricular,” Inside Higher Ed. October 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/curricular-and-co-curricular. [Accessed April 12, 2021]. [8] Knight, D. B. & Novoselich, B. J., "Curricular and Co‐curricular Influences on Undergraduate Engineering Student Leadership", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 1, January, 2017). Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20153. [Accessed April 13, 2021]. [9] Burt, B. A., & Carpenter, D. D., & Finelli, C. J., & Harding, T. S., & Sutkus, J. A., & Holsapple, M., & Bielby, R. M., & Ra, E. (2011, June
deliver the content effectively and achieve equalacademic outcomes, how can we improve the experience?Overall, given the limited timeframe in which to redesign the course and challengingcircumstances for all, achieving parity with last year’s outcomes is a win and we remainoptimistic that first year students are getting the foundational research skills they’ll need to besuccessful in their academic and professional careers as engineers.References [1] E. Cordell, A. Link, S. Freeman, R. Whalen, and B. Williams, “A First-year Engineering Information Literacy Workshop to Increase Student Awareness of Research Databases,” American Society for Engineering Education, Virtual Online, June 2020, doi: 10.18260/1
standards budget but spent $20,000 on standards in 2019.Institutions A, B, and OO did not provide values therefore they were counted as null values.Many librarians indicated a $0 budget but then reported spending money on standards.The responses to the questions 1-3 of this survey become of more interest when combined withquestion 12 of the survey. In the final question, respondents were asked to describe theirstandards access model and multiple librarians mentioned not having a budget but having aninformal cap on ordering for specific faculty/students. Figure 2A: Question 2: “What is your yearly Standards budget?” Figure 2B: Question 3: “In the last year, how much would you estimate that you spent on
with research data management as a ‘wicked’ problem," Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, vol. 48, no. 1, 2016.[5] S. Schulte, "Embedded Academic Librarianship: A review of the literature," Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 122-138, 2012.[6] O. Olivares, "The sufficiently embedded librarian: Defining and establishing productive librarian-faculty partnerships in academic libraries," Public Services Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 140-149, 2010.[7] M. Wang and B. L. Fong, "Embedded Data Librarianship: A Case Study of Providing Data Management Support for a Science Department," Science and Technology Libraries, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 228-240, 2015.[8] H. Coates
Paper ID #33628Augmented Library: A Vertically Integrated ProjectDr. Matthew Frenkel, New York University Matthew Frenkel is the engineering librarian at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, and an adjunct faculty in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon. He is a member of the ASEE Engineering librarian division (ELD). Matthew’s background is in the experimental study of optical whispering gallery sensors, but his current research interests are in how undergraduate and graduate engineering students develop their professional skills.Jada ForresterMr. Andrew QuShinkyum (Kevin) Rho, New York University Shinkyum (Kevin) Rho is an
form and Qualtrics. The purpose of the survey is twofold: a. Tounderstand what students’ expectations and the diversity in their expectations are, and b. To helpstudents actively recognize the diversity among their peers. Librarians can get a sense ofclassroom diversity by looking at the results of the survey. However, that alone does not advancethe concept of inclusion. According to McNair, inclusion is the “active, intentional, and ongoing engagement withdiversity—in the curriculum, in the co-curriculum, and in communities (intellectual, social,cultural, geographical) with which individuals might connect—in ways that increase awareness,content knowledge, cognitive sophistication, and empathic understanding of the complex
differences in labeling retractionsbetween Web of Science, Scopus,Google Scholar, and other increasingly popularscholarly search engines like Dimensions and Microsoft Academics, and to measure theimpact of these practices on the scholarly record.AcknowledgementsWe thank the reviewers for their feedback and comments on our manuscript.References[1] A. Hutchinson, Science Libraries in the Self Service Age: Developing NewServices, Targeting New Users. Chandos Publishing, 2018.[2] A. R. Craft and S. Harlow, “Scholarly communications training: Professionaldevelopment for the next generation of scholars,” Ser. Rev., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 175–183,Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1080/00987913.2020.1806651.[3] B. L. Fong, M. Wang, K. White, and R. Tipton, “Assessing
Paper ID #34701The (Augmented) World Is Our CampusMr. David S. Pixton, Brigham Young University David Pixton is a subject liaison at the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University. In this role, he is responsible for providing research training and assistance to students and faculty within the majority of engineering and technology fields offered at the university. He holds degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Library and Information Science. David’s current research is focused on improving learning in a library environment, including the use of augmented reality for educational purposes, and a pedagogical
of extracting the automatic conference call transcript. Oncethe transcripts were cleaned up for readability and personally-identifying information of theinterviewees was removed, the recordings were deleted. Since the author acted as the soleresearcher on this study, no other person was able to access or view these recordings. Allinterviewees digitally signed a consent form following UB IRB policy.The semi-structured interviews lasted between 45 and 60 minutes; no follow-up questions weregiven to interview participants after the interview session. The interview questions themselves(Appendix B) were modeled after the questions used during the Ithaka S+R study on teachingbusiness. There were some key differences, however. The Ithaka study had
all threeinstitutions and based on results of the survey, developed an introductory instructional modulewhich was first tested as a guest lecture in an existing Computer Science Special Topics class inSpring 2019. The lecture was revised into a module and was taught again at Boise StateUniversity on July 24, 2019, at University of Southern California on November 25, 2019, and atCalifornia State University, Los Angeles on March 11, 2020. 1) State of Ethics Education in Computer ScienceOur literature review explored published work in two broad areas: a) pertaining to how ethicalconcerns have traditionally been addressed in computer science and engineering education,and b) pertaining to how the phenomenon of algorithm bias has been addressed
, 2018.[11] T. S. Berry, "A leadership collaborative model: Fostering community through diversestudent organization collaborations," in CoNECD - The Collab. Netw. for Eng. and Comput.Divers. Conf., Crystal City, VA, USA, 2018.[12] J. B. Napp and A. Sabharwal, "Academic libraries and the strategic vision for diversity inhigher education," in ASEE Annu. Conf. and Expo. Proc., Tampa, FL, USA, 2019.[13] K. Beck. "Display celebrating female engineers in the Engineering Library." Penn StateLibrary News. https://sites.psu.edu/librarynews/2020/03/16/display-celebrating-female-engineers-in-the-engineering-library/ (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).
Paper ID #33155Using the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Exam as an Assessment Toolfor Engineering Schools and Their LibrariesMs. Jean L. Bossart, University of Florida Jean Bossart is an Associate Engineering Librarian at the University of Florida (UF). She assists students with research, data support, and citation management. She investigates and integrates creative technolo- gies, such as 3D printing into the STEM discipline library services. She has a BS in chemical engineering and MS in environmental engineering from UF, over 20 years of experience in industry and consulting, and is a licensed professional engineer