to influence class preparation.Table 1 summarizes the sample size, average GPA’s , average reported prep time by studentsthat elected to take the survey and the actual time data for the entire course that the samples camefrom. The average GPA and class preparation time is what the students reported on the survey. Page 25.595.6Also annotated is the actual average GPA and class preparation time for the entire course for (a) (b) (c)Figure 2-Time data reported for three separate semesters of the same heat transfer course
students quickly learned how to identify theappropriate ASTM standard for 3D modeling of 3D printed testing coupons. ASTM D638(Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics) was followed by the students for the3D modeling of coupons and identifying the exact testing procedure, including load rate andtesting data processing procedure. The created 3D coupon model was used during the 3Dprinting process, as shown in Figure 3 (a). Students printed pristine testing coupon using pristinePLA and ABS filaments purchased online and in-house prepared nanocomposite filament. The3D printed coupons are shown in Figures 3 (b and c).Figure 3. 3D printing of ASTM dogbone coupon: (a) 3D printing process using an FDM 3Dprinter; (b) 3D printed dogbone
plans to reduce barriers to success, and utilize what we learn from thisproject to promote change in our department. This study utilized institutional data provided bythe Analytics and Institutional Research department and the paper will describe the results andimplications of our project, specifically with respect to the following questions: • Is the mechanical engineering curriculum “equal opportunity?” We investigated grade distributions (number of A, B, C, D, F, W) and DFW (Drop, Fail, Withdraw) rates in 200, 300, and 400 level courses in the ME curriculum for all students and for students from under-represented minority groups. • Who is leaving our program, what is their performance when they leave (GPA at
(revised approach) consisted of 42 students (19 females and 23 males) from two more-recent Statics classes (fall 2010 and fall 2011). Both classes were taught by the first author usingthe revised approach.Because there is always the possibility that one cohort happens to be more academically adeptthan the other, the prior academic performance of each cohort was examined in terms of theirgrade point average (GPA) in prerequisite mathematics and science courses, specifically,Calculus I, Calculus II, Physics I, and Physics II. The GPA for these courses was calculatedusing the following four-point scale: A 4.000 B 3.000 C 2.000 D 1.000 A 3.667 B
. Page 11.904.5Bibliography1. Engineering Self-Study Questionnaire - http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml2. Kunz David. 1997. Understanding Pump Curves. Engineered Systems. Volume 14, pg. 68.3. Roberson, John A., Cassidy, John J., Chaudhry, M. Hanif, Hydraulic Engineering, 2nd edition, 1997, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, pg. 418.4. Mott, Robert L., Applied Fluid Mechanics, 3rd edition, 1990, Macmillan Company, New York, pp. 472-3.5. Albertson, Maurice L., Barton, James R., Simons, Daryl B., Fluid Mechanics For Engineers, 1960, Prentice- Hall Inc., New Jersey, pp. 521-523. For Constant Head - 120 ft 80
Page 11.884.14and notation used in the manual.Page 11.884.15 Bibliography1 Office of the Dean, United States Military Academy, 1978, “Academic Program 78-79,” West Point, New York,pp. 9-16.2 Bailey, M., Albert, B., Arnas, O., Klawunder, S., Klegka, J., Wolons, D., 2004, “A Unique ThermodynamicsCourse with Laboratories”, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 32(1), pp 54-77.3 Van Poppel, B., Albert, B., Boettner, D., 2003, “A Proposal for an Integrated, Multidisciplinary MechanicalEngineering Program at the United States Military Academy,” Proceeding of the 2003 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN, Jun 22-25.4 Wankat, P
were embedded into the course to help with active-learning activities.The instructor, GTAs, and UGTFs walked around during the group work time to assist groups and/orindividuals with questions. Description of Homework Systems: In Fall 2017, the homework system changed compared to Spring2017. The instructional team developed new homework problems, and a common homework template(example shown in Figure 6 at the end of the paper). The template included an instructor-providedproblem statement and problem illustration. The student had specific places on the page to: a) gatherinformation (givens and unknowns), b) organize their approach, c) sketch the system, d) analyze theproblem symbolically, e) solve the problem with numbers, f) report final
is shown in Appendix B. The students are required to design their assembly inSolidWorks, including into the dimensions the tolerance they need to make their type of fit. Thestudents then 3D print their parts using the Maker’s Lab at Cline Library NAU. With thephysical components, the students reconstruct their assembly and reflect upon the final products’form, fit, and function. For example, if the assembly is the sliding shelf, the students’ shouldhave designed for a clearance fit and the shelves should successfully slide within the cabinet.Students are also expected to comment on the effectiveness of their tolerances given. With thesliding shelf, if the shelves are too wobbly within the cabinet, the students are expected tocomment on their
theASEE Annual Conference.[13] Farouki, R. T., & Linke, B. S. (2016). Shigley Hauler— A competitive project illustratingbasic machine design principles. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education,44(4), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419016669189[14] Farouki, R.T. URL: https://faculty.engineering.ucdavis.edu/farouki/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2014/06/project.pdf Retrieved January 2, 2019.[15] Yilmaz, E., Wheel Balancing Machine Design Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference,St. Louis, Missouri. https://peer.asee.org/8848 Page 18 of 18
ignited. To analyze the resulting process, launch the premixed closed-process IGcombustion daemon located in the Daemons> Systems> UnsteadyProcess> Specific>Combustion> Premixed> IG Model page. Configure the reaction in the Reaction Panel fortheoretical combustion of octane. Evaluate the reactants state with p1 = 1 atm, T1 = 298 K, andpartially evaluate the products state with Vol2 = Vol1 (for a constant-volume process). In theProcess Panel, load state-1 as the beginning state (b-state) and state-2 as the final state (f-state),and enter Q = W = 0. Click Calculateand then Super-Calculate to obtain thefinal state. The final pressure andtemperature are found in state-2 as1065 kPa and 2911 K, respectively. Inprocesses where a
goals of this research are to have colleagues from other departments createvideos for their areas and to make the videos public, so that any instructor or student has accessto the videos.AcknowledgementsThe research in this paper was supported by a Graduation Initiative 2025 Innovation Grant fromCalifornia State University, Fullerton.References[1] S. H. K. Kang, "Spaced Repetition Promotes Efficient and Effective Learning: Policy Implications for Instruction," Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12-19, 2016.[2] S. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe and M. L. Brannon, "Online modules enable prerequisite review and mastery during design courses," in Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference &
. Page 26.810.5The overall look of the 3D environment is patterned after the movie ‘Tron,’ the goal reflects thestyle of the light column in ‘Wreck-it Ralph,’ and a playful music track courses throughout thegame.In Class Use of the GameDuring the fall 2013 semester, Professor Pfotenhauer taught one of the three 60-student-largeundergraduate thermodynamics sections at the University of Wisconsin - Madison. As acollaborative effort of the Professors involved, the three sections followed the same syllabus,including homework and exam assessments. In keeping with many introductory courses onengineering thermodynamics, the first two weeks present information to the students regarding a)closed and open systems, b) the first law energy balance relating
kits with a net cost ranging between $20 and $40. Kits were purchased with the supportof the Mechanical Engineering department and were sent to the students’ homes. Then, studentswere tasked with designing, assembling, and operating a generalized measurement system, similar tothe ones available in the laboratory. Thereby, students were able to conduct experiments at home,attained the main objective of the laboratory assignment, and orally presented their results throughBCU. Students were allowed to keep the educational kits for use in other upper-division courses.Another author (Instructor B) taught a required undergraduate course in Thermodynamics (ME4293) with an enrollment of 92 students, as well as a graduate course in Advanced
uniquestructure recognizes that early career design is beneficial for students. All ABET-accrediteduniversities maintain a design requirement per ABET learning outcomes B and C for the 2018-2019 requirements [1]. However, our emphasis on design is focused to obtain early engineeringprinciples such as hands-on understanding of force, energy and motion. We believe that thesethree principles are one of the most significant topics to cover at an early stage, as instruction inthese areas can lay the foreground to higher levels of Mechanical Engineering concepts such asstress, strain, tension, torsion, and more - all of which are implemented in the upper-level designcourses at NMT.Course Structure RedesignThe introduction to Mechanical Engineering course was
American Manufacturing Research Institution (NAMRI) and chair of the Manufacturing Engineering Division of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (MED/ASME). Dr. Liang is a member of CIRP (The International Academy for Production Engineering) and the recipient of many awards including the Robert B. Douglas Outstanding Young Manufacturing Engineer Award of SME, Ralph R. Teetor Education Award of the Society of Automotive Engineers, and Blackall Machine Tool and Gage Award of ASME. Dr. Liang is fellow of both ASME and SME. Page 23.1296.1 c American Society for Engineering
. Figure 3. CDM defect detection process.The key characteristic of the CDM test is the diffusion flux rate of the evaporating penetrant outof the flaw, and into the indicator. The solution concentration of the penetrant is volatile bydesign, and its purpose is twofold, (a) to furnish information about the presence and depth ofdefects by reacting with the indicator, and (b) to vanish from the flaws and make the post-cleaning unnecessary.Examples of experimental results obtained though CDM are presented in Figures 4 and 5. Figure4 shows a test on the blade of a turbine. A clear defect is revealed by CDM at one of the edges ofthe blade. Such detection is not possible by a simple visual inspection of the blade. Figure 5shows a test performed on a
. [Accessed Jan. 12-14, 2020].[8] I. Busch-Vishniac, T. Kibler, P. B. Campbell, E. Patterson, D. Guillaume, J. Jarosz, C. Chassapis, A. Emery, G. Ellis, H. Whitworth, S. Metz, S. Brainard, and P. Ray, "Deconstructing Engineering Education Programmes: The DEEP Project to Reform the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36, pp. 269-283, Jun. 2011.[9] D. Wroblewski, "Herding CATS: Weaving Coherent Application Threads through a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum to Facilitate Course-to-Course Connectivity and Improve Material Retention," American Society for Engineering Education, 2011.[10] A. T. Kirkpatrick, R. O. Warrington, R. N. Smith, K. A. Thole, W. J
% 22.12% 20.00% 16.35% 8.65% 10.00% 0.96% 0.00% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Figure 2: Incoming Mechanical Engineering Freshmen Math ConfidenceFigures 3 and 4 show what the students thought they would earn in their first college mathcourse, Pre-calculus and Calculus 1, respectively. Blue indicates an A, red was a B, and greenwas a C. The top of each bar shows the number in each category. The horizontal axis (finalgrade) compares the students’ expectations (colored column), clearly showing the reality of therigor of college math courses. For
AC 2008-933: MICROSOFT EXCEL HEAT TRANSFER ADD-IN FORENGINEERING COURSESTroy Dent, University of AlabamaKeith Woodbury, University of AlabamaRobert Taylor, University of Alabama Page 13.894.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Excel Heat Transfer Add-in for Engineering CoursesAbstractThe application of computer software is central in modern engineering instruction. Software hasbeen specifically designed for courses and some textbooks are packaged with specializedversions of popular software. However, a survey of University of Alabama alumni shows thatthe majority primarily uses MS Excel for engineering computations compared to those thatcommonly use
,Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.A., June 24-27, 2001, pp. 6.84.1-6.84.7.[5] R. Bannerot, "Ac 2008-809: Hands-on projects in an early design course," in Proceedings ofthe 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., June 22-25, 2008, pp. 13.663.1-13.663.34.[6] S. Daniels, B. Aliane, J. Nocito-Gobel, J., and M. Collura, "Project-based introduction toengineering - a university core course," in Proceedings of the 2004 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A., June 20-23, 2004, pp. 9.1020.1-9.1020.13.[7] G. Sullivan, and J. Hardin, "Integrating ’Design challenges’ into a freshman introduction tomechanical engineering
. Stud. Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–19, May 2006, doi: 10.2190/4YNU-4TMB-22DJ- AN4W.[5] R. S. Hathaway, B. (Ratnesh) A. Nagda, and S. R. Gregerman, “The Relationship of Undergraduate Research Participation to Graduate and Professional Education Pursuit: An Empirical Study,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 614–31, 2002.[6] A. Dollar and P. Steif, “Learning Modules for Statics,” undefined, 2006. /paper/Learning- Modules-for-Statics-Dollar-Steif/fafc31154b0409f7fdf8e601691f6bc2e4879f97 (accessed Mar. 03, 2021).[7] G. Lemons, A. Carberry, C. Swan, L. Jarvin, and C. Rogers, “The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design,” Des. Stud., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 288–309, May 2010
Applied Research), Volume 2004, Issue 7. 3. Kadle A. (2009). “Blended Learning with Social Technology Components”, Upside Learning Page 23.569.8 Blog, December 22, 2009 (www.slideshare.net/UpsideLearning/blended-learning-3374296).4. Driscoll M., “Blended learning: let‟s go beyond the hype”, IBM Global Services (http://www- 07.ibm.com/services/pdf/blended_learning.pdf).5. Milne A.J., “Designing blended learning space to the student experience”, EDUCAUSE (http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/learning-spaces/chapter-11-designing- blended-learning-space-student-experience).6. Dean B. (2007). “Blended learning
engineering field. The students and teachersexperiences were investigated using a combination of questionnaires and interviews. It wasfound that the students were relatively satisfied with the project, although there was arelatively large spreading in the group. The teachers noticed a clear difference regarding thequestions asked and the discussions that took place when comparing the project withtraditional lessons/lectures. Altogether, the project was found to have benefits from bothmotivation and learning perspectives.IntroductionSince the founding of engineering thermodynamics in the 19th century, the subject has becomerecognized as one of the keystones in many engineering disciplines. Dealing with thefundamentals of energy and energy conversion
moreclear that student not only have to be able to conduct experiment following a given procedure, butthey also have to be able to develop experimentation on their own for an specific purpose. Currentstatement for student outcome (g) is expanded and presented as student outcome (4) in the 2016proposal. The current student outcomes (f) and (h) are combined and are presented as studentoutcom5 in the 2016 proposal. Student outcome (i) is reworded and is presented as student outcome(6) in the 2016 proposal. Student outcome (d) is reworded and is presented as student outcome (7)in the 2016 proposal. Student outcome (j) is not included in the 2016 proposal and student outcome(k) is a requirement of part (b) of criterion 5 in the 2016 proposal.Table 9
animations, which are parts of the described course, can also be usedindependently for various training subjects.Figure 5. The fragment of a steam Figure 6. The top right simulation helps a learner toplant system during the warm-up stage understand processes and potential problemsis shown above. Using this simulation associated with a pipeline expansion due to increasingthe learner is able to explore all its temperature. For instance, a breakdown ofprocesses occurring at that stage. expansion bearings can cause the cracks or evenParticularly, he/she can see what is rupture of the pipeline. The relations betweengoing on inside the turbine (b) and mechanical strains in the pipes and
., Mayadas, F., 2005. “Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1. 5. Novak, G.M., Patterson, E.T., Garvin, A.D., and Christian, W., 1999. Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. 6. Todd, R., Magleby, S., Sorensen, C., Swan, B., and Anthony, D. 1995. A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America. Engineering Education: 165-174. 7. McKenzie, L., Trevisan, M., Davis, D., and Beyerlein, S. 2004. Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City. 8. Ulmann, D. 1992
, problem-solving techniques. Students used the mobile device to create screen-captured videos (using theExplain Everything application) on engineering problem solutions. (See Appendix B for links tostudent e-portfolios, which contain the videos). These products were uploaded into theirindividual course e-portfolio. Instructions for/expectations for completion of the digital videoswere provided (See Appendix B). The mobile device (iPad) was also used to complete in-classquizzes using an application.At the end of the semester, students were invited to participate in a voluntary and anonymousonline survey (20 item Likert scale instrument) regarding their perceptions of the efficacy ofusing mobile learning strategies and devices to create electronic
this question is to gauge if the student would watch videos for lecture beforecoming to class. As shown in figure 2 - B, 50% of the students, they would take advantage ofwatching the videos. In addition, it shows that if the students have suitable tools, such as videos,they would be more motivated to review the material before coming to the class. This is a goodtrend, which indicates students would be more prepared before class and be more capable to starttheir assignments successfully. Page 26.343.9 Figure 2: First Survey - Questions 1 and 2Question 3: After watching some of the videos created for this class, how
transfers are always the same. (T/F) Example 2: Which of the following cannot improve the gas turbine cycle? (a) Increase Tinlet (or T3) (b) Increase jturbine or jcompressor (c) Apply regeneration (d) Preheat inlet air to the compressor.There is no doubt that the instructor can get feedback from chatting with students. A well-designed class survey can collect more comprehensive information on the teaching/learningprocess. Survey problems can include how much the students like the course, how many hoursthe students spend on the homework, and whether the students prefer class power-pointpresentation or black-board presentation, etc. Based on the answers to the survey, the instructorcan see
structure files from the Protein Data Bank (pdb files), rotate andview the molecules in different atom display modes (wire, ball-and-stick, space-filling), andmeasure distances between atoms and constituents within the protein structure, such as theflavin mononucleotide (FMN) coenzymes within the dihydromethanopterin reductase B (pdb3WIS) protein structure [20] (Figure 6). This exercise provided the basis for the professionallevel program ICM-Pro (Molsoft) that allows computational predictions of chemical inhibitorsthat bind to the protein active site and may serve as potential candidates for pharmaceutical drugdiscovery.Figure 6: MolSoft Program modeling of pdb 3WIS, a redox enzyme used in bacterial metabolism,bonded to FMN. Left: two FMN binding