space as well as at least eight engineering students who used themakerspace. Researchers specifically aimed to include women and individuals fromunderrepresented groups in the sample. Student participants were recruited via individualrequests, mandatory engineering courses and/or were recommended by the makerspacemanagement.Data analysisAfter interviews were conducted, they were transcribed and coded with recommendations fromSaldaña [10], which included: 1) utilizing broad codes for the preliminary coding stage, 2)repeating codes to find patterns in the data, 3) developing broader codes and categories, 4)writing analytic memos for insights that occur, and 5) reducing codes through code mapping(i.e., reorganizing and condensing codes to create a
unusually large population of students who were homeschooledwhen they graduated from high school (about 1/5 of students university wide and 1/4 of studentscurrently enrolled in the School of Engineering and Computer Science). In this paper, I investigatethe retention rate and calculus readiness for homeschooled students entering the School ofEngineering and Computer Science as compared with their non-homeschooled peers.In this study, I hypothesized that homeschooled students might have a different likelihood tosucceed in engineering school compared to their non-homeschooled peers. The results of the datastudy support this hypothesis and suggest that homeschooled students are more likely than othersto succeed in engineering school, with retention in
assessments intended for the public (which many are). Learning how peer review is done, and the role of critical feedback, is a critical piece of the standard process. This means both writing peer reviews and reading/ comprehending existing reviews.Study MethodThe research involved study over a 2 year period. We asked faculty who taught a full-semesterlife cycle assessment course that used our textbook as a resource to participate and eleven facultyat different institutions volunteered. These institutions included eight doctoral, highest researchlevel universities, and one each of doctoral - higher research, doctoral - moderate research, andmasters institutions. The courses included mostly courses for graduate students but
instructors. These benefits caninclude increased learning gain3,4, flexibility5-15, increased interaction with peers and theinstructor6,8,9,12,13,16-22, improved professional skills20,23, and increased student engagement andpreparation9,13,25,26. Based, in part, on the potential benefits identified in previous studies, ajunior-level transportation engineering course was converted into a flipped format. This paperaims to investigate student perspectives on various components of the course. In particular, thefollowing research questions will be addressed. 1. Are students prepared to take a flipped course? 2. What are student perspectives on a flipped transportation engineering course?Course DescriptionCE 355: Principles of Transportation
worked individually. The instructors walked around the roomto check on student understanding and ask and answer questions.For both Engineering 82 and Math 45, all PowerPoint slides and tablet writing shown in thecontrol section were contained in the video watched by the inverted section. For both courses,all students completed the same problems that students in the control section completed ashomework. In Engineering 82, students in the inverted section completed specified problemsduring class meeting time (and turned them in at the end of class) and turned others in ashomework. In Math 45, students in the inverted section used in-class time to work on anyproblems from the homework assignment and turned in all of their work as homework. As a
academic potential, and the ability for transferadmission. ETS scholars could renew their scholarships for up to three semesters (approximately2 years) if they demonstrated progress toward their degrees and maintained a minimum 2.75cumulative grade point average (GPA). Students who fell below the requirements were placed ona one-semester probation period and received a counseling session with their academic facultyadvisors to discuss academic difficulties.In addition to the scholarships, ETS participants attended the Success Seminar Series along withstudents participating in the TAMU Engineering Living Learning Community (ELLC). TheELLC housed students in a common dormitory, conducted seminars, provided peer-tutoring, andfacilitated networking
. Examining the pattern of instructor and student activity during the observed class (seeTable 1) suggests that these activities were both active and well-aligned with the learningoutcomes. For example, the instructor only spent a small portion of class time lecturing (20%)and addressing students as a whole group (24%). Instead, he directed students to work in smallgroups, where they spent the majority of class time (76%). The instructor assigned five grouptasks during the observation and spend his time monitoring students’ work (56%) and interactingwith small groups (56%). Students, in turn, spent most of class discussing with their peers (68%)and engaging in Level 1 activities (64%), such as calculating and following procedures, andLevel 3
responsibility? And when you have identified an issue or area, give it a short title, write it down on the paper provided and sign it. Leave some room at the bottom for others to sign [up to attend] [4].”In our event, our facilitator incorporated this prompt into their introductory comments; a more detaileddiscussion of facilitation is provided in later sections of this paper.Use of Open Space/Unconference in Engineering Education Unconferences have been used in engineering education research to bring experts together andleverage their collective expertise to achieve research goals. Examples of unconference structures inengineering education include the PEER Collaborative [6], which was designed as a vehicle for assistantprofessors
isolation on campus and other challenges related to their successful transition into theuniversity. Over the years, many strategies have been implemented in efforts to address thesechallenges. These strategies have included peer counseling, faculty, and corporate mentoring,targeted academic support programs, need-based financial assistance, centralized academicadvising, and student transition support. The projected shortcoming of students completing thedegree program create an urgent need for diversity within the field; it is critical to increase effortsto provide first-year and underrepresented students with the academic, social and transition supportneeded to promote their success.The purpose of this research is to introduce the Successful
, project-based learning but also gives students opportunities to develop the ability towork in a team to accomplish self-assigned responsibilities; give and receive peer critique; anddevelop empathy. A common reason for student interest in the course is motivation to make apositive contribution to society. Table II. Representative comments from student reflections on HuskyADAPT course “…it was wonderful to work on a project that individuals have a real need for. Many of my design experiences have involved hypothetical end products that don't necessarily benefit its potential users.” “I really enjoyed the difficulty of the challenges presented to me in this project. Most engineering challenges are very deterministic and straight forward, whereas
of Florida campus would be intimidating to any student unfamiliar with sucha large academic system. I considered myself lucky at the time because I had at least attended apredominantly White middle and high school. But nothing can prepare one for the vastness of theadministrative process of financial aid, finding your way around campus and such large numbers of Whitepeople.IsolationI was a loner growing up. I was considered a “nerd” by my peers and rarely interacted with crowds ofpeople unless I was cheerleading. I credit this character trait for the struggle I experienced socially-in andout of class. I simply had a hard time letting people know me. Because of the pain this isolation causedme, today, I look for these individuals when I visit
engaged in undergraduate research,which in-turn derives more responsibility and teamwork. Second, it provides the students withthe opportunity to learn different styles of technical writing following required formatsassociated with various journals and conference proceedings. The last but not the least, itsignificantly improves graduates portfolio that while looking for the job can "bring to the table"more than their competitors - applicants.Technical Content of the ProjectTo integrate a PLC with HMI to control a chemical mixing plant a Senior Design team of 3students was formed in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School ofTechnology at the Michigan Technological University. The plant uses various normally open andnormally
was used to help students makeprogress in their projects. These weekly consultation meetings gave the students more time withthe course staff and their peers, increasing their sense of relatedness, and allowed them to receivemore personalized and faster feedback than the previous model of grading, increasing their senseof competence. By trading grading hours for weekly consultation hours, we also did not increasethe TAs’ time commitment in teaching the course. To further support students’ autonomy, we also developed a formal petition process Page 23.347.8through which students could petition to change any component of the course. A few
participating in undergraduate research, in the middle of the secondsemester the team led by the faculty prepares the paper to be further submitted in one of theengineering journals or conference proceedings. In the author's opinion, this experience shouldbecome an integral part of any capstone project since it derives an additional benefits previouslynot included in the capstone environment. First, this requirement makes the students to fill themproud to be engaged in undergraduate research, which in-turn derives more responsibility andteamwork. Second, it provides the students with the opportunity to learn different styles oftechnical writing following required formats associated with various journals and conferenceproceedings. The last but not the
of minority students [8]. Different from typical PBLsetting, CPBL is more focused on the creation of a friendly learning environment that is lessintimidating to minority students. The key features of CPBL include: 1) A series of small in-classprojects that are simple enough for students with limited background knowledge but collectivelyserve as a ladder to build up the students’ design skills progressively; 2) Fostered peer-collaboration to help build up students’ confidence to complete the projects; 3) Timely help andimmediate feedback from the instructors. Since the peer collaboration and student-professorinteraction are key to the success of CPBL, the projects are typically conducted in the class
implementations of web logs in academia reportgroup blogging as well.One of the main drivers of the popularity associated with blogging in academia is its potential to Page 25.620.2create or enhance a highly engaging learning environment3 that promotes interactivity amongstudents and in some cases the instructors. Its general use varies based on course needs; someresearchers report using blogs to (1) gather/share resources, (2) share opinions, ideas andexperiences, (3) exchange hyperlinks, (4) enable peer review, (5) provide instructor feedback, (6)encourage reflective learning, (7) report course news and updates, (8) improve writing skills, and(9) serve
Education, 2010 Evaluation of PeerWise as an Educational Tool for BioengineersAbstractThere is a need to develop, validate, and widely implement tools that incorporate proveneducational strategies including collaborative learning, active learning, and peer tutoring.PeerWise is an innovative, web-based system in which students create multiple-choice questionsand answer those created by their classmates. Creating the question bank, rather than justaccessing an existing one transforms students from passive recipients to active learners. Theobjectives of this study were to characterize the use of PeerWise in a lower divisionbioengineering course and to measure its efficacy in improving student learning. Students whoused PeerWise performed
• Dating networksStudent Engagement: Definitions and MeasurementsWhile most college instructors have heard the term “student engagement” and would likely agreethat engaged students are a positive reflection upon their teaching strategies, a consensus on itsdefinition is difficult to determine. A common definition of student engagement, however,evolves beyond the mere transmission of information from instructor to student and moves intothe realm of active learning. As Williams and Chen write, Common characteristics associated with active learning include the use of higher level thinking and engagement of students in activities that encourage exploration and subsequent evaluation of their involvement. The emphasis on skill
. Page 24.190.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Applying Self-authorship Theory among Chinese Engineering Doctoral Students in U.S. InstitutionsAbstractDespite a large representation of Chinese students in U.S. engineering doctoral programs, thesestudents are understudied compared to their U.S.-born peers. In this study, we applied self-authorship theory among Chinese engineering doctoral students in U.S. institutions. Using thistheory, we try to understand the Chinese engineering doctoral students’ development towardsself-authorship. Focusing on sixteen participants who had been identified to exhibit self-authorship in the epistemological dimension through prior research
website. Communications II INDIVIDUAL: Deadline for having a design notebook. 5 Wireless Systems I INDIVIDUAL: Review of design notebooks. 6 Printing in a Wireless World 7 Wireless Systems II 8 Physical Layer Communications I INDIVIDUAL: Self assessment and peer evaluation. 9 Physical Layer Communications II TEAM: Progress report. INDIVIDUAL: Review of design notebooks. Midterm 10 Midterm Project Reviews presentation. 11 Multimedia Applications for Wireless 12 Cellular Technology 13 Multimedia
competitive peer comparisons.The self-assessment report data provided documented evidence of significant growth in oralcommunication skills for almost every student. Furthermore, the data provided insight into waysfor the instructors to improve the students’ experiences in subsequent course offerings.Introduction: course context and goals for student learningThe recent impetus to rethink our national policy for engineering education originated with theNational Academy for Engineering report Educating the Engineer of 2020.1 As Redish andSmith expressed it: “The increasing importance of technology in our modern economic systemand the increased globalization of scientific and technological ideas, development, andproduction have focused national
Patterson11 HBDI Interpretation Middleton12 Handling Conflict and Peer Evaluation Graham13 Conceptual design using Pugh method; invention disclosure Phillips/Leamy14 History of engineering and computer science Snyder15 Discussion of 7 Habits assignment; time management. Shelnutt16 Curriculum purpose and structure Snyder17 Project Update Graham18 Introduction to Civil Engineering Graham19 Jobs, salaries, and graduate study
; communicated to peers and broader our academic lives,audiences; recognized, accepted, cited,adopted, or used by others. In other words, that • give more responsibility for learning to 6 the student, andit made a difference.” This scholarly work canvary in that it can include teaching, research • set measurable teaching goals,activities, and professional practice. However, establishing plans to meet these goals,it is required that “evidence that a significant and reviewing progress towards theseportion of a faculty member's scholarship has goals.been documented (i.e., communicated to andvalidated by peers beyond the university).”6The
sketchpad drawing tool. Students can manipulate and illustrate their own designs within the system. WISEngineering records all student data, so these initial ideas can be referenced at a later time. TheFigure 2. Engineering design cycle aligns with project steps for explicit navigation. design portfolio allows students to collect any of their work from the project unit and compile it into anelectronic portfolio that can be shared with both peers and instructors. This feature
, suggestingbetter team coordination by the end of the course. Students also showed increased autonomyand a stronger sense of belonging, and they valued peer feedback and small-team work more.However, the rise in stress associated with teamwork highlights the importance of integratingcollaborative skill development earlier in the curriculum.Keywords: Collaboration, Construction Engineering, Capstone Project, Teamwork skills,Sense of belonging, self-efficacyIntroductionThe construction industry faces significant challenges due to the complex andmultidisciplinary nature of its projects. Effective teams in this sector must coordinate varioustasks, from design to execution, often within dynamic and rapidly changing environments.However, recurring issues such as
, enhancing intrinsicmotivation.Social Constructivist Phase: The final phase integrates social learning, where studentscollaborate and engage in discussions and group activities. This phase uses the social features ofthe LMS to enrich learning through peer interactions and community feedback, solidifying theknowledge constructed in earlier phases.MethodsTo address the research questions, we will use a systematized literature review according to thePRISMA framework as proposed by [8]. Therefore, the stages are the following. First, we foundalternative terms used for chatbots and Learning Management Systems and formed queries forour searches in the databases. Next, we consulted the databases ERIC, Compendex, INSPEC,Scopus, Web of Science, and ACM
, services specificto veteran students, and a better understanding of military culture, and what their service meanswithin a broader campus context.Additionally, quantitative academic data from years 2021/22 through 2023/24 were analyzed toexamine DFW rates in key gateway courses, levels of remedial coursework, and academicwarning/suspension rates for veteran students versus their traditional college-age peers. Anupdated survey has been disseminated at the start of spring 2025 as a follow-up to the originalsurvey. Questions remain in line with the original iteration, and examine pathways to enrollment,awareness and satisfaction with academic and support services, engagement with campusactivities, perceptions regarding veteran friendliness, and types
perspectives students bring to such programs, we can assess the degree to whichdisciplinary background shapes their approach to teaching and determine whether a generalizedprogram can still align with their values and experiences.Data were collected from 68 students in a graduate-level capstone teaching course providedthrough the Center for Teaching and Learning at a large, public, research-intensive institution inthe southeastern United States. Of these students, 37 were in the College of Engineering, while31 were from other disciplines. Students participated in a semester-long mentored teachingexperience and completed the TPI around Week 3 of the semester. They were asked to write areflection on their scores and develop teaching philosophy
amicroaggression scale than their White peers (Forrest-Bank & Jenson, 2015). As these slightinsults may be intentional or unintentional, microaggressions likely have contributed to theracial/ethnic and gender disparities in the engineering field. Within the last decade, engineeringeducators have expressed interest microaggressions and how these interactions impact thelearning environment, later workplace. Table 1 Microaggression Taxonomy, Sue et al. (2007) and Lewis and Neville (2015) Microinsult Microinvalidation Microassault Ascription of Alien in own land Assumptions about Intelligence style & beauty
increase the likelihood of first-yearand second-year student retention for low-income STEM students as compared to theirincome/high school GPA-ACT (or SAT)/geography-matched peers within STEM? RuralArkansas has experienced economic hardships that have severely limited STEM education-relatedresources for K-12 students as school systems in these areas have continued to struggle financially[3]. Data have also shown that students from rural areas receive limited exposure to academicenrichment programs. This can lead to lower levels of confidence as well as the belief that theyare not prepared to be successful in STEM programs [4]-[11]. Secondly, can the PTG supportinitiatives significantly increase the average first-year and second-year GPA for low