effectof their tolerance values when they put the assembly together. The students write a report afterthey assemble their rapid prototype, addressing if their assembly meets the required form, fit, andfunction of the assignment. A lecture is constructed and given to students before their assemblydesign project. The lecture presents the basics of tolerancing, including the types of fits andwhen to implement them. The lecture content is reconstructed each semester for 3 semestersbased upon the students' feedback. Data is gathered through students' self-evaluation of theirlearning utilizing a questionnaire, as well as grading of their reports. After the first semester,students show signs of understanding tolerance theory concerning the types of fit
proposal-writing workshops; Co-facilitator (2004), Boston East Pipeline Network; and Alumni, Lead Boston 2004 (The National Conference for Community and Justice). She won the 2006 Northeastern University Aspiration Award, and was recognized at the 2003 Northeastern University Reception honoring Principal Investigators that obtained funding in excess of $1 million over a five-year period.Miss Maureen D. Cabrera, Center for STEM EducationMadeline Jean Leger c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Summer Research Programs for high school students, supporting componentsAbstractThe Young Scholars Program at Northeastern University provides a diverse group of high schoolstudents who have
a project on faculty workshops. In other words, we werepresented both as outside researchers and as "junior members" of their line of work, and studyparticipants related to us as such when discussing their experiences.Data collection: focusing on written attendee reflections Page 24.1366.4Within the existing workshop activities, written reflections were the data source that mostdirectly addressed our research questions about faculty motivations and workshop perceptions.All attendees were given time to hand-write brief thoughts on their hopes, worries, etc. for theweek at the start (Monday) and mid-point (Wednesday) of the workshop. This
research interests include active learning techniques, peer to peer learning, and participation of underrepresented groups in engineering.Mr. Ryan Christopher Reuer Gergely, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ryan Gergely is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign where he is pursuing a degree in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. He received his B.S. (2006) and M.S. (2010) in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He plans to finish his studies at UIUC in 2015 Page 24.1372.1
: “Students must be prepared for engineering practice through thecurriculum culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge and skills acquiredin earlier course work and incorporating engineering standards and realistic constraints” [2].The ME faculty have defined the following four areas to quantify and assess the ProfessionalComponent: • Engineering Design (teaching and practicing design skills) • Professional Communications (conveying designs and interacting with peers) • Professional Skills (teaching and implementing design tools) • Professional Ethics (evaluating and practicing appropriate professional behavior)In each of these areas, a formal implementation plan has been developed to coordinateinstruction across
development perspective, assistant professors may need help transitioningfrom graduate school to the role of an academic so activities relevant to them may includementoring and peer consultation with an emphasis on course reduction and reduced servicecommitments in the first year or two as they develop productive research program and teachingcredibility 8. One way of helping new faculty may be to consider team teaching or to ensure anew faculty member received early and ongoing feedback on teaching practices.In terms of research, it may help new faculty to be aware of university and government researchgrant opportunities, perhaps through the Research Office. The Research Office may also befamiliar with industry grant opportunities that are often
AC 2012-3077: ONE OR MANY? ASSESSING DIFFERENT DELIVERYTIMING FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES RELEVANT TO ASSIGN-MENTS DURING THE SEMESTER. A WORK-IN-PROGRESSProf. Amy S. Van Epps, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amy Van Epps, M.S.L.S., M.Eng., is an Associate Professor of library science and Engineering Librarian and Coordinator of Instruction at the Siegesmund Engineering Library, Purdue University. Her research interests include information literacy, effective teaching, and integration methods for information literacy into the curriculum and ethical writing skills of engineering students.Ms. Megan R. Sapp Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Megan Sapp Nelson is Associate Professor of library sciences at Purdue
://quickplace.udayton.edu/kidslearn ); ‚ Overseeing all team activities; ‚ Coordinating the presentation to the school children; ‚ Delegating duties to team members; ‚ Scheduling out of class team meetings; ‚ Submitting a hard copy of the weekly progress reports to the graduate student instructor.Students were required to review their teammates’ performance. Peer review scores wereaveraged and a grade was issued based on the outcome of the peer review. Page 9.833.3Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering
innovative strategies educatorsemploy to foster inclusive, effective, and culturally enriching learning experiences. The studyreviews issues related to language proficiency, academic writing, cultural differences, differenteducation backgrounds, unique learning habits, course delivery, teaching methodology, academicdiscipline, acculturation, pedagogical adaptations, and support services, shedding light on theevolving role of American universities in shaping the global education landscape. Addressing thesechallenges and leveraging the diverse perspectives international students bring to the classroomcan enrich the educational experience for all students and prepare them for a globallyinterconnected world.IntroductionAs the globalization of higher
, andproject development of the participants. This paper will also focus on the continued use of remote internshipsand experiential opportunities as a High Impact Practice to engage students at an urban commuter universityacross all majors.BackgroundHigh Impact Practices (HIPs) have been shown to be effective in retention, persistence, and overall studentsuccess [1-5]. These practices include activities such as undergraduate research, service learning, experientiallearning opportunities, internships, study abroad, collaborative projects and writing intensive courses. Theseactivities have been found to be very beneficial for underrepresented students. Institutional resources,curriculums and student body demographics limit the effectiveness of the
students for the distance class werevolunteers and there was no control group available, there were no statistical methods use tocompare the students performance. Also, I was the only one evaluating the students in thedistance laboratory whereas in the previous semesters I was responsible for only a portion of the Page 4.411.5students’ overall grade. Another significant difference is that the students who participated inthe distance course were actually on-campus students. They did not need to rely oncommunicating only through the discussion group and email. They could communicate directlywith their peers. This is significantly different than
the engineering curriculum.Most engineering graduates employed in industry will work in collaborative teams. Currentprojects, particularly those in aerospace, defense, and vehicle design, are of such magnitude thatthe involvement of multiple disciplines becomes essential. Separation of disciplines essentiallydisappears in much of modern industry.1Some of the advantages of project teams include: • Teams provide the most efficient use of workers’ skills. • Employees are able to pool knowledge and ideas to arrive at better and more creative problem solutions.2 • Teamwork based on coordinated tasks and peer leadership permits removal of layers of hierarchy.3 • Teams benefit from the combination of people with diverse
address topical areas as part of an NSF-funded project. One of these focused on Statics and Dynamics; 24 instructors from research-based, community colleges, and MS granting institutions participated in the Mechanics VCP.The VCP was centered on aligning the classroom around teaching objectives, classroomactivities, and assessment and utilized the How Learning Works framework for discussions.Topics included Bloom’s taxonomy and writing learning objectives, active learning strategies,collaborative learning, conceptual understanding, hands-on activities, and flipping the classroom.An initial 8 week period introduced these topics and helped the instructors formulate their plansfor the upcoming term, and a follow-on period is currently underway to
of Central Florida Professor Hyoung Jin Cho is the Associate Chair of the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida. He coordinates two undergraduate programs – B. S. Mechanical ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #43410Engineering and B. S. Aerospace Engineering. He has published over 130 peer-reviewed journal andproceeding papers. He has 12 and 6 patents granted in the U.S. and Korea, respectively, in the areas ofsensors, microfluidic devices, and micro/nanofabrication. His current research focus is on miniaturizedenvironmental sensors and sample
parental supervision and wasting time with aimless socializing/e-mail/chats over the Internet. This is done instead of studying, working with peers, working on and identifying common problems they have in their classes, daily activities, homesickness, etc. The author’s observations indicate that most of the students who did not achieve satisfactory results in their classes during the first two terms did not study systematically. In fact, the main item on their agenda of the day was doing e-mails and chats on their computers. They would engage in these activities for hours and sometime for whole weekends. In a few cases, when most of the chat group was in the same class, the students were encouraged to get together during the
instructional strategies have been developed for the teaching of problem solvingin physics. Among them are: 1. Cooperative group problem solving using Context Rich Problems [CRP]4. Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Education 2. Qualitative strategy writing- where students explain how they would solve the problem before attempting mathematical manipulations5. 3. Modeling instruction- where students discuss problems before solving them and resolved conflicting ideas while attempting the solutions6. The purpose of this research study is to explore
cyberlegislation currently proposed and under discussion. The course grooms GW'sCyberCorps students to succeed by developing their technical, analytical,managerial, presentation, and writing skills with regard to cybersecurity issues.The course also provides a baseline of relevant federal policies and mandates andgives an informed picture of federal government roles, responsibilities, andprocesses in cyber security. It reviews basics of the U.S. Constitution and law andsteeps students in the CSIA elements necessary to planning federal computersystems within a framework that is cognizant of privacy, cost, risk, civil liberties,and public acceptance. It routinely discusses contemporaneous speeches, reports,guides and laws that are shaping how the government
established research labs thatwould provide peer mentoring and a CoP for the incoming ECHS students. Leveraging existinglab infrastructure for professional, technical skill, and community development was ideal forremoving additional burden to those facilitating the program, both at the ECHS and universitylevels. The faculty mentors’ preparation and training played a critical role in creating an inclusive,effective research environment. For example, mentors tailored their feedback to meet students attheir developmental stage. They focused on practical skills like poster presentations, writing forresearch, and hands-on laboratory experimentation. One participant highlighted the value ofthese experiences: “This REU was significant in me feeling
student’s schedule.Universities generally staff career services offices for their students, offering a host of resourceson finding internships, writing resumes and cover letters, and practicing effective interviewstrategies. However, nearly 40% of students never even visit their universities’ career servicesoffices [1]. Disseminating useful information on career and professional development, therefore,must occur through the individual department. And, the timing of such exposure should be suchthat the student can contextualize any career advice received; giving students advice in interviewstrategies, for example, when they are in the midst of finding internships is more effective thanadvice given pre-college, which is naturally proffered in the
to ensure that their contentknowledge and instructional practices keeps up with the changing base of knowledge andpractices needed for effective classroom instruction. Our experience with providing web-basedprofessional development programs for teachers can serve as a model for distance learningprograms for teachers, where they can enhance their content knowledge and instructionalpractices, and also network with others.Two professional development programs are described that are responsive to teacher isolationfrom peers during a pandemic. Lessons learned from these programs can serve as a frameworkfor the implementation of teacher professional programs during a pandemic or even after apandemic.IntroductionBy its very definition, a
“Gender, Work andLeadership”, which was focused on best practices to engage and retain women and minoritizedindividuals in STEM. The committee created and leveraged personal relationships via grassrootscampaigns to recruit, matriculate, retain, and support women students in the CEC. For example,committee members began a letter writing campaign, writing to high school senior girls who hadbeen accepted to the engineering program encouraging them to enroll. The committee membersbegan conducting outreach at their respective local high schools, and represented the Universityat the TechOlympics, one of the largest annual gatherings of STEM-interested high schoolstudents in the metropolitan area and state. The committee met with University staff
Oregon State University.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is a Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University Dr. Montfort is an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State UniversityDr. Qwo-Li Driskill, Qwo-Li Driskill is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Oregon State University. They hold a PhD in Rhetoric & Writing from Michigan State University
process, he or shemust decide whether or not to proceed with turning the findings into the scholarship of teaching.The faculty must also consider, however, whether the extra effort to write up the material,subject it to another peer review, and disseminate the resulting manuscript would be worth thetime required in terms of faculty rewards. The sad truth is that many departments and institutionsdo not count pedagogical scholarship as part of the faculty members’ scholarly production.6 41At SDSU, in the Professional Staff Evaluation that each faculty fills out each year, faculty areasked to set goals for next year and review their performance from the past year, in four majorareas: teaching and
design tools, technical writing, intellectual property,and ethics. Figure 1: Organization of the Engineering by Design course.Grades are determined by assessing student performance in both the project section and commonlecture, with the majority based on the project. In the project section, grades are based onattendance, peer evaluation, writing assignments, and presentations. In the common lecture,grades are based on attendance and quizzes.Further details of the course, its history, and how it supports the curriculum have been previouslypublished2.Digital HealthDigital health is the monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic and acute health conditionsthrough the use of medical devices, remote sensing technologies, local
, 5 points for edited volume, 4 pointsfor book chapter/book edition, 3 points for peer reviewed journal, 2 points forresearch/technical report, 1 point for peer reviewed conference paper and presentation, 0.5points for non-peered reviewed conference paper and presentation, 0.25 points forpresentation only. The goal of this point system is to visibly increase the amount ofscholarship while determining the average scholarship amount for motivational effect. Allnew faculty (15 since 2012) have attended a Mini-ExCEEd teaching workshop taught by oneof the authors and four of these have attended the week-long ExCEEd. These same newfaculty are the primary foundation of faculty modifying and invigorating the freshmencourses. The institution tracks
performancerelative to the traditional instructional format [14].In STEM education, the flipped classroom model has been found to be used mostly used to teachpure science and mathematics courses. This model has rarely been used to teach subjects from theapplied science, technology, and engineering fields [5]. In a recent study of fifty-eight peer-reviewed research studies on flipped learning in the higher education STEM disciplines, resultsindicate that only about 6% of these studies were conducted in the applied science, technology,and engineering domains [5]. There are a few works where a flipped model has been usedsuccessfully in the applied science, technology, and engineering disciplines ([3]; [7]; [10]; [11];[13]; [10]; [16]). Similar to the non-STEM
analyzeunknown systems using MATLAB programming. The problem based instructional approach forthe fall 2015 term began with a series of assignments guiding the students in decomposing theproblem into components; this allowed the problem itself to become central to skill development.The flipped instructional environment challenged students to prepare for lab sessions byreviewing programming examples and completing online assessments to gain early feedbackbefore going to the lab sessions. The lab sessions were then reserved for collaborative, hands-onprogramming practice with peers and just-in-time instructor questioning and monitoring.Students were encouraged to submit periodic progress reports (i.e. design reviews) for instructorfeedback and guidance
timely feedback. 4. Students make complex decision on course concepts during class that are reported in simple form.In a team-based learning course, it is recommended that large (five to seven students per team)diverse teams are formed by the instructor at the beginning of the course, and stay consistent forthe duration of the course. To motivate every student to contribute and hold them accountable forin-class teamwork, peer evaluations are used. Either a fixed percentage grade or a scale factor forteam portion of the total grade is often incorporated in the grading scheme based on the result ofpeer evaluations.In a TBL class, course materials are divided into modules. A typical module spans several classperiods. Every module follows
education faculty. Research grants bring in money, which isimportant, and as a relatively small engineering school we have not attempted to pursuelarge NSF-style education grants or attempted to participate in an engineering educationcoalition.As Richlin7 states, when a faculty member has completed a scholarly teaching process, heor she must decide whether or not to proceed with turning the findings into thescholarship of teaching. The faculty must also consider, however, whether the extra effortto write up the material, subject it to another peer review, and disseminate the resultingmanuscript would be worth the time required in terms of faculty rewards. The sad truth isthat many departments and institutions do not count pedagogical scholarship as
students continue on the project throughtheir education they can see how the engineering sciences interact in design and how changingthe design to improve performance in one area may degrade it in another.The experiential learning elements of the ISD project are many. Multi-year projects are commonin industry, so the ISD experience starts early in the students’ educations to break the classroomexperience that after 15 weeks everything resets and you start over. With the involvement ofstudents over many years, it is common to have Freshmen and Sophomores working with Juniorsand Seniors, providing peer learning, leadership, and mentoring opportunities. The ISDexperience is run more like industrial projects with student teams assigned tasks, and the