to relatively poor school districts.There were 10 applications for the positions, and they have been narrowed down to four outstandingcandidates. They each had a one-day interview where they talked with five to seven different people inthe company (typical was three developers, two product managers, a program manager, and one of theVPs). Information from their resumes and notes from their interviews are attached.All of them have graduated from UWT with a degree in CSS.Your goal is to make the following decision regarding hiring: Who should be hired for the two positions(program manager and software developer)?The context for the in-class activity will be the final hiring committee meeting to make the hiringdecision(s). Each person will make
fms willrevive this sector in the 2000-to-2005 period. U. S. transportation manufacturing are stronger than manyobservers realize. U.S. manufacturing continues to lead that of other nations in industrial productivity. Manyaerospace-related industries are now positioning themselves overseas with various sized operations.A 1993 study by McKinsey illustrates that, as of 1990, Japanese workers were only 83 percent as productive asU.S. employees in manufacturing, and German workers were 79 percent as productive. A key finding of theMcKinsey study is that competition played a key role in the U.S. lead. If Germany and Japan open their marketsto competition in the future, as is expected, sales and employment will gruw to meet export market
10-13, 2. R.J. Bonk, P.T. Imhoff, and A.H.-D.Cheng. “Integrating Written Communication within Engineering Curricula.” Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice (October 2002): 152-159.3. C. Plumb and C. Scott. “Outcomes Assessment of Engineering Writing at the University of Washington.Journal of Engineering Education (July 2002): 333-338.4. Norback, J.S., L.D. McNair, M.J. Laughter, G.A. Forehand, and B.Sutley-Fish. “Teaching WorkplaceCommunication in Industrial and Electrical Engineering. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004.5. J. S. Norback and J. R. Hardin, “Integrating Workforce Communication into Senior Design
take place evenin the face of large enrollments.References [1] Bloom, B.S. (ed), (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Cognitive Domain, White Plains, NY, Longman. [2] Bowman, J.S. (1979), Lecture-Discussion Format Revisited, Improving College and University Teaching 27, pp 25-27. [3] Duck, S. and McMahan, D.T. (2008) The Basics of Communication, SAGE. [4] Higbee, K.L. (2001) Your Memory : How It Works and How to Improve It, 2nd Ed, Da Capo Press. [5] Lowman, J. (1995), Mastering the Techniques of Teaching, 2nd Ed, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. [6] McKeachie, W.J. and Svincicki, M. (2006), Teaching Tips, Houghton Mifflin Company, NY. [7] Neisser, U., Hyman, I. (1999
- Volume 52, Darlinghurst, Australia, 2006, pp. 151-155.22. Daniel E. Stevenson and James D. Schwarzmeier, “Building an autonomous Vehicle by Integrating Lego Mindstorms and a Web Cam,” in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, New York, 2007, pp. 165-169.23. Tanya Markow, Eugene Ressler, and Jean Blair, “Catch that Speeding Turtle: Latching onto Fun Graphics in CS1,” in Proceedings of the 2006 Annual ACM SIGAda International Conference on Ada, New York, 2006, pp. 29-34.24. Barry S. Fagin, “Teaching Computer Science With Robotics Using Ada/Mindstorms 2.0,” in Proceedings of the 2001 Annual ACM SIGAda International Conference on Ada, New York, 2001, pp. 73-78.25. Donald Knuth. Interview by Len Shustek. “The 'Art' of Being Donald Knuth,” in
Page 14.162.11there is a strong job market. However, it seems clear that employers would have a preference forthe CE grads over CET grads which could create a “class” structure within the program.The most common reason for a preference to hire CE over CET graduates is licensure, notability. Employment is an area where personal bias also plays a role in hiring. This bias is notlimited to CE vs. CET. Some engineering firms will have a preference for graduates from thesame institution that the firm’s principle(s) attended.8. Potential CostsThe potential CE curriculum presented in Figure 2 consists of 100% existing courses at ourUniversity. Therefore, the cost of teaching (i.e. additional faculty, associated office space andlabs) would be very
Health Organization data tables. Accessed 01/24/09 from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/en/3 United Nations Millennium Development Goals. Accessed 01/24/09 from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals4 Striebig, B., & Norwood, S. (2009). West African Technology, Education, and Reciprocity (WATER) Implementation in Benin. Paper accepted for publication in the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. Page 14.943.15 14AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all those that
…2. What suggestion(s) do you have for improving it? Student survey #2 (Administered after 6 flipped class sessions)1. Did you watch the recorded lecture as assigned?2. How many times did you typically watch the lectures?3. Did you review portions of the lecture that seemed unclear? (Almost always, Often , Sometimes, Rarely, Never )4. Did you watch the video straight through, or watch it in pieces and take breaks? (Straight through, Pieces, Straight through, then reviewed unclear pieces, All in one sitting, but I would pause and review certain sections)5. How long did you typically spend watching the lectures at one sitting? (10 mins, 15 mins, 20 mins, 30 mins, 45 mins, 1 Hour, More than 1 hour)6. What length of posted
Educational Science. Page 14.317.15[6] Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1998) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Calif: Sage.[7] Clark, B. R. (2004) Sustaining Change in Universities: Continuities in Case Studies and Concepts;UK: OU Press.[8] Duke, C. (2002) Managing the Learning University. Buckingham, SRHE & OU Press.[9] Trowler , P. (1998) Academics responding to Change; New higher Education Frameworks andAcademic Cultures; SRHE & OU Press; UK.[10] Shattock, M. (2003b) Managing Successful Universities. UK: McGraw-Hill.[11] Marginson, S.(2007) Prospects of Higher Education: Globalization, Market Competition, PublicGoods and the
., “Principles of Distributed Database Systems”, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, 1999.17. Wyne, M. and Hyder, S. “HIPAA Compliant HIS in J2EE Environment”, International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), Idea Group Inc., Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 73-89, 2007. Page 14.958.15
Science, and The Experiential Curriculum, 31st ASEE/IEEC Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV, October 10-13, 2001.4. Duffy, J., Tsang, E., and Lord, S. (2002). Service-Learning in Engineering: What, Why, and How? Proceedings of the ASEE 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, June 20035. Joseph Arumala, Khaled Nassar, Emmanuel Akinjide, Anthony Stockus and Carlos Salgado The Princess Anne Athletic Center: Demolition and Site Clearance Phases, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL June 18-21, 20066. Joseph Arumala, Khaled Nassar and Carlos Salgado, The Princess Anne Athletic Center Project, 2006 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE), San Juan, Puerto Rico, July 23-28, 2006.7. Time
. "Online Collaborative Design Projects: Overcoming Barriers toCommunication." International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2001, 189-196.9 Paulik, M. and M. Krishnan. "A Competition-Motivated Capstone Design Course: The Result of a Fifteen-YearEvolution." IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2001, 67-7510 McMasters, J. and S. Ford. "An Industry View of Enhancing Design Education." Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. No. 79, No. 3, 1990, 526-529.11 Culver, R., Woods, D. and Peggy Fitch. "Gaining Professional Expertise Through Design Activities." Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 79, No. 3, 1990, 533-536.12 Ernst, E., and J.R. Lohman. "Designing Undergraduate Curricula." Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 79
Alumni Weekly, vol. 109, no. 2, 2008, retrieved on 02/05/09 at http://paw.princeton.edu/issues/2008/10/08/pages/1822/.2. S. Peters, “Friend Center is dedicated; Building is a testament to an eternal friendship,” E-Quad News, vol. 1, no. 1, 2001.3. Y. Liao, et al., “Information-Seeking Behavior of International Graduate Students vs. American Graduate Students: A User Study at Virginia Tech 2005,” College & Research Libraries, vol. 68, no. 1, 2007, pp. 5- 25.4. Leslie Haas and Jan Robertson, “The Information Commons,” ARL SPEC Kit 281, 2004, retrieved on 02/05/2009 at http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/spec281web.pdf .5. M. Noden, “A New Chapter for Libraries: Humanists ponder what will become of libraries in the digital
of Texas at Austin and several students who have participated in our surveyand learning module testing.Bibliography 1. Wiggins, G., McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA. 2. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). A Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, Longmans, Green, 1956. 3. Instructional Consulting Center (2009). Active Learning Strategies. School of Education, Idiana University Bloomington. Retrieved on Feb 3rd, 2009. URL: Page 14.1171.16 http://www.indiana.edu/~icy/document
purchases and maintains oil spill response equipment, which will allows it tocontain and clean up a spill up to 25,000 tons of persistent oil. If a large oil spill is beyondMalaysia’s own resources, the DOE will seek and coordinate an international response2. Figure1 shows the three-tiered approach to Malaysia’s national oil spill contingency plan1.Spill Notification and ReportingWhen a spill occurs, it must be reported to local DOE officers or the Marine Department officenearest to the incident site. The report should have the following information2: ≠ location of incident; ≠ type and size of spill(s); Page 14.922.4 ≠ date
for the foreseeable future. EETprograms that continue to teach electronics from a “component perspective” will behandicapping their graduates in this newer, systems based, paradigm.So what has been the reaction to declining enrollments? As pointed out elsewhere[3], in theUnited States, government policy setting organizations like the NSB have been busy attemptingto advance the agenda of increased enrollment in the engineering technologies under theumbrella discipline know as “science and engineering” (S&E). The major thrust of thisundertaking has been through the efforts of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and inparticular the Advanced Technology Education (ATE) program and its ATE Centers[4] at thepost-secondary school level and
learning engineering concepts while respecting theirexpertise. In this paper, approaches used in the topic selection and lesson plan development,implementation of student activities, impacts on high school teachers and students, challengesfaced by the collaboration, and lessons learned are discussed. The academy model is generic andmay be applied to any high school student population.IntroductionAccording to the National Science Foundation (NSF)'s 2004 Science and Engineering Indicators,only 328 American Indians and Alaska Natives earned bachelor's degrees in engineering in 2000.Although this number is impressively larger than the total in 1977 data when only 135 degreeswere awarded, the number of American Indians and Alaska Natives earning
122. Masakatsu Matsuishi, Kazuya Takemata, Shigeo Matsumoto, Tetsuro Furukawa, Loo Ching Nong, Pee Suat Hoon, “International Collaborative Project in Engineering Design Education between Kanazawa Institute of Technology and Singapore Polytechnic”, ICEE 2004, Florida, USA3. C. N. Loo. S. H. Pee, “Engineering Design Education – Learning Experience at Kanazawa Institute of Technology”, Excellence in Education and Training Convention 2003, Singapore Page 11.819.14 13 ED I ED II
of Sputnik I in the 1950’s,forced engineering colleges to hurriedly restructure their curricula.Development. In our initial research to determine current and future trends in engineering programs, wefound many and different views of the future demands and practice of engineering. It wasdecided to research and survey several significant areas for this proposal: (1) Academicinstitutions that are currently reviewing trends towards new educational approaches; (2)Corresponding technical articles describing the trends; (3) Current efforts in academe;and (4) Industrial sources (both manufacturing and engineering-based) that have adirect/current need for engineering. We also used the Listserv to ask engineeringeducators to describe and recommend
team (2005)Bibliography1 Schmalzel, J. L., Marchese, A. J., and Hesketh, R. P. "What's brewing in the Clinic?," HP EngineeringEducator,2:1, Winter 1998, pp. 6-7.2 Schmalzel, J. L., Marchese, A. J., Mariappan, J., and Mandayam, S. A., "The Engineering Clinic: A four-year design sequence," presented at the 2nd An. Conf. of Nat. Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance,Washington, D.C., 1998.3 Dym, C. L., Agongino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., Leifer, L. J., “Engineering Design Thinking,Teaching and Learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 103-120, January 2005.4 Dym, C. L., Engineering Design: A Synthesis of View, Cambridge University Press, 19945 von Lockette, P., Pietrucka, B., Acciani, D., Dahm, K., Harvey, R., Courtney, J
and ethical aspects involve or technical aspects inthe proposed design as well as the more narrowly defined engineering Page 11.568.12Case 2. A Ticket Tearing Device for a Disabled PersonConsider the case of David S., a young man who suffers from a variety of physical andmetal disabilities. David was employed at a movie theater in his local community nearPhiladelphia. His primary responsibility was to welcome patrons as they went into thetheater hall, taking their admission tickets, tearing them in half and placing the torntickets into a receiving basket. As David had very limited strength in his hands, the linesof people seeking admittance would
. Freire, P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (1971). New York: Herder & Herder. hooks2. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. NewYork: Routledge.3. Costa, A.L. and Kallick, B. (2003). Assessment Strategies for Self-Directed Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.4. Riley, D. (2003). “Pedagogies of Liberation in an Engineering Thermodynamics Class.” ASEE Annual Meeting, June 22-25, Nashville, Tennessee.5. Riley, D., Claris, L., Ngambeki, I., Rua, A. (2006) The Ethics Blog: Students making connections among ethics, thermodynamics, and life. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings (in press).6. Etheridge, S. and Rudnitsky
with the word “knowledge.” This was used as a springboard for discussion aboutthe class, its content, and its pedagogy. The week before reading Foucault, students wereintroduced to liberative pedagogies in class and through course readings1 and a reflective essay.On the first day of class, students were introduced to the syllabus as one representation of what isimportant in thermodynamics, not the definitive word.In a reflective essay and class discussion, students considered the relationship between powerand knowledge. The essay prompt read: “What is/are the relationship(s) between power andknowledge? Is knowledge the same thing as truth, or how does it differ? How does this relate tothe course (both the subject matter and how it is taught or
than 40 papers, book chapters and journals.Alice Abreu, OAS ALICE ABREU, PhD, former Director of the Organization for American States (OAS) Office of Science, Technology and Education.Marta Cehelsky, InterAmerican Development Bank MARTA CEHELSKY is Senior Adviser for Science And Technology in the Department of Sustainable Development of the InterAmerican Development Bank, where she has spearheaded a initiatiative to strengthen the effectiveness of the Bank’s S&T. Previously, Dr. Cehelsky served as Executive Officer of the Presidentially appointed National Science Board, responsible for policy of the National Science Foundation and for advising the US President and Congress on
the new millennium. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.4. Dorf, R. C. & Byers, T. H. (2005). Technology ventures: From idea to enterprise. Boston: McGraw-Hill.5. Goetsch, D. L. & Davis, S. B. (2003). Quality management: Introduction to quality management for production, processing, and services (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.6. Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.7. Narayanan, V. K. (2001). Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.8. Prasad, B. (1996). Concurrent engineering fundamentals: Integrated product and process organization. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.9
undergraduate students in both countries for their time-investment on paid-jobs. Both extremes need to be scrutinized; and the improved policies and practices should be developed by the educational policy-makers in both countries.Bibliography Information 1. Lan, S., and Lee, G. (2005). A Comparison of Electrical Engineering curricula at Tsinghua University (Beijing) and at the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign). Paper published in the Proceedings, American Society of Engineering Education IL/IN Regional Conference, DeKalb, Illinois, April 2005. 2. Li, W., and Min, W. (2001). Tuition, private demand, and higher education in China. Beijing, China: Graduate School of Education, Beijing University. 3
Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.Carroll, P. and P. Steane. 2000. “Public-private partnerships: sectoral perspectives.” In S.P. Osborne (Ed.) Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective. New York: Routledge.Hanneman, Robert A. and Mark Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside ( published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/ )Sirotnic, K.A. and J.I. Goodlad. 1988. School-University Partnerships in Action: Concepts, Cases, and Concerns. New York: Teachers College Press.Wasserman, S. and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge
Kaleidoscope, accessed December, 2005. [13] Taylor, K., More, W.S and J. MacGregor. 2003. Learning Community Research and Assessment:What We Know Now. National Learning Communities Project Monograph Series, Olympia, WA:TheEvergreen State College. [14] National Science Board. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004 Volume 1, Arlington,VA:National Science Foundation (volume 1, NSB 04-1). [15] Jackson, S. 2003. Engineering Education in the 21st Century, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteDelivered at the Society of Women Engineers, Birmingham, Alabama, October 11, 2003., accessed December, 2005. [16] U.S. Census Bureau (2001). Retrieved January 14, 2003, from the U.S. Census Bureau, AmericanCommunity Survey Website: http