observing when a lightbulb connected as a load turned off and back on. The tablebelow depicts the trial runs and duration in seconds between the power outage and startup. Trial Number Did the atto-grid start up Time from power outage to after the power outage? startup (s) 1 Yes 5.09 2 Yes 5.14 3 Yes 5.42 4 Yes 5.33 5 Yes 5.02
the approach for the first time in one course. New and next iterations onthis approach include sourcing and sharing ideas for the task from KEEN’s EngineeringUnleashed website (engineeringunleashed.com) and combining the epic finale approach with amastery-based course structure.References[1] P.D. Schreuders and A.T. Johnson, "An Alternate Presentation Method for Final Examinations," in 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, 1999.[2] A. Gregerson and S. Franey, "Optional Final Exams as an Assessment Tool in Engineering Curricula," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012.[3] Y. Yihun, R. Nair and J Herron, "Changing the Paradigm “Cheating In a Traditional Exam Setting” Into a Possible
Institute of Standards and Technology, Blockchain Technology Overview - NISTIR 8202: Draft January 2018. USA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2018. [2] “Ethereum peer-to-peer networking specifications.” https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p, Retrieved: Jan 2021. [3] Ethereum, “Ethereum Project.” https://www.ethereum.org, Retrieved: Jan 2021. [4] Jimi S., “Blockchain: What are nodes and masternodes?.” https://medium.com/coinmonks/ Blockchain-what-is-a-node-or-masternode-and-what-does-it-do-4d9a4200938f, Retrieved: Jan 2021. [5] Bitcoin Wiki, “Genesis Block.” https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis block, Retrieved: Jan 2021. [6] Blockgeeks, “What is Hashing? Under The Hood of Blockchain.” https://blockgeeks.com/guides
requirements -15% f The project contributed to my ability to use modern 74 engineering tools and techniques 24% k 80 The project had significant practitioner involvement 18% d,kThe strong survey increases are supported by further examining the student responses to eachcriterion since integration of the ABET criterion is evaluated by each student throughout theexperience, both for the in-country and on-campus design experience. While on-site, studentsmaintain a learning log. For each entry or experience, the ABET requirement(s) that apply to theproject task, experience or lesson are to be documented. A summary report of how
previous opportunities for discussions to share ideas andresources, it doesn’t appear to be utilized to a great degree as in previous years. Programscurrently tend to struggle with the same issues of program implementation and evaluation and itwould be nice to see increased dialogue between programs and to ensure that information andresources are readily available to those working with similar programs. Plans are now underwayfor an RET Listserve of current RET programs5 and a potential conference emphasizing theissues surrounding program evaluation. SWEPT programs, in their current form, have been in existence at least since the early1990’s and have been wrestling with the issues surrounding program evaluation from the start.Following a
program.The Food Engineering Program Assessment Plan consists of three major parts4-10:Part I: Determining expectations. Along with stating expected outcomes, we try to identify if, infact, we provide sufficient educational opportunities inside and outside of the classroom todevelop the desired outcomes we assert we teach and/or develop. Courses may be one means, butseveral other options exist. To assure that students have sufficient and various kinds ofeducational opportunities to learn or develop desired outcomes, we engage in curricular and co-curricular mapping.Part II: Determining timing, identifying cohort(s), and assigning responsibilities. This part of theAssessment Plan focuses on how and when every Food Engineering Program faculty will
development r. Fulfill commitments in a timely manner s. Discern and pursue ethical practices t. Contribute to society as an active citizenThese outcomes form an excellent basis for gauging how well the entrepreneurial mindset isbeing incorporated into student activities within a course, and will therefore be referred tothroughout later sections of this paper.As of January 2013, KEEN includes nineteen institutions across the U.S. The KEEN programprovides access to vital resources for building quality entrepreneurship education programs thatengage engineering and technical students including grants, faculty fellowships, capacitybuilding workshops, networking opportunities, and resources. More specifically, KEENprovides financial and developmental
Session 2526 A Laboratory Experiment in Linear Series Voltage Regulators Jeffrey S. Franzone University of MemphisAbstractMany advanced electronics courses cover linear voltage regulators from the “black-box” (or IC)perspective. Although this perspective is valid and useful, it doesn’t give students muchopportunity in a laboratory setting to deeply investigate the behavior of the major parts of theregulator, its characteristics, and the reinforcement of transistor theory. Many “canned” linearvoltage regulator labs favor the “quick-and-dirty” approach