has published articles in the fields of cybersecurity, intrusion detection, machine learning, and technology education. Dr. Chou has experience in supervising both graduate and undergraduate student thesis, practicum, and grant project research.Tijjani Mohammed (Chairperson) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comThe Role of Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing in Cybersecurity EducationAbstractNo mater individuals or organizations are inevitable to be targets by hackers. Data breaches ofsensitive data happen every day. It has become an emergency task to take necessary steps toensure the data secure from
framers from various industry companies, he found that safety is held at the same level of importance as productivity. He is also inter- ested in educational contributions and research opportunities towards integrating field-level construction knowledge in BIM models and exploring their benefits in classroom environment with feedback from jobsite project managers.Dr. Clint D. Martin, Georgia Southern University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016A Case for International Study in Construction Education and Industry PracticeIntroductionA Construction Management (CM) student at Georgia Southern University was offered a uniqueopportunity to do an internship with a
an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for nearly 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Analyzing an Abbreviated Dynamics Concept Inventory and Its Role as an Instrument for Assessing Emergent Learning PedagogiesAbstractThe Dynamics Concept Inventory
frameworks, Fink’s SignificantLearning Outcomes and virtue ethics embraces the educator’s role in developing wisdom rootedin context, experience, & good engineering practice. As an integrative taxonomy that has beenapplicable in other engineering disciplines [14], we utilize this conceptual framework toemphasize that ethics and character are “coming along for the ride” in professional engineeringpractice.The ‘Snail Progression of Ethical Instruction’In this paper, we propose the Snail Progression of Ethical Instruction (Figure 1) as a novel wayto embed ethical content across the biomedical engineering curriculum. As biomedical engineers,our students are uniquely poised at the interface of technology and human health and thereforethe ethical
opportunities and challenges. deployment of AI.Our camp developed a custom curriculum to give the participants a learningexperience that is often curated toward college students and early careerprofessionals.We partnered with highly regarded faculty (and their graduates students) tointroduce the history of AI, how it has developed and some of the dangers ofthe increased reliance on technologyFaculty from our partner institution led workshops and discussions onunderstanding and forming ethical and moral positions.The students worked in groups to develop projects and complete assignmentsthroughout the week, with assistance of academic and industry leaders toreinforce their
technicalelective courses for the student’s concentration. The disciplinary design courses do, however, Page 4.513.2contain some required core topics that are required of all students and these topics are covered ina modular approach, for example integrated product and process design.The threads on communications, use of computers and social, ethical and moral issues are alsoenhanced in the Design Spine compared to the previous curriculum. A new thread on industrialecology (e.g. life cycle analysis and design for environment) is added to address what willincreasingly become an overarching consideration in the engineering profession, namelysustainable growth
Paper ID #22734Work in Progress: An Investigation of a College of Engineering Underrepre-sented Minority Students’ Perceptions of Inclusive Co-curricular Spaces andStudent Support Programs Beyond the First Year.Cherish C. Vance, Texas A&M University Cherish Vance is a doctoral student in the Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, having also received a B.S. in Biological and Agricultural Engineering from Texas A&M University in 2013. She actively participates as an Ambassador for Texas A&M’s Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate. Additionally, she serves on the Climate Council for
AC 2011-556: INTEGRATED STEM-BASED PROJECTS TO INSPIRE K-12 STUDENTS TO PURSUE UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMSIN ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERINGQING ZHENG, Gannon University Qing Zheng received the M.Eng. degree from the National University of Singapore in 2003 and the Ph.D. degree from the Cleveland State University in 2009, both in electrical engineering. She is currently an assistant professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Gannon University. Her research interests include modeling, estimation, control and optimization for complex systems, such as chemical processes, MEMS, hysteretic systems, biological systems, power systems, etc. Dr. Zheng is an IEEE senior member and an Associate
&U Greater Expectations project and the Clarkson Common Experience.In an earlier white paper on liberal education in engineering,5 Steneck, et al, considered threetypical curriculum delivery models and recommended the integration of all three models. TheCommon Experience curriculum incorporates each of these models in its implementation.Traditional Humanities and Social Science Courses: Courses addressing the various studentlearning outcomes in six areas of knowledge are predominantly from the humanities and socialsciences disciplines. However, these courses must address specific learning outcomes in one ormore of the knowledge areas, so the concept of humanities and social science courses, per se, isno longer relevant to the curriculum
, programs and corporate interests. This social network issupported by an implicit incentive system that benefits everyone. Our study characterizesthe incentive-benefit network of a small-scale group assessment project.Another important concept is the development of an assessment technique for averagedgroup assessment when the concepts to be measured do not lend themselves easily to Page 11.237.9classical methods of testing and grading. Taking a client out to lunch may, in manyways, influence the success or failure of a professional’s career more than rememberinghow to solve a complex integration problem—yet educational programs shy away fromteaching the
curriculum in theirclassrooms. A thematic analysis of the data revealed that teachers associated computationalthinking with specific coding activities, an interdisciplinary subject, and a problem-solvingprocess.IntroductionOver the years the presence of engineering as well as computer science (CS) education in K-12classrooms in the U.S. has increased. In essence, numerous programs and curricula have beendeveloped to support pre-college engineering and computer science education for formal andinformal learning settings [1-3]. This presence and integration of engineering/CS in K-12 is animportant phenomenon due to the implications it has for the future of STEM education [4]. Infact, a variety of positive outcomes have resulted from engineering
Paper ID #37979Understanding Expert Perceptions of PBL Integration in IntroductoryAerospace Engineering Courses: Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups withPBL and Aerospace Engineering InstructorsDr. Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Andrew Olewnik is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the Univer- sity at Buffalo. His research includes undergraduate engineering education with focus on engineering design, problem-based learning, co-curricular involvement and its impact on professional formation, and the role of reflection practices in supporting engineering
AC 2005-226: DESIGN, RAPID PROTOTYPE, CAST, AND TEST AN ALUMINUMLINKRichard Griffin, Texas A&M University at Qatar Page 10.414.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2005 Design, Rapid Prototype, Cast, and Test an Aluminum Link Richard B. Griffin and Terry Creasy Mechanical Engineering- 3123 Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3123Abstract Integrated design, rapid prototyping, manufacturing processes, and testing has beenaccomplished in a junior materials and manufacturing class. Students are given a design space
once underrepresented students joined the research group. In such process, the facultymember serves as a mentor by providing extensive technical guidance, role modeling approachesto problem solving, and advocating post-graduation career venues. These academic resources arenecessary components for securing employment post-graduation or establishing fundamentalresearch knowledge for graduate school.Post-graduation InstructionBased on the open-ended question, students shared relevant information about receiving guidancerelating to Mechanical Engineering curriculum, undergraduate resources, summer internships, andgraduate programs. One student, in particular, alluded that the faculty advisor invested time inexplaining the benefits of pursuing an
instructionalmodules for use in existing courses.Four core chemical engineering courses are targeted: fluid flow operations, heattransfer operations, mass transfer operations, and chemical reactor design. Overthe three-year CCLI project, activities/modules will be developed andincorporated into each of these courses, with each activity/module focusing on aparticular element from the process intensification spectrum and designed to alsoenhance vertical concept integration. This poster presentation will focus on theactivities and modules developed in Year 1.INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUNDThe chemical industry faces numerous challenges in the coming years due todecreasing availability of raw material and energy resources. Thus, existingprocesses must operate in an
part of cornerstone (i.e. first-year) and capstone (i.e. senior-year) design courses. These design courses are often significantand memorable experiences in students’ education where they actually get to design—and maybeeven build and fly—an aerospace vehicle. While the importance of design courses in aerospaceengineering education is clear, they only make up a small part of the curriculum. After studentshave an exciting and engaging first-year design experience, students’ sophomore and junioryears are dominated by core technical subjects such as mechanics of materials, aerodynamics,propulsion, and controls. We define these non-design and non-lab courses (although they mayhave lab components) as engineering science courses. For example, at the
courses. She aspires to understand and improve student attitude, achievement, and persistence in student-centered courses.Mrs. Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University Lindy Hamilton Mayled is a PhD candidate at Grand Canyon University. She is pursuing her PhD in Psychology of Learning, Education, and Technology. Her background in in K-12 education where she has served as a high school science teacher, Instructional and Curriculum Coach, and Assistant Principal. Her research and areas of interest are in improving STEM educational outcomes for Low-SES students through the integration of active learning and technology-enabled frequent feedback. She currently works as the Project Manager for the NSF faculty
First common year (FCY) newly added courses through sophomore (second year), junior (third year), and senior years (fourth year). 3. Evaluating the impact of the newly added courses on the attainment of ABET student outcomes 1-7. An example of how the FYC content is carried out and integrated into the petroleum engineering curriculum is presented in this paper. Furthermore, the paper shows how ABET student outcomes were mapped to these courses.1. Background Engineering is the process of developing an efficient mechanism that quickens and eases the work using limited resources, with the help of technology. Adding computational thinking, bio-inspired engineering, and ethics /humanities courses to the first-year curriculum is an
Paper ID #37030Biologically Inspired Design for Engineering Education-9th/10th Grade Engineering Unit (Curriculum Exchange)Roxanne Moore (Research Engineer II) Roxanne Moore is a Senior Research Engineer in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on design and engineering education with a focus on promoting diversity and inclusion. She has served as PI and co-PI for grants from multiple sponsors including NSF and Amazon totaling more than $9M. In addition, her
An Undergraduate State-Space Theory Course with Emphasis on Designs Chiu H. Choi, Ph.D., P.E. Electrical Engineering Program Division of Engineering University of North Florida Jacksonville, Florida 32224AbstractA new approach of enhancing undergraduate engineering courses is proposed in this paper. Theenhancement is the integration into the courses a wide range of practical design problems ofwhich the solutions require in-depth knowledge of computational software package. Thisapproach was tried on an undergraduate-level state-space theory course. The reasons
3-dimensional flows32-33.Another module in development uses a home-built microstereolithography apparatus for makingpolyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel structures.In conclusion we are pleased that most students find the course interesting and useful, as we feelthat nano/micro scale manufacturing does have an important place in the ME curriculum. Wewill continue to update the course to keep it novel and relevant as this field is still rapidlychanging. Our main goal for the short term is to make the course transparent and teachable by awider range of faculty so we can maintain a good learning experience as the course continues togrow.AcknowledgementsThis course would not have been possible without the generous support of the LufkinFoundation
strongfoundational skills in traditional power systems topics, with added skills in integration ofrenewable and distributed resources and in energy data analytics. In this paper, we present the process and initial outcomes of a collaborative two-institutionproject aimed at updating the undergraduate (UG) power engineering curriculum at bothinstitutions. The added educational modules focus on electric power distribution systems,renewable energy systems, and energy data analytics. In addition to new lecture modules, thecurriculum update revolves around active and situative learning methodologies, in an effort to helpstudents place topics into context and equip them to grasp effects of the emerging changes andtechnologies. The paper is organized as
assistant professor of Computer Graphics Technology at Purdue University. He holds a BAin Telecommunications and an MS Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction. Prior to working at Purdue University, Carlosworked as a Technical Director. His research interest includes distance learning, animation, and multimediadevelopment. He can be reached at crmorales@tech.purdue.edu Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Page 8.660.10
Auction, Dr. Chris Carroll and Dr. Tom Kaziorfrom Raytheon and Dr. John Vaughan from MA/Com. The issue of integrated curriculum is ofprime importance to these national leaders. Preparing the students at UMASS Lowell with aproper mix of engineering fundamentals and training at state-of-art technology, so that they arereproductive on the job right away in the topmost percentage. It is because of this sublimeendeavor of the department in general, and that of the author in particular, there is hardly any Hi- Page 11.186.2Tech industry in the nation, where our alumni are not in significant numbers in leading jobs.Details of all these endeavors will be
STEM teaching and learning with local STEM related resources guided thedesign of our week-long integrated STEM K-12 teacher professional development (PD) program,i-STEM. We have completed four years of our i-STEM PD program and have made place-basedSTEM a major emphasis of our curriculum. This report focuses on the data collected in thefourth year of our program. Our week-long i-STEM PD served over 425 educators last summer(2013), providing them with in depth theme-based integrated STEM short courses which werelimited to an average of 15 participants and whole group plenary sessions focused around placed-based integrated STEM, inquiry, engineering design, standards and practices of Common Coreand 21st Century skills. This state wide PD was
culturallyimmersive China context. It is these experiences, skills, and opportunities that have beendeemed necessary to prepare graduates for the rapidly globalizing and highly technicalworld they are entering according to industry and the Accreditation Board forEngineering & Technology (ABET). Success factors include: • The transition to an experiential learning curriculum that cross-cultural, multidisciplinary student teams employ in assessing new ventures and internal growth opportunities presented by startup or established firms, • The inclusion of an executive education style workshop attended by sponsor firm personnel, and Page
focusing on developing an embedded system curriculum with the follow-ing innovative features: (a) an interdisciplinary curriculum and (b) integration of research resultsinto teaching. The design of embedded systems requires knowledge from many different disci-plines. For this purpose, we have designed a sequence of interdisciplinary courses for impartingembedded systems design education. The course entitled “Real-time Systems Theory” is a part ofthis curriculum. This course directly imports ideas developed as part of our research in embeddedsystems. The aim of this course is to provide students with a strong theoretical foundation fordesigning and analyzing embedded systems. This paper will present the motivation for designingthis course, the
. Page 6.907.8 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ? 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences1. Felder, R.M., Bernold, L.E., Burniston, E.E., Gastineau, J.E., and O’Neal, J.B., “An Integrated First-Year Engi- neering Curriculum at North Carolina State University,” 1995 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, November 1995.2. Felder, R.M., Bernold, L.E., Burniston, E.E., Dail, P.R., and Gastineau, J.E., “IMPEC: An Integrated First-Year Engineering Curriculum,” 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, D.C., June 1996.3. Felder, R.M., Beichner, R.J., Bernold, L.E., Burniston, E.E., and
evaluation purposesGillian Roehrig (Professor)Elizabeth Ring-whalen Elizabeth A. Ring-Whalen is an Assistant Professor of Education at St. Catherine University in St. Paul, MN and the Director of the National Center for STEM in Elementary Education (NCSEE). She received her PhD in Curriculum and Instruction - STEM Education from the University of Minnesota in 2017. Her research focuses on STEM education and what this looks like in PreK-12 classrooms and explores teachers’ beliefs of integrated STEM as well as how these beliefs influence teachers’ practices and student achievement in the classroom. Alongside this research, she has worked to explore the attitudes and beliefs teachers hold about cultural diversity and
[1,2]. In 2018, 57% ofAmerican students in eighth grade indicated that they had taken or were taking one or moreclasses related to engineering or technology, an increase from 52% in 2014 [3]. Engineering maybe taught as a stand-alone topic or integrated with other STEM (science, technology,engineering, and mathematics) fields [1]. As a result, many students entering engineering majorsin college are likely to have some knowledge and/or preconceptions about engineering. It isimportant that from the beginning, students understand the important role of ethics inengineering.Engineering ethics includes both microethics and macroethics. Microethics encompassesindividual responsibilities (such as avoiding bribery and issues such as cheating in an