Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Silver, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Elizabeth Friedman, The University of Illinois, Chicago

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

result in delivery of a better master’s level education. Finally, experience with anIDP acclimates the students to personal development plans/assessments widely used in theworkplace and to the necessity of ongoing planning and awareness for continuous professionaldevelopment.Acknowledgement:The STEM IDP workshop and msIDP initial development (Nov 10, 2021) was supported by theNational Science Foundation (Award Abstracts #1940221, #193934) through a collaborativegrant to the NPSMA (P.I. Deborah Silver, Rutgers) and CGS (P.I. Hironao Okahana). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References:[1

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Danowitz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Kacey Beddoes, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

under grants EEC#1929484 and #1929478. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] R. L. Spitzer, K. Kroenke, J. B. Williams, and P. H. Q. P. C. S. Group, “Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study,” Jama, vol. 282, no. 18, pp. 1737–1744, 1999.[2] R. P. Cameron and D. Gusman, “The primary care PTSD screen (PC-PTSD): development and operating characteristics,” Primary Care Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2003.[3] D. Van Dam, T. Ehring, E. Vedel, and P. M. G. Emmelkamp, “Validation of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tony Hills, Northwest State Community College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] C. Singleton, C. DeBeck, J. Chung, D. McMillen, S. Craig, S. Moore, C. Hammond, J. Dwyer, M. Frydrych, O. Villadsen, R. Emerson, G.-V. Jorudan, V. Onut, S. Carruthers, A. Laurie, M. Alvarez, S. Wuttke, G. Prassions, J. Zorabedian, M. Mayne, L. Kessem, I. Gallagher and A. Eitan, "X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2022," IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, 2022.[2] S. M. Loo and L. Babinkostova, "Cyber-Physical Systems Security Introductory Course for STEM Students," ASEE 2020 Annual Conference, 2020.[3] J. Ekong, V. Chauhan, J. Osedeme, S. Niknam and R. Nguyen, "A framework for Industry 4.0 workforce training through project-based and experiential learning approaches," ASEE Annual

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle E Jarvie-Eggart P.E., Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

generalizability of the results to an international context.Currently, additional faculty are being surveyed as to which of these suggested interventions topromote engineering technology adoption would be most appealing and most likely to be utilizedby them. The results of these surveys will inform focus groups that will flesh out more detailsand structures of chosen interventions. Work is also underway to expand the survey to includeengineering faculty at another university.Acknowledgement:This work was funded by the National Science Foundation award # 2024970. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References: 1. Schwab, K. (2017

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shengfan Zhang, University of Arkansas; Eric Specking, University of Arkansas

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

industry advisors helpedthe participating teachers develop modules reflecting current cutting-edge research in dataanalytics as well as gain a better understanding of the development needs for next-generationdata analytics workforce. In this paper, we summarize key activities of the AR-DATA program,including findings from the application process, the six-week summer program, and academicyear follow-up. We analyze the teachers’ expectation and feedback of the program as well as thelearning modules developed and piloted in the classroom. Finally, we present challenges andopportunities for sustainability of the AR-DATA program.IntroductionThe Arkansas Data Analytics Teacher Alliance (AR-DATA) program was established in 2020,funded by the National

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chrysafis Vogiatzis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Stephanie Marie Teixeira-Poit, North Carolina A&T State University; Tobin N. Walton, North Carolina A&T State University; Grace Gowdy, North Carolina A&T State University ; Bala Ram P.E., North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

that position the self within networks of social relationships (Burke& Stets, 2010). This positioning includes seeing oneself as similar to some and different from others;(Walton & Jones, 2018). Individuals hold multiple identities all of which are dynamic, yet provideindividuals a sense of consistency and stability by connecting the past with one’s (perceived) futuretrajectory through providing an answer to the question, who am I? Importantly, the self-meanings thatconstitute one’s identity are built up from social interactions and the reflected appraisals of others. Itfollows then that academic departments with stronger bonding capital (i.e., resources and information),likely provide students with more interactive opportunities to

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joana Marques Melo, Purdue University; Maeve Drummond Oakes, Purdue University; Allison Godwin, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

work supported by the National Science Foundation under awardnumber EEC-1647722. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.The authors wish to thank Jennifer Mamph and Cristina Farmus for the support in collecting thisdata.References[1] M. Drummond Oakes, M. E. Cardella, M. Sydlik, and K. M. Everett, “Board 41: DevelopingSummer Research Programs at an NSF ERC: Activities, Assessment, and Adaptation,” presentedat the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019, Accessed: Jan. 07, 2021.[Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-41-developing-summer-research-programs-at-an-nsf-erc

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: K-12 Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rebekah J, Hammack, Montana State University; Nick Lux, Montana State University; Paul Gannon, Montana State University; Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

means to identify FoI in both child and adult populations.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Research in theFormation of Engineers program under Grant Number EEC- 1916673. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Esteban-Guitart, M. & Moll, L. C. (2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on funds of knowledge approach. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 31-48.[2] Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carl A. Nelson P.E., University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Greg Bashford P.E., University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. We also wish to acknowledge the many faculty mentors who contributed tothis project, as well as the Bureau of Sociological Research at UNL for assisting with programevaluation.References Cited[1] Cesar Guerrero, Miguel Labrador, Rafael Perez, 2007, “Enhancing the Global Perspective ofREU Site Students,” ASEE 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii.[2] Robert Nerenberg, 2006, “Challenges and Opportunities in Working With Minority/OverseasREU Students,” ASEE 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois.[3] Terri Camesano, David

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carl A. Nelson P.E., University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Judith Marie Burnfield, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals' Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering; Linxia Gu, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Adam Wagler, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; William Edward Dick, Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

studentsprovides mutual benefits, particularly improved understanding of stakeholder requirements forthe engineering students and the realism of working with a product development team for theadvertising students. Achievement of certain student outcomes targeted in engineeringaccreditation criteria is an added benefit.AcknowledgementsThis material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant Number 1159626. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References Cited[1] Don Dekker, Stephen Sundarrao, Rajiv Dubey, 2007, “Capstone Design and theRehabilitation Engineering Program

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Cavicchi, University of Akron; John Fellenstein, University of Akron

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

with the Ohio Science Standards, which list designingtechnological/engineering solutions using science concepts as one of four cognitive demands andemphasizes real-world applications in demonstrating content mastery.5 The focus is alsoconsistent with National Science Standards that emphasize both that “science and engineeringare integrated in K–12 science education and K–12 science education should reflect real-worldinterconnections in science.”6ActivitiesThe RET site ran as an eight week program each summer. The program met for five days thefirst week and four day each subsequent week. This is a similar number of days to a five day perweek/six week program, but the extended total time of the program allows the teachers the timeto adjust to

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University; Austin Spencer Bohlin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Science Foundation CAREER grantunder Grant No. 1150874. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References 1. Golish, B. L., Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., & Shuman, L. J. (2008). Comparing academic and corporate technology development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Mangagement, 25, 47–62. 2. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). 16 implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. Handbook of Creativity, 313. 3. Fila, N. D., Purzer, Ş., & Mathis, P. D. (2014). I’m not the creative type: Barriers to creativity in student engineering innovation projects

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech; Cassandra J. Groen, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

engineering service-learningprograms [28, 29] are more likely to pursue a graduate degree or enter the engineeringworkforce, maintain a greater belonging to the engineering field, and experience increasedgrowth in professional and professional skills.However, despite these positive impacts, undergraduate engineering students are less likely totake advantage of such experiences than their non-engineering counterparts and spendsignificantly more time on academic coursework [30]. While this may reflect a traditionaltendency to focus on technical competencies in engineering education, current thinking amongengineering professionals, as evidenced in engineering education standards, aligns with moregeneral trends in undergraduate education that emphasize

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Wood, University of Notre Dame; Alisa Zornig Gura, University of Notre Dame; Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame; Sam Alptekin

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

to understand changes in student outcomesfrom the initiation of the internship to its end. The pre/post testing was delivered througha digital survey instrument using Qualtrics software and included quantitative Likert-typescaling and qualitative open-ended questions. Other qualitative data was collectedthrough reflections, interviews, and ethnographic observations. Qualitative data was usedto provide context, augmentation, and nuance. Ethnographic observations providedinsights to the learning environment, culture, and other socially constructedprogrammatic concerns. This study was submitted to and approved through theUniversity of Notre Dame’s Institutional Review Board.Analysis and FindingsAfter data cleaning, quantitative information from

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech; Scott T. Huxtable, Virginia Tech; Sathyanarayanan Subramanian, Virginia Tech; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

of the project.AcknowledgmentThis research is supported by the NSF under IUSE #1712210. The contents of this manuscript donot necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the funding agency.Reference[1] Dalryrmple, O., Sears, D., & Evangelou, D. (2011). The motivational and transfer potential of disassemble/analyze/assemble activities. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 741-759[2] Grantham, K., Okudan, G., Simpson, T. W., & Ashour, O. (2010). A study on situated cognition: product dissection’s effect on redesign activities. In ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, (pp. 617-626). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.[3] Simpson, T

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Courtney A. Betoney, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Tyrine Jamella Pangan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic; Ieshya Anderson, Arizona State University; J. A. Fernandez, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

criteria, brainstorm ideas, select a solution, and create a cardboard prototype of a solution to the problem. 3. Introduction to the Engineering Profession. In this lesson, students are introduced to the profession of engineering through the people who are engineers. Stories of Navajo engineers and the impact they make are shared, and students are asked to reflect on their own motivations as they explore potential career pathways. 4. Solving a Problem with the Scientific Method and the Diné Engineering Design Process. In this lesson, students learn about and explain differences between the scientific method and the engineering design process, and then conduct hypothetical investigations using the different

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Faculty Development 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hadi Ali, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

the additive innovation cycle. Participants were selected to create a coherentcommunity of uniform rank and shared perspective on the importance of teaching. Data werecollected from each participant in multiple forms: teaching artifacts they created, surveys,reflective interviews, and videos of stories about the experience. Details about each stage of theadditive innovation cycle, including collected data, are provided in [3].Overview of case study researchCharacteristics and advantages of case study researchCase study research has been used ubiquitously in psychology [9], sociology [10], politicalscience [11], social work [12], business [13], and community planning [14]. Case study researchis suitable when research questions ask about the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: K-12 Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Stacey V. Freeman, Boston University; Sandra Lina Rodegher, Boston University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

collaborative relationship with theEngineering Ambassadors Network and located other engineering ambassador programs aroundthe country that focus on broadening the participation of underserved groups in engineering.Fifty stakeholders participated in 30-45 minute interviews.Phase Two: Research Agenda Meeting (March 2019 – August 2019)During this phase, the steering committee is co-planning the research agenda meeting informedby the initial interview findings. The meeting will take place in September 2019.Phase Three: Research Agenda Proposal (September 2019 – March 2020)During this phase, we will create an iterative process of synthesis which allows for stakeholdersto reflect on, respond to, and otherwise inform the findings of the proposal writing

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Learning Tools (Hands On)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Aldo A. Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technology; James I. Craig, Georgia Institute of Technology; Bonnie H. Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Benjamin Klein, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

onmany different levels. Active learning and other evidence-based learning strategies promote adeeper understanding of complex material because students are forced to think about the materialand apply fresh concepts to new situations [1]-[4]. Hands-on learning is a particular form ofactive learning where students engage in a topic in several different ways including sight, sound,and tactile sensory input [5]-[8]. While engaging multiple senses, students can interact with otherstudents and reflect on how their understanding of some topic can be used to explain a particularphenomenon. When the hands-on experiences are well-designed, students can go beyond thelecture material and observe how theory is manifested in the real world. Unfortunately

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Xinrui (rose) Xu, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Alexandra Marie Dukes, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. (1505006). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References[1] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the numbers,” in Engineering College Profiles & Statistics Book, Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education, 2011, pp. 11-47.[2] J. Mortimer, M. Shanahan, and M. Johnson, Handbook of the Life Course. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2003.[3] J. Blickenstaff, “Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?” Gender and Education, vol. 17, no. (4), pp. 369-386

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danyelle Tauryce Ireland, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Penny Rheingans, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Lee Blaney, UMBC; Marie desJardins, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; E. F. Charles LaBerge, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Susan Martin, University of Maryland; Carolyn Seaman, UMBC; Gymama Slaughter, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Anne Marie Spence, Baylor University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Leaders from Baccalaureate-Granting Institutions. 2011, College Board. 10. Hrabowski III, F., Fostering first-year success of underrepresented minorities, in Challenging & Supporting the First-Year Student, M.L. Upcraft, Gardner, J.N., and Barefoot, B., Editors. 2005, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA. p. 125-140. 11. Jewett, S. and Martin, S. “STEM Transfer Success: The Value of Critical Reflection and Shared Responsibility.” Evollution. Published online, August 20, 2015.http://evolllution.com/attracting-students/accessibility/stem-transfer-success-the- value-of-critical-reflection-and-shared-responsibility/ 12. Jewett, S. and Martin S. “STEM Transfer Success: Reflecting on Lessons Learned.” Evollution

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; James A Middleton, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Robert J Culbertson, Department of Physics, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Elizabeth Lopez, Arizona State University; Yong Seok Park, California State University Fullerton; Bethany B Smith, University of California, Berkeley

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

)encouragemetacognitiontobuildhabitsofexpertlearnerswhodefinetheirlearninggoalsandmonitortheirownprogress.These principles were realized through student reflection, student engagement, andcontextualizationofconceptsbylinkingabstractconceptstoreal-worldconcreteexamples.Thepositiveimpactofthisapproachoffacultybeliefswasshownwithasurveytakenafterthreeyearsontheproject.Itfoundthateightoutofeightfacultysaid,inthelasttwoyearsof using JTF pedagogy, their classroom practice had "changed somewhat or changedsignificantly." One quote illustrating this was, "I teach using full engagement strategies....previousclassesweremuchmorelecture-centric."Anotherquestionshowedthat7of8feltthat their views about teaching had changed "somewhat or significantly." On an open-endedsurveyfacultywerequeried,"HowdoyouviewyourroleintheclassroomnowascomparedtobeforejoiningJTF

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Debra A. Major, Old Dominion University; Seterra D. Burleson, Old Dominion University; Xiaoxiao Hu, Old Dominion University; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

points, first prior to the start of fall semester before taking any engineeringcourses (Time 1). They were surveyed again at the close of fall semester, their first semester inthe engineering program (Time 2). Students were provided time during summer orientation aswell as class time to complete each survey. In total, 2315 participants completed the engineeringidentity measure at Time 1 (n = 1,900) and Time 2 (n = 1083). To assess students’ persistence inengineering, retention information was obtained at the beginning of their second year, and thisinformation reflected their major status at the end of the previous academic year (Time 3).MeasuresA five-item measure of engineering identity utilized in this study was developed and validated asa

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Anagnos, A. Lyman-Hold, C. Marin-Artieda, and E. Momsen, “Impact of engineering ambassador programs on student development.” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 15 (3), 14-20. 2014.3. C.R. Smaill, “The implementation and evaluation of a university-based outreach laboratory program in electrical engineering.” IEEE Transactions on Education 53 (1), 12-17, 2010.4. L. Nadelson and J. Callaghan, “A comparison of two engineering outreach programs for adolescents,” Journal of STEM Education 12 (1), 43-54, 2011.5. J.R. Amos and M-C. Brunet, Pre-post assessment in a speaking communications course and the importance of reflection in student development of speaking skills, ASEE Conference and Exposition, June 25-28

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech; Dustin M. Grote, Virginia Tech; David B. Knight, Virginia Tech; Abbey Rowe Erwin, Virginia Tech; Bevlee A. Watford P.E., Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

need be remedied. Ultimately, these findings illuminate and help prioritizethe human, financial, and physical resources dedicated towards supporting all transfer students inengineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation EngineeringEducation and Centers under Grant Number DUE-1644138. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott W Campbell, University of South Florida; Sylvia W. Thomas, University of South Florida; Venkat R. Bhethanabotla, University of South Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

group specializes in characterizing, modeling, and integrating materials that demonstrate high levels of biocompatibility, thermal reflectivity, mechanical robustness, and environmental sustainability, such as carbides, sol-gel coatings, high temperature oxides, and sev- eral polymers. Her research is interdisciplinary in nature and fosters collaborations with Chemical and Biomedical, Mechanical, and Environmental Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Public Health, Medicine, and the Nanotechnology Research and Education Center (NREC).Prof. Venkat R. Bhethanabotla, University of South Florida Venkat Bhethanabotla obtained his BS from Osmania University in Hyderabad, India, and Ph.D. from Penn State in Pennsylvania, USA

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Cheryl Matherly; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

/intercultural experiences contributedmost to the individual’s global preparedness as identified in Study One. The resultantbackground survey instrument consisted of four components: profile characteristics (e.g., gender,age, class standing,), educational background (e.g., university, major, QPA), travel abroad/international experiences (e.g., level of interest in international issues, foreign languageproficiency), and characteristics of the international experiences (e.g., programmatic elements ofexperiences such as duration, amount of reflection, and comfort zone). The background surveyitems also provided independent predictor variables to help explain the results of the outcomeinstruments (EGPI and GPI). Samples (from each of the four partner

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton; Melissa Rose Taylor, University of Dayton; Ahsan Mian, Wright State Unviersity; Sandra M Preiss, Dayton Regional STEM Center; Leanne Petry, Central State University; M. Suzanne Franco

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

teachers and pre-service teachers joinedother professionals in the region in an immersive materials “boot camp” facilitated by ASM priorto the start of their research experience. Field trips, guest speakers and group work that producedK-12 curriculum complemented the teams’ research experience. During the culminatingactivities, the groups presented the STEM curriculum developed, the final laboratory projectresults and provided regular guided reflections regarding their efforts during the six-weekprogram. Local System Change (LSC), Mathematics Teaching Efficacy and Beliefs Instrument(MTEBI) and Science Teaching Efficacy and Beliefs Instrument (STEBI) surveys wereadministered to identify changes in attitudes, beliefs and practices. Results of the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven D Hart, Virginia Military Institute; Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Matthew W Roberts, Southern Utah University; Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

published in future ASEE Annual Conferenceproceedings as well as on the CIT-E website.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1323279. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 26.785.4

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chelsea Mann, Arizona State University; Kristen Parrish, Arizona State University; Mikhail Chester, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

red will work alongside the Transportation group in CEE/SOS 598, the five teams highlighted in green will work alongside the Environment group in CEE/SOS 598, and the five teams highlighted in orange will work alongside the Social/Institutions group in CEE/SOS 598.Second Implementation: Spring 2015In the second implementation, overall project themes better reflect one another to promotevertical integration between the two courses. The vertical integration process is shown in Figure3 below. ! CON$252$ ! Responsibili+es