eitherstudent success or engineering lab tours. The student success topics presented to the on-sitestudents included time management, GPA calculation, resume building and internshipopportunities, library services, and personal learning styles.The faculty lectures discussed the engineering design process; engineering disciplines;importance of mathematics in engineering, chemistry and computers in engineering; leanmanufacturing; engineering mechanics; data analysis and visualization; ethics; professionallicensure; and career searches. Content varied from material that would be included infreshmen engineering courses to material that introduced advanced (upper-level) engineeringcourses. The portion of the SBP program involving industry professionals as
indicates the presence of all fourpathways. All results taken together demonstrate how understanding individuals’ experiencesthrough early childhood and high school can evolve or stagnate with age and development.1. IntroductionIt is the unique experiences and perceptions of an individual which develop personal identity;often each of those experiences are heavily influenced by others surrounding us [1-2]. One’schoice in a college, or major, or even a particular career path is shaped by both positive andnegative perceptions of prior experiences, often emerging from passions or interests developedthroughout childhood [3]. Perception is a subjective evaluation of these experiences, and thus,positive and negative experiences differ from person to
only attended to in preparation for career fairs and interviews. In this study, weexplored the role of reflection on students’ abilities to communicate their engineering experiencesin professional terms. Students participated in formative reflection about specific professionalcompetencies scaffolded around engineering problem typology (EPT). We conducted mockinterviews (MI) pre-/post-PT based professional competency reflection with undergraduateengineering students. Analysis showed statistically significant improvement in MI evaluationscores. Through qualitative analysis of interview transcripts for the teamwork interview questionwe identify specific features of student responses that changed from pre to post mock interviews.The findings from
asystematic review of literature on the impact(s) of involving undergraduates in engineeringoutreach with a particular focus on studies that report on the impact on the undergraduatestudents. Supporting this effort is the NSF EArly-concept Grant for Exploratory Research(EAGER) program.Introduction In response to the need to increase interest and persistence in STEM careers, manyuniversities have created organized outreach initiatives. Engineering outreach by undergraduatestudents takes different forms but can include leading summer camps, teaching afterschoolprograms, conducting classroom presentations, and hosting engineering fairs and competitionson colleges campuses. The focus of evaluation efforts for K-12 outreach programs is typically
before joining the PhD program at Texas Tech. His current research interests include microfluidics, machine learning, holography and biomedical instrumentation.Mrs. Chamila Kalpani DissanayakeDr. Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University Dr. Paula Monaco, E.I.T., successfully defended her dissertation research Spring 2016 and began a career as a wastewater consultant with Alan Plummer Associates. Paula has led multiple outreach summer programs at Texas Tech University and provides support to student organizations within the college of engineering.Dr. Susan A. Mengel, Texas Tech University Susan Mengel, Texas Tech University Dr. Susan Mengel is an associate professor in the Computer Science Department of the Edward E
got the intention to start a firm one day 6. I intend to start a firm within five years of graduation Positive View of Entrepreneurship – from Gundry and Welsch (2001) 1. Being an entrepreneur implies more advantages than disadvantages to me 2. A career as an entrepreneur is attractive for me 3. If I had the opportunity and resources, I would love to start a business 4. Being an entrepreneur would give me great satisfaction 5. Among various options, I would rather be an entrepreneur Table 1. Survey Questions for Entrepreneurial Affinity Found in Solesvik (2013)Participants came from sections of the class offered in the fall and spring semesters, resulting intwo separate cohorts. The students in each cohort did not work together, and
Paper ID #25694The 5Ws of the Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of KnowledgeDr. Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at The University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama. Dr. Fridley has been recognized as a dedicated educator throughout his career and has received several awards for his teaching efforts, including the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Leadership Award
various national and regional conferences, with work appearing in The Science Teacherand on TeachEngineering.com, and has been awarded a National Endowment for the Humanities grant. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Argument Driven Engineering in Middle School Science Classrooms: A Growth Curve Model Analysis of Engineering Attitudes (RTP, Diversity)AbstractThe goal of this study was to examine how the use of a newly developed instructional model isrelated to changes in middle school students’ attitudes toward engineering and participation inengineering careers. Although the literature shows that much has already been
Strengthening Community College Engineering Transfer ProgramsAbstractBroadening participation in engineering among underrepresented minority students remains a bigchallenge for institutions of higher education. Since a large majority of underrepresentedstudents attend community colleges, engineering transfer programs at these community collegescan play an important role in addressing this challenge. However, for most community collegeengineering programs, developing strategies and programs to increase the number and diversityof students successfully pursuing careers in engineering is especially challenging due to limitedexpertise, shrinking resources and continuing budget crises.This paper is a description of how a small engineering
, students will be prepared topass the patent bar examination and become certified to practice patent law before the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. Hence, graduates of the ESIP-Project will have new career optionsincluding choices for becoming patent engineers and patent agents, in addition to traditionaltechnical career choices.This paper includes an overview of the three-course sequence, as well as evaluation results of theimplementation of the first course. A survey was designed by the investigators and implementedpre and post course. The survey included three constructs: Knowledge of IP Concepts, InnovativeProduct Design, and Careers in Patent Law. Following reliability testing procedures, studentresponses to these constructs were compared
’ perception of the relevance of physics and math,and found that students in general do not appreciate the importance of mathematics and physicsin engineering, neither as a professional career nor as a basis for other courses in their degree.We also found that first-semester students have a better perception of physics and mathematicsthan third-semester students and that the perception of the importance of mathematics is higherthan that of physics. These and other findings have helped us to recommend some actions to theDepartment of Mathematics and Physics of that university. After this experience, we conducted asimilar study with engineering students in a Mexican university. This study’s populationconsisted of 1073 students taking first and third
learning, and preparation of engineering graduate students for future careers. Her dissertation research focuses on studying the writing and argumentation patterns of engineering graduate students.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity and is the Inaugural Director of the Engineering Leadership Minor. She obtained a B.S. in mathemat- ics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering
Paper ID #31419Reauthoring Engineering Identities as Belonging to a Community EngagedProfessionDr. James L. Huff, Harding University James Huff is an assistant professor of engineering at Harding University, where he primarily teaches multidisciplinary engineering design. His research interests are aligned with how engineering students develop in their career identity while also developing as whole persons. James received his Ph.D. in engineering education and his M.S. in electrical and computer engineering, both from Purdue University. He received his bachelor’s in computer engineering at Harding University.Degnan William
-world situations, students find the material more engaging. 2It has been pointed that “improving performance in the STEM subjects and inspiring youngpeople to consider careers in science, technology engineering and mathematics are complexgoals that only can be achieved by a multifaceted, systematics and sustainable initiative [6].” Thekey to success is changing the school culture to one of collaboration with high expectations andcontinual reflection for growth. We propose that given the right environment, schools canincrease the quality of STEM instruction through an integrated and hands-on approach. The P-TECH 9-14 school model aims to create
students. In 2018 and 2019, she collaborated with Dr. Kavitha Chandra to utilize participatory action research (PAR) as an evaluation approach for the Research, Academics, and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) summer program for first-year female engineering students.Prof. Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Kavitha Chandra is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering in the Francis College of Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She directs the Research, Academics and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) to Success program that aims to estab- lish successful pathways to graduate school and interdisciplinary careers for new undergraduate students
currently working on the Space Engineering Institute CubeSat team and is on the Texas A&M Rugby team. She served as the day-to-day coordinator on the Discover Engineering Conference. Page 11.487.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Discover Engineering - A High School Conference for Students and TeachersIntroductionThe Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University held its first DiscoverEngineering conference on Saturday, October 22, 2005. The goals of the conference were tointerest high school students in a career in engineering and inform parents and
, teaching is an important aspect of the faculty career. Providing engineeringgraduate students with opportunities to focus on teaching is one way to prepare future faculty fortheir faculty career (also a widely accepted national goal). In this paper, we focus on a programwe have created that addresses these two observations.This program, the Engineering Teaching Portfolio Program, is devoted to helping engineeringgraduate students advance their teaching ability. The Engineering Teaching Portfolio Program(ETPP) is only one of many efforts of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Center for theAdvancement of Engineering Education (CAEE). The ETPP is the primary program throughwhich the CAEE achieves one of the primary goals of the National Science
University of Wisconsin at MadisonAbstractThe Engineering Education Scholars Program (EESP) is a small but crucial endeavor in theNational Science Foundation’s (NSF) approach to stimulate a comprehensive reform ofundergraduate engineering education. For two summers, EESP has invited diverse groups ofseveral dozen, doctoral engineering students and junior faculty members to participate in aweeklong, hands-on workshop focused on teaching philosophy, classroom skills, and theessentials of the academic career. This paper outlines the background and scope of EESP, thebenefits enjoyed by participants, and tips on establishing EESP at other institutions.Participants testify to enjoying myriad benefits during and after EESP, especially in effectiveteaching
approach may leave students unsure about potential careers [3], since itoften does not include integrating innovation, ideation, and developing new products, which arecrucial areas within the cutting-edge BME field [1], [4].One way to improve BME students’ confidence in their career preparation has been to introducethem to undergraduate research in BME-specific areas, such as research experience forundergraduates (REU) programs [5], [6], [7], as a way to encourage them to pursue graduate-level research and apply their curricular knowledge to practice [2], [8]. Generally, REUprograms have encouraged development of communication skills through both oral presentationand writing technical research, laboratory and computer skills, and collaboration
within a curriculum. Adelman (op cit) reports that among men and women who indicatedengineering/architecture as their intended field, 54.3% of men and 21.3% of women earnedbachelor’s degrees in their intended field. He also shows that engineering attracts a relativelyhigh percentage of students who have a constant vision of their career goals and a low percentageof students who have a constantly changing vision.Kroc, et al4 considered graduation rates across university curricula using data for 130,000students from 44 universities. They considered graduation rates as a function of major, notingtrends in transfers between majors, considering in-migrants, or those who transfer intoengineering from another field and out-migrants, engineering
Republic (DR).1 Two coreobjectives of MACILE are: (1) to develop solutions to optimally increase access to challengingand stimulating learning environments and quality MACILE resources; and (2) to nurturetalented young people from less privileged backgrounds. It is hoped that these students will thenrise to the highest educational standards, pursue studies and careers in mathematics, science, andengineering fields, and make a difference in the world by creating opportunities to furtheradvance science and technology in their countries and communities and to promote sustainabledevelopment.MACILE started in the Itabo-Nigua (Ytabo) region of the DR. Ytabo is approximately 20 milessouthwest of the capital, Santo Domingo. The region includes six towns
help university-level educators understand the instructionalinfrastructure differences at schools, identify the barriers, and customize the outreach activities tocater to the needs of specific K-12 classes or groups. This will also aid schools in adhering to the“Nebraska College and Career-Ready Standards for Science” (NCCRS-S)[20],[21] which alignswell with the “Next Generation Science Standards” (NGSS).Given the vastness of Nebraska, it is also crucial to implement a system that can enhance STEMliteracy among demographics that are significantly underrepresented in STEM fields. However,the outreach activities and STEM camps organized at UNL primarily attracted students andteachers from nearby cities (Lincoln, Omaha), often missing those in
and nature. She is fascinated with how people and organizations learn and develop in ways that enable them to thrive. Rebecca’s career began in environmental education and outreach at places like the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and at a university in China, where her primary assignment as a Peace Corps Volunteer was environmental education. In 2009, she went on to work with the Institute of Environmental Decisions at ETH Zurich and, then, to earn her PhD at the University of Geneva, Switzerland, studying out-of-classroom science education. In 2017, she joined the Wisconsin Evaluation Collaborative, where she continues to support education programs through research and evaluation. She has published and
Engineering Education, 2011 MIND Links 2011: Resources to Motivate Minorities to Study and Stay In EngineeringAbstractThe Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND) of the American Society of EngineeringEducation (ASEE) created the MIND Links project in 2004, recognizing that, although there aremany resources available to inform, motivate, fund, mentor, promote, and support minorities andwomen to pursue a career in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, but finding theseresources is not easy. MIND Links gathers and updates each year links to resources in anorganized manner that is useful for parents, students, professionals, academics andadministrators. Special attention is paid to provide useful resources
failure. His other research interests include experimental nuclear medical physics, laser-based medical physics research in cerebral metabolic pathways of oxygen, petro physics, and petroleum fluid character- ization of reservoirs.Dr. Devdas M. Pai, North Carolina A&T State University Devdas Pai teaches and conducts research on manufacturing processes and materials engineering. Pai has lead effective education outreach activities under the ERC initiatives and implemented several pre- college programs to motivate and better pre-URM students for STEM careers. He has won several service awards including the NC A&T State University Outstanding Teacher Award for College of Engineering, ASME Region IV Faculty Advisor
the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering culture, engineering careers in the public sector, and ethics and equity in STEM. Dimpho has several years of experience in thDr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leadingDr. Andrea Chan, University of Toronto Andrea Chan is a Senior Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoMs. Emily Macdonald-Roach, University of Toronto
, and the resulting social capital’sinfluence on their persistence in the field, remain unexplored. Motivated by the literature thatassociates demographic identifiers with access to social capital, and students’ access todevelopmental relationships and career-related resources (social capital) in CS with theirpersistence, this study explores a CS support program’s impact on persistence through capitalbuilding. We focus on Google’s Computer Science Summer Institute (CSSI), which providedgraduating high school students with a 3-week-long introduction to CS. We use interviews withparticipants who are now 2-5 years out of the program to study CSSI’s impact on their socialcapital and long-term persistence in CS. Thematic analysis reveals three
explanation of the situation based on my own experiences.Table 2Composite Narrative ExampleComposite Narrative Excerpt Direct Quote from Manager Decisions in Developing a Narrative ThreadAs a recent graduate, Sofia is excited So we had hired in November of last year, an Each of the three excerpts focused on anto be a design engineer – a role she is engineer, mid-career probably about 10 years engineer at a different career stage (late, mid,passionate about and has experience of experience, to come in as a design or early). I chose to use the mid-career designin. She starts her new position, and engineer on a specific project. The project engineer example with the early
case for using undergraduates in research by discussing the benefits of usingthem in research programs; it also identifies some pitfalls. Based on these observations and theliterature, the recommendation is made to engage undergraduates in research early in theiracademic career, during their first or second year. Benefits for undergraduates in research overtheir academic career can result in these students continuing with the graduate program at theirhome institution or at other institutions.The Kern Foundation recognized the importance of undergraduates in research and sponsored aRequest for Proposal (RFP) to address this topic. A collaboration of five universities from theKern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) answered the RFP and
, departments and universities often rely on aprofessional development driven approach to establish community. While useful, these effortsare misdirected because literature shows that women’s isolation and lack of sense of community,rather than lack of career preparedness, contribute to attrition from graduate programs. To besteradicate this isolation and lack of belonging among graduate women in engineering, we took auser-centered approach. Community-led, stakeholder-centric, participatory research is astakeholder-owned means by which to elicit community member needs. This process translatesinto strategies that are developed by community members themselves to address those needs.The authors of this paper developed a pilot survey distributed to all