chapters and self-assessingcurrent understanding via a follow-up assessment makes for more productive educationalactivities in-class.10The inverted Bloom’s taxonomy captures the essence of the flipped format12 and its focus on thehigher order stages of thinking in face-to-face class sessions that create time for effectivepractice of engineering design. Figure 1. Flipped format for an engineering design classroom12.Advantages of a flipped classroomFlipped classrooms are credited with many learning benefits,12 such as more rigorous studentpre-class preparation, in which independent content mastery is tied to student ability to self-manage, self-assess and recognize connections between previous and new knowledge; respectinga student’s own pace
theexperiences they had in the RET, but rather to better understand the perceptions they and theirstudents bring, as a means to consider how to design professional development experiences thataim to enhance diversity of the engineering pipeline.Conceptual frameworkRecruitment and retention of students from groups underrepresented in engineering has been thefocus of a great deal of recent research. We take that stance that interest development is the firststep for recruitment of students who otherwise might not consider engineering. Interestdevelopment is needed but insufficient for real change, as students who become interested butare poorly prepared are not likely to persist in engineering [1]. We therefore focus on strategiesthat develop interest and
responsibility" to the more specific, "ability to recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must considerthe impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societalcontexts"1 (p. 28). While this criterion pertains to undergraduate engineering education, thecriteria for Master programs include the "fulfillment of the baccalaureate level generalcriteria"2 (p. 5).Several researchers have examined various methods on how to effectively teach engineeringethics, with an emphasis on what topics should be included and what kind of format should beused. In particular, debate has ensued on whether ethics should be taught as a 'standalonecourse' or if it should be
to the growing database. Asrequired by the university, the data was anonymized by assigning each student a code. Becausethe database is extensive and spans multiple courses taught by multiple instructors, theresearchers have the ability to track an individual student from their first course as a freshmanuntil that student graduates.This paper is based on the data from 2,836 students, who were enrolled either in non-math ormath intensive classes. The detailed demographics are summarized in Tables 1 to 3. The onlystudents not included in the following data are those who dropped out of the courses and thosewho arranged to receive an incomplete. At the time of this paper, there was not enough data toreport on the performance of students who
would need to design and implement several logical steps including thedetermination of the distance between two locations, ranking hotels based on locations,querying airport information, and identifying nearby gas stations. Moreover, after thisapplication has been developed, it cannot be easily reused by another softwareapplication due to potential interoperability issues, such as the difference of programminglanguage and development platforms.Under the SOP paradigm, the development becomes easy and flexible. The problem isfirst decomposed into several components: (1) a hotel query component that takes anaddress, a radius, and the hotel type as input and returns a list of hotels nearby and relatedinformation such as names, addresses, and
teaching paradigm, is a progression fromabstraction to idealization to mathematical modeling to simulation to performance evaluation to,finally, relating to reality.1 First-year students learn mathematical and engineering concepts andthen progress through courses involving design testing and assessment. Ultimately, engineeringprograms should produce graduates who can successfully apply engineering concepts to realworld problems. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) sets thecriteria that colleges and universities should follow in order to produce engineeringprofessionals. ABET Criterion 3: Student Outcomes, originally published 20 years ago, has beenrevised over the years, but has always included an emphasis on student
active learning strategies usedincluded a high amount of “individual” problem solving. The electrical engineering introductionto computing course also served as one of the active courses, and this course contained a highamount of “group” problem solving. For the remainder of the paper, these courses will bereferred to as “traditional,” “individual,” and “group.” Preliminary qualitative observations of thecourses verified that these courses fit these characteristics, and the course instructors alsoconfirmed these characteristics reflected their type of teaching. The three courses sampled aresummarized in Table 1. The traditional and individual courses were predominantly taken bysecond year students, while the group course was taken by
program of research is: How can we effectively and ef- ficiently promote cyberlearning in complex knowledge domains such as STEM (science, technology, en- gineering and mathematics)? Towards this direction, she (1) investigates the development of higher-order thinking and complex problem-solving competencies following a comprehensive framework that includes cognition, metacognition, cognitive regulation, motivation, emotion, and epistemic beliefs; (2) develops innovative assessment methods that can benchmark progress of learning and the development of com- plex problem-solving competencies; (3) develops new and effective approaches to design state-of-the-art digital learning environments (such as intelligent tutoring
. professional attitudes and habits related to ethics, lifelong learning, developing professional networks, passion and balance in life9 (slightly modified block quote)Within this framework of abilities and skills, the following research questions were examined todetermine how the future faculty seminar influenced students’ understanding of faculty work.The research questions that were explored in this study are: (1) How do doctoral students describe successful engineering faculty after participation in the preparing future engineering faculty seminar? (2) How do doctoral students’ descriptions of successful engineering faculty change from participation in the preparing future engineering faculty seminar?We
yearchemical & bioprocess engineering course at a university in Ireland, and an upper level chemicalengineering core course (Transport II). The design challenge required students to design, build,and test a heart-lung machine to simulate the performance of a clinical cardiopulmonary bypasssystem. The project proved to be adaptable and transferrable to different contexts with differentlearning objectives, assessment, instructional strategy, student population, and details ofimplementation.1. Introduction1.1. Biomedical EducationBiomedical engineering is a relatively new, interdisciplinary field existing at the intersection oflife science, medicine, and engineering. An aging population and increasing focus on healthissues are accompanied by a
howstudents’ innovative capability influences such transfer capacity. The goals are: (1) to explore thepedagogical practices used to support non-traditional students in community colleges to informpersistence, (2) to understand whether such practices are effective in offering non-traditionalstudents a program that enables them to stay in engineering and science majors and to transfer toa four year college or university, and (3) to determine if students’ propensity for innovativeproblem solving influences use of pedagogical practices and ultimately, transfer persistence. Theresearch targets five research questions: (1) What are the patterns of pedagogical practices thatcommunity colleges employ to enhance students’ transfer success in engineering and
in rural areas, and engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Perceptions and Applications of Honors Contracts in Developing an Undergraduate Engineering Research ExperienceAbstract: Honors colleges have become very effective in attracting and recruiting highlymotivated and talented students to institutions of higher education [1, 2]. The Honors Path allowsstudents to earn an Honors Diploma and provides them with unique educational opportunities,which facilitates strong personal and academic growth [1]. At Western Carolina University(WCU), two ways to earn Honors credit include taking an honors course (often a generaleducation
Paper ID #16074Promoting Engagement through Innovative and Pragmatic ProgramsDr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well as served in the Corps of Engineers for over
learned were: (1) design definitions vary across disciplines anddepartments need to explicitly develop design guidelines across all programs offered, (2)significant efficiency can be gained by developing one set of Program Education Objectives andOutcomes encompassing all programs offered, and (3) capstone design classes will need muchattention to detail if a single class is for multiple degree programsIntroductionOver the last several decades, and in response to a variety of drivers, departments of civilengineering at universities across the United States have expanded and many now supportmultiple degrees. Over the same time period, ABET’s Engineering Criteria 2000 introducedoutcomes-based assessment to the accreditation process for engineering
studentmotivation, and the connection between SRL, PI, and FTP has been described in previousliterature27. While theory and literature has shown connections exist between SRL and FTP,including quantitative studies of engineering students10,28, research is lacking to describe thenature of these connections. This pilot study will begin looking qualitatively at why and howengineering students connect their views of the future to the self-regulation of their learning inthe present.Research PurposeThis research is a pilot of a piece of a larger, mixed methods project which seeks to understandthe connection between engineering students’ FTP and their SRL strategy use throughinvestigating the sub-questions as outlined below: 1) What SRL strategies do IE
the individuals contributed to creating Page 26.1573.5a cohesive team environment. In particular, we were interested in which behaviors the teammembers displayed, when they displayed them, and how they contributed to the team’satmosphere and ability to work effectively together. The particular behaviors we used come fromSheridan et. al’s Team-member Effectiveness Framework which articulates 12 behaviors across3 ways of contributing to the team’s effectiveness, Table 2-1. Effective team members werethose seen exhibiting these behaviors and encouraging the rest of the team to exhibit them aswell.Table 2-1: Behavioral Team-member
. Page 26.592.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Elementary Teachers’ Reported Responses to Student Design FailuresIntroduction The inclusion of engineering design within elementary education means that students’engineered designs will sometimes fail. Failure is a normal part of engineers’ and students’attempts to solve a problem by creating and testing possible designed solutions (i.e., designs); itis expected that one or more designs will fail to solve the problem and operate as intended.1, 2, 3, 4Although students may receive failing grades or perform poorly on a test, failed designs arerelatively new artifacts within elementary education.5, 6
employing quantitative methods are likely of most interest to practitioners who wouldwant to evaluate the effectiveness of this pedagogical approach before implementation in theclassroom. As a means of identifying future possible frameworks for further investigation on theimpact of peer coaching on female engineering students, this study explores the followingresearch questions: (1) How does student opinion about coaching transform through this class?(2) What new or revised perspectives do students gain, as both coach and coachee? (3) How doescoaching equip engineering women for the transition to the workforce? Findings indicate thatstudents’ initial apprehension about coaching progresses into recognition and experience ofbroad potential impact
Paper ID #16070Holistic Mentoring through Sharing an Entire Course Built on the ExCEEdModelDr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well as served in the Corps of
Subdisciplines: Challenges and OpportunitiesIntroductionThere are many benefits to a diverse workforce of civil engineers. In particular, work-placeinnovation, creativity, knowledge and productivity have been shown to be enhanced when manyperspectives and experiences are represented.1 As the civil engineering profession tackles someof big challenges facing society in the 21st century, it is critical that we are able to recruit andretain the most talented students, regardless of gender or race/ethnic background. Unfortunately,engineering schools continue to be challenged by student retention, and, for example, only about70% of entering engineering freshman at our large public university graduate with anengineering degree within six years. Although
Education, 2016A Civil Infrastructure System Perspective – Not just the Built Environment1 IntroductionBased on a perceived need within the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at theUniversity of Utah to increase faculty and student awareness of 1) the national infrastructurecrisis and 2) a departmental-wide pedagogical approach to engineering instruction with a moreholistic, global understanding of infrastructure systems, three faculty members attended the 2ndAnnual Infrastructure Education Workshop on Pedagogies of Engagement in InfrastructureClassrooms. Hosted by the Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E), over30 national faculty members participated in a three-day, best-practices teaching seminar
their preferred time within a one-week Evaluation Window in aGTA-proctored Evaluation and Proficiency Center (EPC). Third, utilizing the Vygotskianconcept of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and Bruner’s Scaffolding Theory 1 astheoretical frameworks, learners review their evaluation results with Content GTAs, who areavailable to tutor due to the abridged homework and exam grading loads. Finally, learnersrequiring additional explanation visit their instructor to resolve concerns mediated astask/response flows within their individualized Learner Electronic Workspace.EPICS uses a layered remediation hierarchy to resolve two fundamental hurdles to utilizingelectronic evaluation within STEM curricula. First, a taxonomy of online assessment
- Purdue University Master of Engineering in Educa- tional Technologies - Eafit University Systems Engineer - Eafit UniversityDr. R Edwin Garc´ıa, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 26.185.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An Exploratory Study of the Role of Modeling and Simulation in Supporting or Hindering Engineering Students’ Problem Solving SkillsBackground and MotivationIn the context of problem-solving in science and engineering, the use and creation of computingartifacts are being used to understand and design systems 1
evaluated each item in the original EAO individually for reasonablenessand ease of interpretation by a first-year undergraduate student population. The evaluationsfocused on ensuring alignment between the experiences that items asked subjects to recall andexperiences that first-year undergraduates are likely to have had. In keeping with the goal ofminimal modification, changes did not include any adjustment to item-subscale alignment. Themodified instrument maintained the four original EAO sub scales: innovation, personal control,self-esteem, and achievement. The breakdown of items by subscale and attitude componentappears in Table 1. Subscale Affect Behavior Cognition Total achievement
labeled engineering or not, canserve a unique role for African American boys. These experiences may inspire them to pursueengineering degrees, can contribute to the students’ development of engineering skills,knowledge, behaviors. Furthermore, the experiences may positively impact their engineeringself-efficacy through their college years. Although all students may not continue into engineeringcareers these skills are transferable to many career and challenges. [1, 2] For those AfricanAmerican males, who complete STEM degrees, they will be our problems solvers who willaddress the technological challenges to come. While society is bombarded with propagandaaround the challenges and failures that African American male students experience
sense.When we expose students to component models without giving them an experiential context fortheir application, we run the risk that they will never develop a sense of what happens when themodel limits are exceeded, and the implications that might have on an overall systems leveldesign. Also, we run the risk of overwhelming them with theory and having them lose interestaltogether.In the larger picture, we must also prepare engineers to address the "Grand Challenges" of thefuture.1 Virtually all of these challenges involve electrical and computer engineering to anextraordinary degree. Let us consider several that are enumerated by the National Academy ofEngineering."Make Solar Energy Economical" would appear to be, on the surface, a problem in
of the art digital technology is essential forCQI in education.II. Methodology for AssessmentThe Faculty of Engineering at the Islamic University of Madinah has studied various options fordeveloping its assessment methodology and systems [5,6,7,8,9] to establish actual CQI and not just tofulfill accreditation requirements of ABET [49] or NCAAA [48]. The following points summarizethe essential elements chosen by the faculty to implement state-of-the-art assessment systems forachieving realistic CQI in engineering education: 1. OBE assessment model 2. ABET, Engineering and Accreditation Commission (EAC) outcomes assessment model employing Program Educational Objectives (PEOs), 11 EAC Student Outcomes (SOs) and Performance
earned his Bachelor of Science in Systems Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point and is a decorated combat infantryman. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Running head: PRECEDENCE DIAGRAMS AND LEARNING 1 Inventing the Precedence Diagram as Preparation for Future Learning Abstract Visualizations and diagrams help us organize many facets of data in SystemsEngineering, from Pareto charts to fish bone diagrams. Typical instruction often introduces thebest form of the graphical aid actively, and in doing so, ties it directly to the task. However, amajor goal of
differences exist between male and female students regarding preferences forvarious pedagogical practices, such as collaborative learning. Additionally, we know thatstudents may construe an instructor’s gender as influencing their capacity to be role models,teach effectively, and produce scholarship. Less well known is how male and female instructorsview specific classroom strategies, as well as how often they use those strategies. To aidunderstanding, the newly developed Value, Expectancy, and Cost of Testing EducationalReforms Survey (VECTERS) was applied. VECTERS was based on expectancy theory,implying instructor decisions to integrate, or not integrate, classroom strategies are based on (1)perceived value for both students and self, (2
developed method to overcome theproblems of fixation is 77 Design Heuristics. This method for generating design concepts comesin the form of 77 cards, each with a different cognitive prompt for generating a solution (e.g.,reduce material, flatten). By using the cards, engineers and engineering students are able toexpand their horizons of possible solutions to challenging design problems.Using a first-year engineering course, we integrated the 77 Design Heuristics cards to documenthow these students develop final concepts in relation to their initial ideas. We analyzed 12 first-year engineering students, distributed across 3 different design teams. Our findings demonstratekey influences that did foster idea fluency (Theme 1: Influence of 77 Cards on