sample of the students’ papers. The preliminary results provide insight intostudents’ evaluation of their success during their first semester, which is a critical semester instudents’ college careers.IntroductionProject Control is an interactive process in which actual performance is compared to plannedperformance with adjustment(s) being made to address identified deviations3.The project controlcycle has seven basic steps: (1) develop project plan, (2) establish benchmarks, (3) monitorproject performance, (4) identify deviations, (5) evaluate corrective options, (6) makeadjustment, and (7) document, report and evaluate4. When attempting to teach this projectcontrol cycle, the importance of ‘evaluate’ can be difficult to convey to students
curriculumand program development enables continuous improvement activities. The complete list ofCEAB GrAtts is provided here:1 Page 26.242.2 1. A knowledge base for engineering 2. Problem analysis 3. Investigation 4. Design 5. Use of engineering tools 6. Individual and teamwork 7. Communication skills 8. Professionalism 9. Impact of engineering on society and the environment 10. Ethics and equity 11. Economics and project management 12. Life-long learningAlthough students will develop all GrAtts throughout their undergraduate engineering programs,assessment of the attributes in the final year of the students’ programs provides
strategiesintended to increase student interest, achievement and persistence in engineering are based onincreasing self-efficacy, which is a better predictor of those outcomes2,3.A logical starting point for examining this topic as it relates to community college students is toexamine the relationships between conceptual knowledge of DC circuit analysis with self-efficacy for circuit analysis. An instrument was created to measure the relationship betweenself-efficacy for and conceptual knowledge of DC circuit analysis. The instrument was a three-tiered concept-inventory that included: Tier 1: Multiple choice assessment of understanding related to a DC analysis concepts. Tier 2: Multiple choice question regarding subjects’ reasoning for
order to ensure progress, future research on the flipped classroom should employcontrolled studies that objectively examine student performance throughout a semester, with bothtraditional and concept-inventors style problems."1 Therefore, this research study wasconstructed to satisfy this statement to the best of the author's ability.Study DesignTwo sections of thermodynamics were taught by the author during the same semester. Studentsin one section were taught using the flipped classroom pedagogy, while students in the secondsection were instructed using the Think-Pair-Share methodology. There were 20 students in theflipped section with class periods on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 11:00 am to 12:15 pm.Students in the flipped classroom watched
engineering technology department at our university activelyparticipates in recruitment opportunities with regional and local schools at varied age levels. Aspart of our informational table, we often use an interactive construction activity through buildingtower structures. “Today’s hot new toys are teaching kids how to innovate.” 1 Research suggeststhat building toys hone spatial skills and that kids as young as 5 can grasp many of the conceptsneeded to build.1 Our tower project is received very positively by participating students and is agreat example of a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) activity.For over 20 years in Maine, several professional engineering societies such as the AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers (ASCE), the
as a poster presentation at a formalresearch forum.Project DetailsSpecifically, students are given a detailed problem statement with objectives, idealcharacteristics, required features, required constraints, and specific tasks. Excerpts from theproblem statement are given in this section. The acronym for the device the student teams createis the “Nanofunctionalized Assay Nested in an Onboard Laboratory Yielding SpecificExpeditious Results” or NANOLYSER. The project objectives are as follows:1. Exposure to various fields of engineering – specifically, how nanotechnology approaches can be utilized for various applications in many fields2. Experience in essential time management, task scheduling, and project management skills3. Experience in
the world’s wealthiest citizens. 1 In response, a moremodern vision for engineering education promotes “a world where all people have access to basicresources and knowledge to meet their self-identified engineering and economic developmentneeds.” 2 By providing students the opportunity to explore the engineering curriculum as it appliesto the challenges of globalization, population explosion, resource depletion, and so on, we arepromoting and contributing to a more socially aware and responsible profession: “Addressing theneeds of clean water, sanitation, energy, shelter, etc. is no longer an option for the engineeringprofession; it is an ethical obligation. Both engineering practice and engineering education needto be considered.” 3
implemented in a sophomore level course in biomedicalengineering at Western New England University. Results from assessment using pre- and post-module surveys showed increased student-reported knowledge/ability regarding a variety ofEML concepts, including opportunity recognition and communicating solutions in terms ofsocietal benefits. Additionally, while the present activity used QS to investigate a biomedical-related problem, the module could be tailored to fit the needs of a variety of engineeringdisciplines so as to engage other students in EML.IntroductionRecently, there has been significant interest within the engineering education community toproduce engineers with an entrepreneurial mindset.1-3 Students with this mindset are oftenhighly
. Authorshave focused on establishing curriculum suitable for video, techniques for video development,and assessment of video use. These studies will be used to provide insight into creating a videofor a laboratory or design project. The fundamental difference is that these videos are notreplacing lectures typically delivered during class time. Instead, they intend to reduce the amountof one on one instruction required for fundamentals of course topics.The fundamentals of video instruction are important for addressing what aspects of thecurriculum can be covered in a video and how to implement the video in the course. A rule ofthumb is for the video to focus on curriculum, student involvement, and professionalopportunities.1 A wide variety of courses
questions, with 73% earnestly attempting 80%100%. Only 1% of students blatantly "cheat the system" by earnestly attempting less than 20% of questions. Thus, the heartening conclusion is that students will take advantage of a welldesigned learning opportunity rather than just quickly earning points. We noted that earnestness decreased as a course progressed, with analyses indicating the decrease being mostly due to tiredness or some other student factor, rather than increasing difficulty. We also found that analyzing perquestion earnestness can help question authors find questions that need improvement. In addition to providing results of our earnestness analysis, this paper also describes the style by which the learning questions were made
different forms. Dym et al.1 identified thefollowing approaches to characterize design thinking: “design thinking as divergent-convergent questioning, thinking about design systems, making design decisions, designthinking in a team environment, and language of engineering design”. According to Brown 2,some characteristics of the profile of a design thinker include “empathy, integrative thinking,optimism, experimentalism and collaboration”. The commonality between these approachesand aspects is that design skills are understood and experienced by different individualsdifferently. This may be attributed to the context of the design activities, prior knowledge ofthe learner, personally meaningful connections, and other humanistic factors.In this paper
degreesMany Universities in Europe have adapted to, or tried to adapt to an educational structure thatfacilitates exchange and mobility often referred to as the Bologna process. This structure isbased on three degree cycles: Bachelors, Masters and Doctoral [1]. The structure is sometimesreferred to as the “3-5-8”-structure, with a 3-year bachelors program, a 2-year mastersprogram and a 3-year doctoral program.In several countries in Europe, traditional engineering professional degree programs of four tosix years existed long before the ambitions to create a uniform structure emerged. In somecountries, more academic oriented programs coexisted in parallel with the professionalprograms. At the moment, various countries and educational systems have
engineering and technology needs, a more diverse pool of students mustbe attracted to major in science and engineering.To address this problem, a push has been made to recruit students from community colleges totransfer into a bachelor program, majoring in STEM. Community colleges have a diversepopulation to pull from, 57% are women, 14% are African American/Black and 16- 20% areHispanic.2,4 The national transfer rate in 4-6 years for students enrolling in community collegewith the intention to transfer to a bachelor program is between 25-39% and efforts are needed toincrease this transfer rate.4Past studies on increasing the diversity of engineering have focused on social cognitive careertheory.1 Within this framework, researchers have examined the
University Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Abstract Cybersecurity is important for many applications in both research and education. Currently, graduates incybersecurity are in short supply because few universities have sufficient courses in this area. An interesting andpractical hands-on labware can help students obtain knowledge in security. We have been working on integratingsecurity education into Georgia State University's computer science curriculum since the project was funded byNSF in Sept. 2013. We focus on adding security teaching activities into four courses: (1) Operating Systems, (2)Embedded Systems, (3) Computer Networks, and (4) Web
models studied inclass. Therefore, circuit prototyping and measurement labs are a universal requirement forelectrical engineering programs1. Instructional laboratory facilities are typically only accessibleto students studying engineering at a formal institution of higher education. Though the recentproliferation of massive open online courses (MOOCs) have extended access to high qualityelectronics instruction2 (see Table 1 for a brief survey of available and proposed electronicsMOOCs), globalized access to laboratory education remains prohibitive due to the expense ofequipment3.Some MOOCs, notably edX’s inaugural 6.002x: Circuits and Electronics, use simulations andvirtual labs to give students more experience with experimentation4. These
. Then for the third phase, the data sources from the participants and thefaculty mentor were triangulated, developing themes revealing successful aspects, as well asareas for potential modification and improvement.ResultsOverall Research ProjectsFive items on the survey pertained to the overall research project (See Table 1). Participants’perceptions about their overall summer research projects revealed mostly neutral or above ratingson a five point scale: (1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) neither agree nor disagree, (4) agree,and (5) strongly agree. For the REU students, two of the three students tended to respond to thesefive items as neutral (3) or above (4 or 5). Both of these participants were undergraduates goinginto their senior
systems has never been greater.1 ITS have been developed for a wide range ofsubject domains (e.g., mathematics, physics, biology, medicine, reading, languages, andphilosophy) and for students in primary, secondary and postsecondary levels of education.Although most ITS have been developed by researchers and never deployed outside thelaboratory or the single university-level course for which they were designed, there are examplesof mature systems that have been deployed more widely and extensively evaluated.2, 3Like previous reviewers1, 4, 5 we have adopted a definition of ITS that emphasizes studentmodeling as an essential characteristic. We identify an ITS as any computer system that performsteaching or tutoring functions (e.g., selecting
provides further information about the background of the DAD Project anddiscusses the Project in more detail. Also, relevant literature is reviewed and a methodologyis proposed to assess the potential benefits of using full-scale physical models as a part of amaster degree module offered in the academic year 2015-16. Finally, the outcomes of theresearch, as well as further recommendations are provided.1. BackgroundThe Author, as a practicing architect and the director of an architectural firm, has beeninvolved in the design and construction of around 150 ‘Spatial Structures’ in differentprojects since 1999. An example of these projects is a 40 metre span geodesic dome shown inFigure 1. Also, to maintain the relationship between the industry and
become a valued resource for business incubator programs throughout Virginia and her success as a business consultant is reflected in the successful outcomes of her clients. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Beyond "The Innovator's DNA:" Systematic Development of Creative Intelligence in an Engineering Entrepreneurship ProgramIn a seminal paper published in the Harvard Business Review in 2009 and titled “The Innovator’sDNA,” Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen argue that there are "five discovery skills thatdistinguish the most innovative entrepreneurs from other executives." The specific skills theyidentified through their research were (1) associating, (2) questioning, (3
skilled technical areas, both in the classroom and “on-the-job”, todevelop system level expertise in their respective technical disciplines. Key components of theprogram include: (1) establishing a mechanism for outreach and recruitment; (2) providingleveling, tutoring, mentoring, and support for students; (3) teaching and learning through provenpedagogical practices and through sound academic advising; (4) partnering with the DoDcommunity to facilitate student career placement in the DoD STEM workforce; (5) providingworkforce development for DoD STEM professionals. This paper will discuss the academicchallenges that student veterans face while in higher education and the current STEM pipelinesas students move through their college to
incorporating ENoCS into an existing computer architecturecourse curriculum and an evaluation of its effectiveness in a small senior/graduate-level course.Students in the evaluated course who used the tool showed an increased competency in theconcepts, as well as interest in using the tool further. While the sample size was small, itdemonstrates the promise of using the ENoCS tool in the classroom. The simulator is availableon-line for public use at https://github.com/ProfACarpenter/ENoCS.1 IntroductionCollege-level courses are always improving the learning experience for their students byincorporating new technology into the classroom. On-line courses and on-campus coursecurricula increasingly rely on the development of a growing library of
acquires knowledge, gains experience todevelop needed skills, and adopts professional values that lead to a successful start in their career[15]. In essence, students should be able to answer three questions as they progress through theprofessional socialization process: 1) What do I do with the skills learned? 2) What am I supposed to look like, and how should I act in my professional field? 3) What do I, as a professional, look like to other professionals as I perform my new roles? [17].Researchers have offered multiple and complex conclusions around professional socializationand its contribution to identity formation [18, 19]. Several studies have used the framework toexplore undergraduate
staff advisors. Each advisor meets with two teams over a one hour“cohort” meeting once per week to discuss progress of the project. The teams come preparedwith a short slide deck (1-5 slides) detailing the progress made in the past week. Lectures areonce per week and serve the purpose of reinforcing the design process by introducing techniquesfor project management, research, design process management, sketching, ideation, prototypeplanning, photography and videography skills, effective presentations and writing skills.The Electrical Engineering capstone course consisted of 6 projects. Five of these projects weresponsored and defined by industrial partners, and 1 was industry sponsored but competitiondefined (SpaceX Hyperloop Pod). The course
instructors. These benefits caninclude increased learning gain3,4, flexibility5-15, increased interaction with peers and theinstructor6,8,9,12,13,16-22, improved professional skills20,23, and increased student engagement andpreparation9,13,25,26. Based, in part, on the potential benefits identified in previous studies, ajunior-level transportation engineering course was converted into a flipped format. This paperaims to investigate student perspectives on various components of the course. In particular, thefollowing research questions will be addressed. 1. Are students prepared to take a flipped course? 2. What are student perspectives on a flipped transportation engineering course?Course DescriptionCE 355: Principles of Transportation
Computer Integrated Manufacturing System project coordinator for RIT’s integrated circuit factory. He is a senior member of IIE and SME, and a member of ASEE, Alpha Pi Mu and Tau Beta Pi. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016A holistic student-centered approach to retaining and graduating engineers at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Ma Zenia Agustin1, Marcus Agustin1, George Pelekanos1, Cem Karacal2 Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics 2 School of EngineeringAbstractThis work in progress describes a
learningoutcomes. The evaluations were done with all five evaluators present. Student progress throughthe first three years of PITCH is quantified and the results demonstrate that student writingimproved significantly. The pedagogical and administrative lessons learned by developing andimplementing the program are also discussed. PITCH is supported by a grant from the Davis Educational Foundation.Background A key skill desired by employers of new engineering graduates and valued by alumni is theability to communicate technical content effectively.1-5 Engineering educators have recognizedthis need for many years and a variety of efforts have been undertaken at different universities toaddress it.6,7 An approach adopted by many engineering schools
for the course along with examples from theinternet and other books. Examples we use to teach the basics in our MATLAB course relate tothe following subjects: 1. Built in functions. 2. MATLAB matrices and arrays. 3. User defined functions. 4. Loops, logical functions and selection structures. 5. Graphing and plotting. 6. Matrix algebra. 7. User-controlled input and output. 8. Symbolic Mathematics. 9. Graphical user interface. 10. Simulink.A simple example to teach students about “built in” functions is to use a program to generate asine wave with noise. This problem combines the random number function along with the sinefunction to model random noise such as noise = rand(size(t));y = 5*sin(2*t) + noise. The output is then
the various aspects to an ethical issue, allowing for an engaging experience14. For thefirst phase of the project, ethics education assignments were integrated into a senior-levelbiomechanics class. The class had a total of 79 students. The point/counterpoint assignment hada 94% participation rate, as the homework was worth 2% of the students’ final grades. Resultsfrom the assignment showed that the class was fairly polarized in opinions for the first part,where the students voiced their own beliefs. After completing the assignment, 20% ofparticipating students changed their original viewpoints on the case study, seen in Figure 1. Thischange in mindset indicates that the students considered other options than their personal belief,and found
while reducing imposeed risks and d harms (meeans) amongg agentic citiizens of a sppecific munity.” (p. 4) commStemmin ng from this definition, d we w have intro oduced studeents to six ellements of soocial justice forconsideraation in engiineering probblem solving g and definittion, as show wn in Table 1. In some w ways,IFCS, a rigorously r mathematical m course, seem ms a difficullt choice for social justicce integrationn.Howeverr, students inn the course learn to desiign a feedbacck controllerr to
. Page 26.814.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Gender Bias in the Purchase of STEM-Related Toys (Fundamental)IntroductionMotivationWhile there has been much research dedicated to the issue of underrepresentation of women inengineering fields and collegiate programs, the potential causal factors of this phenomenon havelargely been considered institutional and the result of unfair bias (both in employment andincome) against women in these technical positions [1]. However, other recent research indicatesnot institutional factors but resource availability as the primary source of workplacediscrimination against women in technical fields [2]. Among these resources is the developmentof