Technology. She is a co-PI for RIT’s ADVANCE grant, where her focus is on structural changes that can improve the climate for women faculty in STEM.Prof. Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology Professor Sharon Mason is an Associate Professor in the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology at RIT where she has served on the faculty since 1997. Sharon has been involved in computing security education at RIT since its inception. She is the PI of for the Department of Defense (DoD) In- formation Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP) awards to RIT. These scholarships enable students to study and do research in graduate programs in security, forensics and information assurance. To date
material in accordance with a time schedule.Teaching ResponsivelyBeing a responsive teacher is part and parcel of being a caring faculty member. To teachresponsively, one needs to examine how students experience their learning. It is importantto know what significance students ascribe to faculty’s actions, views, and concerns. Forthe students, faculty’s choice of exercises, materials, assignments, etc.may not always becompatible with faculty’s intention. Therefore, methods, content, connectedness, andgoals may have to change to become more compatible with the ways these are perceivedby students. Which knowledge and skills to explore next and how best to examine these,are decisions made in the midst of the teaching activity itself, rather than
students can benefit. Student needs can readily extendbeyond academic topics and provide a considerable challenge to effective advising. Thispaper explores the territory between student personal issues that faculty worry about havingto address and curriculum matters dealing with course selections and prerequisites. Effectivestudent advising demands that the entire range of issues be addressed, yet faculty are hesitant.Faculty can and should shoulder only a part of the burden but could benefit from viewing theadvisor-student relationship as an opportunity to help the student acquire life skills.What the authors have found to be true to a great extent is that a major need of students is tosimply talk, to talk to someone who cares. Engaging students
University of Florida, 2George Mason UniversityAbstractA metacognitive approach to engineering education, including inquiry-based collaboration, canimpact and prepare STEM graduates for a modern workforce that requires high levels of criticalthinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills. This exploratory study examinedgraduate STEM students’ perceived metacognition as they worked together to develop andimplement applied research in both online and in-person learning environments. It developed andimplemented online learning modules for four graduate engineering courses for researchquestion development, literature reviews, and conducting research. Students self-evaluated usinga survey at the end of each course. For all course sections and
scholarships that were eligible ourmajors. These types of events are highlighted in both the campus and the localnewspaper, providing welcomed exposure and public relations.Additional networking benefits include industrial sabbaticals for faculty memberswishing to keep abreast of current trends and technologies, and an excellent source ofnew members for advisory boards. The opportunities are endless as new doors open toyour program that you never knew existed.Traditional and Nontraditional Student GrowthMany traditional students lack resume worthy industrial experience and may be unsure ofthe valuable contributions they are capable of making. Placing this type of student underthe supervision of an experienced manager will clarify their role and
engineering knowledge. The Council emphasized that University of Portland’s competitive advantage over the larger engineering schools has been that we graduate students with a breadth of knowledge in addition to technical depth, i.e., the University of Portland develops “T-shaped” engineers10. Council members noted that the competition for graduate placement is no longer local, but is now global. Promotes student development of global competencies that will enable our graduates to work more effectively on cross-cultural teams. The Council emphasized that this sill is highly valued for engineering employers. Enhances capacity for personal and professional growth for our graduates, as well as their career mobility. Is
’ personal, livedexperiences of their interactions with their faculty. In these interviews, we initially askedparticipants to narrate their life stories to give us further context and understanding of theirexperiences [14], consistent with the norms of unstructured interviews beginning with a singleplanned question [15]. We then focused more specifically on the interactions that participants hadwith faculty both inside and outside traditional class hours. In keeping with an unstructuredinterview style, we asked probing questions to uncover and further explore salient experiences ofstudent-faculty interaction. For example, after a participant offered their life story, we wouldmaybe focus on their chapters concerning their decision to major in
important factor in a potential faculty member’s decision to join.Additionally, PhD students play a vital role in mentorship of undergraduate students, serving asteaching assistants in courses and as mentors in the laboratory. Graduate students can beparticularly influential role models for undergraduates considering research careers. Finally,graduate students that go on to successful careers in a variety of sectors plays a crucial part inexpanding the reputation of the School. Their success is a direct reflection of the laboratoriesand faculty that mentored them.Just as important as the number of graduate students is the diversity of the student body. TheNational Science Foundation (NSF), other members of the National Academies, and the USCongress
ethics (50%) and broader impacts (46%). Graduate student ESI education wasperceived to be even weaker; 76% rated ethics education insufficient and 74% rated broaderimpacts education insufficient. At the median, chemical engineering faculty identified threedifferent types of courses where they believed undergraduate students in their program learnedabout ESI, most commonly capstone design (72%). Over half of the chemical engineeringinstructors reported teaching safety, professional practice issues, engineering decisions underuncertainty, environmental protection issues, sustainability, ethical failures, and the societalimpacts of technology in their courses. The survey and follow-up interviews with three chemicalengineering faculty members
, University of Michigan Megan Ennis is a master’s student in aerospace engineering and a research assistant with the SHUTTLE Lab at the University of Michigan. After completing a B.S. in aerospace engineering at the University of Michigan, she spent a year at University of Cambridge for a master’s in gender studies. She returned to Michigan and is now enjoying her time as a graduate student instructor. Beyond being involved in the lab’s macroethics work, Megan’s research interest is to apply feminist theories to engineering education.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him/his) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering
Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan. She also received her M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a focus on Operations Research at Georgia Tech. She is President of the Health Systems Engineering Alliance (HSEA) Board of Directors. She is an active member of the Institute of Operations Research and Management Science (INFORMS), Dr. Ivy served as the 2007 Chair (President) of the INFORMS Health Applications Society and is a past President for the INFORMS Minority Issues Forum. Her research interests are mathematical modeling of stochastic dynamic systems with emphasis on statistics and decision analysis as applied to health care, public health, and humanitarian logistics.Dr. Cara
teaching, research, and service? 2. Is the balance of teaching, research, and service complicated by race/ethnicity or gender? 3. What components are needed in a successful mentoring relationship? 4. Are there personal qualities an individual should possess to be successful in an academic career? 5. Are there personal qualities that inhibit individuals from being successful in an academic career?Figure 2. Twitter and text message chatbot examples.Participants. Two focus groups comprised of five URM doctoral engineering students wereconducted to explore the efficacy of the chatbots in future faculty mentoring. Students werepursuing their engineering doctoral degrees from either Georgia Institute of
learning environment provided by this university.Data and MethodologyMost documented research available on faculty diversity at institutions of higher learning istypically tailored for specific institutions. Little work was found that highlighted generalizedfactors in faculty members’ decision to join the faculty at an institution. Through backgroundresearch, faculty interviews and personal experiences, certain factors that may contribute to theattraction and retention of minority faculty members were identified. A survey was developedbased on these factors. The data collection process was based on the one performed by Mayhewand Grunwald4.Survey InstrumentA survey was created and administered to black faculty members at this institution. Results
include interdisciplinary higher education, focusing on organizational systems theory and facilitating interdisciplinary graduate programs; the identity development and experiences of interdisciplinary engineering graduate students and faculty; and the decision-making processes and factors impacting implementation of interdisciplinary graduate education initiatives. She works as a graduate research assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.Xiaoqi Feng, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland Xiaoqi Feng is a Doctoral Researcher at Aalto University. Her research area includes
. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her primary areas of research include engineering ca- reer pathways and decision-making, undergraduate student persistence, professional engineering practice, and faculty mentorship. Brunhaver graduated with her B.S. in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Perceived Advisor Support and Thesis Self-Efficacy: An Instrument DevelopmentAbstractThe path to degree completion for graduate students in engineering disciplines is fraught withchallenges, but one factor that
five architectural studio courses. She is an active member of numerous on and off-campus committees, including the Applied Learning Review Board (Chair 2022 – 2023, member since 2016), Farmingdale Executive Committee (Chair 2018-2022, member 2016-2022), ASC, AAS, Public Art Task Force (former Chair), Calendar Committee (former Chair), Sustainability Committee, the American Society of Engineering Education Middle Atlantic Section (former Chair and Secretary and Treasurer). Professor LoPiccolo served as department chair from 2017-2021. She prepared and oversaw three successful ABET re-accreditation reports and visits, streamlined the department processes for student success, and actively linked students and graduates
pedagogical revision to their established workload. Most faculty did not see improvingstudent retention as an individual obligation nor a clear departmental objective. A departmentalleader at Tech (himself an older faculty member) said, “a lot of our older faculty can't seem toaccept [the shift in admissions away from white, U.S. born students from strong high schools].”He accepted the changing admissions profile, but felt the institution should providecompensatory training. At every institution, some of the senior people expressed the view that anadministrative decision to change the incoming students was fundamentally mistaken, andtherefore held that faculty have no duty to participate in finding a way to make it work. Ironically, few faculty
industries now represent a fast-growing labor market within an otherwisestagnant economy. By 2018, economists estimate that there will be 2.4 million new STEM jobsfor U.S. graduates. In addition to the increased demand for STEM graduates, competitivesalaries equip STEM students to demand more money after they graduate. More than half of allbaccalaureate –holding STEM graduates are earning more annually than non-STEM graduateswith a master's or doctorate5. These educational and career opportunities offer uniqueadvantages for STEM majors thus highlighting the socioeconomic significance ofunderrepresented students‘ access into and persistence in STEM education. Investigation on underrepresented students‘ persistence in engineering
Paper ID #31599Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Faculty Mindset AmidstProfessional Development ActivitiesKristen Ferris, University of New Mexico Kristen Ferris is a student in the Organization, Information, and Learning Sciences program at the Uni- versity of New Mexico. Her research interests include faculty mindset change, change management, and organizational citizenship behavior. Much of her research is part of a National Science Foundation grant at UNM where the chemical and biological engineering department is redesigning curriculum to support diverse student retention and graduation. She intends to further
influence of cultural differences hasemerged as a prominent factor shaping their acculturation style. Curtin [12] and Glass [13] havereported that international students may have encountered more adverse experiences whencompared to their domestic students. Trice [14] explored the viewpoints of faculty members acrossfour academic departments—architecture, public health, mechanical engineering, and materialsscience and engineering—pertaining to international graduate students. A recurring observationamong faculty members was the challenge of English language proficiency. The temporaryresidence status of international students (i.e., F-1 visas), in contrast to that of domestic peers andother immigrant groups, may contribute to the different contexts
hired faculty members are all required to have a PhD degreein engineering. Publication and external funding are also important factors when tenure andpromotion are considered. Since the ET programs at Texas A&M University only offer BSdegrees, many faculty members hire graduate students from other departments within the collegeof engineering to help them conduct research work. An increasing number of faculty membersare experimenting with research by undergraduates. There are unique issues related to REU forET students.In addition to the benefits for both students and faculty members, REU can also be used toimprove curriculum. EET faculty members always try to use research results in lectures and labsas real-world examples29-31. Research
faculty member for the Scientista Foundation and ASEE student chapters at Binghamton University.Mr. Koenraad E. Gieskes, State University of New York, Binghamton Koen Gieskes currently serves as the Watson College Interim Assistant Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Interim Director of the Engineering Design Division. He is also director for LSAMP and co-director for STEP and UBMS. Koen first joined the Engineering Design Division at Binghamton Uni- versity as a graduate student in 2004, then, in 2009, he was hired on as a full-time lecturer, in 2017 he became the Assistant Director, and in 2022 began serving as the Interim Director. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
Paper ID #45484Navigating Pathways: Qualitative Insights into Personal and ProfessionalTrajectories of Non-Traditional Groups across Engineering-Related AcademicDisciplinesMs. Kimberly A Luthi, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide Dr. Kimberly Luthi is a Department Chair for the Applied Aerospace Sciences, and Faculty Member at Embry-Riddle Aeronautic University-Worldwide in the College of Aviation. Her research background is in workforce development education and engineering education.MICHAEL KOSLOSKI, Old Dominion UniversityBettina Mrusek, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide
project has, over the past four and a half years, worked toimprove the climate across campus, enhance recruitment efforts, increase retention andadvancement, and open leadership opportunities for faculty women especially in STEMdisciplines. In this paper, we discuss our strategies for effectively engaging male faculty ininstitutional transformation, leading to increased participation of women in all academic facultyranks and administrative positions.Institutional context Our institution is a land grant university in the upper Great Plains with around 692ranked faculty and instructors in seven academic colleges, serving approximately 14,500undergraduate and graduate students. The undergraduate student population is 42.6% women(2011 data
ismany engineering faculty have not had formalized teacher and curriculum development trainingand tend to adopt grading practices and policies they were exposed to as students [4]. As a result,grading has become an important yet unpredictable measure of performance that can drasticallyshape the ways students navigate their undergraduate experiences to become engineers.To date, little work has explored the interplay between course grades and professional identityformation in undergraduate engineering programs. However, these links have been highlighted inliterature that tends to describe engineering educational culture as inherently valuingperformance and productivity encompassed by an aura of exceptionalism. For example, Stevenset al. [5
instructors make when planning and implementing class projects in themakerspaces.ContextThis study was conducted at a large, public research university in the southwestern United States.This university boasts a large and respected engineering school with an undergraduateengineering population of approximately 6,000 students. The school of engineering is home to arecently redesigned makerspace that is available to all engineering students and faculty forcoursework, research, and personal projects. The makerspace is over 30,000 square feet and isprominently located in the newest engineering building on campus. The space is highly visiblewith floor to ceiling windows giving it a powerful presence in the school of engineering, whileproviding a warm
addressing writing issues of students. In addition, Jenkins (1993) found thatgraduate faculty members would re-write anywhere from 11-25% of their students’ theses. Thus,it appears that advisors tend to take on more an role of copy editor than that of writing mentor.The strategies listed above are not necessarily sustainable for graduate faculty nor supportive tostudents who are learning to create an academic and professional “writing persona” (Becker,1986) as well as taking on a “authorial voice” (Hyland, 2002).Engineering-Based Graduate Writing CentersOne writing support initiative that has been undertaken in Colleges of Engineering has been thedevelopment of college-specific writing centers, with the few institutions that have
studentswho self-identify as potential future faculty to visit the CU Boulder campus to learn more aboutacademic careers at doctoral research institutions, including our own. The program, calledACTIVE, encourages community building among individuals who are currentlyunderrepresented in the engineering professoriate, and highlights varied opportunities withinacademic faculty roles, especially in the CEAS. For this program, underrepresentation wasdefined broadly to include all women and others who identify as members of minoritized groupsincluding those who identify as Hispanic/Latinx, African American, Native American/AmericanIndian, and Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders; members of the LGBTQIA+community; first-generation college students
, financial and political barriers preventedoffering engineering courses, and native Skyline students had to complete their engineeringcoursework elsewhere in the district, a neighboring district, or worse, transfer without lowerdivision coursework completed. In Fall 2014, the college offered its first and only Engineeringcourse (Introduction to Engineering), developed and taught by an adjunct instructor in theirphysics department, whose technical background was in engineering. This adjunct professorbegan to develop a few other engineering courses over 2015, and in Spring 2016 the college wasleveraging external grant funds to hire him as a temporary full-time faculty member to begin thedevelopment of what was to become the Engineering and Computer
worldwide pandemic?”While this paper is not about where faculty members were when this happened, it is about thelessons learned after a university campus made the decision to close its doors to in-personlearning in the Spring of 2020. Specifically, this paper explores broad lessons learned forengineering faculty development as well as staff and departmental supports in a universitymakerspace during the 2020 spring and fall semesters. We refer to the abrupt transition to onlineand hybrid courses because of an international pandemic as the COVID-19 pivot.Context These lessons learned were discovered at a large, public research university in thesouthwestern United States. This university boasts an engineering school with an