Solar Car Figure 6: Pulling a Load with a Solar CarEach team prepares a summary sheet showing a sketch of their design, a bill of materials (theparts they used with the cost of each), the total cost of their design, and how much weight theircar was able to pull. After the competition, the entire class reflects on the results and discusseswhat worked and what did not.After completing this ETK, the students have learned about solar cells, motors, and tirematerials, but they have also learned about the engineering design process, and how to constructa vehicle to perform a task. They also learned how to measure the values of variables, theimportance of consistent procedures for making measurements, how to compute
exists.In 1996 ABET (formerly the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology), adopted anew set of standards for undergraduate engineering education. They were called EngineeringCriteria 2000 and shifted the focus of undergraduate engineering accreditation from lists ofrequired courses to eleven learning outcomes (9).Preliminary WorkSome of the new outcomes went beyond the standard classic engineering education. Amongthem five outcomes (listed below as “f” through “g”) were a clear reflection of the need toanchor engineering education into ever-evolving reality of interaction between technology andsociety:f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityg. An ability to communicate effectivelyh. The broad education necessary to
corresponds to four credit hours. The year is structured into twelve milestones withspecific deliverables from the team due at each milestone. The course milestones are: (1)project exploration, (2) team formation, (3) problem identification, (4) conceptual projectrepresentation, (5) technical and logistic representations, (6) second iteration and reflection, (7)fabrication and unit test, (8) system integration and test, (9) finalize representations, (10) systemacceptance test, (11) client delivery, and (12) final reporting and reflection.The rationale for creating a much more structured design course was the observation thatstudents were often not sufficient familiar with the design process to exhibit good design habits.While students were exposed to
therewas no race or ethnicity making up the majority of the class, which had 28% of the class self-identifying as African American, 28% as Hispanic/Latino, and 44% as White as shown in Figure2. As the students in this special section were allowed to select more than one race or ethnicityon their demographics survey, the percentages shown in Figure 2 add up to more than 100%.This diversity is an approximate reflection of the university’s undergraduate demographics,which includes approximately 9% of the population self-identifying as African American, 35%as Hispanic/Latino, and 49% White as of Fall 201514. For the university numbers, studentsidentifying with more than one race were categorized as multi-racial (3% of the undergraduatestudent
study extensively analyzes students’ learning progress in intercultural competence. Datainvolving both quantitative and qualitative methods are used to assess student learning via pre-/post surveys and student performance in discussion board activities, reflection assignments,projects. The study emphasizes translating skills between disparate groups, be it a cultural,academic, or physical separation, as fundamental skills for the students of tomorrow.Certificate program designBuilding upon the existing agricultural-based partnership between a the University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign and a Njala University in Sierra Leone, a new facet was establishedspecifically focused on Global Health.While significant work on global health-related topics
via exploration of artwork. Students were pairedtogether to play characters provided to them as part of a popular role-playing game with theintent of shortening the development time of the comfort level of students with respect to sharingtheir observations and perspectives as well as enhance the esprit de corps of the class. The role-playing game utilized here is a cooperative game requiring students playing characters withdifferent skills to overcome conceptual and combat challenges. The game was played in a labsection, with modifications to suit it to the purposes of the course. While the game was not thefocus of the work, the comments in the course reflections indicated it was an effective way tofacilitate student interaction and
a sense of accomplishment from helping the mill meet its “bottomline” goals, time management skills as they worked to prioritize daily tasks,and communication strategies from reflective journaling and speaking “onthe job.” There was less evidence that students learned much about theorganization itself, industry issues, corporate values, or aspects of their ownprofessional identity. Not only have researchers shown that internshipsproduce learning but Fogg and Putnam (2004) provided data indicating thatinternships often lead to higher earnings once in a professional job.Despite this evidence base, there are important limits to what we knowabout internships in engineering and the role they play in student success.Scholars who have focused on
that when compared to more traditional learning approaches,cooperative learning results in higher test scores, higher levels of critical thinking, higher levelsof transfer, and improved ability to work in groups (Johnson and Johnson, 1989). Students wholearn in cooperative environments tend to be more actively engaged and motivated by the topicand have more frequent student-student as well as student-faculty interactions (Lord, 2001).Project PhasesThe project was separated into three phases: a conceptual design phase, a calculations andprototyping phase, and a construction and reflection phase. Rubrics for each phase of the projectwere distributed to the class and are included in the Appendix of this paper.Phase 1: Conceptual Design. During
to develop models to reflect the reality. Clear examples can teachstudents how to collect data, develop base model, improve it to advanced models, analyze theobtained results, and think about usability of their simulation results. These learning outcomes canclearly demonstrate valuable educational objectives.This paper, presents an example where a group of students were assigned to develop a simulationmodel for the BGSU Students Union (BTSU) Cafeteria. Managing a university cafeteria oftenexhibits challenges for the food services located in the cafeteria. One challenge regards waitingtimes. This study was focused on reducing the average waiting time of the diners in the queues,while increasing overall efficiency of the food services.The
connections between teaching skills and leadershipskills in the course based on our reflection and feedback from the first version. Our programevaluation uses two surveys: the STEM GTA-Teaching Self-Efficacy Scale 5 and a modifiedversion of Alpay and Walsh’s skill-perception inventory. 6In this paper, we will describe our collaborative design process, strategic partnerships withvarious engineering departments, and enhancements of the integrative approach. Additionally, wewill discuss students’ perceptions of how well the program enhanced their teaching andleadership skills and how much they viewed teaching opportunities as a source of transferableleadership skills.Program OverviewOur program takes an integrative approach in two ways: 1) incorporating
participation in a TDG, instructors were asked to select at least one research-basedstrategy for interactive teaching that they would adopt in one or more of their courses. They wereasked to share the planning and implementation process with the group, as well as to shareresults of trying the new strategy. Participants were also asked to write a design memo as amechanism to reflect on the change they made and to share their teaching efforts more broadly soothers could learn about the strategy. The memo described the strategy the instructorimplemented, their motivation for selecting it, how they implemented it in their course, andpotential challenges others might face in implementation.Groups were very flexible in terms of structure but were designed to
understanding of engineering concepts [4], insufficient backgroundin engineering [5], or a lack of self-efficacy [3] [6] [7]. Because of this gap in the ability andconfidence of science teachers to teach engineering, there is a need for improved professionallearning opportunities for these teachers.Instead of having the eight participating STEM teachers be only chaperones, they were given theopportunity to experience the engineering activities with their students and were able toparticipate in several evening workshops led by the researchers. In these workshops, the teacherswere able to reflect on and discuss their engineering experiences in the camp, participate inactivities related to implementing engineering in their classrooms, and were given time
score, citing the fact that the performance of therocket was “like stuck in the middle,” so the score should reflect that. Her use of “like,” “kindof,” and “doesn’t really” served to highlight her uncertainty, while still positing that a design was“stuck in the middle” and required some score that was not featured on the decision matrix.Sympathizing with a designRebekah and Bonnie spent several turns sympathizing with one of their designs that scored 0 inevery category (named “mega-hedgehog,” Figure 2). This sympathy was indexed by aheightened affective stance adopted by the girls, marked by diminutive affix, repetition, andvocabulary choices (strategies underlined in the following excerpt). 11 Bonnie: I feel bad this was our best
publication[8]; Book chapter (in publications and global educators review); Plenary Talk at the 11th networks. International Workshop on Design Theory; ASEE 2019 Workshop Biomimicry Educators Network contribution Evaluate the learning impact of the evidence-based instructional resources. Objecti ve 2 a. Assess student engagement in learning. Reflection analysis for JMU and
would help focus students on seeing themselves as engineers andhave their ideas, rather than the LEGO bricks, drive the creation of the scene. We also added abrief time at the end of the activity to talk about what an engineer is and does, the variety ofscenes created and how that reflects the variety of engineers, and how students’ interests can fitwith the many different types of engineers. This shift moved the activity more into the realm ofan intervention rather than just data collection alone. The revised version of the activity was usedin the remaining nine classrooms. When they completed their scene, we encouraged students tocreate a brief video using a GoPro camera to describe what their engineer was doing. However,time constraints
join a small committee of teachersworking to redesign the science curriculum resources for the city.Data Collection and AnalysisTo track the evolution of Vanessa and Dani’s choices for teaching engineering, we invited bothto be interviewed periodically as they implemented engineering units, which ranged in lengthfrom one class session to several months. The first author conducted three interviews withVanessa and five with Dani, using the same protocol each time. Each interview began with theteacher describing her most recent units, often with pictures of student work and binders oflesson plans. The second part of each interview asked teachers to explain their instructional andpedagogical choices, reflect on why they persisted in teaching
contentstandards is also part of a larger educational shift towards standards-based education. As anexample of this shift, the Common Core standards for English and Mathematics were adopted byforty of the fifty states (although later repealed in a few states).In 2010, the National Academy of Engineering published a book discussing whether K-12standards should be developed for engineering, and if so how they should be incorporated intothe curriculum. After reviewing several approaches, the authors recommended that engineeringstandard be integrated into existing science standards to emphasize the symbiotic interaction ofengineering and science practices. The conclusion to integrate engineering standards into otherSTEM standards also reflects a larger-scale
self-reflective essays.In this section, we present an analysis of the collected data from tutors and tutees separately, aswell as an overview of faculty roles and involvement in the program.1. Impact on TutorsIn studying the effects, the service has on the tutors; we focus on the following aspects: • The academic and social impact • The advantages and disadvantages of participating as a tutorAs mentioned earlier, 10 tutors were involved in this study, all seniors, and juniors, with goodacademic standing. A focus group was held at the beginning of the semester to identify thestudents' vision of a successful tutoring service. Based on their prior experience as tutors,students were asked to provide suggestions to incorporate into the new
demonstrated excellence in four core areas:professional development, scholarly achievements, community outreach, and co-curricular orextracurricular activities.Finally, the Alliance is currently focused on determining what other practices are provingeffective and adding more signature practices to our portfolio, such as: (1) providing workshopson computational thinking and computer science principles to effectively prepare K-12 teachersto integrate these into its existing curriculum; and (2) the development of one- and two-credithour courses on problem solving, which are now in its pilot stage at six CAHSI institutions.These problem solving courses are intended to shift student thinking about how best tosystematically approach a problem, reflect on
Figure 1) [17, 18, 24]. Learner can do The principal characteristics of a sociocultural unaided model include: the importance of authentic activities Zone of Proximal to promote learning; the importance of the Development collaborative construction of knowledge; the need [Learner can do with guidance] for coaching and scaffolding at critical moments; and the importance of reflection to
engineeringprogram, we compared attendees vs non-attendees grade outcomes using SAT/ACT scores for amore accurate reflection of the effects of the exam review. This report investigates the effects ofthe collaborative mock exam review on student grade outcomes. The study utilizes a quantitativeapproach, incorporating data relating to grades and attendance with data relating to studentperceptions about the impact of the exam review to their performance on the actual exam, as wellas changes to their study approach.Motivation for StudyAs student retention and four-year graduation rates in engineering are of continued interest andconcern at our university, a collaboration between the Cockrell School of Engineering and theSanger Learning Center continues to work
, briefly practice leading the rest of the group through the activity they each learned. Metric source: observation 2) Lead: museum educators/facilitators lead activities with group of children on the public floor of a museum for 1-2 hours. Metric source: observation 3) Reflect: museum educators/facilitators discuss their experience learning and leading activitiesImproving the Engineering Pipeline Through University & Community-Developed Museum-Based Educational Kits Metric: capturing report out/discussionThe full protocol was implemented in Ontario, Portland, Los Angeles, and Fort Lauderdale atthree large museums that serve youth and families. An abridged protocol (which skipped steptwo) was also implemented in
from the two schools were paired up and worked together to develop andintroduce innovative teaching practices that have been tailored for different majors. Forengineering technology education, hands-on real-world problems and approved applied learningtechniques were emphasized and integrated into student learning experiences. Industrial standardsoftware, industrial instrumentation, and new industrial measuring techniques were introduced inlab projects. Structured reflection techniques were used to monitor and manage student projectactivities both inside and outside classrooms. The student evaluation data in first year show thatsuch techniques not only can greatly increase student involvement in class activities, but also canbetter prepare
decomposition,dependency analysis, process time analysis, and operation analysis reflects the students’ learningoutcomes to evaluate the design and analyze the operational performance of manufacturingsystems. The other two indicator indicates the students’ feelings on the classroom activities andtheir motivation on learning. Table 1. Assessment result of the computer simulation project Student assessment Group1 Group2 Project 1 (trailer camper manufacturing Computer Paper based assembly plant) simulation-based activity activity 1
Paper ID #30450Engagement in Practice: Exploring Boundary Spanning in aSchool-University PartnershipDr. Julee Farley, Montgomery County Public Schools and Virginia TechDr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include
in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She has been involved in several major engineering education initia- tives including the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education, National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter), as well as the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education. Helen holds an undergraduate degree in communication from UCLA and a PhD in communication with a minor in psychology from Stanford University. Her current research and scholarship focus on engineering and entrepreneurship education; the pedagogy of portfolios and reflec- tive practice in higher education; and redesigning how learning is recorded and
-Dick [2]point out that feedback, when used properly as a teaching and learning tool, can lead to morethan just a dialog regarding content and learning; it can also help students begin to develop theirown techniques for reflecting on and self-assessing their own learning and increase their self-esteem and positivity regarding learning. This source also points out that instructors benefit fromtaking time to provide quality feedback to learners, as they can use that as an opportunity toidentify common gaps or misconceptions that may impact how they address topics and content infuture lessons [2]. Affecting deep, impactful change in students from feedback provided is notcommon to all forms of feedback. Best practices regarding feedback, such as
time they were willing to dedicate to advising a capstone team. All facultyinterviewed agreed that the project topic was important to the success of a capstone project, butnot for the reasons assessed in the survey. They indicated that student passion and engagementfor the topic were of primary importance to a project’s success. Furthermore, one interviewedfaculty member reflected on their own experiences as a student being engaged by interactionswith passionate faculty in their prior engineering education.Table 1: Survey responses related to faculty incentives for advising capstone projects. Responses are reported aspercentages of the total number of responses. Strongly
” and reflective of what students expect to see intheir career or find personally meaningful. This study focuses on the students’ perceptions ofcourse elements and the extent to which students’ perception of the presence or absence of theseelements impacts their motivational state in their coursework.IntroductionIntrinsic motivation, defined as the “inclination toward assimilation, mastery, spontaneousinterest, and exploration”(2), is positively correlated with task-persistence and overallsatisfaction with a given task (3). Because intrinsic motivation is a self-generated state, onemight think that if faculty desire this as an outcome, they might have little impact on its presenceor absence in a given student - that’s what intrinsic means