Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Masoud Rais-Rohani P.E., University of Maine; David S. Rubenstein, University of Maine; Wilhelm A. Friess, University of Maine

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

more flexible by expanding the numberof graduate-level aerospace engineering courses offered in the near future.Laboratory capabilitiesIn 2015, a closed-circuit subsonic wind tunnel with a 75 cm x 75 cm test section and a top speedof approximately 130 km/h (80 mph) was designed and constructed by a group of senior studentsas a capstone project. Figure 2 shows the wind tunnel’s Solidworks CAD model and CFDsimulated flow field, whereas Fig. 3 shows photos of its wooden construction and assembly. (a) (b) Figure 2. Subsonic wind tunnel (a) Solidworks CAD model and (b) CFD simulated flow field. (a

Collection

2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring Conference

Authors

Lisa L Greenwood, Rochester Institute of Technology; Jennifer Schneider, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); Maureen S. Valentine PE, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

new material. Assessment varied fromshort answer or multiple-choice questions to a large project, and was evaluated using a gradingrubric to generate a score for each portion of the work. Regardless of the method used, the goalwas to evaluate the student learning that was occurring in each piloted module. A standard wasset at achieving a grade of a B (80%) or better.In addition to our own evaluation of student learning as each module was piloted within courses,we also went a step further and engaged other interested faculty, both internal and external to ouruniversity. Those instructors that reviewed the drafted materials provided feedback on efficacyand usefulness within their own teaching lexicon. This was important, because we needed

Conference Session

Gender Track - Technical Session I

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Maya Rucks, Clemson University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Gender

social cognitive career theory. Professional School Counseling, 91–97.Godwin, A. (2016). The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity. 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 15. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26122Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving Engineering: A Multi- Year Single Institution Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6–27.Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development

Collection

2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference

Authors

Kattia Chang, Cañada College; Karina Abad, Cañada College; Ricardo Jesus Colin, Canada College; Charles Tolentino, University of California, Merced; Cameron Malloy, University of California, Berkeley; Alex David, San Francisco State University; Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College; Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University; Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University; Hao Jiang, San Francisco State University; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Education through the Minority Science andEngineering Improvement Program (MSEIP, Award No. P120A150014); and through theHispanic-Serving Institution Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (HSI STEM)Program, Award No. P031C110159.Bibliography1. Olson S, Riordan DG: Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President 2012.2. Gregerman SR, Lerner JS, von Hippel W, Jonides J, Nagda BA: Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education 1998, 22:55-72.3. Graham MJ, Frederick J, Byars-Winston A, Hunter A-B

Conference Session

Connecting BME education to the "real world"

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tanya M. Nocera, The Ohio State University, Department of Biomedical Engineering; Alexis Ortiz-Rosario, The Ohio State University; Amena Shermadou, Ohio State University; David A. Delaine, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2002.803606 6. Whitaker International Program. (n.d.). Retrieved 2017, from http://www.whitaker.org/ 7. Seely, B. E. (1999). The Other Re-engineering of Engineering Education, 1900– 1965. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1999.tb00449.x 8. ABET Accreditation Program. (2017). Retrieved 2017, from http://www.abet.org/ 9. Abu-Faraj, Z. O. (2008). Career development in Bioengineering/Biomedical Engineering: A student’s roadmap. In 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (pp. 1564–67). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649469 10. Ebrahiminejad, H. (2017). A Systematized Literature

Conference Session

Capstone Projects in Manufacturing

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Michael G Mauk P.E., Drexel University; Carlos Michael Ruiz, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

engineering and technology courses at undergraduate and graduate levels. His tremendous re- search experience in manufacturing includes environmentally conscious manufacturing, Internet based robotics, and Web based quality. In the past years, he has been involved in sustainable manufacturing for maximizing energy and material recovery while minimizing environmental impact.Dr. Michael G Mauk P.E., Drexel University Michael Mauk is Assistant Professor in Drexel University’s Engineering Technology program.Mr. carlos michael ruiz, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018  A Senior Design Project in Fabrication of Microfluidic HIV/Zika Viral Load

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julanne K. McCulley, Weber State University

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

Paper ID #21245AAS Controls Technology Stackable Degree Education Requirements for Em-ployees by Highly Automated Manufacturing Companies Drives a Collabora-tive Pathway at Weber State UniversityMs. Julanne K. McCulley, Weber State University Julanne K. McCulley possesses a master’s in engineering from Arizona State University and a bachelor’s of science degree in electronics engineering technology and a bachelor’s of science degree in mathematics teaching from Weber State University. McCulley is an Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator for the Electronics Engineering Technology program in the Engineering Technology

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech; Veronica van Montfrans, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Gary R. Kirk, Virginia Tech; Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech; Andrew L. Gillen, Virginia Tech; Sarah Anne Blackowski, Virginia Tech; Holly Larson Lesko; Tawni Paradise, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1994. 45(1): p. 79-122.13. Markus, H. and P. Nurius, Possible Selves. American Psychologist, 1986. 41(9): p. 954- 969.14. Eccles, J.S., Families, schools, and developing achievement-related motivations and engagement, in Handbook of socialization: Theory and research, J.E. Grusec and P.D. Hastings, Editors. 2007, Guilford Press: New York, NY. p. 665-691.15. Hidi, S. and K.A. Renninger, The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 2006. 41(2): p. 111-127.16. Thomson, A.M. and J.L. Perry, Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public administration review, 2006. 66(s1): p. 20-32.17. Wood, D.J. and B. Gray, Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration

Conference Session

FPD and DEEDs Joint Postcard Sessions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anas Chalah, Harvard University; Fawwaz Habbal, Harvard University; Michael Raspuzzi, Harvard University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, First-Year Programs

the three areas outlined inASEE guidelines [2]: a) student inputs, b) student outcomes, and c) the educational environment.As they entered, students were given a baseline assessment upon arrival to measure inputs, andas the program began, topic based assessments were given to students at the conclusion of eachworkshop to measure educational environments (Figure 3).Figure 3: The students’ average confidence levels collected from a daily survey in the selected areas of Applied Math, Computer Science,Engineering, Systems, Robotics, Design Thinking, and Prototyping throughout the program. Assessments included: gathering information onstudents’ exposure to and familiarity with topics prior to the start of the program, self-evaluations of the

Conference Session

IED Technical Session: Preparing Courses for the Future

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Javier Rubio-Herrero, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

their homework assignments. This fact greatly questions theequity and effectiveness of this measure when evaluated in the middle of the course, as it ismainly taken to improve the grade of those students that do not perform well and yet it maypunish them for their low midterm grades.References [1] E. H. Simpson, “The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), pp. 238–241, 1951. [2] M. G. Pavlides and M. D. Perlman, “How likely is Simpson’s Paradox?” The American Statistician, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 226–233, 2009. [3] P. J. Bickel, E. A. Hammel, and J. W. O’Connell, “Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from Berkeley,” Science, vol. 187, no. 4175, pp. 398

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kristin L. Wood, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD); Aaron P Bauer, United States Air Force Academy; Blake Perez, Singapore University of Technology and Design; Milton Doria, United States Air Force Academy; Michael Lawrence Anderson P.E., United States Air Force; Luke Jensen, CREO

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Covert Visual Systems: A pilot study, SW Regional ASEE Conference, Provo, UT, Sept. 2017. 4. Linsey, Julie S., K. L. Wood, and A. B. Markman. "Increasing innovation: presentation and evaluation of the wordtree design- by-analogy method." ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2008. 5. Helms, Michael, Swaroop S. Vattam, and Ashok K. Goel. "Biologically inspired design: process and products." Design studies Journal, Design Research Society, Vol 30.5, 606-622, 2009. 6. Zahedi, Mithra, and Lorna Heaton. "Mind Mapping as a Tool, as a Process, As a Problem/Solution

Conference Session

Supporting Faculty in Course Development and Pedagogy

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; James A. Middleton, Arizona State University; Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University ; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Kara L. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

Paper ID #22002Assessing Faculty and Organizational Change in a Professional DevelopmentProgram with Workshops and Disciplinary Communities of PracticeProf. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include faculty development, evaluating con- ceptual knowledge change, misconceptions, and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials

Conference Session

College-Industry Partnerships Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University; Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University; Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

topics: A. How technical work is accomplished B. Corporate culture C. Professional dress code D. Ethical behavior E. Reporting structure F. Teamwork G. Appreciation of diversity 5. Did the internship provide you with a team or community of practice (ie. your work team consisted of your supervisor or other personnel such as managers, engineers, technicians, etc.)? Please describe the membership of your “team” or “community”. 6. If so, how did this community help with your learning at work? 7. Did the internship provide opportunities to engage in company events such as retreats, strategic planning, socials, etc.? Please describe. As this is a descriptive case

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Anna Montana Cirell, Arizona State University; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Audrey Boklage, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, 2013.[2] C. E. Foor and S. E. Walden, “‘Imaginary Engineering’ or ‘Re-imagined Engineering’: Negotiating Gendered Identities in the Borderland of a College of Engineering,” NWSA J., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 41–64, 2009.[3] R. M. Marra, K. a Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, 2012.[4] J. P. Gee, “Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education,” Rev. Res. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 99–125, 2000.[5] P. L. Horta, “Identity in Education

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelly Peterson-Fairchild, Dixie State University; John Burns, Dixie State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

. [Online]. Available:https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/ww72bc50w. [Accessed Dec. 07, 2017].[7] Association of Research Libraries, “21st-Century Collections: Calibration of Investment andCollaborative Action,” 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.arl.org/publications-resources/2021-21st-century-collections-calibration-of-investment-and-collaborative-action#.WkWN3iRlChA. [Accessed: Dec. 28, 2017].[8] B. Brin, “Building a Library Collection to Support New Engineering Programs,” inEngineering libraries: building collections and delivering services, T. W. Conkling and L. R.Musser, Eds. New York, Taylor and Francis, 2002, pp. 46-78. [Online]. Available: Proquest e-book.[9] J. R. Davidson and C. A. Middleton, “Networking, Networking

Conference Session

Middle School Engineering Education

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanda C. Johnston, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Murat Akarsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Engineering Education : Research and Development A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education : Research and,” J. Pre-College Eng. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2014.[11] B. V. Koen, “Some thoughts on engineering,” in Discussion of the method: Conducting the engineer’s approach to problem solving, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 7–25.[12] R. S. Adams, J. Turns, and C. J. Atman, “Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice,” Des. Stud., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 275–294, 2003.[13] H. W. J. Rittel and M. M. Webber, “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning,” Policy Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 155–169, 1973.[14] C. J. Atman, R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg, and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dustyn Roberts P.E., University of Delaware; Trevor Scott Stephens, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

]. Available: https://lerner.udel.edu/centers/experiential-learning- centers/horn-program-in-entrepreneurship/. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2018].[4] “Innovation & Entrepreneurship Institute,” Fox School of Business | Temple University | Philadelphia, PA. [Online]. Available: https://www.fox.temple.edu/institutes-and- centers/innovation-entrepreneurship-institute/. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2018].[5] “Center for Entrepreneurial Studies,” Stanford Graduate School of Business. [Online]. Available: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/centers-initiatives/ces. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2018].[6] S. Blank and B. Dorf, The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company, 1 edition. Pescadero, Calif: K & S Ranch, 2012.[7

Conference Session

Robotics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S.M. Mizanoor Rahman, New York University; Sonia Mary Chacko, New York University; Sheila Borges Rajguru, New York University; Vikram Kapila, New York University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

examining the developed lessons, robotic behaviors, and adopted scenariosto ensure that (a) they do not generate misconceptions among learners, (b) they are safe and do notharm students in any manner, and (c) they do not require excessive time for implementation, etc.;(iii) developing robotics-based lessons with necessary materials such as lesson descriptions,activity sheets, etc. [10-12]; and (iv) considering the potential effect of robotics-based lessons onstudent performance evaluation and annual evaluation of teacher performance [10,12]. Next,regarding teachers, we recommend: (i) providing necessary professional development (PD) so thatthey successfully teach robotics-based lessons [9,11] and (ii) considering instructional supportssuch as

Conference Session

Career Decisions and Faculty Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan; Katie A. Shoemaker, University of Michigan; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior, behavioral intentions, such as plans to major inor work in engineering, are informed by three factors: (a) attitude toward the behavior, (b)subjective norms, and (c) perceived behavioral control [5]. Ajzen defined attitude toward thebehavior as the general disposition toward performing a particular behavior; thus behavioralintentions serve as proxies for motivations. In general, the magnitude of a behavioral intention istheorized to correspond to the likelihood of behavioral performance.Ajzen recognized that general dispositions toward behaviors alone are poor predictors ofbehaviors. Thus, he added the concepts of subjective norms and perceived behavioral control toaid in explaining additional variation in

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Okere, Washington State University; Chris Souder M.S., California State University, Chico

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Paper ID #21027Making the Case for Temporary Structures as a Required Course and Rec-ommending an Instructional DesignDr. George Okere, Washington State University George is an assistant professor in the construction management program in the School of Design and Construction at Washington State University (WSU). Before joining WSU he worked for Kiewit Corpo- ration on various heavy civil projects. He received his PhD in Technology Management from Indiana State University with specialization in Construction Management. His research focus is in the area of contract administration on state DOT projects.Mr. Chris Souder MS

Conference Session

Division for Experimentation & Lab-oriented Studies Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gene L. Harding, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Megan Prygoski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; James Burns, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Brian Jeffrey Carmichael, Security Automation Systems; Matthew S. Engstrom, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

Paper ID #21403A Portable Engine Dynamometer Test Cell for Studying Spark-ignition En-gine Performance and Mechanical-Electrical-Thermodynamic Energy Con-versionProf. Gene L. Harding, Purdue Polytechnic Institute GENE L. HARDING is an associate professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University, where he has taught since 2003. He has three years of industrial experience with Agilent Technologies, 28 years of combined active and reserve service in the United States Air Force, holds an MSEE from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and is a licensed professional engineer.Dr. Megan Prygoski, Purdue

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session on Conservation and Optimization

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Radian G. Belu, Southern University and A&M College; Lucian Ionel Cioca, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu; Richard Chiou, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

Paper ID #21962Development and Implementation of a Power and Energy Engineering Minorwith Limited Resources: First Results and Lessons LearnedDr. Radian G. Belu, Southern University and A&M College Dr. Radian Belu is Associate Professor within Electrical Engineering Department, Southern University, Baton, Rouge, USA. He is holding one PHD in power engineering and other one in physics. Before joining to Southern University Dr. Belu hold faculty, research and industry positions at universities and research institutes in Romania, Canada and United States. He also worked for several years in industry as project manager

Conference Session

Clinical Learning Experiences in BME

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah Lynn Cash, Clemson University; John D. DesJardins, Clemson University; Breanne Przestrzelski, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

Paper ID #22471The DMVP (Detect, Measure, Valuate, Propose) Method for Evaluating Iden-tified Needs During a Clinical and Technology Transfer Immersion ProgramMiss Hannah Lynn Cash, Clemson University Hannah Cash is pursuing her PhD in Bioengineering with a focus on Engineering and Science Education. Working with students through the engineering design process, Hannah has been encouraged to aid in outreach opportunities to bring Bioengineering and Design to younger students and teachers throughout the Upstate of South Carolina through work with the Perry Initiative and Project Lead the Way. The Perry Initiative works to

Conference Session

Maps, Metaphors, Tweets, and Drafts

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jared David Berezin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

(a is to b, as x is to y). Most often, we encounter analogy as a form of reasoning (“analogical reasoning”) aimed at persuading an audience. For example, a common refrain in U.S. political campaigns involves variations of the following analogy: “My opponent is a Democrat, and Democrats raise taxes. I’m a Republican, and Republicans don’t raise taxes. So vote for me and I won’t raise your taxes!” In engineering, analogical reasoning is a common strategy during the design and iteration process. Analogical reasoning, “a form of inference that allows us to derive implications from single cases even when we do not know all the factors involved,” enables engineers to make comparison-based predictions [33]. For example

Conference Session

Cognitive Engagement

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allyson Jo Barlow, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Benjamin David Lutz, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

frameworkin engineering. Work evaluating the nature of engagement linked to higher levels of learning inengineering classrooms would provide value feedback to faculty seeking to modify theirclassrooms. Further work is needed in the realm of survey development to better understand theways in which students can provide feedback with accuracy.References[1] R. S. Heller, C. Beil, K. Dam, and B. Haerum, “Student and Faculty Perceptions of Engagement in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 253–261, Jul. 2010.[2] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies Of Engagement: Classroom Based Practices,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 87–101, 2005.[3] H. L. Chen, L. R. Lattuca, and E. R. Hamilton

Collection

2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference

Authors

Ava Madeline Bellizzi; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego; Elizabeth A. Reddy, University of San Diego

the Fall 2016 and Fall 2017 semesters. The authorswould especially like to thank Alyssa Beamish for her unique contribution to this work. Thiswork was partially supported by the National Science Foundation through a RevolutionizingEngineering and Computer Science Education (RED) Award #1519453. The views expressedherein are solely those of the authors.References1. Duffy, J., Tsang, E., & Lord, S. (2000, June). Service-Learning in Engineering: What, Why, and How? ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, St. Louis, MO.2. Jacoby, B., & Assoc. (1996). Service Learning in Higher Education (p. 5). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.3. Paquin, J. L., (2006). How Service-Learning Can Enhance the Pedagogy and Culture of Engineering Programs

Conference Session

Construction Division Technical Session 4: Capstone, Safety and Beyond

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dorail F. Porter, Associated General Contractors; Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

their career rolepreferences and recommend construction education program improvements. Informal discussionswith some selected students provided additional insights.Key findings indicated that future construction career role preferences were: (a) Project Manager(MPCRS = 8); (b) Superintendent (MPCRS = 7); (c) Real Estate Developer and Graduate Student(MPCRS = 6); and (d) Estimator / Inspector (MPCRS = 5). The reasons construction students gavefor preferring the project manager and superintendent roles included high salaries, opportunity tolead, love for authority, prior experiences, internships, role models, management skills, hands onwork, and working outdoors. The study showed that key reasons for students’ pursuit of a CMdegree included

Conference Session

Makerspaces

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron Kyle, Columbia University; Christine Kovich, HYPOTHEkids; Michael A. Carapezza, Hk Maker Lab

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

high school joined the high school summer program to observethe course and learn about engineering design process pedagogy (Figure 2a). One of the teachersfrom the informal 2015 co-learning environment returned during 2016 as part of a pilot run-through for the formal collaborative curriculum development effort. In the summer of 2017 thecurriculum development effort officially became a part of the Hk Maker Lab programmaticactivities. (a) (b) Figure 2 (a) Two teachers (rear) participating in the informal co-learning environment. (b) First teacher to participate in the official curriculum development effort. One teacher joined during the summer of 2017 (Figure 2b

Conference Session

Modeling, Inquiry, Engineering Literacy & Argumentation

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roxanne A. Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Michael Helms, Georgia Institute of Technology; Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

multi-tracktimeline of sound clips and effects, and (b) the code editor in which students authorthe Python or JavaScript scripts used to generate the music, (c) the sound library,and (d) a curriculum pane containing programming constructs and examples.EarSketch has shown promise in facilitating learning of computational principlesand improving engagement for student populations traditionally underrepresentedin the field [10]. EarSketch is being implemented as a 10-week module within the~36 week CSP course that covers all learning objectives in the Programming BigIdea and additional learning objectives in other Big Ideas (Creativity, Abstraction,and Algorithms). EarSketch and CSP are well-aligned in their goals of broadeninginterest in computing

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shawn S. Keshmiri, University of Kansas; Aaron Blevins, University of Kansas; A Ram Kim, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

large fixed-wing UAS, known as theMeridian, was developed using Advanced Aircraft Analysis (AAA). The Meridian is a 1,100 lbUAS that was designed, manufactured, and flight tested by the KUAE department. The dynamicmodel of the Meridian was investigated over a broad range of Mach numbers and flight altitudes.The dynamic model for the UAS was verified with actual flight tests [14]. Figure 2: Dynamic Modeling of Meridian UAS (Ref. 14)b) Effects of Winglets on Small Unmanned Aerial SystemsAlthough the benefits of winglets on the fuel efficiency, takeoff, and climb performance of largetransportation aircraft have been extensively investigated and documented, their impact on smallUASs have not been widely modeled. This