* Explaining key physical effects influencing selective thermal emitters in order to achieve high performance thermophotovoltaic systemsDr. Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Krishna Madhavan is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. In 2008 he was awarded an NSF CAREER award for learner-centric, adaptive cyber-tools and cyber-environments using learning analytics. He leads a major NSF-fundedprojectcalled Deep Insights Anytime, Anywhere (http://www.dia2.org) to characterize the impact of NSF and other federal investments in the area of STEM education. He also serves as co-PI for the Network forComputationalNanotechnology (nanoHUB.org) that serves hundreds
Through a Course Redesign InitiativeBackgroundThere have been myriad studies that have examined factors that contribute to student retention inengineering programs. These studies have helped guide efforts in implementing effectivestrategies to increase student retention, persistence, and degree completion. Two common themesrelated to engineering retention that have emerged from the literature are individual andinstitutional factors. Individual factors can be summed up as aptitude, pre-college preparation,academic performance, affective factors, personality traits, and satisfaction; while institutionalfactors include academic engagement, academic and career advising, environmental and socialdynamics, and climate
Paper ID #19829Work in Progress: Signature Pedagogies in Engineering - Surface StructureDr. John Tingerthal P.E., Northern Arizona University John Tingerthal joined the Construction Management faculty at Northern Arizona University in 2007 and was appointed as a Distinguished Teaching Fellow. His engineering career spans a variety of design and forensic engineering experiences. He spent the first eight years of his career performing structural consulting engineering in Chicago. He earned his Doctorate in Education and is currently the Associate Chair of the Civil Engineering, Construction Management and Environmental
. Zenan YuProf. Hyoung J Cho, University of Central Florida Hyoung Jin Cho is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Uni- versity of Central Florida. He earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2002, MS and BS in Materials Engineering from Seoul National University in 1991 and 1989, respec- tively. He was a recipient of NSF CAREER award in 2004. His main research interest is in the develop- ment of microscale actuators, sensors and microfluidic components based on micro- and nanotechnology.Dr. Lei Zhai, NanoScience Technology Center, University of Central FloridaProf. Jayan Thomas, University of Central Florida Dr. Jayan Thomas is an associate
thecurriculum in its existing power electronic and power system courses. These initiatives expandthe power systems laboratory curriculum to include a series of protection experiments. Thenewly-proposed set of laboratory experiments utilizes microprocessor-based protective relays togive students hands-on experience in power system protection. The experiments drive learningoutcomes which incorporate the theory and practice necessary for technical careers in today’spower industry. This paper presents an overview of the content and learning outcomes of theexperiments, in addition to initial student performance.IntroductionThe growing density of distributed energy resources (DERs) in utility circuits calls for newconsiderations in circuit planning and
and facilities of a Center Bold yet achievable• Frontier investigations across and/or within disciplines (“Transformative”, “Grand Challenges”) Legacy• Promote organizational linkages capitalizing on cyberinfrastructure Partnerships• Integrative learning and discovery for (U.S.) students Broad set of career paths• Engage and develop nation’s talent, including groups underrepresented in STEM research and education Diverse STEM workforce• Foster science/engineering in service to society Knowledge Transfer, new research areas, instrumentation, technologies Example: I/UCRC Pre-‐competitive Research Portfolio: cooperative ly defined & funded on shared value Ideas, Industry
-Gilbert Community College.Prof. brad allenby, Arizona State UniversityProf. Amy E. Landis, Clemson University Dr. Landis joined Clemson in June 2015 as the Thomas F. Hash ’69 Endowed Chair in Sustainable Development. Previously, she was an Associate Professor at Arizona State University in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment. She began her career as an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, after having obtained her PhD in 2007 from the University of Illinois at Chicago under the supervision of Dr. Thomas L. Theis. She has developed a research program in sustainable engineering of bioproducts. Her research ranges from design of systems based on industrial ecology and byproduct
Undergraduate Engineering Outreach 1MotivationWhen undergraduate engineering students participate in various forms of community outreachthrough an ambassador-style group, the mission is often to promote engineering and engineering-related careers to K-12 students and their families, and increase interest in engineering amonghistorically underserved populations. Yet, the preparation and delivery of outreach activities mayalso impact the undergraduate students. In this Work in Progress paper we present the earlyfindings of a project seeking to identify common practices among university-based, ambassadorprograms, with a view to informing communities of researchers and practitioners. We exploredthree questions [1]: (1) What similarities and differences are
Paper ID #26719Work in Progress - The GPA Trajectories of Engineering StudentsMr. Hassan Ali Al Yagoub, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hassan Al Yagoub is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research in- terests include diversity & inclusion, students’ persistence, advising and mentoring, engineering career pathways, and school-to-work transition of new engineers. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to beginning his doctoral
across-the-board gains in everyaspect of ability, but most so in “Learn new things,” “Empathize,” “Communicate,” and“Document technical matters.” Each of these had more than double the effect size of the nextmost affected task – “Identify a need.” This is especially interesting because needs identificationis not only a primary goal of our program, but also a goal of NIBIB R25 programs in general[11].To broaden impactThe inaugural year of our program showed where there is room for improvement with secondcohort. The first of these improvements, already enacted, is to urge students to apply who do notconsider themselves to be pre-med. This did indeed change the spectrum of career intentions inour next cohort. We are also requiring Scholars to
math, offering Statway and Quantway as alternative developmentalcourse sequences that progress students “to and through” their college mathematicssequence. Statway and Quantway utilize a non-traditional intuitive problem-based andcollaborative learning pedagogy. Statway and Quantway Pathways engage students inthe statistical and quantitative reasoning concepts increasingly seen as more relevant tomany students’ educational and career goals than those in the traditional algebraicsequence (Huang 2018). Although there is nothing completely new under the sun, thisteaching and learning methodology puts several components together in a homogenousclassroom operation. Essentially it's answering that collective student question, “am Iever going to use
do not receive detailedfeedback on style and form. While surveys of recent graduates and engineering department heads support thecontention that these approaches are preparing engineers to write, another survey of industrymanagers refutes that contention. In 2012, an ASME survey of 590 early career engineers foundthat 75 percent assessed their own preparation of engineering writing as sufficient or strong [6].In that same ASME study, a survey of 42 heads of mechanical engineering departments acrossthe United States found that 65 percent viewed their communication programs as strong orsuccessful at preparing engineering students to communicate. In contrast, that same ASME studyconducted a survey of 647 industry supervisors and found
Paper ID #25584Work in Progress: Exploring the Attributes of a Prototypical Leader AsViewed by Undergraduate Engineering StudentsProf. Carmen Maria Lilley, University of Illinois, Chicago Dr. Lilley’s research interests in engineering education focus on professional development of engineering students at the undergraduate and graduate level. In particular, she is interested in the nuances of how the intersection of race/ethnicity with gender affects professional development in the area of leadership and the long term career trajectory of an individual. Her other research interests are focused on syntheses of low
one two-hour laboratory session eachweek. Following training, students are given access to the department maker space, whichfeatures 3-D printers, circuit fabrication stations, and hand and power tools. Approximately 50%of the lecture topics in the course provide a survey of biomedical engineering careers paths andour curriculum, and the remaining lecture topics relate to the design project. These includepresentations covering computer-aided drawing, electric circuits, cardiovascular physiology, andengineering standards. Laboratory activities provide practice in developing skills in usingSolidWorks (Dassault Systemes), making electrical measurements, fabricating circuits, and using3-D printers. Students work in pairs on the term design
the undergrads to be creative and to share their experienceswith K-12 students. All of our undergrads are great role models, and this is a chance to introduce K-12 students to technical areas and careers that they might have not considered. It is also an exercisein problem-based learning. Undergrads must decide what they need to learn, then figure out how tolearn it and then how to teach the material. Our undergraduate students also have the opportunity topractice communication skills with people who possess little technical knowledge. In addition, theyalso have to work in a group setting, towards a common goal and they have to critically assess theirown performance, as well as the performance of others.The project has the following
Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at Vir- ginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive ped- agogical practices, environmental, ethics and humanitarian engineering, and non-traditional knowledge transfer. Homero has been recognized as a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Natasha Smith, Virginia Tech Natasha is the Director of Enrollment Management for the College of Engineering as well as an under- graduate academic and career advisor for General Engineering students. These dual roles allow Natasha the unique opportunity to
careers, research isclear that providing students autonomy in their learning environment fosters collaboration andstudent-driven learning [8]–[10]. After completing their chosen subcomponents, students thencombined their parts in order to create the completed circuit. Attendance is voluntary and is notfactored into students’ grades. The lessons are developed by the Graduate Teaching Assistant(GTA) and are complete with step-by-step instructions. An example circuit is shown in Figure 1.The remaining lessons can be found in an online repository [11].Surveys were distributed to students at the end of the semester. Survey questions were pairedsuch that we could compare students’ assessment of #FunTimesWithTheTA with that of thenormal course. We
to prepare them for careers in industry. Leaders of other engineering studentorganizations, summer camp counselors, and college ambassadors are invited to participate in thesecond leadership workshop with the peer mentors. A team of staff plan activities andpresentations with input from the students. Past topics of this workshop include intergenerationalcommunication, cultural awareness, DiSCÓ leadership styles, personality type assessments, andconflict resolution. Many of these workshops have been supported by industry partners, and theyhave sent representatives to help deliver some of the activities. Once the leadership trainings are completed, there a number of ways for mentors to getinvolved in the organization. The most popular
means that there is a need tofurther emphasize these kinds of skills early in higher education curricula so that students cangrasp the importance of these skills in the beginning of their academic career and long beforestarting their professional career [2]. In an effort to train senior biomedical engineering studentsto be more effective writers we adopted a two-stage approach that began with first training theprofessors to effectively teach students to be better writers (Maroon Institute for WritingExcellence) then employing two strategies: Writing-to-Learn and “Scaffolding” Writing in thecourse to develop our students into effective writers (Figure 1). Figure 1. Flowchart of Intervention to Improve Effective Writing SkillsMaroon
analyzed for enrollment, as well as diversity of courses available in the tracks. Adiversity score was calculated for each track by counting how many of each mechanics,electrical, programming, cell, and materials science classes were in each track offering andcomputing the standard deviation of each track, where high numbers meant less diversity incourses.In addition, faculty, alumni and current student surveys were collected through an online surveysystem asking a variety of questions about importance of skills, topics, ranking of courses andpreference of topics, as well as career alignment with track area. The survey was sent to 400people and a 34% response rate was achieved with an even gender split amongst participants.The survey of both
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.[2] White House, “STEM for all,” 2016 [Online]. Available: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/02/11/stem-all.[3] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914-925, 2013.[4] C. Adelman, Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analyses of undergraduate careers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, 1998.[5] J. Blickenstaff, “Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?” Gender and Education, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 369-386, 2005
University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?” He has also been part of the teaching team for NSF’s Innovation Corps for Learning, and was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014. Dr
Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education Session CEED 432 Solutions to challenges IIntegration of internship preparation into the curriculum from the first to the lastsemester1. Univ 1810 (First Semester Learning Community): first round of (English) resume and cover letter as part of the Career Center’s “Certificate of Professional Development,” establish LinkedIn profile, “connect” to current and former Eurotech students as part of the LinkedIn Eurotech Group, explore internship portals of German companies in CT2. Second semester: Company visits, applications for summer internships in the US3. 2nd Year 1 credit modular
classes including his senior This was a great idea and I feel that the things Icapstone design project. The student who created the second learned in this course will stay with me beyond myePortfolio went to a top-ranked graduate school for pursuing undergraduate career. Thanks for everything!his MS in Aeronautical Engineering and is continuing to use ePortfolios should be added to the curriculum, ithis ePortfolio to showcase projects done as part of his provides a great interactive class summary. Other students could take advantage of this great feature. Overall, this has been a
inception • Past visits included: Yelp, Andreessen Horowitz, • Students who attended Malwarebytes, Affirm, Bloom Energy, Giant Pixel previous workshops are now Corporation, Bit Torrent, Tiny Prints, Twitter, hosting current students at Palantir, Founders Fund, Tesla companies in Silicon Valley• January 7-13, 2018 as alumni• Learn more at tec.illinois.edu/programs/silicon-valley • Unique engagement opportunity for alumniThis workshop impacts students when making their final career choicesCozad• Founded in 2000• Collaboration with Entrepreneurship at Illinois• Mentoring from alumni &
actuallylooking for individuals that have a breadth of hands-on skills and practical experience relatedquality in their discipline rather than just management theories. Therefore, to adequately preparestudents for a career in manufacturing, and gain the necessary skills related to quality beforeentering the workforce, the author suggests developing partnerships with a diverse set ofmanufactures to integrate practical projects into the classroom. This paper will discuss therelationships with industry and the projects that students enrolled in Quality for Manufacturingcourse at Purdue University undertake to gain a well-rounded understanding of the various waysthat quality impacts industry.Building Connections with IndustryAs manufacturing companies
based instruction to prepare graduatesfor careers in industry. Each of the programs also utilize an Industry Advisory Board (IAB)comprised of industry experts to assist in curriculum steering and program development. Severalfaculty members within the programs, along with assistance from IAB members recognized aneducational gap between the students entering undergraduate degrees interested in robotics(based off of their robotics experiences in high school), and the demand from industry lookingfor graduates with knowledge in automation and industrial distribution. Conversations betweenthe EET program faculty and the IAB, lead to planning of a Robotics and Automation minor Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education
Page 12.755.5with industry members, professors, graduate students, and UCSD alumni/ae. The halftime eventwas so successful that it was extended from the originally-planned 15 minutes to >30 minutes.Students interacted with faculty, graduate students, industry members and alumni to talk aboutresearch and job openings, current trends in bioengineering, career development decisions, and,in general, gained insight into what their futures might hold.The Future of BQBsThe 1st BQB completed its mission, to establish a tradition in the UCSD Department ofBioengineering, to foster recognition of advances in bioengineering, to raise awareness ofachievements in the field of bioengineering, to connect students with educators and members ofindustry, and
industryneeds, develop skills to solve practical problems for the industry community, and grasp theknowledge of project planning and managing. The outcomes are to provide graduates who arewell trained and are experienced at creative problem analysis, solving, planning and managing,for the manufacturing community. Understanding these techniques and gaining the experienceoutlined above is vital to the success of students who pursue a career in the manufacturingindustry [1] [2].Strategies for Enhancing Manufacturing Curriculum Our vision is to make the College the leading source of well-educated problem solversand project managers for the manufacturing community. Our goal is to deliver graduates withexceptional skills at solving problems in an
seismic loads are determined using the ASCE 7-05 code‘Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures’. This is the student’s first exposureto this code that will be highly used throughout their careers. Preliminary design calculations areperformed to determine structural sizes that are modeled in a frame analysis program used in thiscourse. The frame analysis program used is the RISA-3D analysis/design program, and a modelFig 3: Students utilize the RISA-3D Program during the Analysis Phase of the Project 2for the entire building structure is input for analysis. Though the students have used this programin a previous course, its use in that course was limited, and did not include a three dimensionalstructural modeling. Utilizing this