role of hip-hop celebrities in constructing racial identity on Black Twitter," Information, Communication & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 352-368, 2019.[3] M. Randle and S. Dolnicar, "Does Cultural Background Affect Volunteering Behavior?," Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 225-247, 2009.[4] S. A. Amponsah‐Afuwape, L. B. Myers and S. P. Newman, "Cognitive predictors of ethnic minorities' blood donation intention," Psychology, Health & Medicine, pp. 357-361, 2002.[5] J. A. Youngman and C. Egelhoff, "Best practices in recruiting and persistence of underrepresented minorities in engineering: a 2002 snapshot.," 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, vol. 2, pp. F2D-11, 2003.[6] E. R
manufacturing au- tomation. As a student, she worked at Kimberly-Clark, Motoman, and Intel and gained experience in the areas of industrial automation, manufacturing, and sensors. As a professor she has grown an international reputation for BID process and pedagogy research and has given invited talks/webinars/lectures to SWE, INCOSE, NASA, and at universities in Canada, France, and USA. As a consultant, she leads practicing engineers and organizations through the process of taking inspiration from nature to solve problems.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is the 2022-23 President of ASEE and one of the recipients of the 2022 NAE Bernard M
Suturin, Monash UniversityDr. Robert Lee Read, Public Invention Robert L. Read, PhD, founded Public Invention in 2019, 35 years after first being inspired to do so by Buckminster Fuller. He is a professional computer programmer and manager, an amateur scientist, physicist, mathematician, mechanical engineer and electrical engineer. He speaks Esperanto fluently. He hopes that 20 years from now you will be able to go to a party and say, ”I’m a Public Inventor” and have everyone know what that means. Email: . Twitter: @robertleereadNathaniel Bechard ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A democratized open-source platform for medical device troubleshootingIntroductionThe COVID pandemic
the survey items. In contrast, severalsurvey items were found to be correlated with second semester enrollment, specifically theWellness Composite score from the PWS, the overall wellness rating from the ICOPPE, and astudent’s confidence in graduating from WMU. Previous work by the authors found correlationsbetween second semester enrollment and confidence in graduating from WMU for first-yearstudents in Fall 2020 but not for students in Fall 2019 [17]. When survey responses werecompared to third semester enrollment (i.e., retention to the second year), confidence ingraduating from WMU was positively correlated with retention for both cohorts. Additionalwork is required to determine if the current wellness and self-efficacy correlations will
Texas A&M University. He holds a Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Masdar Institute of Science & Technology and a Bachelor’s degree in Mechan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Paper ID 39732 ASEE 2023 Annual Conference & Exposition, 25-28 June 2023, Baltimore, MD, USA How to Address Sustainability in a Mechanical Engineering Program ― Implementation and ChallengesAbstractWith the growing consciousness of depleting material and energy resources, the concepts ofrenewability and sustainability are becoming increasingly important. Sustainable engineeringrequires improved design of products, systems, and services, targeting better
faculty member for the Scientista Foundation and ASEE student chapters at Binghamton University.Mr. Koenraad E. Gieskes, State University of New York, Binghamton Koen Gieskes currently serves as the Watson College Interim Assistant Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Interim Director of the Engineering Design Division. He is also director for LSAMP and co-director for STEP and UBMS. Koen first joined the Engineering Design Division at Binghamton Uni- versity as a graduate student in 2004, then, in 2009, he was hired on as a full-time lecturer, in 2017 he became the Assistant Director, and in 2022 began serving as the Interim Director. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
21st Century,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 1999.[2] J. Cantor, “Experiential Learning in Higher Education: Linking Classroom and Community,” 1995.[3] R. Graham, “The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2018. Accessed: Oct. 04, 2018. [Online]. Available: file://engin-storage.m.storage.umich.edu/engin- storage/jcallew/windat.v2/Documents/Conferences/ASEE/2019/MIT_NEET_GlobalStateE ngineeringEducation2018.pdf[4] L. Harrisberger, “Experiential Learning in Engineering Education,” ERIC Clearinghouse, 1976.[5] D. R. Fisher, A. Bag, and S. Sarma, “Developing Professional Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students Through Cocurricular
Knowledge: AFramework for Teacher Knowledge,” Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarshipin Education, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.[15] M. Schmid, E. Brianza, and D. Petko, “Developing a short assessment instrumentfor Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factorstructure of an integrative and a transformative model,” Comput Educ, p. 103967, Jul.2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967.[16] C. S. Chai, “Teacher Professional Development for Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Review from the Perspectives ofTechnological Pedagogical Content (TPACK),” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 5–13, 2019
Education,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 858–885, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2014.11777350.[4] L. Lattuca and J. Pollard, “Towards a Conceptualization of Faculty Decision-Making About Curricular and Instructional Change,” p. 20, 2016.[5] M. Paretti, J. Deters, and M. Menon, “Building a Sustainable University-Wide Interdisciplinary Graduate Program to Address Disasters,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/41956[6] J. R. Deters, M. Menon, M. C. Paretti, and M. Webb, “Exploring Interdisciplinary Identity Development Using Possible Selves: An Exploratory Study,” REES AAEE 2021 conference: Engineering Education Research Capability
iterations.In general, both based on direct positive experience, student feedback, and resulting quality of studentachievement, the author cannot recommend using an ungrading approach highly enough.References(1) Schinske, J; Tanner, K. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2014, 13(2), 159–66.(2) Starch, D.; Elliott, E.C. School Review 1912, 20: 442–57.(3) Starch, D.; Elliott, E.C. School Review 1913a, 21: 676–81.(4) Starch, D.; Elliott, E.C. School Review 1913b, 21: 254–95.(5) Stevenson, D. “A, B, C, D, and F: Meaningful Grades or Random Letters?” Paper presented at the2019 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics conference, September 25–27, 2019, Boston, MA.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFR93oiwFEk#action=share(6) Blum, S.D. “Just One Change (Just
Quarterly Insights, Fall 2021.34. D. Laughlin and B. Laughlin, “Virtual and Augmented Realities – Continuing EngineeringEducation,” in C. Baukal (ed.), Continuing Engineering Education Handbook, Nova Science,New York, 2022, 129-154.35. C. Baukal, B. Olson, and R. Ernst, “Virtual Reality for Continuing ProfessionalDevelopment,” paper 26721 presented at American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Annual Conference & Exhibition, Tampa, FL, June 2019.36. L. Ausburn, F. Ausburn, J. Martens, C. Baukal, I. Agnew, and R. Dionne, UserCharacteristics, Trait vs. State Immersion, and Presence in a First-Person Virtual World, Journalfor Virtual Worlds Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, December 2019.
,” Equity Excell. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2002.[6] K. Cross, K. Clancy, R. Mendenhall, P. Imoukhuede, and J. Amos, “The double bind of race andgender: A look into the experiences of women of color in engineering,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition Proceedings, 2018.[7] N. Griffith, N. M. Hurd, and S. B. Hussain, “‘I didn’t come to school for this’: A qualitativeexamination of experiences with race-related stressors and coping responses among Black studentsattending a predominantly White institution,” J. Adolesc. Res, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 115–139, 2019.[8] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Women,Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017
Student Persistence,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2016-June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.27280.[3] K. A. Feldman, J. C. Smart, and C. A. Ethington, “Using Holland’s Theory to Study Patterns of College Student Success: The Impact of Major Fields on Students *,” Accessed: Aug. 31, 2021. [Online].[4] J. R. Edwards and A. J. Shipp, “Relationship Between P-E Fit and Outcomes 1 The Relationship Between Person-Environment Fit and Outcomes: An Integrative Theoretical Framework,” Accessed: Aug. 31, 2021. [Online].[5] C. Bohndick, T. Rosman, S. Kohlmeyer, and H. M. Buhl, “The interplay between subjective abilities and subjective demands and its relationship with academic success. An
Engineering (BME) and STEM.Undergraduate (UG) and PhD: degrees awarded in that year. Faculty: tenured or tenure-trackfaculty. Sources: Engineering by the Numbers, ASEE EDGE Graphic Explorer, NCSES Surveyof Earned Doctorates, NCSES Science and Engineering Indicators, NCSES Diversity andSTEM: Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities Several societal pressures and personal experiences are responsible for women’s decision notto remain in biomedical engineering and other STEM professions. Women turn away fromengineering often because of social expectations/pressure, perceptions that they don’t belong,and a hostile learning environment [3], [8]–[11]. In addition to this “chilly climate,” societalfactors (e.g., family responsibility) are also
Paper ID #36947Personhood at the ExtremesDr. Suzanne Keilson, Loyola University, Maryland Suzanne Keilson is a faculty member at Loyola University Maryland. Her background and degrees are in Applied Physics and her research interests include signal processing, biomedical and materials engineer- ing, design, STEM education and assistive technologies.. She has served in the Mid-Atlantic section of ASEE for a number of years and is active in ASME and IEEE activities. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Personhood at the ExtremesAbstractThis paper investigates
academic rank: Fall 2015, fall 2017, and fall 2018,” Digest of Education Statistics, 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_315.20.asp[21] B. Rios-Ellis, M. Rascón, G. Galvez, G. Inzunza-Franco, L. Bellamy, and A. Torres, “Creating a Model of Latino Peer Education: Weaving Cultural Capital into the Fabric of Academic Services in an Urban University Setting,” Educ. Urban Soc., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 33–55, Jan. 2015.[22] Y. P. Bynum, “The power of informal mentoring,” Education, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 2015.[23] J. Horowitz and K. Christopher, “The Research Mentoring Program: Serving the Needs of Graduate and Undergraduate Researchers.,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 105– 116, Apr. 2013
Hyflex learning model,” International Journal of Innovation and Learning, May 2019, Accessed: Apr. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/10.1504/IJIL.2019.099986[2] A. Hsu, “‘Where is my office anyway?’ As COVID recedes, remote workers prepare to head back,” NPR, Feb. 17, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.npr.org/2022/02/17/1080881870/return-to-the-office-remote-work-hybrid-sched ule-worker-productivity[3] E. Pandey, “Generation Z fears being left behind by the push to remote work,” Axios, Jul. 13, 2021. https://www.axios.com/2021/07/13/gen-z-remote-work[4] M. Arshad and R. R. Romatoski, “Effective Learning Strategies: Design of Course Structure for Engineering Courses Aimed for Hybrid
. Lawhorn. “Solar and wind generation occupations: a look at the next decade,” Beyond the Numbers:Employment & Unemployment, vol. 10, no. 4 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2021), [online]. Available:https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-10/solar-and-wind-generation-occupations-a-look-at-the-next-decade.htm.[4] D. Keyser and T. Suzanne, “The Wind Energy Workforce in the United States: Training, Hiring, and FutureNeeds,” Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A20-73908, 2019. [online]. Available:https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73908.pdf.[5] Sharma, S. and Sengar, N. “A Review of solar PV training manuals and development of survey based solar PVsystem training formats for beginners,” Solar Energy, vol. 241, pp. 72
University Center for Postsecondary Research. The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2021 edition. Bloomington, IN, Author, n.d.6. A.H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, 19707. C. Forest, H. Hashemi Farzaneh, J. Weinmann, U. Lindemann. “Quantitative survey and analysis of five maker spaces at large, research-oriented universities.” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. New Orleans, LA, USA, 2016, pp. 1-128. V. Wilczynski, “Contributions of Academic Makerspaces to Design Education”. in Design Education Today. D. Schaefer, G. Coates, C. Eckert, Eds. Cham: Springer, 2019. pp. 91-114.9. B.R. Martin, “What's happening to our universities?” Prometheus, vol. 34
. [2] J. Keshwani and E. Curtis, “To Change the World: Student Motivation for Pursuing a Degree in Agricul‐tural or Biological Engineering To Change the World: Student Motivation for Pursuing a Degree in Agricultural or Biological Engineering,” American Society for Engineering Education,. 2017. [3] D. R. Keshwani and J. Keshwani, “Understanding Student Successes, Challenges, and Perceptions of Community: Work‐in‐Progress.” American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. [4] C. Hershock and M. LaVaque‐Manty, “Teaching in the Cloud: Leveraging Online Collaboration Tools to Enhance Student Engagement,” Center for Research on Learning and Teaching Occasional Papers , no. 31, 2012. [5] R
advisors teach?” NACADA Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 65–73, 2005.[4] B. B. Crookston, “A developmental view of academic advising as teaching,” NACADA Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 5–9, 1994.[5] D.G. Creamer and E.G. Creamer, “Practicing developmental advising: theoretical contexts and functional applications,” NACADA Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 17–24, 1994.[6] K. C. Davis, “Examining the efficacy of exam wrappers in a computer science course” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://216.185.13.174/37120, July 2021.[7] C. Napier, “Thinking about thinking: the relationship between confidence, attainment and metacognition in computer science
, vol. 276, pp. 1-20, 2020.[5] N. Lieu Le and S. P. Nunes, "Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability," Sustainable Materials and Technologies, vol. 7, pp. 1-28, 2016.[6] L. Malaeb and G. M. Ayoub, "Reverse osmosis technology for water treatment: State of the art review," Desalination, vol. 267, pp. 1-8, 2011.[7] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education," J. Eng. Ed., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[8] W. Chen, U. V. Shah and C. Brechtelsbauer, "A framework for hands-on learning in chemical engineering education—Training students with the end goal in mind," Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 28, pp. 25-29, 2019.[9] S. Freeman, S. L
is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. Grant Nos. 1821638, 1821439, and 1821445. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. Koretsky, S. Nolen, B. Self, C. Papadopoulos, J. Widmann, M. Prince, D. Dal Bello, “For Systematic Development of Conceptests for Active Learning,” in Proceedings EDULEARN 19 (11th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies), 2019, vol. 1, pp. 8882–8892.[2] M. D. Koretsky, B. J. Brooks, R. M. White, and A. S. Bowen, “Querying the Questions: Student Responses and
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. G. P. Berdanier, “Genre maps as a method to visualize engineering writing and argumentation patterns,” J Eng Educ, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 377–393, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20281.[2] M. Borrego, “Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 91–102, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x.[3] S. Dart, S. Trad, and K. Blackmore, “Navigating the path from technical engineering to engineering education research: A conceptual model of the transition
. "Assessment of student learning in an entrepreneurship practicum course." 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2017.[11] M. Pynnönen, J. Hallikas, M. Immonen. “Innovation Commercialisation: Processes, Tools and Implications.” In: Chechurin, L., Collan, M. (eds) Advances in Systematic Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_19. 2019[12] N. Duval-Couetil, A. Huang-Saad, and M. Wheadon. "Training Faculty in Entrepreneurship and Innovation: An Evaluation of the National Science Foundation Innovation-Corps™ Program." Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy 4.4: 583-608. 2021Appendix AInnovation commercialization surveyThe study is to assess the level of
projects that provide virtual educational experiences for K-12 students on marine science. She loves to cook, ride her bike, and play with her dog. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reimagining Methodologies: Why We Center Marginalized VoicesAbstractWe are a student, alum, and faculty research team seeking to reduce harm, be responsive to /mitigate / reduce trauma, and grow justice within engineering education pedagogy / practice,related research communities (including ASEE), and the broader world. We seek to utilizeresearch methodologies that align with these aspirations, goals, and commitments. However,many standard
Paper ID #38132“What’s getting in the way?” Personal and ProfessionalBarriers to Engineering LeadershipCindy Rottmann (Associate Director Research) Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director, Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She conducts research on engineering leadership, engineers' professional practice, and ethics and equity in engineering. She is currently the Program Chair of the ASEE LEAD division.Emily Moore Dr. Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto
, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.24059/olj.v19i2.454.[5] O. Balci, K. Deater-Deckard, and A. Norton, “Challenges in teaching modeling and simulation online,” in 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC), Washington, DC, USA, Dec. 2013, pp. 3568–3575. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2013.6721718.[6] M. Aldoayan, R. Sahandi, D. John, and D. Cetinkaya, “Collaborative Cloud-based Online Courses: Issues and Challenges,” p. 5, 2019.[7] C. Chhetri, “‘I Lost Track of Things’: Student Experiences of Remote Learning in the Covid- 19 Pandemic,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, Virtual Event USA, Oct. 2020, pp. 314–319. doi: 10.1145/3368308.3415413.[8] J. Bourne, D. Harris, and F. Mayadas, “Online Engineering
minimal Brought no evidence of Work Product of work, in format evidence of evidence of work from last week (0) ready for report (4) work (3) work (2)Figure 1: Original individual report document flow (orange/blue) and revised flow (green/blue)Current DesignIn 2019, we moved to a new assessment model with a team of two to four faculty mentoring andassessing all capstone project teams. No team is assigned to an individual faculty member,instead the mentoring and assessment responsibilities are distributed so that each team hasopportunities to interact with all the faculty mentors. In parallel with this shift, we
construction software applications). Thefirst part of the survey results (as shown in table 1) show that the students believe that theCM260 has moderately prepared them for most conceptual topics except for project schedulingand project management, for which students responded with “slightly prepared”. The “slightlyprepared” could be due to the lack of background knowledge (e.g. construction workflows andthe sequence of construction activities courses that these students would learn after CM 260)among the students for learning the more complicated topics such as construction projectscheduling and management. However, it is possible that the students that took the survey mostlikely took their CM 260 course in the 2019-20 academic year and during the