and qualitative), curriculum design, curriculum implementation, and sustainability.Dale Baker, Arizona State University Dale Baker, Ed.D., is an international expert in equity issues in science education. She was honored in 2006-07 as a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science for this body of work. In 2008 she was elected fellow of the American Educational Research Association. She is a former editor of the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause, Ph.D., is professor of Materials Science and Engineering. His research in engineering education has focused on misconceptions and he has expertise in the development of
University, with an emphasis in Robotics and Automation. I have a passion for robotic integration and design, 3D modelling, and finite element analysis.Mr. John Shine, Eastern Washington University Graduated from Eastern Washington University in December 2017 with a degree in Mechanical Engineer- ing. Now working at University Mechanical Contractors as a project engineer. I enjoyed working as a group on this project and feel like I learned some valuable skills and lessons from it.Mr. Andrew William Phillips, Eastern Washington University I am a recent graduate of Eastern Washington University with a Mechanical Engineering degree. This project was my last and most involved project during my college career. This project was
Paper ID #39609Gendered patterns in first-year engineering students’ career aspirationsand expectationsMs. Catherine MacKenzie Campbell, University of Toronto, Canada MacKenzie Campbell is a MASc student in Chemical Engineering specializing in Engineering Education. Her thesis is exploring how the quality of work-integrated learning experiences shape women engineers’ career intentions, with a focus on intersectionality and diverse engineering fields including emerging and non-traditional areas of practice. MacKenzie has an undergraduate engineering degree in Biomedical Systems Engineering, where her research
University, Nashville, Tennessee, and is a registered professional engineer. In 2021 he was named an AIChE Fellow; in 2022 he was named a CCPS Fellow.Christy Wheeler West (Associate Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com How We Teach: Material and Energy BalancesAbstractThe Curriculum Committee of AIChE’s Education Division surveyed chemical engineeringdepartments across the United States and Canada in Fall 2021 about material and energybalances (MEB) courses. Courses have been described by 84 faculty at 75 institutions.MEB is taught primarily to first-term sophomores (78% of schools) majoring in only
, the developmentof engineering education, as a kind of professional education, is influenced by the game playingbetween scientific thought and pragmatistic thought. 19 Building an engineering education curriculummechanism applicable to improve scientific research capability is still a major practical problem in thedevelopment of engineering education. Thus, for building an engineering education and trainingsystem in a scientific manner, it is prerequisite to keep deepening the study on scientific researchcapability of engineers, figure out the root of the mechanism for enhancing scientific researchcapability and further construct the engineering education curriculum on the basis of solving practicalengineering problems. Next, we need to
projectthree years ago to explore integrating these subjects and literacy in a curriculum for 5-8-year-oldstudents. We reported on the development of this project and an analysis of how the existingcurriculum highlighted CT knowledge and skills, and how we expected the curriculum to engagestudents in CT in an ASEE conference paper in 2016. This paper reports on the evolution of theproject and curriculum. Part of this evolution included the defining of CT and its associatedcompetencies and what it would look like for this young age group. In this paper, we discuss thisevolution as well as how we have operationalized the competencies with data from classroomtesting. At the outset of this project, there were few resources that specifically
introducing this technology in a course or including examples of hightechnology applications in civil engineering throughout an undergraduate’s career, while abidingby ABET and other accreditation requirements. As this is a work in progress, the paper in itscurrent form evaluates how universities have integrated high technology in their civil engineeringcurricula, defines ABET requirements for new coursework, and provides sample questions togauge public perception of high school students interested in engineering. Future work includesproviding a sample syllabus of a new high technology course and how a four-year plan can berestructured to incorporate these concepts. Although the curriculum may not be the only factoraffecting enrollment and retention
curriculum development such as: aims and outcomes; course structure;identification of the curriculum content and assessment strategy. Would it not be important toconsider that although all these areas related to the curriculum may be looked at independentlythey should be treated as part of an integrated domain, as a Systematic Approach to curriculum Page 2.306.2development would suggest?With that in mind it is suggested here that a Knowledge Based System can represent analternative to assist in developing curricula. The Knowledge Based System proposed aims toassist the Course Developers on those relevant issues which may lead to a successful design
thereof), the availability of resources such as problem-based learning activities, and course/curriculum challenges were identified. Common areas ofstudent weakness are mentioned below, with those weaknesses appearing in the 2010 surveymarked with *: • *Math software, • Programming, • *Differential equation formulations, • *Analytical solutions when possible, • Numerical methods when needed, • *Chemistry recollection, • Thermodynamics recollection, • Comprehension of mixing, and • Mass transfer/fluid mechanics applicationMost often students struggled with the knowledge and conceptual integration required tounderstand and analyze chemical reactors and chemical reactor design. Other challenges inteaching kinetics and
avenue forstudents to learn these concepts. However, the downside to this is that students cancompartmentalize this information and fail to connect it with the rest of the curriculum, as that’show the course was designed. On the other hand, an across-the-curriculum model in which ethicaland global concepts are integrated into many disciplinary courses provides a model in whichstudents can connect their ethical knowledge to their disciplinary work. And while an across-the-curriculum program for these integrative concepts might lead to a lack of depth of continuity, manyfaculty do not have the competencies to teach these concepts even if they wanted or were requiredto [3]. This lack of a shared vision is one of the many barriers that researchers
Boundaries of Engineering Education.AbstractGenerative artificial intelligence (GAI) has long been used across various fields; however, itsusage in engineering education has been limited. Some areas where GAI tools have beenimplemented in education include intelligent tutoring, assessment, predicting, curriculum design,and personalized student learning. The recent proliferation of CHATGPT and other GAI toolspresents limitless possibilities for transforming engineering pedagogy and assessment. At thesame time, there are challenges associated with implementation. Consequently, there is a need toconduct an empirical study to evaluate these tools' strengths, limitations, and challenges tohighlight potential opportunities for their application in
engineeringcurriculum and importance for a civil engineering graduate. The Department has taken theinformation collected from the survey and catalog to develop a sequence of mechanics coursesthat incorporates the most important topic areas with innovative practices, such as integration oftopic areas across disciplines, integration of lecture and laboratory experiences and applicationsto real world examples. The new mechanics sequence will be launched in fall 2009.The authors have found the survey to provide a wealth of information and it played an importantrole in the development of a reformed mechanics curriculum. Future curriculum changes canbenefit from this survey and surveys directed at specific ideas, such as problem based learningand service learning
looking at the first year curriculum that introduces calculus and physics courses,often taught by non-engineering faculty, but that are fundamental to the core of engineering. As aresult, there have been several attempts at integrating math into other courses in an effort toencourage that transfer [2, 13-16]. Instead of a separate “math” course, calculus is taught throughoutmultiple courses, as topics are needed, allowing for a clear relationship between the how and thewhy. This model provides increased motivation for, and transfer of, calculus to other relatedareas, in part because terminology differences are quickly resolved. The increased learning andmotivation associated with such models often improves student retention[16]. In their work
College Academy, an urban school sponsored by the University of Dayton. Brett is involved in multiple levels of education from the Ohio Department of Education to teaching course to new teachers in alternative certification programs to managing a small curriculum and professional development organization.Dr. Ahsan Mian Ahsan Mian received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from Bangladesh Univer- sity of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Bangladesh, the M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from Auburn University, Auburn, AL in 2000. Ahsan Mian joined the Department of Mechanical and Materials En- gineering in
ofthese programs exhibited significant curriculum transformation or redesign around sustainabilityconcepts. Furthermore, the majority of programs either did not include any sustainabilityconcepts in their programs (27%) or exhibited a weak level of integration of sustainabilityconcepts in their programs (28%). This lack of significant incorporation of sustainability inenvironmental engineering programs is surprising, considering that ABET has identifiedsustainability as an important student outcome. The major challenges that prevent progress insustainability integration likely include the shifting paradigms around sustainability; rigidity ofexisting education system; a lack of new methods of teaching; lack of resources or incentives toteach
robotics10 and human robot teaming11. Due to their distributed, wireless nature,swarms have also been used as an internet of things testbed12. Several low-cost ground roboticsswarms have also been proposed, which allow for scalable testing13-14. Of these platforms,several examples, such as the Pheeno, Spiderino, and Pi-swarm, have been used in educationalcontexts to teach swarm robotics, often in a K-12 context15-18.However, education tools and programs around AI and Swarm AI do not generally have astandard curriculum, as many different traditional fields are needed to come together to learnabout and develop AI at the level of professional practitioners. In Swarm AI in particular, aspectsof robotics, engineering, and computer science are often seen
chipbased logic controller, PLC and general purpose CNC controllers with application examples arepresented.Students who have taken this course welcome such a totally different approach. In a typicalmechanical engineering curriculum in Asian countries, teachers and students spend much longertime in studying sub system design. For example, Machine Element Design course will contain aweek long project to design a speed reducer in great detail. A jig design project will be includedin a Manufacturing technology course which not only teaches detailed step by step processplanning but also special tool design for the established process. When the students and facultycome to the capstone design, it is more an integration process to pull together and
as the Page 22.847.13interface realms. Although it was a valuable learning experience that may even be closer to thereal world situation, the compounded complexity inevitably prolonged the lab sessions and inone group case the standard three-hour lab session became an over six-hour adventuring ordeal.This complication can be largely reduced in the future when a full LabVIEW thread isimplemented in the PBL enhanced curriculum. There we will have sufficient dedicatedLabVIEW sessions as well as integrated lab and LabVIEW sessions on a learning curve withmuch reduced slope throughout the curriculum. Additionally, integrating some basicrequirements
project is to provide students with an education that stresses engineeringfundamentals set in the context of Conceiving-Designing-Implementing-Operating (CDIO)real-world systems and products Page 7.732.1The project strategy to implement CDIO has four themes: Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education 1. curriculum reform to ensure that students have opportunities to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to conceive and design complex systems and products 2. improved teaching and learning
. Project Description - Coordination of research efforts between physics and the crash safety center to fulfill the obligations of the funding agency in the redesign of the PHYS-115 lab curriculum. Create, edit, and integrate data and multimedia for use in lab curriculum. Assess curricular materials and student feedback for improvement in lab activities. Perform research in Kettering University’s Crash Safety Center Page 22.389.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Crash Safety in the Introductory Physics LabIntroductionIntroductory Physics labs would seem
. Prior to participating in any module, the student views an “Introduction to the Virtual Enterprise” and “Introduction to the ALIVE System” streaming videos. When ALIVE is used as a curriculum integrator, students would quickly become familiar with this information and would skip to the next step.2. In some cases, students take a pre-test evaluating existing knowledge and perceived capability.3. The student is placed in the role of a short-time intern walking into a new department of the company. The function of the area is explained and physically demonstrated to the student. The functional step may or may not involve teams. The student is required to perform the functional operation for some higher implementation levels.4. Next
San Antonio CollegeAbstractAs the realm of cybersecurity grows increasingly critical, imparting the knowledge of computersystem security particularly cryptography to students is paramount. This paper presents an inno-vative approach to this endeavor through the integration of scavenger hunt, uniquely tailored totranscend the boundaries of traditional teaching. Unlike conventional methods which are predom-inantly introduced during high school or incorporate a single intricate puzzle for participants tosolve, this paper emphasizes practical application over theory, improving the way students graspcomplex concepts and retain them. In this work, students collaborated in groups to engage inan “Capture the Flag” style scavenger hunt, conducted
Facilitating the Development of Student’s Personal Ethics in Cultivating Professional Ethics in Engineering Classrooms Dr. June Marshall, Dr. John Marshall Saint Joseph’s College/ University of Southern MaineThis document focuses on how ethics education, more globally referred to as charactereducation, is being implemented into an undergraduate college program. Very successfultechniques are discussed that have been proven useful in providing instruction to futureprofessionals in national character education curriculums involving morals, values andethics. Suggestions for integrating character education into the engineering ethicsrequirement are highlighted.Engineering programs across the
Paper ID #37043Combining Game-Based and Inquiry-Oriented Learning for Teaching LinearAlgebraDr. Ashish Amresh, Arizona State University Ashish Amresh is an Assistant Professor in the College of Technology and Innovation and is leading the Computer Gaming curriculum initiatives at Arizona State University, where he founded the Computer Gaming Certificate and the Camp Game summer program. IDr. Vipin Verma, Arizona State UniversityMichelle Zandieh, Arizona State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Combining Game-Based and Inquiry-Oriented Learning for
enjoyable learningexperience, ultimately enhancing performance and retention over rote learning. Our research builds upon these insights, presenting conceptual videos as a supplementarytool. Drawing inspiration from the favorable results seen in blended learning models, ourapproach integrates dynamic tutorial videos formulated by students serving as coaches. Thisprovides an extra layer of support, relatability, and engagement while still maintaining traditionalinstructional methodsMaterials and Methods The creation of these instructional materials involved a collaborative effort among fivestudents who had completed the Intro to Programming (CMPSC-121) course. The topics coveredin the conceptual video series aligned with the curriculum
%- >200% 199%As can be seen from the chart above, six classes experienced a gain in achievement of over 200%during the course of the instruction. In addition, 25% of the classes at least doubled theirachievement, while over half experienced a gain that exceeded 50%.In order to summarize the findings of the project, one must examine the 1997 – 1998 yearseparately from the others. A fundamental change in research design took place after that year.The major thrust of year one was to attempt to determine if the use of teacher teams inconjunction with an integrated curriculum could demonstrate an increase in student achievementwhen compared with a traditional, separate curriculum approach
Session 1606 A CAPSTONE DESIGN EXPERIENCE IN ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY Daniel Davis University of HartfordAbstractAt the University of Hartford, we have developed a “Capstone Design Experience” in an effort toimprove our Architectural Engineering Technology curriculum. By increasing the awareness ofthe interrelationships between different areas of study, we are attempting to strike a new balance.We have integrated the following into a single yearlong design project: research, programming,planning, history and theory
. It is also an important ABET Learning Outcome. Student technical writtenand oral communication are embedded in courses spanning the undergraduate experience,traditionally leaving the basic writing skills to be addressed in composition or English courses. Arecent restructuring of the University’s core curriculum heightened not only the practice ofwriting across the curriculum but emphasized the practice of writing in the discipline. Toaccommodate the new core curriculum, it was necessary for each engineering program at theUniversity to redesign one of its courses to be designated writing intensive.The Mechanical Engineering curriculum at the University of New Haven, even prior to the newcore, included a sequence of 3 laboratory courses, each
called dataset augmentation. This method introduces variations into the dataset throughthe application of either geometric transformations or kernel filtering operations [11]. Commongeometric transformations encompass resizing, flipping, and stretching images, among others,whereas kernel filtering operations involve actions such as blurring and altering the overall reso-lution of the image. In our specific approach, we opted for kernel filtering over geometric trans-formations to preserve the integrity of the hand landmarks.For the data annotation process, we leveraged MMPose to generate annotations in the specifiedformat. MMPose is an integral component of the renowned MMLab framework, an open-sourcetoolkit built on PyTorch [12]. An
online course format. The relationships between course grades, KarmaCollab app engagement, student self-reported sentiment via an end-of-quarter survey, and teaching staff interviews are presented to showcase interesting remote learning insights. At the start of 2020, university students, staff, and faculty faced the unforeseen challenge of transitioning to a fully online curriculum due to the COVID-19 shelter in place order. Although fully online course formats are nothing new, university courses are traditionally built around an in- person experience. One area that thrives from an in-person format is STEM laboratory courses. From chemical mixtures in a controlled lab