program phase we used avariety of surveys and instruments to collect relevant data, including demographic information,self-assessment of readiness for an experience abroad, and general measures of culturalorientation (using the MGUDS-S survey12), and global engineering competency. Other surveysallowed the participants and their research hosts to evaluate all major program components.Finally, a series of exercises and assignments provided participants with reflective learningopportunities, while also giving the program team rich insights about student experiences.In the remainder of the paper we present preliminary results of our program evaluation, includingevidence of the quality and success of the program generally and a number of major
teams of four students, which gave an opportunity to learn orreinforce effective teaming skills. The changes to the project allowed flexibility in the designsolutions that encouraged the students to be more innovative and creative in the design process.The purpose of this paper is to describe the team design project including how it was able toimprove the student‟s learning experience. Assessment strategies and results will be shared.Preliminary findings indicate that the project increased the students‟ awareness of the world,their teamwork skills and reinforced the application of a formal design procedure. Individualswho are involved in the development of design projects, international projects, or teachingengineering mechanics may be
. CARREIRA [2005], Lean Manufacturing That Works, Ch. 10 75-88 (Amacom, American Management Assoc., New York). 5. R. R. CAVANAUGH, R. P. NEUMAN, and P. S. Pande [2005], What is Design for Six Sigma? Ch. 3, pp. 19-25. (McGraw-Hill, New York). 6. M. L. GEORGE, D. ROWLANDS, M. PRICE, and J. Maxey [2005], The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook, Ch. 1, pp. 1-26; Ch. 9, pp. 197-231 (McGraw-Hill, New York). 7. C. GYGI, B. WILLIAMS, and T. GUSTAFSON [2006], Six Sigma Workbook (Wiley, New York). 8. P. KELLER [2005], Six Sigma Demystified: A Self-Teaching Guide, Ch. 1, pp. 1-35 (McGraw-Hill, New York). 9. P. S. PANDE, R. P. NEUMAN, and R. R. CAVANAGH [2002], The Six Sigma Way Team Field Book: An
direction imaginable, including universities, industry, andall levels of government29, more research about perceptions is needed and research about theperceptions of underrepresented population groups is especially limited.Background to the Study: Methods, Participants, and Theoretical PerspectivesMost of the data for this study were collected during the assessment and evaluation of projectssponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF): Research Experience for Teachers inHazard Mitigation (RET) and Focus On Retention in Cohorts of Engineering Students (FORCES-S-STEM). Broadening the participation of underrepresented groups in STEM fields is one ofNSF‘s objectives addressed by both of these projects.Research on the effectiveness of these
. How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. New York: National Academies P, 1999.6 Cen, G., Xu, B., Luo, J. Y. 2010. Implementing open-ended project-based instruction in experiment of university physics. 2nd International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, (1) 830-832, 2010.7 Fontenot, D., Chandler, J.R., Talkmitt, S., and Sullivan, K. 2007. The Texas High School Initiative aims at STEM education reform: Texas Tech University T-STEM Center - Putting the "E" in K-12 STEM education. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, F2B1-F2B5,8 Fuentes, A., Crown, S., Freeman, R. 2006. Selective Integration for Student Motivation in the
Construction Engineering and Management and Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Mississippi State University. He is a former U. S. Navy SEABEE Officer and has managed projects and programs worldwide. He has been accepted as an expert by the U. S. Court of Federal Contract Claims in the areas of Cost and Schedule. He is a former executive with Hill International and FTI Consulting and has been associated with the construction of Boston’s Central Artery Tunnel, Dubai Mall in the United Arab Emirates, and the U. S. Department of Energy’s Nuclear Waste Treatment Plant at Hanford, Washington
position. The interface with the ELVIS IIboard provides the ability to send control signals to the motor from a computer and record theon-board sensor data using the integrated data acquisition system. (a) (b) (c) (d)Fig. 2. NI ELVIS II platform (a) Prototype board, (b) QNET Mechatronics Sensor Trainer,(c) QNET DC Motor Trainer, (d) DC Motor position control results.M Series NI DAQ cards PCI-6010 and PCI-625153The NI PCI-6010 is low-cost 16-Bit, 200 kS/s, 16 analog input and 2 analog output multifunctionDAQ. The NI PCI-6251 DAQ is available for high speed data acquisition. This card provides 16analog inputs that can be
engineeringstudents, this paper focuses on understanding the sequencing and overall arrangement of coursesin a program. We adopt the terminology from Heileman et al. [7] to formally call these constructscurricular design patterns, which they describe as, “collection[s] of curricular and co-curricularlearning activities intentionally structured so as to allow students to attain a set of learningoutcomes within a given educational context” [p. 5]. Although the term co-curricular is used inthis definition, there is much greater emphasis on the structure of prerequisite and corequisiterelationships. Still, by examining these roadmaps for how students are expected to progressthrough their discipline’s plan of study, we can understand how different curricular
. Sci., vol. 11, no. 9, Art. no. 9, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11090520.[4] A. J. Magana, T. Karabiyik, P. Thomas, A. Jaiswal, V. Perera, and J. Dworkin, “Teamwork facilitation and conflict resolution training in a HYFLEX course during the COVID ‐19 pandemic,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 446–473, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20450.[5] P. Bahrami, Y. Kim, A. Jaiswal, D. Patel, S. Aggrawal, and A. J. Magana, “Information Technology Undergraduate Students’ Intercultural Value Orientations and Their Beliefs about the Influence of Such Orientations on Teamwork Interactions,” Trends High. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 270–282, 2023.[6] A. Jaiswal, K. Patel, D. Patel, and A. Magana, “Perceived scrum Values, Conflict
-generation Yes 17% 25% 33% No 83% 75% 67% First research experience Yes 83% 75% 89% No 17% 25% 11%S=Spring / F=FallThe third cohort can be partially considered for this study due to their recent involvement withROLE and not having all data collected yet from this student group.MethodsData collectionIRB was granted to conduct this research. This study used a mixed methods approach to captureHispanic engineering students’ learning process and benefits from participating in a
)Kinyua, A., Negusse, E., Adesua, E.D. Adedapo, A., Akingbola, T., Isa, A., Oshineye, O., Yazdandoust, F.,Adedoyin, A., Mirindi, D., Isola F., Payne K., Owusu, G.K., Mallory, K., Wilson, K., Houston, T., Peterson,M., Dzotcha, A., Ariyibi, A., Pramanik, S., Koissi, N., Moncrieffe, K., Damoah, R., Murdock, M., Dyson, K.,Almahdi, A., Bista, K., Gaulee, U., Peters, K., Owolabi, O., OladoKun, H., Addo E., Keels-Fields, T., Holmes,C. and Wilson, J. Morgan State University, 1700 East Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD, USA.AbstractOur HBCU has a well-established record of providing quality college and pre -college programs in mostacademic disciplines in the state and the nation. We present our on-going experiences in thedevelopment and
observed. The CW scores weresignificantly different between female and male students, except for black/white shading. Therewere no significant differences between the AE scores for female versus male students. Therewas a negative correlation between CW and ISE scores. A correlation between multilingualismand travel with artistic creativity and ISE attributes could not be established. The results illustratethat there are significant differences between artistic creativity and innovation attitudes inengineering students.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based in part on work supported by the National Science Foundation underAward No. 2205067. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s
quotes below are in response to the criterion "Connectionbetween Identity and Team Experiences" (T1S1's rating was 1, whereas T1A1's ratingwas 4): This was a clear weakness in the GPT-generated ARM. To me, GPT seemed to fabricate the stated connection between Omar’s experience in [Engineering Course ST] and his engineering identity (I don’t think Omar indicated that this experience made him feel more – or less – like an engineer). … As another example of where I think GPT may be giving an interpretation that the data does not support, it said, “Omar's teamwork experience in [Engineering Course ST] made him feel more like an engineer.” I don’t see Omar actually saying this. In short, GPT’s
essential courses.Ultimately, the course's emphasis on practical, experiential learning aligns with the educationalphilosophies of smaller institutions, providing a unique opportunity for students to explore andunderstand the various engineering disciplines through collaborative projects, thereby enhancingtheir readiness for future academic and professional pursuits.AcknowledgmentThis work is an initiative supported by the Department of Education Title V grant for “City TechSTEM Success Collaborative” (2021-2026). Project number P031S2210228. Director: ShelleySmith.Thanks to Amy A. Germuth, Founder and President of EvalWorks, for her help in developing andanalyzing the student survey.References[1] S. N. Neagu, “The Motivational Factors Involved in
://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1308[3] Denton, M., Borrego, M., & Boklage, A. (2020). Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 556–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20322[4] Siregar, E., Rachmadtullah, Y., Pohan, R., Rasmitadila, N., & Zulela, M. S. (2019). The impacts of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) on critical thinking in elementary school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1175, p. 012156). IOP Publishing.[5] Whittaker, J. A., & Montgomery, B. L. (2012). Cultivating Diversity and Competency in STEM: Challenges and Remedies for Removing Virtual Barriers
increases inthe service sector, manufacturing plays an important role in the gross domestic product (GDP) inthis region, and GDP shows continuous growth over the last decade [14]. Manufacturingrepresents more than 15% of GDP in T.N., and advanced manufacturing has seen significantinvestment and growth recently [15, 16]. We can use T.N.’s 1st Congressional District as anexample of area demographics. The area lags behind the rest of the nation with an overall povertyrate of 15.4%, while 22% of children fall below the federal poverty line [17]. Demographic dataare summarized in Table 1.In addition to traditional manufacturing industries, Tennessee as a whole has a thriving lifesciences-based economy. Bioeconomic centers exist primarily around Memphis
themes within the dataset, emphasizing the need fora nuanced evaluation of its effectiveness across different thematic categories. Table 3. Topics, Themes, and word clouds emerged from Method #2 (Most Frequently Occurring Words associated with Each Topic (N=1785)) Topic 1 Topic 2 Topic 3 'lecture', 'class', 'lectures', 'student 'office', 'hours', 'hold', 'available' 'practice', 'problems', 'exams', 'p s', 'notes', 'questions', 'time', 'make , 'offer', 'extra', 'help', 'provide', ' rovide', 'examples', 'tests', 'home ', 'online', 'slides' having', 'hour' work', 'extra', 'exam', 'example
' experiences with the CAVE technology, particularly within the distinctive context ofHBCU engineering programs. The study is structured around two guiding research questions thatform the framework for the extensive investigation undertaken. 1. Does Korkmaz et al.’s (2017) [4] CT scale effectively measure the underlying construct of CT in HBCU engineering students? 2. To what extent do HBCU engineering students believe that the integration of the CAVE into the curriculum enhances their CT skills relevant to engineering? The paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, the problem statement is presented. Section3 offers a background on immersive technology and CT in engineering education. The researchdesign and methodology used in
is an urgent problem in the field of engineeringeducation.Purpose: This study took an ongoing and successful AI interdisciplinary certificationprogram as research object, and deconstructed the whole process of the program’ s design,implementation, and operation from three dimensions of vision, teaching, and support tosummarize its successful experience in the AI talents cultivation and interdisciplinaryeducation.Method: Adopting an exploratory case study methodology, we conducted semi-structuredinterviews with 5 instructors and professors involved in this program, and collected 10documented materials about the program from internal channels, official websites, andmainstream media to ensure the authenticity, richness, and completeness of the
. Finelli and T. Harding, "Suggestions For Establishing Centers For Engineering Education," in ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, 2002 .[5] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, "Applying authentic learning through cultivation of the entrepreneurial mindset in the engineering classroom," Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 7, 2019.[6] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers, Cham: Springer, 2017.[7] N. M. Anid, S. H. Billis and M. A. Panero, "Entrepreneurship and Technology Innovation Center: Bringing Together Industry, Faculty, and Students," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, 2013 .[8] T. Mason, "Impacts Of Entrepreneurship Centers And Programs On The Preparation Of
tools for integrating human-centered design at thecourse level as well develop longitudinal tools to evaluate students’ learning at the programlevel. In this paper, we discuss the co-development of program-level learning progressions thatconnect directly to program educational objectives as well as ABET (formerly AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology) student learning outcomes [8]. These progressions alsoconnect to the Kern Family Foundation (KEEN)’s entrepreneurial mindset [9], which proposes aset of attitudes, dispositions, habits, and behaviors that shape a unique, desirable engineeringproblem-solving approach.BackgroundWe are an interdisciplinary design team at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign that iscomposed of
approaches to GenAIliteracy should therefore explicitly address these power dynamics while making space for diverselanguages, identities, and ways of making meaning in engineering.ReferencesAdúriz-Bravo, A. , Chion, A.R. & Pujalte, J.P. (2013). “Scientific Literacy.” Encyclopedia of Science Education. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_262-1.Alexis, C. & E. Leake. “The Stylized Portrayal of the Writing Life in Spike Jonze’s Her” in Style and the Future of Composition Studies, Ed. by Paul Butler, Brian Ray, and Star Medzerian Vanguri. Utah State UP, 2020, 85-97.Ariyo Okaiyeto, S., J. Bai, & H. Xiao. (2023). Generative AI in education: To embrace it or not. International journal of agricultural and biological
“Technology Education/Pre-engineering education” (TE/PreEE)program and has its roots in industrial arts education dating back to the 1930s. More detaileddescriptions of each of these programs have been previously reported.[1-3] Both programsrequire substantial coursework in all four elements of STEM, as well as integrated-STEM(i.e.- how to use multiple STEM elements together in K-12 curriculum/activities). Studentsin both programs also acquire substantial experience in integrating non-STEM subjects withSTEM subjects. In 2006 our department completed a redesign of our “TechnologyEducation” curriculum to integrate more M&S into our Technology & Engineering (T&E)courses, resulting in our current “pre-engineering” curriculum. Even though this
a discussion of educationalimplications.Mr. SAt the time of this study, Mr. S had been teaching for 10 years. He began as a chemistryteacher and shifted into teaching engineering and robotics 3 years prior to the study’sbeginning. Mr. S taught only engineering and robotics courses. He used robotics as anavenue for students to study engineering concepts and skills, namely: design processes,Computer Aided Design (CAD), electronics (sensors) and programming. The class weexamined was a Robotics I class taken by students ranging from 9th-12th grade. Mr. Sdesigned the curriculum of the first semester (the focus of our study) to engage studentsin solving one complex, ill-structured, engineering challenge. In particular, his studentswere working
Abstracts International, (55), (010), 3129. Page 4.497.122. Bruno, J. (1988). An experimental investigation of the relationships between and among hemispheric processing, learning style preferences, instructional strategies, academic achievement, and attitudes of developmental mathematics in an urban technical college. (Doctoral dissertation, St. John’s University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(5), 1066A.3. Clark-Thayer, S. (1987). The relationship of the knowledge of student-perceived learning style preferences, and study habits and attitudes, to achievement of college freshmen in a small
viable solutions. Even a single external tank would provide habitable volume comparable to that of the International Space Station. Such a facility would benefit a variety of businesses that need more than the "glove-box" dimensions of present experimental facilities on the Space Station.2. An electromagnetic launcher system on the Moon. The lunar day provides intense sunlight, enabling capacitors to be charged up to power an electromagnetic rail system. The velocity required to launch from the lunar surface to lunar orbit is only of the order of 2200 m/s, far lower than on Earth, and there is no atmosphere to cause drag on the Moon. While being beyond the resources of individual companies, such a "transit system", perhaps
Optimization ResultsFrom these charts, conclusions were drawn that for a speed of 2.5 mph (1.2 m/s), the maximumvelocity increase will come from a 25° angle and the largest feasible outlet area.4.4 Preliminary Shroud TestingThe current testing setup measures free stream velocity but not velocity within the shroud, so adirect assessment of velocity increase is not possible. However, testing does show increasedpower output from shrouded geometry that can be compared to unshrouded tests to determineand “effective” velocity to see what speed is necessary to produce the same power without ashroud.To further confirm CFD predictions, three different shroud sizes were tested: 20°, 25°, and 30°.All had an outlet area to inlet area ratio of four
rpm 2. For the rated power and speed, the maximum fuel flow rate andthe injector period are given in Table 2. The details of these calculations are given in AppendixA. Table 2. Sample Laboratory Pre-Calculations Injection Parameters for a 2011 Sport/Utility Vehicle Max. Fuel Flow Rate 23.1 cm3/s Flow Rate per Injector 3.85 cm3/s Injector Period 18,462 μs Max. Injector Pulse Width 7692 μsFollowing the discussion of fuel injectors, the students are then introduced to the concept ofexperimental uncertainty analysis. This is a brief introduction, usually with an
project, is the Page 24.948.3problem definition phase characterized by asking relevant questions and attempting to findplausible/ realistic answers. No sooner has a client or professor defined a series of objectives fora design project than the designer- whether in a consulting office or in a classroom- want to findout what the customer really wants. Questions such as: what is an economic project? How doyou define the best design? What is a safe design? What are the factor(s) that will affect thedesign the most? Phrasing it differently, knowledge resides in the questions that can be asked andthe answers that can be provided. (2, 3) A sequence
International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED'09), Vol. 2 (pp. 441-452).[17] Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. L. (1999). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152.[18] Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers' professional development.English language teaching, 3(4), p237.[19] Akao, Y. (1990). Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity Press.[20] Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. H. (1996). The Kano model: How to delight your customers. In International Working Seminar on