AC 2007-2866: ENGINEERING TEACHING KITS: BRINGING ENGINEERINGDESIGN INTO MIDDLE SCHOOLSLarry Richards, University of VirginiaChristine Schnittka, University of Virginia Page 12.655.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Engineering Teaching Kits: Bringing engineering design into middle schoolsAbstractEngineering Teaching Kits (ETKs) introduce engineering concepts and methods intoexisting middle school science and math classes. We identify topics from science, math,and technology that have interesting engineering applications, and then help studentslearn science and math in the context of engineering design. Each ETK includes
simulate a model of whathappens in the real world. One of the great strengths of SU's EE curriculum is theemphasis on fundamentals that apply to real world problems. The ultimate goal of thisdesign course is to bring together seniors in electrical engineering, and industrial designengineers with a focus on mixed signal testing of discrete components in themicroelectronics area. The lecture will cover the following topics: modern analog andmixed signal technologies, an introduction to test electrical characteristics of integratedcircuits (IC) and devices incorporating both digital and analog functions; the laboratorywill give the students an opportunity to test a variety of circuits for AC and DC
STEM and supporting teacher professional development related to engineering education. His research interests include engineering education, design thinking and teaching failure. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering First: How Engineering Design Thinking Affects Science Learning The integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)disciplines has been emphasized over the past decade in many reform documents1, 2.These fields hold promise for filling jobs of the future, and schools across the countryhave developed STEM programs or adopted STEM initiatives to meet the growingneeds and interests of students, as well as the changing needs of the
Paper ID #10223Pre-College Engineering Participation Among First-Year Engineering Stu-dentsMr. Noah Salzman, Purdue University, West Lafayette Noah Salzman is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Purdue University. He received his B.S. in engineering from Swarthmore College, his M.Ed. in secondary science education from University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University. He has work experience as an engineer and taught science, technology, engineering, and mathematics at the high school level. His research focuses on the intersection of pre-college and
in the Information Sciences and Technology Department. Dr. Johri studies the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for learning and knowledge shar- ing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He also examine the role of ICT in supporting distributed work among globally dispersed workers and in furthering social development in emerging economies. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr. Johri earned his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design at Stanford University and a B.Eng. in Mechanical
part.Preliminary student assessment indicates that the students feel that designing, rapid prototyping,and physically producing the Cube of Knowledge was both a valuable and enjoyable experience.The vast majority of students agree that the project experience will be valuable for senior designand their future engineering careers. Additionally, they indicated that they would like to see themodule expanded to include a larger variety of fabrication techniques and more time for basicskill development.IntroductionGiven the broad spectrum of topics that must be addressed in an undergraduate biomedicalengineering (BME) curriculum it is difficult to provide adequate exposure to students in designand manufacturing technology such as computer-aided design (CAD) and
conclusions. The outcomes of this programare substantiated with student surveys and feedback from the various courses.I. Academic Program GoalsThe United States Military Academy (USMA) is the only college in the nation whose charter isto prepare every one of its students for professional service as a regular Army officer. Like theother facets of the West Point environment, the academic experience encourages study in a widevariety of traditional subjects to include the humanities and sciences essential to such service.To this end, USMA requires its graduates to take a set of engineering courses to develop theirproblem solving skills and expose them to technology in society. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Paper ID #41911Designing a New Civil Engineering Curriculum to Prepare Tomorrow’s EngineerDr. Elizabeth G. Jones, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Elizabeth G. ”Libby” Jones is a professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Her areas of specialty are transportation systems, appropriate technology, service learning, and engineering education. She earned her BS in Civil Engineering at Colorado State University and her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. She is active in curriculum activities at UNL at the department, college, and
Academy of Astronautics (IAA) in Paris, France. As an internationally recognized author and instructor in system engineering and its organizational application, he is an invited guest speaker and panelist at professional meetings and symposia. Wasson champions the need to strengthen undergraduate engineering programs with a course in the fundamentals of system engineering. He holds B.S.E.E. and M.B.A. degrees from Mississippi State University and a certificate in systems engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology. His professional affiliations include the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the International Council on System Engineering (INCOSE), and the Project Management Institute (PMI
AC 2010-2216: LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF A LEARNING SYSTEM FORTEACHING GIS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A GEOTECHNICAL PROBLEMAparna Sukhavasi, Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRichard Hall, Missouri University of Science and TechnologyHong Sheng, Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRonaldo Luna, Missouri University of Science and Technology Page 15.847.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF A LEARNING SYSTEM FORTEACHING GIS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A GEOTECHNICAL PROBLEMAbstract: A learning system, to train civil engineering students to apply GeographicalInformation Systems (GIS) in geotechnical
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Making Games to Teach Physics and Mechanics David I. Schwartz, PhD School of Interactive Games and Media Rochester Institute of Technology igm.rit.eduAbstractThis survey paper introduces engineering educators to a subfield of computer graphics calledphysically-based animation (PBA) to advocate for collaboration in creating courses to improvestudent learning in STEM fields, especially in engineering. Engineering students may not realizethe degree to which they can leverage their education to enter the
technology and the profit-maximization of theemployer. This simple scenario intrigued the following two-prong issues for engineeringeducators: 1) what should be the underpinnings/justification of the decision-making process of anengineer? 2) when and in what context should an engineer learn these decision-makingprocesses? Engineers should anchor their decisions on ethical/moral basis, and learn and practicethese ethical-decision-making skills in their early professional development phase.Undergraduate education is one of the first formal places in the professional development of anengineer. Engineering students would be able to far-transfer ethical decision-making skills intheir industry career if they learn and practice in context. Capstone design
engineering course, titled “Engineering Disciplines andSkills,” provides students with foundational engineering skills necessary to be successful in latercoursework. Using the Reid and Reeping taxonomy [6], the course focuses on the Math Skillsand Engineering Specific Technology / Tools domains, but also incorporates aspects from eachof the Global Interest, Engineering Profession, and Academic Advising domains. The latter threedomains are used to both expose students to the breadth of engineering and help students exploretheir interests and learn more about the engineering majors available to them. Ultimately, thegoal is to provide students with the information and resources they need to make an informeddecision about which major they want to
Session 1471 Curricular and Student Characteristics of Accredited Engineering/General Engineering Programs Jim Farison and Byron Newberry Department of Engineering, Baylor University1. IntroductionThe majority of accredited engineering programs in the United States are discipline-orientedprograms, such as electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, etc., for which theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditation criteria compriseboth the general criteria that apply to all accredited engineering programs and the accompanyingprogram
as the necessary framework for solving complex problems; (iii) incorporationof state-of-the-art technologies throughout the curricula; (iv) and creation of continuous opportu-nities for technical communication. To best meet these objectives, the four engineering programsof Chemical, Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering have a common engineering clinicthroughout their program of study. In addition to the engineering clinic, they share a commonfirst year of courses. Our first class of entering freshmen consists of 101 students having an av-erage SAT score of 1274 and graduating in the top 12% of their high school class.The current Freshman Engineering Clinic sequence, which is taught in the Fall and Spring se-mesters, has laboratory
Paper ID #42659Engineering Design Process through Game-Based Learning for FreshmenEngineering StudentsMs. Laura Ngoc Nhi Nguyen, University of Oklahoma 2nd-year Computer science major at the University of Oklahoma with a passion for stimulating more progression in education with the help of technology!Dr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics
Paper ID #8120Getting More Learning From Labs - Six Principles to Build Understandingand SkillDr. Clark Hochgraf, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST)Prof. Richard Cliver, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Richard C. Cliver is an Associate Professor in the department of Electrical, Computer and Telecommu- nications Engineering Technology at RIT where he teaches a wide variety of courses both analog and digital, from the freshman to senior level. He was the recipient of the 1998 Adjunct Excellence in Teach- ing Award, the recipient of the 2002 Provost’s Excellence in Teaching Award and a finalist in the 2009
2006-943: TEACHING STUDENTS HOW TO EVALUATE THEREASONABLENESS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS RESULTSJames Hanson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. James Hanson is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He teaches mechanics courses for the freshman through senior levels including structural analysis and design. He is a strong advocate of hands-on learning and problem-based learning. He is a licensed professional engineer. He has also taught at Cornell University and Bucknell University. Page 11.1225.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
circumstances and to the requisites of a predominantly information-based culture. Of course theprocesses of curricular reform must encompass aspects beyond the older narrow curricular issues such asnumber of credits, disciplines, areas of specialized training, etc. As was pointed out by the National ScienceFoundation[41 there is a consensus that all aspects of engineering education should be reexamined, including thelearning and t~aching processes, the learning environment, the effectiveness of engineering education, thepreparation of students for lifelong learning, and the use of technology in education. Based on these broaderconcerns, this paper will present some recent influences of the discussions and trends in engineering educationthat have been
?+.$ .as engineering curricula become more practice-oriented is a move of economy material from the Michael L. Mavrovouniotis is an Associatesenior level to the first or second-year level. Professor of Chemical Engineering at NorthwesternStudents acquire the needed mathematical University, in Evanston, Illinois. He received hisbackground for engineering economics sufficiently Diploma of Engineering from the Nationalearly, and economic computations are an excellent Technical University of Athens in 1984, and hisway to introduce computer tools in a unified Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute ofmanner for all engineering disciplines. The earlier Technology in 1989. Prior to joining Northwesternexposure
utilize the technical knowledge available to themeffectively, but they also must understand foundations of the social settings in which they wish toapply that technology. Engineering, by its nature, is a multidisciplinary endeavor requiring skillsand knowledge from a variety of backgrounds.In a recent accreditation review of engineering programs at the University of Minnesota Duluth(UMD), the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) visitors suggested that away be found to instill in students a more complete appreciation for this “ProfessionalComponent” of engineering. According to ABET criteria, students should understand howengineering relates to activities in • Economics, • Environment
A New Freshmen Engineering Design Experience in Chemical Engineering at NJIT R. Barat, G. DiBenedetto, and T. Boland Otto York Department of Chemical Engineering New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ 07102IntroductionThere is a general recognition of the need to give their students considerable training beyond the standardknowledge of a particular engineering fieldi. Students must now have the ability to think critically andcommunicate effectively, to work in multidisciplinary teams and have good interpersonal skills, and toexhibit a broader professional and ethical
Paper ID #6500A Framework for Developing Collaborative Training Environments for As-semblingYizhe Chang, Stevens Institute of Technology Yizhe Chang is currently a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering Department, Stevens Institute of Technology. He received his B.Eng. from Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. His current research topics include virtual environment for assembly simulation and collaborative system for engineering education.Dr. El-Sayed S. Aziz, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES) Dr. El-Sayed Aziz holds a faculty position as associate professor in the Production Engineering and Mechanical Design
learning. The outcomes-based approach requires ashift from a teacher centered pedagogical approach to a student-centered approach. Evenso, this slow adoption of active learning is apparent despite a dramatic increase in ourcapabilities and capacity to leverage instructional technologies, and that as project-baseddesign education has become common in engineering programs. Active learningpedagogies challenge the more traditional teacher-centered pedagogies such as lectures,which are the dominant form of delivery. This slow adoption is apparent notwithstandingthe large body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of student-centered approaches.This resistance to active learning can also be noted in both engineering educators andengineering students
Paper ID #38717Mixed in Engineering: Introducing Critical Multiracial Theory toEngineering Education ResearchMs. Michelle Choi Ausman, Virginia Tech Michelle Choi Ausman is a first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received a BS in Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, and an MS in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Her research focuses on exploring relation- ships between Asian American identity, multiracial identity, and belonging in engineering. Her research interests include engineering identity, diversity, equity, and
whether or Page 11.1288.10not these products will contribute to “the good.” What we or they mean by the good is anotherother conversation which must remain on-going. 9Bibliography1 Gene Moriarty, “Three Kinds of Ethics for Three kinds of Engineering,” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Fall 2001.2 Gene Moriarty, “What, More Assessment?," ASEE Conference (June 2001) in Albuquerque, NM.3 Martin Heidegger, “The Thing,” an essay in the book Poetry, Language, Thought, translated by Albert Hofstadter. Harper & Row: New York, 1971, p. 165
of Powertrain Planning and then Product Development Operations for all Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, Mazda and Volvo brands globally. Prior to joining Northeastern, Pitts served as director of the Ford-MIT Research Alliance.Steve McGonagle,Mr. Steven W Klosterman, Northeastern University Director of Engineering Leadership Steven Klosterman works in the Gordon Engineering Leadership Pro- gram. Klosterman is also a professor of the practice in Engineering Leadership at Northeastern University. Klosterman teaches leadership, product development and systems engineering. He has over 25 years of experience in the high technology and renewable energy industries. Following roles in computer archi- tecture and design at the
Paper ID #9440Active Learning Modules Assessments: An Update of Results by Gender andEthnic GroupsDr. Ashland O. Brown, University of the Pacific Ashland O. Brown, Ph.D, P.E. is currently a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of the Pacific School of Engineering and Computer Science. He served as a Program Director in the Mechani- cal/ Civil Engineering Section of the National Science foundation from 1998 to 1999. He served as Dean of Engineering at the University of the Pacific from 1991 to 1998, and Dean of Engineering Technology at South Carolina State University from 1989 to 1991. He served as a
, she served as a special educator for students with behavioral and learning disabilities in Title I elementary and middle schoolGretchen Dietz, University of Florida Gretchen A. Dietz is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Engineering Technology and Construction Management at UNC Charlotte. Her research interests include diversity in engineering and qualitative methodologies.Randy Dorian Brown, University of FloridaPaul G Richardson ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Firms as Racialized Organizations: The Experiences of Black Male EngineersAbstractRecent studies have shown the barriers that African Americans
Paper ID #35895Intellectual Mental Models of Engineering and Non-EngineeringUndergraduate StudentsDr. M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University Dr. M. Javed Khan is Professor and Head of Aerospace Science Engineering Department at Tuskegee University. He received his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M University, M.S. in Aero- nautical Engineering from the US Air Force Institute of Technology, and B.E. in Aerospace Engineer- ing from the PAF College of Aeronautical Engineering. He also has served as Professor and Head of Aerospace Engineering Department at the National University of Science and Technology