doubled afterModule 1. Figure 2. Pre- and post-module results from Module 1 (a) and Module 2 (b).In Module 2, the proper use of language for algorithm commands increased from 68% to 95%and the quality of input prompts and printed outputs improved from 31% to 56% (Figure 2 (b)).However, despite improvements in clarity and comprehensibility, we observed that prompts andoutput messages often lacked specificity. For example, instead of detailed prompts such as“Enter the length and radius of the barrel in centimetres,” many students used vague messageslike “Enter the length and radius in centimetres” or “Enter the length and radius of the barrel.”To address this, we plan to develop guided activities that emphasize the importance of preciseand
,over 5,000 students were enrolled in the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering andEngineering Technology (SPCEET). Like KSU, SPCEET attracts a diverse student body relatedto race. Nearly 24% of students identify as African American and 15% as Hispanic. When genderis considered, 21% of SPCEET students identify as women. SPCEET comprises ninedepartments, including CEE, the study’s target department. The CEE department enrollment wasover 700 students during the Fall 2022 semester. Of these students, 21% were African Americanand 20% were Hispanic. The department outperformed the college with women representation atjust over 27%.C. Community Engagement Event (Planning)A planning effort was launched approximately 2 months prior to the
asinstrumental approaches [21], organizational communities [25], and engineered formal CoP [22].Because of this wide range in definitions and implementations of CoPs, it is important to definethe CoP that was used in this study.This community is on the less formal side of the spectrum. It is a group of professors who allteach engineering labs and have a strong interest in improving their students’ writing skills andlaboratory reports. The participants described above volunteered to participate and receivedfunding to attend the first meeting of the CoP. This community plans to meet annually to shareideas and support each other’s efforts to improve engineering writing.The first meeting took place face-to-face on the campus of Washington State
designers on diffusion rates. To betterunderstand the adoption data that has been collected, surveys were sent to training participantsafter the school year had started to better understand how they intend to use or are using theinformation from the trainings. While intentions to behavior changes do not always correlatestrongly to actual behavior changes, articulating specific things they intend to do does increasethe likelihood of the intentions being realized [17]. The relevant questions in the survey were: • Even before participating in this workshop, I planned to use Gradescope in at least one of my courses during the upcoming year. (1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: neutral; 4: agree; 5: strongly agree) • After
up earlier to get them ready. The days that hedoesn’t go to school he asks why he doesn’t have school. I have to plan for those days…Sometimes it doesn’t come out as planned. I have to think about what to do. Things change,emergencies come up… I have a Plan A and Plan B just in case” (Family 31). Family relationship building—Another common theme across all seven families wasparents perceiving and leveraging the engineering activities and engineering design practices tosupport family collaboration and build relationships among family members, including siblings,spouses, or extended family members. As one parent stated when reflecting on the most valuableaspect of the program: "El tiempo juntos, aprender juntos uno del otro. Las ideas
different than typical campus events is that these sessionsare tailored to STEM Core student interest and availability. The STEM Core team plans theworkshop schedule around the Bridge program and STEM Core academic schedule, i.e., test dates,busier times of the semester, etc. This is meant to be fun and exciting for students, not an extratask that might be stressful for students to attend.STEM Career AwarenessSTEM career industry awareness is a focus of the STEM Core program from the moment studentsbegin participating in the bridge program, as they are tied to specific employers wherever possible.During summer 2022, sites completed ORISE modules in additive manufacturing andcybersecurity tied to research being conducted at national labs. The bridge
strategies can be categorized into threeoverarching themes: planning, facilitation, and explanation. Planning strategies are those that aninstructor uses when developing an activity and can include getting or incorporating studentfeedback into their activities. Facilitation strategies are those that an instructor uses during theactive learning activities to help better engage the students in the activity, such as walkingaround the room and answering questions. Explanation strategies focus on how an instructor canintroduce or give context to an active learning activity such as an instructor relating the activityback to the lecture or describing why they are doing the activity in the first place. Much of the previous research focused on active
populationinteractions but needed to justify how this would be accomplished. Responses included variouscombinations of mask mandates, percentage of retail closures and travel restrictions. Manystudents were initially concerned with only bringing down the death stock in the stock and flowmodel, however, this prompted a foreign student to share his experience of not being able to seehis family for three years, leading to a very valuable conversation about the effects of policymaking on the population.In both of these activities, the DEI component was not assessed directly as part of the coursegrade although future plans include incorporating this into the grading rubric. Anecdotally, therewere some very valuable learning moments for both the students and
, and readily analyzed, so wecould compare observations to faculty and student reports of engagement. Thus, we consideredexisting observation protocols. At first, we planned to use OPTIC, but pilot observations atmultiple institutions with POGIL, lecture, and laboratory classes, revealed that OPTIC workswell for POGIL, but not for lecture. Similarly, COPUS focuses on practices involving clickerquestions and Peer Instruction and is less suited for POGIL. Other protocols had similarlimitations - SEcLo and ELCOT focus on engineering, while PORTAAL and OSE focus onspecific settings. We liked protocols that coded widely used, lower-level practices (e.g., SPOT).We liked how OPTIC coded similar interactions at different levels — within teams
foster ML self-efficacy within these three audiences,as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Lao’s Learning Outcomes Adapted from [8]Knowledge Skills AttitudesGeneral ML Knowledge ML Problem Scoping InterestKnowledge of ML Methods ML Project Planning Identity and CommunityBias in ML Systems Creating ML Artifacts Self-EfficacySocietal Implications of ML Analysis of ML Design Intentions and Results Persistence ML Advocacy Independent Out-of-Class LearningWhile limited
Paper ID #39852Earning Daisy Girl Scout Robotics Badges with a Hands-on Soft RobotGripper Design Activity (Resource Exchange)Lucy BrizzolaraElizabeth Ann McNeela Bioengineering undergraduate student interested in the effects of outreach programs and curriculums on engineering enrollment.Thomas Tran, Thomas Tran is currently an undergraduate student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the Bioengineering department. He plans to attend the University of Chicago and pursue a Master’s in Molecular Engineeging. His research focuses on utilizing soft robotics as a means to expose K12 students to engineering
GROW: An Equity-Minded Framework to Support the Integration of Equity and Inclusion in Learning2020 brought awareness to many issues surrounding equity and inclusion across the nation. In collegesand universities around the country, open forums on systemic racism and gender bias allowed newvoices to shine through and strategic plans on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) to be reimagined. Acommon theme that has emerged from these discussions is the critical need to effectively integrateequity and inclusion into the teaching and learning environment. As equity-minded institutions, we havea responsibility to not only meet our students where they are at, but also our faculty. Thus, wedeveloped a framework that provides faculty with a self
confusing for a newengineer to recognize a tearout because it will usually still occur on the angled path. The plan forthe experiments in this research is to allow students to see the failure modes predicted and howthey actually fail in real life. Figure 3: Typical Real World Failure Path versus the Idealized Failure Path used in AISC Equation J3-6c,d,fProject ObjectiveTo document the design, construction, and experimental testing of bolted/welded steelconnections to compare real world failure modes to theoretical calculations using AISC limitstate design philosophy.Approach/Methodology ● Research existing literature and online resources available for bolted/welded steel connection and member
undergraduate students at sixuniversities was conducted to determine whether a predictive model to estimate students' choiceswere possible. They identified three primary factors: academic reputation, distance from home,and location. They surveyed 650 first-year students in the accounting and engineering disciplinesand performed a mean and factor analysis.Another published work [14] studied the factors that influenced the choice of a university in whichthe approach was from a marketing point of view. Recommendations were that the institutionshould consider establishing its image or market position, identifying its competitors, determiningthe needs of different market segments, and developing a marketing plan to promote its service.This study is mainly
, retaining, and pursuing theengineering profession [24-26] and better predict the long-term persistence of freshman students[27]. Underrepresented groups like women, who often perceive engineering as a male field,especially experience an identity conflict and gender roles affect their retention in engineering[28,29].The Current StudyThe current study aims to bring up-to-date industry-relevant problems into the classroom and doso by having students interact with industry professionals who pose the problems for students tosolve in a scaffolded manner. It employs design-based research (DBR approach) [30-33] withmultiple cycles of implementation. Our research plan includes one baseline condition (Spring2021) and two cycles of enactment (Fall 2021 and
barriers to graduating and extend the time to graduate for transferstudents. To support transfer students, 2- and 4- year universities need to establish articulationagreements that guarantee credits will transfer toward required coursework within the major. Forexample, the state of California has well-defined agreements between community colleges and theCalifornia State University system (CSU) as well as the University of California system (UC) [5].Students can build their transfer plan of study on the ASSIST.org platform based on the existingagreements by defining their 2-year college and the major they would like to transfer to in the 4year university[5]. Other aspects that facilitate the transfer process are the possibility of
solutions and quantitatively rank them against the requirements. 4. Develop the selected design concept into a preliminary design typically including CAD models and a system performance model; this step often involves lower-level trade studies. 5. Develop a detailed design ready for prototype manufacturing; formal engineering drawings document the design, and detailed analyses show compliance to requirements. 6. Validate the design through prototype testing carefully planned to confirm that the design meets the specified requirements and solves the defined problem.Capstone students struggle with each of these steps because they lack experience with theprocess. They resist documenting a clear problem statement as they assume everyone
period of 30 days during which the violation is not corrected, shall report 11 thereon to appropriate professional bodies and, when relevant, also to public authorities, and cooperate with the proper authorities in furnishing such information or assistance as may be required.No. Question Engineers shall undertake assignments only when qualified by education or12 experience in the specific technical fields involved. Engineers shall not affix their signatures to plans or documents dealing with subject matter in which they lack competence, but may affix their signatures to13* plans or documents not prepared under their direction and control where they have a good faith belief that such
encouraged to complete a“determine knowledge” quiz at the start of each module, which aids the system in understandingstudents’ current knowledge level for module lesson nodes and plan the optimal place for eachstudent to begin learning. As the student progresses through the lesson nodes, the system updatesitself, mapping out a personalized learning path and suggesting what students should tacklenext. Students can see a snapshot of their progress via the course overview page. This dashboardprovides them information on knowledge covered (number of activities completed), masterylevel and overall score, as well as time spent on the course. From here students can navigate toeach module where they can view their learning map (Figure 2), a personalized
Requirements Team demonstrated how the final solution satisfied the sponsor requirements (or explained the test plans created to evaluate the requirements) 6. Professionalism The team exhibited an excellent grasp of how ethics and codes/licensure affected (or would affect) their project.Figure 1 – Design show grading instructions prior to 2021In reviewing this meeting and assessing the purpose of the faculty meeting, it became clear thatthis meeting could be combined with the faculty grading into a verification meeting for 2021.The purpose of the verification meeting would be for teams to focus on the technical details oftheir work with their reviewers. These meetings were relatively brief, typically less than 30minutes, and focused on
. Science Standards Although this thought experiment may seem silly, these are 3-5-ETS1 Engineering Design: the types of questions that engineers must investigate when creating designs and choosing materials to work with. They 3-5 ETS1-2. Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a must be able to determine what tool will complete their problem based on how well each is desired task in the most efficient way; just like choosing the likely to meet the criteria and most efficient utensil to eat your favorite soup. In this activity, constraints of the problem. you will determine which tool will be the most effective at 3-5-ETS1-3. Plan and carry
Course Work Planning 21 Learning New Skills 18 Questions about Company Cultures 17 Trends in Engineering Jobs 17 Getting Ready for the Workforce 16 Time Management Issues 15 Internships 14
students in three U.S. cities.Outreach Module DevelopmentThe module was developed by the four undergraduate engineering cadets with assistance fromtheir advisors. For the model, topics were chosen based on the cadets’ perceived knowledge ofthe topic and how well they could be understood by a younger audience who has less knowledgeof the field of study. Trusses, the inherent stability of triangles, and buckling behavior werechosen as key topics for the module. These three topics are important aspects of civilengineering, and they can be easily understood when incorporated with general knowledge, toybuilding materials (K’NEX), and real-world examples. Once the topics for the model weredetermined, the cadets met with their advisors to discuss a plan
the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020-2021 academic year, the majority of courses at ourinstitution were offered in virtual modes (87%), while 13% of courses identified as essentialwere implemented in-person with an approved safety plan. Students were not compelled toattend face-to-face courses and were given the option to pursue virtual alternatives. In this case,we were able to offer identical material and synchronous instruction during the laboratoryactivity to virtual students. This combination of factors presented us with a unique opportunity tosimultaneously study the impact of face-to-face and virtual synchronous instruction modes.BackgroundThe structure of the Biomedical Engineering program at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo mirrors thatof many peer
[9] is planned to demonstrate andinstitute a sustainable model to increase low-income engineering commuter student engagement,persistence, and graduation, through a program of core elements, which combine to provide ourstudents with an empowering, cohesive academic, social, professional, and institutionalexperience.Lee & Matusovich’s MCCS framework [9], shown in Figure 1, provides the essential schema forour programmatic features, and we very deliberately include building academic, social, andprofessional integration to ubiquitously integrate support of engineering student engagement,identity navigation, and professional growth, to advance and sustain academic persistence andsuccess to graduation.Figure 1: Model of Co-Curricular
scripting. Students will have the opportunity to develop integrationscripts for sensors that need to be onboarded for various projects.The CS will continue to evolve according to a clear roadmap. To further increase the usability of the CS,we plan to add local caching, additional communication interfaces, monitoring capabilities, security with aPUF (Physical Unclonable Function) [38], and a field provisioning/troubleshooting tool capable ofcommunication via Bluetooth. The development of local caching will enable the mitigation of data loss byutilizing the CS software to store small amounts of data. This will allow researchers multiple dataextraction options outside of the standard wireless communication protocol. This becomes critical whenerrors
quickproblem solving. Unlike ERT, online education involves a careful design process, withconsideration of a multitude of options depending on the context of the course, that usually takessix to nine months to plan, and improves during the second and third semester of teaching [2]. Infact, the common stigma that online learning is less effective than face-to-face instruction iscontradicted by research, which details the success of planned online courses [2]. Importantly,while online education requires a supportive community to be successful, under ERT the normalinstructor support resources are often overwhelmed [2]. Support during a crisis and other forcedinstructional changes therefore must be rethought.In engineering, online teaching has not been
canvas, and if needed, create section for remaining notes, then b) fill out remaining sections with what they might know even if that was not documented during the observation, and finally c) mark what needs to be done later in terms of data collection and discuss how they plan to do it. The documentation on the canvas started silently and slowly shifted to a discussion about the blocks that are filled out. It was intentional to not guide Group 1 in sharing the observations to know what changewould happen when the CC is afterwards used to structure the insights by the same group andwhat themes from the context observation might come out without having a guide for possiblethemes. The objective is to see how the CC
level. This game has been used in the COMP420 Network Security class at NC A&T inFall 2021. We plan to use it this semester at both universities and present our findings during theposter session.Summary These games have been made available online (https://gamelab.wssu.edu/modules.htm) foreducators and students at other universities. If adopted, these will help instructors engage theirstudents in the process of learning about cyber security, improving the quality of education inthis important field. The project team will host a faculty workshop in summer 2022 to sharethese games. We will demo these games during the poster session at the conference.Acknowledgements This work is supported by NSF under the grant DUE-1821960 and 1821965. Any
sessionsthroughout the summit will be further discussed and presented during follow-up activities thatare being planned by the organizing committee.In addition to Technology Teams, the NCNGM has Academic & Support Teams to addresstopics such as curriculum development and pedagogy; professional skills; and access, diversity,and equity; industry partnerships. Subject matter experts on these teams assist with thedissemination of information on the additional needs of running a successful advancedmanufacturing program and guiding students into an advanced manufacturing career throughprofessional development activities such as webinars and the development of digital resourcesthat can be accessed through the NCNGM website.Student recruitment and retention in