a. Met with AISC University Programs staff and faculty review panel i. Refine video ideas ii. Verify terminology for script iii. Feedback on jokes 5. Film videos a. Check sound and lighting before filming all scenes b. Practice lines to ensure accuracy of terminology and delivery c. Overcome scheduling and social distancing challenges due to COVID-19 pandemic d. Perform many retakes because most engineering student and faculty actors are not theater majors e. Develop system for labeling scenes and retakes to make editing easier 6. Edit videos a. Select the best takes of the videos b. Used iMovie to create
to future adoption of teaching-related best-practices. The purpose of this research is to identify the self-reported activities of engineeringinstructors and how this changed over the course of three semesters during the COVID-19pandemic. Approximately 40 engineering instructors from a large Midwestern R1 Universityvoluntarily completed online surveys in during Spring 2020, Fall 2020, and Spring 2021semesters about their engagement in teaching-related activities and the perceived normality ofthat engagement. Descriptive statistics were used to examine general trends in activityengagement for each semester and to compare activity engagement across all three semesters.Across all three semesters, instructors most often reported engaging in self
Paper ID #23752MAKER: Simple Making Activities to Expose Middle School Girls to STEMCareersDr. Lunal Khuon, Drexel University Dr. Lunal Khuon is an Associate Clinical Professor at Drexel University in the Engineering Technology (ET) Department. He also serves as the Assistant Department Head for Graduate Studies and the Director of Research for the ET Department as well as oversees the Biomedical Engineering Technology concen- tration. Prior to Drexel, Dr. Khuon had previously held design and system positions at Texas Instruments, Motorola, Hughes, and IBM and faculty positions as an Assistant Professor at Villanova
faculty representatives presented the benefits ofmentorship, mentorship goals, and best practices. Career center representatives shared availableresources, while the grant team provided an in-depth overview of the project's goals, objectives,and activities. The workshop concluded with the group brainstorming activities for the upcomingyear and planning research initiatives to inform and enrich the project.Professional Development LunchesStarting in winter quarter, the grant team initiated a weekly lunch for the students. Each week,the grant team planned a menu and divided the food responsibilities among each other. Thisinformal gathering provided faculty members an opportunity to connect with students whileaddressing homesickness through home
has been involved in research projects to develop, refine, and apply innovative assessment tools for characterizing student knowledge of sustainability. Her ultimate goal is to use this assessment data to guide the design and evaluation of educational interventions to improve undergraduate sustainability education. In the area of bioprocessing, Dr. Watson has experience using bacteria and algae to convert waste materials into high-value products, such as biofuels.Mr. Joshua Pelkey, AirWatch Joshua Pelkey is currently a product manager at AirWatch in Atlanta, GA. He completed his MS in Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at GT and his BS in Computer Engineering from Clemson University. He has conducted
included traffic studies for town administrators, parkinglot and circulation design for a local community, and pedestrian/bicycle facility planning.Specific student research opportunities have included roundabout traffic operation, pavementmarkings, work zone safety, high occupancy toll lanes, vehicle occupancy estimates, amongmany others. A limitation of this approach is that only a portion of students, maybe 25 percent, Page 26.219.11takes advantage of this type of rich and challenging learning experience.Participation in Professional Organizations, Meetings and Forums, Providing opportunitiesfor students to develop their knowledge and skills
Page 12.1119.11hiring, promotion and tenure policies (32) .To insure a fair and equitable system, it is importantthat sufficient weight be allocated to practical experience (past and present), and also, to begin achange in cultural norms that have favored research over teaching for decades.ii) Second, initiating and supporting efforts to educate graduate students, early on, about thebenefits of acquiring industrial experience, and its relevance to their future careers as facultymembers, and becoming engineering educators. Encourage them to get in touch with industry,have a connection with someone on the inside, and plan to get involved with the practice whenthey do graduate. This notion of reaching out to industry at an early stage is foreign
Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude
enhance thestudents understanding of the engineering notions and to motivate them exploring alternativesolutions to practical problems. Two particular cases, involving instruction of undergraduate andgraduate level classes, are here depicted. Software packages for technical computing (MATLAB)and finite element analysis (ANSYS) served for development of classroom demonstrations andassignments in a matrix analysis of structures undergraduate course. Transient dynamic finiteelement program (LS-DYNA) and pre and post-processor (LsPrePost) were employed forillustration of wave propagation concepts taught in an impact strength of materials andcrashworthiness graduate class. To help students acquiring the necessary skills to effectively use these
blender. They performed reverse engineering, redesign, anddeveloped a business plan for market promotion. Two teams addressed the blender's components,dividing them into lower (motor, battery, control board) and upper (cup, blade, seals, shaft)subassemblies. They researched potential suppliers and ensured the design met customer demandsand market competition. This project highlighted the innovative educational methods of PBL. Projects exemplify interdisciplinary approaches where student teams from variousengineering backgrounds come together to form cohesive groups. Forming a team can bechallenging, however, it progresses through various stages in which students would viewthemselves as a group of strangers to a united team with a common
judgments,” and “an ability to apply…,” essentially covering the gamut of cognitiveknowing, judging, and implementing. What is striking about these ABET goals for studentoutcomes is the coordination of engineering practices with a full range of social, cultural,environmental, and global considerations. ABET 3.1 an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors ABET 3.3 an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic
in Chemical Engineering organization at MIT and is a NSF Graduate Research Fellow, a Whitaker International Fellow, and an MIT Chemical Engineering Communication Lab Fellow.Kara Rodby, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Kara Rodby is a third year PhD student in the Chemical Engineering Department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Kara is a member of the Brushett Lab, where she researches system-level, techno-economic analysis and design of redox flow batteries for grid applications. Kara is a co-founder of the Graduate Women in Chemical Engineering group at MIT.Gurleen Kaur Singh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Gurleen Kaur Singh is an Education and
expected to participate in evaluating capstoneteams’ oral presentations. These are formal 20-minute presentations of the team’s resultsfollowed by a 10-minute question and answer period with the collective faculty members. Inaddition, faculty mentors are expected to attend the end-of-semester Senior Design expo andassist with the evaluation of their teams’ technical poster presentations. Faculty mentors provideformal feedback to the course instructor concerning both the oral and poster presentations.These expectations are in aligned with identified best practices for faculty mentoring whichinclude [Watkins, 2011]: 1) Regularly scheduled group meetings, 2) Individual group member queries
are strategic for attaining global competitiveness in knowledge economies, such asmechatronics, industrial design, biotechnology, and information technologies, among others.Furthermore, Monterrey Tech has adopted a philosophy of world-class quality that not onlyaffects its graduates, but also allows the institution to influence and assume the leading role ineducation in Mexico, backed by its international programs for transferring the knowledge,experiences and cultures of work of the world’s foremost universitiesResearch and technological development are pivotal activities. Through its research centers andnational and international network of researchers in disciplines that have been defined as apriority, Monterrey Tech generates knowledge by
words of our corporate champion, “The morewe work together, the better it gets.”Case Study: Accurate Heart ModelThe impact of this program on individual students can best be illustrated by an example from ourfirst trial experience. A typical case involves a Biomechanical Engineering student with noprevious research experience, and pre-class survey results illustrating her belief that she hadbelow-average aptitude for computer use and independent learning. The industrial challengeoffered to her team came from a pacemaker manufacturer: create both an accurate CAD modeland a mechanically-accurate physical model of the human heart to be used in the development of
doing (25, 26) .The activities must be designed aroundimportant learning outcomes and promote thoughtful engagement on the part of thestudents.There are some pitfalls for young engineering faculty, in particular, those who pickup an article or two to learn how active learning works, and how they would beapplying it to enhance their teaching. They should be advised to look at a broad rangeof learning methods and do their level best in scrutinizing information and publishedstatistics, move into active learning gradually and cautiously, and seek the assistanceand guidance of well-informed people, prior to embarking seriously on a specificstrategy. No matter how data on a selected strategy and/or teaching method ispresented, young faculty adopting
outcome or based on student perceptions.On a competition-based project, the project manager uses the work breakdown structure (WBS)to manage tasks [7]. This paper aimed to demonstrate how the WBS can be used to demonstrateachievement of ABET student outcomes individually for each team member.This case study's objective was to provide a framework to individually assess the achievement ofthe ABET student outcomes for each member of a competition team. This research studyinvestigated the implementation of two ASCE Student Design Competitions: the AISC StudentSteel Bridge Competition and the ASCE Concrete Canoe Competition, as culminating capstonedesign projects. The authors assessed best practices from other programs outlined above in theirsuccess
engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences," International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 13, pp. 909-922, 2019.[5] D. Drane, M. Micari and G. Light, "Students as Teachers: Effectiveness of a Peer-led STEM Learning Programme over 10 Years," Educational Research and Evaluation, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 210-230, 2014.[6] J. R. Reisel, M. R. Jablonski, E. Munson and H. Hosseini, "Peer-led team learning in mathematics courses for freshmen engineering and computer science students," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 7-15, 2014.[7] S. B. Wilson and P. Varma-Nelson, "Small Groups, Significant Impact: A Review of Peer- Led Team Learning Research with
evaluations. Recommendations from other faculty were also considered carefully.Distribution Level and Designing for Steady StateIndividual awards were adjusted between $500 per semester (in cases of marginal need) and$1500 (in cases of dire need). Later awards were set at $1000 per semester (with summerpossible in addition) with exceptions handled as they arose – by individual contacts between thestudent, mentor and Financial Aid. The first batch of scholars was selected across the spectrumof class standing from freshman to senior, with due thought given to program viability, enablingus to recruit more students as some graduated and to set up a working rotation with Co-Opstudents. Thus 37 students were selected in Spring and Summer 2002, followed by
design as well as graduate-level courses in engineering innovation and technology management. He has nearly 30 years of combined academic and industrial management experience. He received his B.S.M.E. and M.S.M.E. degrees from Michigan Technological University.Dr. Daina Briedis, Michigan State University Daina Briedis is a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University and Assistant Dean for Student Advancement and Program Assessment in the College of Engineering. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a Co-PI on two NSF grants
construction sites. Virtual reality isemerging as an exceptional training tool to equip these budding engineers with the necessaryexpertise, offering a dynamic and immersive environment to hone their hazard identification andincident reporting skills.The research paper presents a comprehensive Virtual Reality (VR) model designed to assistundergraduate and graduate students, especially in the field of civil engineering in understandingcritical hazardous conditions that can occur on-site. The research employs a simulatedenvironment to expose students to potential on-site hazards, increasing their comprehension ofthe complexities and risks involved. Additionally, the research explores the potential of usingUnity 3D as a powerful platform for virtual
research and feedback on a smaller scale, from institution toinstitution. Each institution should weigh the options to decide which intervention fits best withintheir context. In this literature review, 45 papers and articles were analyzed, and a total of 23 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conferencepapers and articles had positive results indicating student outcomes were improved. Theaggregated data is summarized in the following tables. The differing interventions were groupedinto “intervention styles”, as shown in Table 1. From Table 1, it appears that supplementalinstruction, online resources, in-class structure, and hands-on are the most
engineering graduates.1.2. Impact of LITEE Case Studies on Engineering Education Realizing the importance of addressing these requirements, we formed the Laboratory forInnovative Technology and Engineering Education (LITEE) in 1997. A review of literaturerevealed that the teaching methodologies of lectures, experimental laboratories, design projects,case studies, games, and internships were all likely to achieve the requirements. An analysis ofthe application of these methodologies to meet the requirements, along with the results from pastevaluations of the use of case studies in engineering classrooms, indicated that the case studymethodology was the best candidate for bringing real-world issues into engineeringclassrooms11,3. We obtained
and study abroad practices. The pertinent question at hand is:could this be done without jeopardizing national security, and at what price? This paperwill look at these challenges and provide some examples and solutions to guide policymakers at institutions within the US and abroad interested in having student exchangeprograms.IntroductionPolicy implications affecting international graduate students and postdoctoral scholars inthe United States impact the success of US educational institutions in producing qualifiedengineers and the success of the US economy in the long run. Since the end of WorldWar II, the United States has been the most popular destination for science andengineering graduate students and postdoctoral scholars choosing to
Mahmoud, Wartburg College Murad is an Assistant Professor at the Engineering Science Department at Wartburg College. He has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University. Research interests include recruitment into STEM, diversity in STEM as well pedagogy and instruction.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas
ability to design a thermal system and component to meet desired needs improved my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering thermal problems improved my ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice, improved my knowledge of contemporary issues related to thermal/fluids issues improved my understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. My understanding of the following subjects was adequate preparation for this course
through their academic career without having the opportunity to practice or give an oralpresentation. The challenge for engineering educators is thus clear - how best to providestudents with oral presentation skills in engineering classes without impacting or dilutingtechnical engineering material. In this article, a way to incorporate oral presentation practice inany course is presented, with minimal impacts on class time and with the added benefit of beingable to cover additional technical material that can’t be covered in normal lecture, tutorial, or labtime.Development of the Virtual-i Presenter (ViP) programA software program called Virtual-i Presenter (ViP) was developed to help students improvepresentation skills. ViP allows users to
recruiting program, using current undergraduate students, and onegraduate student, to help in the University’s computer science recruiting efforts. InSeptember 2003, the planning began with the NSF grant to determine the best approachfor recruiting and targeting females and minority students and raising their interest inattending college and majoring in technology related fields. In early 2004, the TETCgrant was added to enhance the ongoing efforts. A&M-CC designed their recruitingprogram using the “Best Practices” for recruiting underrepresented minorities. This is atechnique used by some of the nation’s most successful engineering schools forproducing minority graduates. This paper describes the details of the implementation ofthe recruiting
Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pierrakos is the director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) and director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer identity, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through ser- vice, problem based learning methodologies, assessment of student learning, as well as complex problem solving. Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics, sustainability, and K-12 en- gineering outreach. Dr. Pierrakos is a 2009 NSF CAREER Awardee. Dr. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in Engineering Science
hundred ninety eight faculty members responded, across 119institutions, for an institutional response rate of 43%. All major engineering disciplines wererepresented.Findings from this study provide empirical evidence for the concern many engineering educationfaculty members have about how best to respond to evaluation expectations and opportunities.Although the McKenzie et al. study focuses on a specific component of engineering education,the capstone design course, it is reasonable to assume that faculty would respond similarly ifasked the same questions about other aspects of engineering education programs.The National Science Foundation (NSF) has provided powerful stimulus for renewal efforts inengineering education through competitive funding