Analysis Financial Statements Simulation methods Bottom Tier (< Financial Statements Bottom Tier (< Valuing Stocks, Bonds, and IPs 2.6) Valuing Stocks, Bonds, and IPs 3.5)Bibliography1. Farragher, Edward J., Robert T. Kleiman, and Anandi P. Sahu, “Current Capital Investment Practices,” TheEngineering Economist, Vol. 44, No.2, 1999, (pp. 137-150).2. Klammer, T., B. Koch, and N. Wilner, “Capital Budgeting Practices – A Survey of Corporate Use,” Journal ofManagement Accounting Research, Fall 1991, (pp. 113-130).PAUL KAUFFMANNPaul J. Kauffmann is Professor and Chair in the Department of Engineering Technology at Old DominionUniversity. His
andcorporate executives with backgrounds in engineering, in propagating the growth of corporatecapitalism and shaping the positions of engineers within corporations. Noble describes howengineers leveraged their societal relationship to technological development and production by“informing their work with the historical imperatives of corporate growth, stability, and control… the engineers, moreover, went a step further to ensure that their technical work meshed withthe imperatives of corporate social relations; rather than restricting their attention to technicalmatters, they consciously undertook to structure the labor force and foster the social habitsdemanded by corporate capitalism” [1]. As engineers serve capitalism via industry, they rejecttheir
, no. 1, pp. 30–55, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20184.[6] L. Benson, C. Bolding, J. Ogle, C. McGough, J. Murphy, and R. Lanning, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Belongingness in Civil Engineering,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32737. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32737.[7] “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2021.pdf.”[8] J. M. Smith and J. C. Lucena, “Invisible innovators: how low-income, first-generation students use their funds of knowledge to belong in engineering,” Eng. Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2016.1155593.
. ACTFL Japanese Proficiency Guidelines. Foreign Language Annals,vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 589-603, (1987).MICHIO TSUTSUIMichio Tsutsui is an Associate Professor of Technical Communication and the Director of the Technical JapaneseProgram at the University of Washington. He has earned a B.S. in naval architecture from Osaka University andan M.A. and a Ph.D. in linguistics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He is actively involved inlanguage education for engineers and scientists and research in technology-enhanced language learning. Page 4.357.7
background information) and then merging teams into larger groups as the exerciseprogresses. The workshop will investigate several engineering practices including aspects ofengineering design (defining a problem, developing potential solutions) and the interdependenceof science, engineering and technology. Key habits of mind will also be emphasized through thematerials presented in the example problem. These include asking questions, building models,interpreting data, applying mathematics and designing solutions. The field of Industrial andManagement Systems Engineering (IMSE) and its toolkit will be explored throughout the exercise.This provides an opportunity to introduce this important field to an audience typically not familiarwith the
, "Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth," Race ethnicity and education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69-91, 2005, doi: 10.1080/1361332052000341006.[6] M. Denton, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, "Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 556-580, 2020.[7] C. C. Samuelson and E. Litzler, "Community cultural wealth: An assets‐based approach to persistence of engineering students of color," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 93-117, 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20110.[8] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen
don’t consistently self-report leveragingthese habits significantly more across the board. For this reason, I believe there remains anongoing need for continued development related to best practices in how to engage students inentrepreneurial mindset growth and development throughout the engineering curriculum. Oureducational community should embrace opportunities to reinforce these habits as much as wecan to best prepare our engineering students to live up to the title of “problem-solver” that oursociety has placed on them.References[1] Georgia Tech, “College of Engineering - Home,” College of Engineering | Georgia Institute of Technology - Atlanta, GA, https://coe.gatech.edu/ (accessed May 16, 2025).[2] Virginia Tech, “College of
in the University of ULSAN, South Korea, and his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering in Washington State University. His interests are in the areas of speech and image signal processing, signal processing in communication, photoacoustics and embedded systems.Claudio Talarico, Eastern Washington University CLAUDIO TALARICO is an Assistant Professor in Electrical Engineering at Eastern Washington University. Before joining Eastern Washington University, he worked at University of Arizona, University of Hawaii and in industry, where he held both engineering and management positions at Infineon Technologies, IKOS Systems (now Mentor Graphics), and Marconi. His
Paper ID #13554Integrating Affective Engagement into Systems Engineering EducationDr. Timothy L.J. Ferris, School of Engineering, University of South Australia Timothy Ferris holds the degrees B.E.Hons, B.Th., B.Litt.Hons. Grad.Cert.Ed., and PhD from University of Adelaide, Flinders University, Deakin University, Queensland University of Technology and University of South Australia, all in Australia, respectively. He is a member of the School of Engineering at the University of South Australia. He teaches courses in systems engineering and research methods and supervises several PhD students in systems engineering. He was a
), working on initiatives to protect the watershed by bringing value to waste up-stream and transparency to the state of water quality. ● Twain High School, partnering for the participation of pregnant and parenting teens in a USD interdisciplinary course, Creative Minds, that combines ways of thinking from theatre, mathematics and engineering, to create tools or manipulatives that can be used by young children to facilitate mathematical learning. ● Viejas Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, enabling USD engineering students and Kumeyaay children to exchange ideas, collaborate, and share cultural knowledge in their Science Technology Engineering Art and Math (STEAM) lab. ● Waste for Life, supporting communities to develop
interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21673Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer-ing and Science Education from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Normative and Non-Normative Engineering
Natasha focused on the ease with which engineers conquer the math and sciences --“Ithink an engineer is someone who uses science, math, technology and stuff to solveproblems”(Rogue). Natasha pointed out the tinkering nature of engineers by describing hercolleagues as men that are “[…] at home playing with Raspberry Pi [a small, inexpensivecomputer, namely used by programming hobbyists] and building Ham radios.” They often spokeof these traits as if they were not traits that they possessed themselves, but they acknowledgedthem as traits of “true” engineers. “I don’t relish in wanting to tinker with something that’sbroke. That’s, I feel, like a trait of engineers that I don’t possess” (Natasha).Personal. When the women described how they saw
Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Courtney June Faber, Clemson University Courtney Faber is a graduate student in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow
Paper ID #25135A Seven-week Module to Introduce Electrical and Computer Engineering toFreshmen Engineering StudentsDr. Kala Meah, York College of Pennsylvania Kala Meah received the B.Sc. degree from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology in 1998, the M.Sc. degree from South Dakota State University in 2003, and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Wyoming in 2007, all in Electrical Engineering. From 1998 to 2000, he worked for sev- eral power companies in Bangladesh. Currently, Dr. Meah is an Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering program, Department of Engineering and Computer
Paper ID #5976Teaching System Modeling and Feedback Control Systems: A Multidisci-plinary Course in Mechanical Engineering and Electrical EngineeringProf. Li Tan, Purdue University, North Central DR. LI TAN is currently with the College of Engineering and Technology at Purdue University North Central, Westville, Indiana. He received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of New Mexico in1992. Dr. Tan is an IEEE senior member. His principal technical areas include digital signal processing, adaptive signal processing, active noise and vibration control, data compression and digital communications. He
and holder of the Charles W. Oxford Professorship in Emerging Technologies. His research interests include engineering education, teaching improvement through hands-on experiences and enhancement of the K-12 educational experience. Professor Clausen is a registered professional engineer in the state of Arkansas. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Development of an Introduction to Sustainable Engineering Course as a Chemical Engineering ElectiveAbstractDue to the pressing global challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and environmentaldegradation, there is a growing need for sustainable engineering education. In response tostudent interest and employer
determining their persistence in engineering careers 4.Largely unexplored, however, is the role of the subconscious in determining persistence inengineering majors and careers – this is the domain of implicit cognition.Explicit and implicit cognition are related but distinct concepts 5. Explicit cognition includesconscious choices, judgments, and declarations (e.g. “I believe that men and women are equallygood at math.”). In contrast, implicit cognition operates without conscious awareness or control,and mediates thought, feeling, and action (e.g., 6-9). Implicit attitudes (e.g. “Math is good.”) andstereotypes (e.g. “Engineers are male.”), along with self-concept (e.g. “I am male.”) interact withone another in the prediction of science, technology
Paper ID #40399Chemical Engineering Capstone Course Improved for Broader ImpactsDr. Joaquin Rodriguez, University of Pittsburgh Joaquin Rodriguez is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh since 2018. He received his bachelor degree in Chemical Engineering from Universidad Simon Bolivar (Caracas, Venezuela), MSc. and PhD in the same discipline from the Uni- versity of Pittsburgh (1990-92). He developed his expertise in thermal cracking processes and advanced materials (cokes, carbon fibers) from oil residues, and became a business leader for specialty
Paper ID #30045The Modalities of Governance in Engineering EducationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for
Paper ID #22475Increasing Student Engagement in Engineering Through Transformative Prac-ticesDr. Vittorio Marone, University of Texas, San Antonio Vittorio Marone is an Assistant Professor of Instructional Technology in the Department of Interdisci- plinary Learning and Teaching at The University of Texas at San Antonio. He earned his doctorate in Education in a dual-degree program between the University of Padua and The University of Tennessee. He also holds a doctorate in Languages, Cultures, and Societies from Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. His research interests include new literacies, youth cultures, games and
Air Force Academy (USAFA) faces the samechallenges despite its uniqueness as a military institution. The mission of the Academy is to"inspire and develop outstanding young men and women to become Air Force officers." ManyUSAFA “grads” will enter scientific and engineering career fields after commissioning. Theywill be assigned to laboratories, system program offices, test agencies, and operational air andspace units. The nature of the technology-driven Air Force requires that these new officers beable to understand the key concepts and issues to allow them to resolve ill-defined technicalproblems. “Capstone” design courses in the engineering curriculum at the Academy allowsenior-level cadets to hone their skills at attacking such problems.A
AC 2011-2520: SAFETY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR ENGINEER-ING DESIGN COURSESJunichi Kanai, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute After seven years with the Information Science Research Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, where he was an Associate Research Professor, Dr. Kanai joined Panasonic Information and Networking Technologies Lab, Princeton, NJ in 1998. He was a senior scientist developing and transferring new tech- nologies to product divisions. From 2002 to 2004, he was a manager at Matsushita Electric Corporation of America (Panasonic) Secaucus, NJ, providing system integration and software development for clients. Dr. Kanai joined Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, NY, in 2004. He is
aim to innovate,” strongly criticizing the engineering educationresearch community for not practicing what they preach. In recent discussions of this concern, ithas been identified that “…the issue is not simply a need for more educational innovations. Theissue is a need for more educational innovations that have a significant impact on studentlearning and performance, whether it is through widespread and efficient implementation ofproven practices or scholarly advancements in ideas, methods, or technologies (p. 5).6 ” Effortstowards this end have included the development of frameworks and strategies to make the linkbetween knowledge generated in the learning sciences to the practical delivery of education moreexplicit and implementable5,9,10
between student action less time for analysis of student learning. Faculty are oftenand focused feedback, students often make the same type of absorbed checking student data and have little time to add newerrors week after week. Additionally, engineering laboratories student experiences that might be important and relevant todo not typically use efficacious forms of teaching, such as industrial practice. This problem is shared by most science anddiscovery-methods or project-based learning [1]. technology curricula and delays integration of new topics andUnderstanding how people think and learn has forced a
. Moosavizadeh is currently the Principal Investigator of an NSF collaborative research grant: A National Consortium for Synergic for Synergistic Undergraduate Mathematics via Multi-institutional Interdisciplinary Teaching Partnership (SUMMIT-P) and the director of the First Day Success Program at Norfolk State University.Dr. Makarand Deo, Norfolk State University Dr. Makarand Deo is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Norfolk State Uni- versity. Dr. Deo has earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering from University of Calgary, Canada. His graduate and undergraduate degrees are from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay and University of Pune, India, respectively. After PhD, Dr. Deo joined the
and for the past ten years I have served as faculty member in the Electronics & Computer Engineering Technology de- partment, Computer of Technology at Indiana State University. Currently, pursuing a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education.Oscar Henriquez, Indiana State UniversityMr. Larry D. Pritchett, Indiana State University Instructor at Indiana State University, with former teaching experience at Lycoming College and Penn State University. Industry experience as I.T. Manager at Keystone Veneers, and Project Manager/Prototype Developer at Rose-Hulman Ventures and Structural Fibers Inc. Interests include software development and software engineering, networkng and security, and I.T
Education in Software Defined Radio Design Engineering Abstract— Software Defined Radio (SDR), an interdisciplinary emerging technology,presents new challenges for communications engineers and engineering educators. In SDR,signal modulation and information coding are defined in the system's software, nothardware. The authors have incorporated SDR design into their respective curricula bothto support the growing demand for SDR engineering and to teach widely applicablesystems engineering concepts. SDR-oriented curricular changes include new courses,laboratories, and software design tools. Software radio design is taught as aninterdisciplinary systems engineering undertaking, emphasizing the importance of
to promote cross-disciplinary education for engineering, business, and intellectualproperty/law oriented students by holding an early-stage technology commercializationcompetition with cash prizes to develop the winning product ideas.2. Key Elements of the ModuleThe module, entitled “Synthesizing core concepts for technology entrepreneurship”, is composedof lectures intended to provide an overview of the product development lifecycle, includingcustomer need identification, concept generation, concept development, scope expansion, andbusiness plan.2.1. Need IdentificationTo help students conceive innovative product opportunities in the need identification process, weused the concept of suboptimal equilibrium9. The term suboptimal equilibrium
Knowledge of Contemporary Issues Held By Engineering StudentsAbstractThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has ruled that students shouldhave a knowledge of contemporary issues. In this regard, it is obvious that, today, engineering isconducted on a global scale and is becoming very important for the nation as well as the wholeworld. Therefore, every student should pursue knowledge of contemporary and past informationregarding various engineering issues.This paper presents the level of understanding of typical contemporary issues held by theengineering students. It also compares the knowledge of students enrolled at other engineeringschools. The data may be utilized by institutions to measure and compare the level
, users from all over the worldpost technical questions that are answered by users and by the engineering staff atGlobalspec. Even if I do not formally assign projects for this section, I encourage thestudents to read and if possible to answer questions related to Electrical Technology. Iconsider this activities an integral part of the student education.ForumsAt the time of this writing there are 14 specialized forums in CR4. These forums can beused, just as the questions and answers section as educational tools in classroom. Some ofthe forum titles are: “Education”, “BioMech & BioMed”, “Communications &Electronics”, “Instrumentation”, “Mechanical Engineering”, Electrical Engineering”,“Sustainable Engineering”, and others.Special