Session 1153 Impact of Vertically Integrated Team Design Projects on First Year Engineering Students Helen K. Qammar1, H. Michael Cheung1, Edward A. Evans1, Sandra Prettyman Spickard2, Francis S. Broadway3, Rex D. Ramsier4 Department of Chemical Engineering1/ Educational Foundations and Leadership2/ Department of Curricular and Instructional Studies3/ Departments of Physics, Chemistry, and Chemical Engineering4 The University of Akron Akron, Ohio
environmental quality,lightweight naval alloys and friction stir welding, as well asresistance and powering of small, fast ships. Students were awedwith the extensive research facilities and the obvious knowledgeand dedication of the scientists and engineers who hosted thestudents for brief informational sessions in their labs.Students were vocal about their impressions of Carderock. “I am abit overwhelmed,” said Lisa Hilliard, a graduate student workingtoward her Ph.D. in Chemistry from the University of Florida. “Itis amazing to think that someone is willing to pay you to thinkabout the things you’ve always wondered about as a kid. It’s veryexciting,” she said.After the tour and lunch, the students were welcomed, along withtheir mentors and advisors
design to research that applied engineering and molecular biology approaches to the study of the skeletal response to mechanical loading. As a Mechanical Engineer, she worked on facility design projects involving mechanical systems that included heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and energy conservation systems, as well as R&D of air conditioning equipment for Navy ships. Additional research interests have included the investigation of relationships among components of the indoor environment, occupants, and energy usage. Specifically, the effects of the indoor environment on occupant health and well-being and in parallel, how socially-mediated energy-saving strategies can increase awareness of energy use and/or
position. The experiment was this: create a position dedicated to cultivatinginnovative teaching practices, engineering education research, and engineering outreach withinthe College of Engineering as a tenure-track faculty line, while not housing the position directlyin any one of the existing college departments. While there were well-documented guidelinesand policies for promotion and tenure as a whole, exactly how they would be applied to my casewas also part of the experiment, and it did not end the way we all hoped it would. The takeawaybeing that I am no stranger to uncertainty, and I am also sensitive to the fact that good intentionsare not enough to ensure good outcomes.Our AnalysisThrough analysis of our reflections and discussions, we
Creamer [17] found that relationships formed with peers and thedegree of respect and support received during engineering-based group activities plays animportant role in shaping engineering goals for female students. Furthermore, they foundthat these types of interactions, peer-to-peer and student-to-faculty, tends to have both ashort- and long-term impact on interest in engineering as a major and a career.While the literature on women in engineering education is rather extensive, thescholarship on the experiences of female engineering students in makerspace-basedprogramming, particularly on participation in engineering design activities, is practicallynon-existent. To address this gap in the research, we developed and implemented animmersive
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Quantitative Survey and Analysis of Five Maker Spaces at Large, Research-Oriented UniversitiesAbstractTechnical universities around the world are opening makerspaces on their campuses: facilitiesand cultures that afford unstructured student-centric environments for design, invention, andprototyping. Consequentially, there is a growing need to survey and understand emergent trendsand best practices, to compare and contrast them. Towards this end, we have conductedinterviews at five university maker spaces: Stanford University, Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology, Georgia Tech, Technical University of Berlin, and at Arizona State University. Thecomparison of
AC 2011-740: CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANAL-YSIS OF DEFINITIONS AND ASSESSMENT MEASURESGeoff Wright, Brigham Young UniversityTyler Lewis, Brigham Young UniversityPaul Skaggs, Brigham Young University Paul Skaggs is an associate professor and program chair of industrial design at Brigham Young University. He joined the faculty at BYU after twenty-two years experience in industry. Fourteen years of which he operated his own full-service design consulting firm. Clients included Kodak, Fisher-Price, Federal Ex- press, Motorola, AT&T, Xerox and Hewlett-Packard, to name a few. Paul also taught conducted creativity seminars for in house engineering groups. Paul received his BFA from Brigham Young University
higher education. She has designed, developed and managed degree, and certificate programs, and has experience as an online instructor, and mentor and trainer of other online instructors.Dr. Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group Thema Monroe-White is a senior evaluation and research consultant at SageFox Consulting Group. Prior to joining SageFox, Thema worked as a researcher and evaluator in the areas of mental health, STEM education and commercialization. She has taught in the K-12 environment, served as an instructor and invited guest lecturer for courses in leadership, statistics and cross-cultural psychology at the undergradu- ate and graduate levels. Thema completed her Master’s Degree in Developmental
Session 1793 A Case Study: Development of a Practice Oriented Engineering Program with Implications for Regional Economic Development Paul Kauffmann Ralph Rogers Phil Lunsford East Carolina University, Greenville, NCIntroductionThis paper describes an engineering program planned for implementation at East CarolinaUniversity in fall 2004. The program presents a unique design synthesis of concentration areasrequired to enhance regional economic development and the best practices
Paper ID #15401Stimulating Creativity in Online Learning Environments through IntelligentFast FailureDr. Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME. Dr. Jablokow
programs teach traditionalacademic research skills, they must also provide opportunities for students to collaborativelyengage in research to address authentic STEM problems. Despite the fact that many universitiesare actively pursuing various ideas in their attempt to transform graduate education, federalscience agency programs continuously report that even the best research-based Master’s and PhDprograms that exist in the U.S. today are not fully prepared to provide the kind of support that theSTEM workforce needs [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. It becomes even more relevant when itcomes to the Big Data and Data Analytics (BDA) field, which incorporates professionals fromacross the STEM fields [14].Though there is a large body of research that
integrated engineering disciplines and concepts were developed by a team ofexperienced curriculum developers; field tested at over 40 events in California, Connecticut,Georgia, Michigan, Mississippi, Puerto Rico, Utah, and Wisconsin, to determine theirsuitability for a wide range of settings and audiences; and reviewed by professional educatorsand engineers. Formative evaluation guided development of the program and, once completed,summative evaluation conducted by an independent evaluation team measured impact andefficacy of the program’s design, resource materials, and event formats. Findings indicate thatFamily Engineering activities and events are fun and engaging, result in families having anincreased appreciation and understanding of
2006-2373: INTEGRATING SECURE DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES INTO ASOFTWARE ENGINEERING COURSEJames Walden, Northern Kentucky University Dr. James Walden received his Ph.D. from Carnegie Mellon University in 1997. He worked at Intel Corporation as a software engineer, with a focus on security sensitive applications, before becoming a Visiting Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Toledo in 2003. He is a member of the computer science faculty at Northern Kentucky University. Dr. Walden has taught software engineering and computer security to both undergraduate and graduate students. His research interests focus on both of those subjects and particularly their
AC 2011-146: TEACHING ETHICS FOR PREPARING TRANSPORTA-TION SYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT STUDENTS FOR PROFESSIONALPRACTICERobert M. Brooks, Temple University Dr. Robert M. Brooks is an associate professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple University. He is a registered professional engineer in PA and a fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers. His research interests are Civil Engineering Materials, Transportation Engineering, and Engineering Education.Jyothsna K S, Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore Secured a gold Medal for the highest aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature Course at St.Joseph’s College (Autonomous). Working for the Department of
college students: exponential attrition,lack of social and academic integration, lack of awareness of academic options, and low self-efficacy.Although much research has been conducted on successful recruitment and retention strategiesfor students at four-year universities, there is scant information on the practices that aresuccessful for community college students. As the STEM Center has moved forward with newinitiatives, data collection and research have been key components of all programs and servicesoffered.2. Exponential AttritionThe PCAST report identified retention efforts in the first two years of college as a key and costeffective strategy for increasing the overall number of STEM graduates.2 Unfortunately,traditionally underrepresented
these activities were impacted adversely by the pandemic,such as the postponement of this trip from Spring 2021 to Fall 2021, the transition of in-personinstruction to online instruction in late October, and the less than perfect final project’scompletion rate, beyond the normal adaptation of a course in a different country given thefacility and product differences. The different academic calendars in the U.S. and Bulgarianinstitutions also made it impossible in finding a suitable period for the students from bothinstitutions to interact, but we were able to connect the students with other American visitors inBulgaria to get comments on their designs. There were many other challenges, including thecultural influences on design, and
AC 2011-563: ACADEMIC PREPARATION IN A CO-OP PROGRAM AS ACAREER ENHANCEMENT TOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL ENGINEER-ING GRADUATESSandra Ingram, University of Manitoba Sandra Ingram, Ph.D., is an associate professor in Design Engineering and adjunct professor in Biosys- tems Engineering at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada. Dr. Ingram is responsible for teaching an integrated approach to technical communication in Biosystems Engineering and Electrical and Computer Engineering. Her research interests include mentorship and networking within engineer- ing, integrated approaches to technical communication and post-graduate training of engineers, . Address: E2-262 Engineering and Technology Complex, University of
using a variety of strategies; unfortunately, the literature on the effectiveness ofthese approaches is sparse. We present assessment and evaluation results from a course, “InformalScience Education for Scientists: A Practicum,” taught to graduate students in science and engineering-related disciplines in Spring 2008. This course provides a structured framework and experiential learningon informal science education for the graduate student participants during a semester-long experience.The iterative nature of designing an effective informal science education product and the importance offront-end, formative and summative evaluation are stressed throughout the course. The emphasis is placedon having students use a scientific approach in the
Delaware. She specializes in the development of mixed methods research designs for educational research.Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering learning experiences. She has authored numerous engineering-focused teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre
restaurants, movie theaters, ashopping center, and a recreational park within walking distance or a short bus ride, several othersocial activities were arranged for them.Educational and other informational presentations need to be arranged too. Workshops on libraryresearch techniques, ethics, poster design, presentation skills, writing research papers, gettinginto graduate school, obtaining financial support, patents and licensing, and strategies for successin professional careers, are several alternatives. Several of these presentations can be organizedas lunch seminars. In addition, it is very important to schedule presentations for the students tohighlight their accomplishments. Formal presentations at the middle and the end of the ten-weekperiod
and extensive introduction to the process of research, mentoring, andteamwork. This paper examines BEST PRACTICE in light of students’ experience by focusingon the ideal research experience in relation to the actual research experience. Based on theanalysis a framework is developed for the design and evaluation of research experiences. Thechallenges of socializing students into a research community and developing culturallyresponsive evaluations when the diversity of students is increased are addressed.I. IntroductionIncreasing the number of students in engineering and science have become growing concerns forengineering and science programs across the nation. There is a strong movement in science andengineering education to include all
offering access to rapidprototyping equipment and conceptual design spaces coupled with a unique culture that can betransformative to its users.8 The concept of the university maker space is young, with the firstdating back to roughly 2001 at MIT.9 Consequently, the full effect and impact of these spaces isnot yet fully understood. The research presented in this paper is a first step toward doing just thatby creating a review of the existing state of university maker spaces found through universitywebsite searches. This list will take into account a number of different characteristics, bothunique and common, across university maker spaces in order to create a baseline that can be usedto discover and capitalize on practices being implemented with
design process was included during the second class period (75minutes) of the semester and detailed divergent-convergent thinking10 and included nuancesfrom other best practice articles.12,13 Based on their declared engineering majors, students werethen divided into multidisciplinary teams for the semester, supporting ABET Criterion 3,outcome d.14 The teams in each section completed projects in each of three engineeringdisciplines: civil, electrical and mechanical; albeit in different orders depending on the section.The projects were rotated through each section so that all student teams were assigned eachproject. The projects included the design, construction, and testing of: A wind turbine where students predicted the current produced
research and evaluation of programs to improve human services, as well as developing evaluation methods that can be embedded within programs. Dr. Giancola’s current work focuses on developing methodological processes to embed evaluation into human services programs, such that program development can be driven by reliable and valid information and impact findings can be properly interpreted. Much of her work employs theory-based methods, not to replace rigorous research designs, but rather to supplement, in order to better understand implementation and effectiveness. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 ADVANCE Women’s Leadership at the University of Delaware
taught chemical engineering courses for a few years in his home country, Iran, and first-year engineering courses for several semesters at Virginia Tech. He has provided service and leadership in different capacities at Lehigh University and Virginia Tech.Dr. Christian Matheis, Guilford College I serve as a visiting assistant professor of Community and Justice Studies in the Department of Justice and Policy Studies at Guilford College in Greensboro, NC. My research and teaching specializations bridge theoretical, empirical, and practical subjects informed by social and political philosophy, ethics, public policy, and direct-action organizing. In particular, my work emphasizes how both philosophy of liberation and
barriers to LGBTQ equality.As recommended by Woodford [39], the program offers an incremental design with successivetrainings to address audiences with varying levels of knowledge and awareness. The content ofthe Safe Zone workshops are tailored for a Engineering/STEM audience by incorporating thefindings from our research on LGBTQ in Engineering. This is done by various means such asdirect presentation of quantitative results, case studies about experiences of LGBTQ individualsin STEM, and activities exploring how STEM culture impacts LGBTQ individuals. Uponcompletion of Safe Zone training, graduates receive a Safe Zone sticker to display in theirworkplace. This simple symbol of LGBTQ alliance has been shown to benefit LGBTQ studentsand
experience wherestudents from each of the participating institutions worked collaboratively in support of theoverall research project. To enhance the students’ education, they spent several weeks in afocused experience at two of the universities with visits to the others. The intent was to broadentheir perspectives on the operations at different schools and promote interest in graduate schoolwhile learning about product platform planning. We describe the structure of the program alongwith the activities undertaken by the students. We also include an assessment of the program bythe students and plans for improving our future offering of this program.NomenclatureBOM Bill of MaterialsDSM Design Structure MatrixEBOM Enhanced Bill of
have strongentrepreneurial interests. These students want to develop their design projects into commercialproducts. One venue for commercializing design at our institution, Grove City College (GCC), isthe annual on-campus business plan competition. For the last four years, business andentrepreneurship students often partner in writing a business plan. Students received writtenfeedback from practicing technology entrepreneurs on their plans. That students report thecompetition as a favorable experience fostered the idea for what we called the High TechVenture Start-up course.The business plan competition, however, lacked several essential elements to be a fullyintegrated and maximally valuable educational experience. As important as business
AC 2008-1907: THE IMPACT OF OUT-OF-SCHOOL TIME (OST) MATH ANDSCIENCE CLUBS ON ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS,TEACHERS, SCHOOLS AND THE UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATEFELLOWS THAT FACILITATE THEMLynn Albers, North Carolina State University Lynn Albers is a third-year NSF-GE Foundation RAMP-UP graduate Fellow. She received her B.S. in Mathematics with a minor in Music from MIT in 1992 and her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Nuclear Engineering from Manhattan College in 1996. After working for Nortel Networks and the NC Solar Center, Lynn matriculated at North Carolina State University where she is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering, focusing on renewable energy.Althea Smith
differently. Productdesigners typically do not have the math and science training to make relevant calculations orcomputations to ensure that a design is meeting the requirements, and engineering studentstypically do not have the artistic training to come up with aesthetically pleasing solutions, nor dothey tend to have as much practical experience with user research and iterative prototyping.Biomedical engineering students may find a particular benefit in working with product designstudents, since medical device development is generally a multidisciplinary task. In a study ofthe medical device industry, the primary role that industrial designers were found to play inmedical device development was addressing aesthetic design and human factors