in 1998 and Missouri University Science & Technology in Civil Engineering in 1999, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 2004. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Michigan.Dr. Kenneth J. Fridley, The University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at The University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama. Dr. Fridley has been recognized as a dedicated educator throughout his career and has received several awards for his teaching efforts, including the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering
, the minimum number of credit-bearing hours required toward degreeattainment is 66 (beyond master’s degree). After twenty-one years of practice and 165 graduates,the program is successful despite many administrative difficulties, built into the curriculuminefficiencies, and program procedural issues.Currently, the Consortium has 126 students, but the number of active students is less, because ofthe nature of the students. Enrolled students are allotted nine years to complete the program.Though nine years may seem a bit too long for typical doctoral program students, the averageage of students in the Consortium program is 46. Typically, these are students alreadysuccessfully engaged in careers who have decided to pursue this significant
engineeringcommunication classroom. For example, we have two student teams work together on theirprojects so they can learn more about technology, on the one hand, and writing, on the other. Inthis way, we likewise encourage these students to continue to keep learning over their 30-year-long professional career.3.0 Lifelong Learning Background The goals of the information literacy components of the communication course aresimilar to those of Feldmann and Feldmann’s [6] assignment for their class, which are thefollowing: to make students aware of the rich store of information available; to help the studentslearn the basic skills needed to locate their needed information; to encourage team-basedinteraction on their project; to understand the ethics of
Paper ID #30155Measuring Curriculum Effectiveness for Developing Principled Leaders inan Undergraduate Engineering ProgramDr. David S Greenburg, The Citadel Dr. Greenburg is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Leadership and Program Management (ELPM) in the School of Engineering (SOE) at The Citadel. He served over 20 years of active military service, achieving the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, United States Marine Corps. During his military career he served in a variety of progressively responsible command and staff and leadership positions in Infantry, Logistics, Acquisition, and Human Resources; with
becauseleadership is fully integrated into these programs, and the perception may be that leadership isnot explicitly addressed.The context of this paper is one of these overlooked military colleges: West Point. Whether thecadets at West Point enter the Academy from enlisted service or civilian life, they are all 18-24years of age and struggle with many of the same social and societal issues of their civiliancollege counterparts. Carved into granite at West Point and memorized by every cadet, themission of the Academy is: “To educate, train, and inspire the Corps of Cadets so that eachgraduate is a commissioned leader of character committed to the values of Duty, Honor, Countryand prepared for a career of professional excellence and service to the nation
-Regulated Learning (SRL) conceptual frameworkalong with cognition, learning behaviors, and context [10]. A key assumption of the SRLperspective is that learners can exert some control over not only their behavior, but also theirmotivation, e.g. by positive self-talk, promising themselves extrinsic rewards, or connectingcourse-level goals with long-term career goals [10]. Our curriculum intervention strategy is basedon the hypothesis that we can increase motivation by helping students make connections betweenactivities and concepts in several required courses.Motivational constructs are not fixed for a given student, but are assumed to depend on theparticular learning context. The degree to which a student’s attitudes vary between coursecontexts may
and Wendy Korb Early Career Professorship in Industrial Engineering in 2016. Dr. Ashour’s research areas include applied decision making, modeling and simulation, virtual reality, and process improvement. He contributed to research directed to improve engineering education.Dr. Ashkan Negahban, The Pennsylvania State University, School of Graduate Professional Studies Dr. Ashkan Negahban is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Management at The Pennsylvania State University, School of Graduate Professional Studies. He has a PhD and MS from Auburn University and a BS from University of Tehran (all in Industrial Engineering). His research interest is in the application of agent-based, discrete event, and Monte Carlo
STEM initiative and translate her passion for STEM into opportunities that will attract, inspire and retain more girls in STEM to make it the new norm. She has also architected SFAz’s enhanced Community College STEM Pathways Guide that has received the national STEMx seal of approval for STEM tools. She integrated the STEM Pathways Guide with the KickStarter processes for improving competitive proposal writing of Community College Hispanic Serving Institutions. Throughout her career, Ms. Pickering has written robotics software, diagnostic expert systems for space station, manufacturing equipment models, and architected complex IT systems for global collaboration that included engagement analytics. She holds a US
interdisciplinary career that impacts global society and daily life. 2. Provide students with the opportunity to develop process-driven problem-solving skills that recognize multiple alternatives and apply critical thinking to identify an effective solution. 3. Provide students with the opportunity to integrate math & science in an engineering context. 4. Create motivated and passionate engineering students by challenging them with authentic engineering problems across multiple disciplines. 5. Instill in students the professional, personal and academic behaviors and common competencies needed to move to the next stage of their development.The Cornerstone courses are taught in two forms to accommodate the varying needs of ourfirst-year students
declared their major as S&E at enrollment, were no longerenrolled in any institution three years after their initial college enrollment [2]. These numbersindicate that students lose enthusiasm or interest in S&E somewhere between high school, whenmany are interested in an S&E career, and graduation. Further, students are aware of this, asnearly half (49%) of surveyed engineering juniors report having doubts about majoring inengineering. Retaining students until graduation is recognized as a challenge by higher learninginstitutions across the US [4]. Due to the heavy focus on content, engineering in college turnsinto a “closed club” and becomes less attractive for students to persist in [3].1.2: Predictors of PersistenceSeymour and
thing. Our PI is also very present. He's in lab every day and always walking around asking if you know what you're doing and that kind of thing.”This aspect of her research project allowed for several mediums to which she could seek helpand guidance from. The participant had a positive outlook on the research experience based onthese circumstances. This concludes that a well-rounded mentoring experience can impact aresearch experience in a positive way and introduce a greater amount of knowledge to thestudent. Multiple research experiences entail multiple mentorship experiences that come alongwith it. The different experiences add more depth to a student’s overall research experience.Whether the participant decides to choose a career
Transportation Science, University of California Transportation Center Student of the Year Award, New Faculty Award by the Council of University Transportation Centers, the Cunard, Fred Burggraf and D. Grant Mickle outstanding paper awards by the Transportation Research Board, Harry West Teaching Award by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Penn State, Out- standing Teaching Award by the Penn State Engineering Alumni Society, and Faculty Early Career De- velopment (CAREER) Award by the National Science Foundation.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Professor and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the
graduates add to the state's economy," fourresearchers from West Virginia University5 conducted a sophisticated economic analysis by firstconsidering the additional income earned during their career by highly educated graduates employed inthe state. Next, they determined the multiplier due to "demand-side effect" of additional spendingfrom purchasing goods and services in the state as well as "supply-side effect" of additionalProceedings of the 2019 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2productivity from companies in the state employing these college educated graduates (compared tohigh school graduates). As
) Content centered approachesFaculty centered approaches - Creating more faculty timeAs mentioned above, time is limited. Faculty members need to balance their time in terms ofthe three main responsibilities: research, teaching and service. In some faculty memberscases, complicating the time issue can result in creative ways to carve out more time forthemselves.Creating time for oneself is important as faculty members need to juggle between multipleroles and responsibilities within their positions. Most of our participants commented aboutthe three components of a faculty career – research, teaching, and service – have arbitraryand complicated boundaries. In the examples below, three participants claimed that it washard for them to make the
programming to create balanced teams using aprogram entitled Balanced Student Assignment Team Macro (BSTAM) implemented withMicrosoft Excel® spreadsheets. The method has been used by the Krannert Graduate School ofManagement at Purdue University over the past six years for assignment of individuals to teamsin the Professional Masters Program, encompassing the Master of Business Administration(MBA), Master of Science in Industrial Administration (MSIA), and Master of Science inHuman Resource Management (MSHRM) programs.One especially positive outcome of using the BSTAM method is that the course instructors havea much better understanding of the attributes of each class. The course instructor’s work with anMBTI expert in the Center for Career
time on teaching than on research. Colbeck also notices that theproduction of research was somewhat constricted by the narrow definition of what someinstitutions considered as “acceptable” scholarship.The book by Wankat11 is a great resource for new engineering educators. It concentrates on thedevelopment of time management skills in new faculty and discusses effective and efficienttechniques for teaching, scholarship, and service. Reis9 addresses his book mainly to graduatestudents and postdoctoral researchers preparing for academic career. However, the last chapter ofthe book is dedicated to the first years in an academic position and includes advice on timemanagement, teaching, research, professional responsibility, and tenure.3. Choosing
-driven design. While the curricular goals are to provide value-added experiences forstudents that go well beyond the scope of a traditional, discipline-centered BS degree program,an additional benefit of the program lies in its ability to transform the perspectives of thecollege’s faculty in regards to the vital role that multidisciplinary, team-based productdevelopment will play for engineering graduates who strive to add value to the global economy.Individuals often choose an academic career for the freedom it provides to explore and extendthe boundaries of knowledge in a particular sub-discipline for which they have a passion. Butthis orientation runs counter to the broad-based, customer-oriented perspective needed in productdevelopment and
AC 2007-2197: GATEWAY INTO FIRST-YEAR STEM CURRICULA: ACOMMUNITY COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY COLLABORATION PROMOTINGRETENTION AND ARTICULATIONMichele Wheatly, Wright State University Michele Wheatly (PI) is Dean of the College of Science and Mathematics at Wright State University. She has had a 25 year history of continuous NSF funding to support her lab research, as well as significant experience directing large projects targeting increasing representation in the STEM disciplines (including the Creating Laboratory Access for Science Students, heralded as one of the most innovative projects in undergraduate STEM curriculum in the US). Her career funding from competitive sources has totaled
strategies for effectivelyincorporate writing and speaking into engineering courses1-41. The approaches include writing-to-learn exercises to enhance students’ mastery of technical concepts, individual courses thataddress specific types of documents and presentations (e.g., the design report, the laboratoryreport), and integrated curricula that support students throughout a curriculum. What all of theseapproaches share is a commitment to helping students learn to use writing productively in theirengineering careers. Whether it be an emphasis on writing to learn, where students come to seewriting as a tool for thinking, or introducing students to the types of genres common in aparticular discipline, engineering faculty are seeking ways to support
for the day, one student turned to me and said, “That wasincredible. I have never had the experience where I was the one that everyone else wanted to be.I never thought that would happen in engineering or school.” This past year, we had one studentwho had set plans to get an MBA and go into marketing after graduation, assuming that theywere not a good engineer and they were therefore uninterested in doing it as a career. At ourfinal lunch the team member said, “I never knew I was this good of an engineer. Now I have torethink my whole career plan.” Competition programs run well give these sorts of opportunitiesmore readily than the typical industry sponsored programs. Competition programs run poorlygive no such opportunities.One other
research, and increase the enrollment of women and minorities in STEM degree programs. 5. Service to scientific and engineering community - Member of Rotarian Club, community and global outreach activities. Lectures at area schools and organizations regarding the importance of diversity in higher education, minority education issues, and women in engineering. Dr. El-Hakim has built a bridge program in Colorado that is expanding the educational and career opportunities for diverse populations. It was her vision to create a partnership among Colorado’s institutions of higher education to address the needs of women and underrepresented students. The Louis Stokes CO-AMP program
, particularly women and minorities in engineering and routinely volunteers in Utah's K-12 schools as an engineering mentor, science educator, and engineering career guidance counselor and is active with the Society of Women Engineers, Junior Engineering State, Expanding your Horizons, School-to-Careers, MESA, Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts. Dr. Furse was the Professor of the Year in the College of Engineering at Utah State University for the year 2000. She is the Director of the Center of Excellence for Smart Sensors, an active, funded research program including electromagnetics for biology and remote sensing. The Center focuses on imbedded antennas and sensors in complex environments, including
US Department of Labor10. This funding hasresulted in the development of the various curricula and has provided start-up funding forthe IPD program and Entrepreneurship minor.K-12 entrepreneurship outreach: The Integrated Product Development program hasteamed with Lehigh’s Iacocca Institute for Global Entrepreneurship (www.iacocca-lehigh.org/cap/) to sponsor Career Awareness Programs (CAP) for highly qualified,underrepresented high school students. The focus of these one-week summer programsincluded business, engineering and design arts, all with a technical entrepreneurshipfocus11. In 2001 in conjunction with Lehigh’s Global Village, the Lehigh team from theIacocca Institute and the College of Education was awarded a grant for a
. Many architecture studentstend to defer the required analysis of their design, and many AE students avoid extensiveexploration. However, as its name suggests, the Comprehensive Studio must integrate bothreason and intuition, or technology and design.Architecture and Architectural Engineering ProgramsOur Architecture and Architectural Engineering (AE) programs are five-year professionalprograms. Professors of each program work closely together in designing and teaching bothcurriculums. The curriculums are virtually identical during the first two years allowing studentsto experience the core issues of both programs before making a career choice. AE students takefive design studios along with architecture students (See Figure 1).ARCHITECTURAL
packaging of micromachined sensors and actuators and their interface circuits. Prof. Gianchandani is the recipient of a National Science Foundation Career Award, and he has published about 150 papers in the field of MEMS, and has about 25 patents issued or pending. Prof. Gianchandani serves on the editorial boards of IOP Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering and Journal of Semiconductor Technology and Science, and served as a section editor for Sensors and Actuators for 5 years. He also served on the steering and technical program committees for the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) for many years, and served as a General Co-Chair for this meeting
supported by the National Science Foundation include interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a National Science Foun- dation CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios for graduate students to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles of engineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the engineering education discipline, assessment methods, and evaluating communication in engineering. Page 23.647.1 c American Society for
value of role models when people like engineering faculty, “Lead by example. Act theway you want other people to act. Think about what you are doing and how it will affect otherpeople. Make good decision that can be passed on. Do you say things that someone mightrepeat? If yes, than make it something good.” 2By the time students reach the junior and senior levels they have become engineers. They arelistening to their instructors as mentors to the challenging careers that lie ahead. The captivatingquality of the engineering curriculum lends itself to be the base upon which communication skillsare presented to engineers. Professors would not have to spend great amounts of time discussing thecommunicating that they do. But knowing that professors
design and arduino development.Miss Chanteal Maria EdwardsMr. Cedric Stallworth, Georgia Institute of Technology, College of Computing Cedric Stallworth’s 20 year career as an educator has centered on helping students and their parents make successful transitions from high school to college and from college to the work place. He has developed and run bridge programs that give students and parents practice at the college experience. He has run mentoring programs that contribute to the academic and personal development of students and provide parents with supportive feedback. He is in constant contact with high school and undergraduate students, providing them with encouragement, advice and a sympathetic ear. He considers
Challenges at a Science Center AbstractMany engineers attribute their careers to early interest in STEM. Interest, not performance, hasbeen shown to be a greater predictor of choosing to concentrate in STEM1. However, schoolsoften neglect the engineering component of STEM. Consequently, extracurriculars such asscience centers must play key roles in influencing children by fostering interest in engineering.Taking advantage of the popular tinkering and Do-It-Yourself Maker movement, increasinglymore science centers are offering engineering and maker programs. But are they empoweringvisitors to engineer?This paper details the study of the Ingenuity Lab, an engineering maker space at the LawrenceHall of Science. The space is open to drop-in visitors on