that in the near future,beyond line of sight flights are more extensively adopted, enabling operators to execute longdistance, long endurance flights with complex mission goals. Tracking back from this likely UAS deployment scenario, the requirements for undergraduateaerospace engineers to embark on successful careers in the industry is likely going to be the abilityto move beyond classroom knowledge of flight concepts to being able to Conceive – Design –Implement - Operate (CDIO) such platforms within any mission parameters. The CDIO approach was conceived to fill the gap in “real-world engineering” skills ofundergraduate students (CDIO initiative), with a vision to focus on the fundamental concepts inengineering. Currently, a number of
Higher Education Coordinating Board to develop a statewide articulation com- pact for mechanical engineering and chaired the councils for developing articulation compacts in other engineering and science disciplines. He also served on the Texas State Board of Education committee preparing the standards for career and technical education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Civil Engineering: A Liberal Education Degree of the 21st CenturyAbstractIn the 2004 report “The Engineer of 2020,” the National Academy of Engineering makes thebold contention that engineering is the liberal education of the 21st-Century. This contentionstands in contrast to more widespread notions about
development on career success.Dr. Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary Dr. Mohammad Moshirpour is an instructor of Software Engineering at the Schulich School of Engineer, University of Calgary. His research interests are the area of software architecture, software requirements engineering, design, implementation and analysis of multi-agent systems, intelligent data analytics, data mining and machine learning, and Software engineering and computer science education. He is a senior member of IEEE, and is the IEEE Chair of the Computer Chapter of the Southern Alberta Section.Dr. Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary Dr. Emily Marasco is a sessional instructor at the University of Calgary. Her education research focuses
Toronto. His primary role is coordinating and teaching an award winning first year design and com- munications course (Engineering Strategies and Practice). As well he conducts action-based research into improving the learning experience of undergraduate engineering students and increasing diversity in the profession, particularly women and Indigenous peoples (Native Americans). Professor Bazylak started his career as a manufacturing engineer in a new product introduction division of a large telecommunication manufacturer. He returned to academia joining the University of Victoria first as an engineering co-operative education coordinator and then as an engineer-in-residence. He joined the University of Toronto as a
future careers. Therefore,transitioning to technological pedagogy that integrates different engagement activities supportsteaching vital skills to future workforces.The revolution of technology has brought paradigm shift in the way instructors teach andstudents learn in STEM through technology specifically VR [7]. VR is an emerging technologythat enables learners to immerse into different built environments by observing three-dimensional (3D) model [8]. Research has been supporting informal and immersive learningenvironments due to their effective educational impacts [9, 10]. Haptic learning is one solutionto advance learners’ understanding through physical interactions [11]. However there remains agap in the educational implementations that
at Cal PolyPomona to gauge the impact of the video library on their academic career. Information wasgathered on awareness of the video resources, frequency of viewing, perceived usefulness, andother topics. The majority of students were aware of the video resources, felt the videos had apositive impact on their education, and felt the videos helped improve their grades in at least oneclass.1. IntroductionThe open courseware movement has grown significantly since the early 2000s. Today manyprestigious institutions with large endowments such as MIT [1] and Harvard [2] have developedextensive databases of videos and other free education resources, including complete self-pacedonline courses. These courses are sometimes created in partnerships
control systems and power generation industry prior to academic career. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Creation, Development, and Delivery of a New Interactive First-Year Introduction to Engineering CourseAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper is focused on the initiation, development, andexecution of the second component of a two-course sequence for first-year engineering studentsat a large, public university in the southeastern U.S. This sequence was developed with inputfrom an engineering school-wide committee and represents a thorough restructuring of theschool’s first-year introduction to engineering program. The restructuring was designed tosupport
Paper ID #25880Cross-Cultural Training and Engineering: An Illustration Using VietnameseEngineering Faculties’ Responses to Nature of Engineering Instrument (Workin Progress)Amanda Vazquez, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Amanda Vazquez is a fourth-year mechanical engineering undergraduate student at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is working as a research mentee under the R.A.M.P. (Research and Mentorship Program) at UNLV. This research is focused on Nature of Engineering View’s of Professional Engineers. Prior to the R.A.M.P. program she worked on NSF EPSCoR STEM K-12 outreach programs, including: a STEM career
towards STEM, increase STEMknowledge, and increase likelihoods of pursuing STEM careers [2].As described by Freisen et. al. [3], an inquiry based approach to learning is generally taken aslearning by exploring a question, issue or problem. Connected knowledge applied to multiplediscipline related activities provides better frameworks for students to learn and developconceptual understandings [4]. In a transdisciplinary approach, discussed in detail in [5],learners are required to think across and beyond academic disciplines to incorporate knowledgethat can be shared and implemented into design. Learning environments that focus on design andproblem solving can engage and help students learn core STEM concepts while connectingscience and
portfolio manager in Fortune 500 companies and smaller firms in the Silicon Valley and abroad. She is passionate about bringing the user-centered de- sign principles she learned at Stanford and in her career to Mines’ open-ended problem solving program, and is working with others on campus to establish a broader integrated context for innovation and design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Designing For Stakeholders: Engineering and Applied Science Students Meet Stakeholders in a First-Year Undergraduate Introduction to Design CourseAbstractThe Design I program at Colorado School of Mines introduces open-ended problem-solving andstakeholder engagement to all first-year engineering and
. However, a seminal work by Hunteret al. states that undergraduate research is “a powerful affective, behavioral, and personaldiscovery experience” that contributes not only to career direction but also to upcomingprofessional development [24]. Thus, a successful integration of undergraduate research into theplanned curricular development and execution will be evaluated and the ensuing results wouldbecome an indicator of potential success in the professional career of the participantsConclusionsThe devastation caused by Hurricane María in the Caribbean and the challenges in the ongoingrecuperation efforts increased awareness regarding the need to educate future architecture,engineering, and construction professionals to design and build
some point later on in their careers, and also a generalquestion as to whether or not successful venture creation should be the primary metric by whichthe success of entrepreneurial education is judged. The Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork (KEEN) model suggests that venture creation is just one potential aspect of successfulentrepreneurship education, and that the development of an ‘entrepreneurial mindset’, in whicheducators work to foster creativity and opportunity identification, results in graduates that arebetter prepared to solve meaningful problems within existing workplaces, in addition to startingnew ventures to address challenges [7], [8].A more recent review by Nabi, Liñan, Fayolle, Krueger, and Walmsley [9
Engineering Education, 2019 Evaluating the Impact of Ethics Instruction on Student AwarenessAbstractEngineers must frequently make decisions during their careers without understanding orknowing the full set of consequences. These decisions can have unintended or harmful results.Therefore, it is imperative that engineers consider the ethical dimensions of their decisions whileworking to satisfy their employer’s interests even if these decisions conflict with theirorganization’s objectives or their own goals. Engineers have a responsibility to uphold a level ofethical standards that produces trust in not only their organization but also in their profession.Students entering the workforce must reflect the same level of ethical standards
used the platform to deliver certain non-physics related content,teachers completed a survey and in-depth interview. Initial feedback from the first phase of thePLMS was positive. Teachers interacting with the PLMS have indicated that “[it] provided[teachers] with new ideas and ways to teach science content”, and that it “offered…studentsexposure to more career and real-life applications.” One teacher said that, with the PLMS,“students are learning about science through interaction on multiple levels, not just listening andtaking notes”. Another teacher spoke to the value of the PLMS to engage students in immersiveself-directed learning.Drawing from the success of the current PLMS, the physics related content is expanding andconcurrently being
loading. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology where her research interests include novel manufacturing and characterization techniques of polymer and com- posite structures and the incorporation of multifunctionality by inducing desired responses to mechanical loading.Dr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the faculty of the South Dakota School of Mines and
and flushed” after the exam (Bella 2003).There’s a time and place for number crunching, detailed design calculations, and utilizing designaids. Students will encounter many different problems in their career, but a few design courses incollege certainly cannot expose students to every scenario, much less effectively teach them howto solve each problem. Further, the purpose of our design courses should not be to simply “teachthe code” (Hines 2012). This is sure to reinforce the impression that design is cranking throughequations and picking sizes from tables - a practice that can limit creativity. “The creative structural engineer must be able to anticipate how a structure responds to applied loads and other external influences
outstanding instructional performance. Scott specializes in machine design, vibrations, and controls. He started his career at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez in the traditional role of teaching and administering a modest research program. At Trine University, a small private school in Angola, Indiana, Scott taught ten different courses from introductory freshman courses to senior design, while serving as advisor to many undergraduate research projects. For the last seven years, Scott has been at York College of Pennsylvania where his concentration is on undergraduate education in mechanical engineering.Taylor Schmidt c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Implementation of A
Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively.Kristina Maruyama Tank, Iowa State University Kristina M. Tank is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the School of Education at Iowa State University. She currently teaches
CurriculumA predominantly 'computer-centered pedagogy' can create issues related to reduced communicationand teamwork during classes. This paper explains a team-based collaborative learning exercisesuccessfully implemented in computer graphics technology (CGT) courses in a Midwestern university.Based on the data compiled and analyzed from final exam and quiz results from the modeling andanimation courses taught over the past several years, poor performance in the required CGT coursesalso affects the performance in higher-level courses. Sophomores and junior CGT majors struggle withtechnical graphics concepts and jargon. This affects their performance in advanced CGT courses(causing retention issues) and also affects their career prospects.The ability
interests in engineering education and the role of leadership and culture in process improvement. His research is supported by the NSF and industry and has received numerous national and international awards. He is an elected Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Management and serves as an Associate Editor for the Engineering Management Journal. Prior to his academic career, Schell spent 14 years in industry where he held leadership positions focused on process improvement and organizational development.Dr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University Bryce E. Hughes is an Assistant Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University, and holds a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Organizational Change
stratification in education and the workforce.Dr. Cara Margherio, University of Washington Cara Margherio is the Assistant Director of the UW Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE). Cara manages the evaluation of several NSF- and NIH-funded projects, primarily working with national professional development programs for early-career academics from groups underrepresented in STEM. Her research is grounded in critical race and feminist theories, and her research interests include community cultural wealth, counterspaces, intersectionality, and institutional change.Dr. Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Eva Andrijcic serves as an Assistant Professor of Engineering Management at Rose-Hulman
ourclassrooms, his ability to collaborate with others as well as his initiative led him to be a top contenderfor this award. [He] has furthered our confidence that he has traits and characteristics that will carry himfar in his professional career.” Because of his love for singing, playing, and music education, Juan-Carlosstudies Organ with Celia Weiss and Voice with Emanuel-Cristian Caraman. He is currently pursuing hisBachelor of Music Education with a concentration in general, choral, and instrumental music at IU SouthBend and currently teaches STEM and Music at Pierre Moran Middle school and Roosevelt Elementaryschool. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Informing Replication of the Bowman Creek
career paths. To bring industry to campus, an Industry Adviser with extensive experience inindustry and passion for engineering education, will be on campus part-time and provide insightsto faculty and students on how to bridge course work and industry practices.Current status:a. Faculty industry immersion experience. The grant provides opportunities for faculty to be partof a summer industry immersion experience. In summer 2018, one faculty member spent amonth working in a local company. Through a self-documenting process, the faculty membershared what he learned about industry, about industrial processes, etc. with the rest of the facultybefore the new academic year. They took questions and the faculty took inspiration andidentified
Colorado State University. Her previous careers were as software design and development engineer, project manager, and program manager for Hewlett-Packard Company, and as a management consultant for Personnel Decisions International. She is author of ”Understanding Employee Engagement: Theory, Research, and Practice” and ”Organiza- tional Psychology and Behavior: An Integrated Approach to Understanding the Workplace”. She is the past Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of Managerial Psychology, serves on several editorial boards, and has published in peer-reviewed scientific academic and practice outlets. She frequently consults with organizations across the country, and actively collaborates on grant funded research with
integral partof the attitude of engineering students.Ideally, we could influence the grading styles or expectations in prerequisite courses or even inhigh school level courses, where many of these computational skills are taught, but it’s difficultto change things we don’t control. We do control and we can use assessment to maintain anexpected level of performance for our own science and engineering students.Raising the bar in this way late in a student’s career is sometimes painful, as it revealsweaknesses that were carefully hidden for a long time. If we are steadfast, then word of theseexpectations may eventually trickle down to those courses that support the core science andengineering curricula.This discussion on accuracy would not be
university facultyto promote and extend K20 STEM outreach in Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Wyoming. He has authoredpeer-reviewed articles and papers, presented at national and international conferences, and taught under-graduate/graduate courses in Computer Security, Data Mining, VLSI and pedagogy in STEM. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Building Collaboration and Securing Interest in Computer Science Education through Outreach Opportunities1 AbstractAutomation and mechanization require students to master the utilization and creation of new tech-nology. Vital for potential careers, tomorrow’s professionals require technological understanding toremain competitive in a job market driven by engineering
students’ development as learners.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty
extrinsic values. For students it may be important to consider and reflect whatevervalues their families appreciate. Well Informed includes students’ appreciation of having multiplesources of information about the major they wish to pursue. Through this code, we found aconnection to the paramount importance of SLE discussed in an earlier phase of this study7. References 1. Krieshok, T. S., Black, M. D., & McKay, R. A. (2009). Career decision making: The limits of rationality and the abundance of non-conscious processes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 275–290. 2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 3
controlsengineering in their careers. This exposure-based approach is different from the accounts of mostcontrols laboratories we found in literature, and often ends up being a practical hybrid betweenthe fully COTS and fully DIY approaches described above. This paper is presented as a casestudy that describes our approach to redesigning our 1 credit, junior level, Vibrations andControls Laboratory course that 120-150 mechanical engineering students are required to takeeach Fall semester. Preliminary data on the effectiveness of the redesign is presented. The endgoal is to provide a template for other universities to follow to achieve similarly positiveoutcomes in terms of student engagement.2 Criteria for a Successful Laboratory CourseAlthough Balchen et al
Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15701Dr. Leidy Klotz, Clemson University Leidy Klotz is an engineering faculty member at Clemson University, where he developed and teaches courses like the one described in this paper. He does research on decision making and education for sustainability.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Clemson University Dr. Landis joined Clemson in June 2015 as the Thomas F. Hash ’69 Endowed Chair in Sustainable Development. Previously she was an Associate Professor at Arizona State University in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment. She began her career as an Assistant Professor at the