Conference Session

Issues in Mechanical Engineering Technology II

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Weissbach P.E., Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Koty Jarrod Miles, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

and control, and manufacturing. Introductory courses inelectrical machines are often comprised of the following topics:  Magnetic circuits to demonstrate the fundamental electromagnetic principles that govern the relationship between magnetic and electric fields. This introduction to electromagnetic principles will then be used to explain the operation of all subsequent devices.  Transformer design and operation  Induction motor design and operational characteristics, which includes the traditional torque-speed curve but may also include: o Variable frequency drives (VFDs) and an introduction to power electronic inverters o Different motor classes (A, B, C, etc

Conference Session

Key Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession - and ASCE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

.” J. Surv. Eng., 130(4), pp. 237–242.11 Estes, A. C., Welch, R. W., and Ressler, S. J. (2006). “Teaching lessons learned: The Assessment ofTeaching.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 132(1): 2-10.12 Barry, B. E., Fox, D. J., Wendel, R. M. (2015). “A Nod in the Right Direction? Designing a Study toAssess an Instructor's Ability to Interpret Student Comprehension from Nonverbal Communication.” 2015ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE, Seattle, Washington. June 2015.13 Dick, W. and L. M. Carey, The Systematic Design of Instruction, Addison-Wesley, (1996).14 Apple, D.K., Baehr, M., Batchelor, G., Beyerlein, S., Carroll, S., Demetrio, R., Krumsieg, K., andWignall, E., ed. Foundations of Learning

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Siamak Farhad, University of Akron; Daniel E. Kandray Sr., University of Akron; Maryam Younessi Sinaki, Cleveland State University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

code todetermine the best moves of different joints of this robot to pick and place an object from point Ato point B, so that the minimum energy is consumed in this process. To measure the energyconsumption, UNI-T UT230B-US Power Meter was used [14]. It is noted that the movementfrom point A to B can be done by involvement of different joints in different ways. For example,α 1 degree rotation of joint 1, followed by α 4 degree rotation of joint 4, and α 3 degree rotation ofjoint 3. Another possible way to move from point A to B may be α 2 degree rotation of joint 2,followed by α 4 degree rotation of joint 4, and α 6 degree rotation of joint 6. There are many waysto involve different joints of the robot for the same movement from A to B

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Work in Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oai Ha, Western Carolina University; Martin L. Tanaka, Western Carolina University; Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

University Press.[3] Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C. & Newcombe, N. S., (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), pp. 352-402. doi: 10.1037/a0028446.[4] Uttal, D. H. & Cohen, C. A. (2012), Spatial Thinking and STEM Education: When, Why, and How? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, pp. 147-181, Elsevier.[5] Hegarty, M. (2011). The role of spatial thinking in undergraduate science education. In Third Committee Meeting on Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research. Available: http://www7. nationalacademies. org/bose

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Summerville, Miami University; Jennifer Blue; Brian P. Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Brielle Nikole Johnson

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

manipulation was successful at changing students’ thoughts withoutincreasing emotional distress.The main question in this study was whether the intervention conditions (counterfactual and/orintentions) improved student outcomes. To test this, we regressed the course grade onto theinteraction of the counterfactual condition (coded as 0 = control, 1 = counterfactual), intentioncondition (0 = control, 1 = intention), and the standardized value for the exam grade. Thisrevealed only a significant main effect of exam grade (B = 0.76, t(253) = 6.69, p < .001).Neither main effect of condition was significant (CF: B = -0.17, t(253) = 1.20, p = .23; Intention

Conference Session

Track: Pre-college - Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Malle R Schilling, University of Dayton; Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Pre-College

summerengineering camp participants to the host institution.METHOD To explore the efficacy of the three summer camps as a UD recruitment tool, a surveywas developed. The surveys were disseminated at three engineering camps: a camp for URMmales interested in engineering, a single-sex female camp, and a co-ed camp. In this survey,participants were asked to report their prior exposure to engineering through other campexperiences, classes, and extracurricular activities; their interest in engineering; any official visitsto the university, and interest in visiting the university; their interest in applying to and attendingthe university; and demographics including gender, ethnicity, and year in school. Appendices Aand B contain the full pre-camp and post

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James C. Lester, North Carolina State University; Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, University of Florida; Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University; Bradford Mott, North Carolina State University; Andy Smith, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE ’15, 2015, pp. 392–397.[3] K. Lockwood and R. Esselstein, “The inverted classroom and the CS curriculum,” in Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE ’13, 2013, p. 113.[4] N. Titterton, C. M. Lewis, and M. J. Clancy, “Experiences with lab-centric instruction,” Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 79–102, 2010.[5] S. B. Fee and A. M. Holland-Minkley, “Teaching computer science through problems, not solutions,” Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 129–144, 2010.[6] A. Iosup and D. Epema, “An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education,” in Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2 - Design & Manufacturing Topics

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Nozaki, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Nancy E. Study, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

”, “B”, “C”, or“D” for any particular student. Items on the instrument are arranged by three identifiedconstructs, and appear in order of increasing difficulty. The constructs included in the test areMapping 2D to 3D, Planar Geometry and Projection Theory, and Graphics Conventions. Figure 1 Sample Item from InstrumentParticipants will be given a score of how many correct responses they provided, and will not bepenalized for incorrect responses or blank items. A total score out of 30 will be given to thestudent, along with sub-scores to explain performance on individual constructs [4]. Participantsin this study will be students enrolled in one of two introductory engineering graphics coursesthat are part of a two

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University; William M. Jordan P.E., Baylor University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

,” 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session F3A, Saratoga Springs, NY, October 22-25, 2008.[16] Davis, D., “Collaborating with Industry Via your Advisory Board,” 2006-397, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006.[17] Lunt, B., “Industry Advisory Boards in Engineering Technology,” Session ETD 506, 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration,[18] Genheimer, S. R., and Shehab, R., “The Effective Industry Advisory Board in Engineering Education - A Model and Case Study,” Session T32E, 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI, October

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mathew D. Evans, Arizona State University; Michelle Jordan, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

” between experts and public audiences about recent research throughinteractive platforms7 (p. 2). Through an analysis of science bloggers who promote and discussscientific research, Luzon8 notes that these writers use five main strategies to communicate withaudiences outside of the field: a) take into consideration the background knowledge andinformation needs, b) selecting the most salient information from the research, c) appraise theresults and significance of the research, d) speak conversationally and try to involve the reader,and e) include their personal opinions and feelings on the matter. Guiding Luzon’s work isHyland’s concept of “proximity” which is how writers “represent not only themselves and theirreaders, but also their material in

Conference Session

Best In DEED

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Robin Ott, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Cristian Hernandez; Jessica Deters, Virginia Tech; Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech; Francesca Giardine, Smith College; Anne Kary, Smith College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #25708Women’s Experiences in the Transition from Capstone Design Courses to En-gineering WorkplacesDr. Susannah Howe, Smith College Susannah Howe, Ph.D. is the Design Clinic Director in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College, where she coordinates and teaches the capstone engineering design course. Her current research focuses on innovations in engineering design education, particularly at the capstone level. She is invested in building the capstone design community; she is a leader in the biannual Capstone Design Conferences and the Capstone Design Hub initiative. She is also involved with efforts to

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Jeffrey J. Yackley, University of Michigan, Dearborn

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

outcomes assessment after everyoffering. Applicable ABET Criterion 3 Learning Outcomes is listed in Table 5.Table 5: Applicable ABET Criterion 3 Learning Outcomes for Software V&V course at author’s institution b. An ability to design and conduct experiments, and analyze and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component or a process to meet desired needs e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities g. An ability to communicate effectively h. Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context i. Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning. j. A knowledge

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claude Brathwaite, City College of the City University of New York; Julianne Vernon, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

modulation of TNF receptor expression. Journal of Neuroscience Research,92 (11), 1490-1498. 11. Cruz, J. D., Schmidt-Kastner, R., Stevens, J. A. A., Steinbusch, H. W. M., & Rutten, B. P. F. (2014). Differential distribution of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-beta (ARNT or ARNT2) in mouse substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 61, 64-71.12. Cruz, J. D., Hescham, S., Adriaanse, B., Campos, F. L., Steinbusch, H. W. M., Rutten, B. P. F., ... & Jahanshahi, A. (2015). Increased number of

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Integrating Computing into the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa DeWitte, University of Florida; Pamela L. Dickrell, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

emphasis on industrial engineering and manufacturing. b.) An automated titration apparatus using a Vernier Ph sensor that illustrates applications of environmental and chemical engineering. c.) A model bridge strut equipped with the Vernier Dual Force sensor in selected crossbeams that allows the student to observe static tensile and compressive forces. This demonstration mostly concentrates on civil engineering, with supplementary mechanical engineering principles. This presented body of work includes supporting schematics of all model demonstrations,including detailed descriptions of their functionality and operation, for other universitiesinterested in developing their own representative models for student

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University; Melissa Geist, Tennessee Technological University; Yunbo Zhang, Rochester Institute of Technology; George Chitiyo, Tennessee Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

. J. Roselli, S. P. Brophy, “Redesigning a biomechanics course using challenge-basedinstruction,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 22(4), 66-70, 2003[10] V. Gaddam, I. Fidan, B. Barger, “Hands-On Entrepreneurial Engineering ManagementCourse and Its Experiential Learning,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE2016, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/25433, accessed on April 5, 2019.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno; Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue Engineering Education; Tara C. Langus, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 101, no. 46, pp. 16385–16389, 2004.[7] B. Mazur, B. Mazur, and P. Biatosticka, “Cultural diversity in organisational theory and practice,” J. Intercult. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5–15, 2010.[8] A. Godwin, A. Kirn, and J. Rohde, “Awareness without action: Student attitudes after engeineering teaming experiences.,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 2017.[9] M. K. Feister et al., “Exploring the Social Processes of Ethics in Student Engineering Design Teams,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2015, p. ID# 13322.[10] J. M. LaFave, H.-S. Kang, and J. D. Kaiser

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 1: Methods Refresh: Approaches to Data Analysis in Engineering Education Research

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Theresa Green, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

.), SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 722-724). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. 13Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 457- 482.Mentzer, N., Becker, K., & Sutton, M. (2015). Engineering design thinking: High school students’ performance and knowledge. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 417- 432.Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.Moss, P. A., Phillips, D. C., Erickson, F. D., Floden, R. E., Lather, P. A., & Schneider, B. L. (2009). Learning from our differences: A dialogue across perspectives on

Conference Session

Instrumentation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Instrumentation

currently working towards incorporating writing assignments that enhance students’ critical thinking capabilities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Abstract In this study, the author discusses the beneficial aspects of TQM and PBL and providesan insight as to how these two can be intelligently incorporated in an educational institution.It is a well–known fact that TQM requires considerable time for its effective implementation.Some experts indicate that this is about five years. Researchers Kevin B. Hendricks of RichardIvey School of Business, the University of Western Ontario and Vinod R. Singhal of GeorgiaInstitute of Technology have studied three thousand firms and determined that the

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amitabha Ghosh, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

performthe integration, simplify the ratio incorrectly, or, evaluate the constant incorrectly, which wouldbe revealed from the given choices. If the class performance was not up to expectations, studentswould still get the opportunity to improve their score on the question by resubmitting the quiz[18]. If the class size is small enough, alternate and accurate assessment may be performed usinga stand-alone quiz as the Quiz No. 3 shows. As always, a prompt return of the original quiz isnecessary so that students can relearn the missed topic over the approaching weekend (seeAppendix B for a note sent to students).The relevant flow viscosity questions are preceded by understanding of dry friction first indynamics and then (with the help of strength

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanda Vazquez, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Erica J. Marti, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Erdogan Kaya, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

make it more universal. The modified instrument, as shown in Appendix B, has notbeen validated. All the questionnaire items will be translated to Vietnamese by translators. The NOEinstrument will be distributed to the Vietnamese faculty when they sign the consent form.Participants will have ample time to complete the written questionnaire. This will allowparticipants to reflect on their NOE views in-depth and relate the responses to their current workexperiences. After receiving the written responses, we will conduct a follow-up interview withthe participants to elaborate on their written responses to generate as much detail as possible ontheir NOE views. All NOE items will be used in conjunction with individual follow-upinterviews with

Conference Session

SED Technical Session: Systems Thinking

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raed Jaradat, Mississippi State University; Michael Andre Hamilton, Mississippi State University; Vidanelage Lakshika Dayarathna, Mississippi State University; Sofia Karam, Mississippi State University; Parker Jones, Mississippi State University; Emily S. Wall , Mississippi State University; Safae El Amrani; Ginnie Shih En Hsu, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

analysis will be conducted infuture research to study which method has a lower impact on causing simulation sickness. Withall feedbacks and results, the remaining dimensions on the ST skills instrument will be developedas VR complex system scenarios to assess student’s system skills capacity.References[1] R. M. Jaradat, “Complex system governance requires systems thinking - how to find systems thinkers,” International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1/2, pp. 53- 70, 2015.[2] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, & D. R. Krathwohl, “Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1: Cognitive domain.” Longman Publishing Group, 1984.[3] L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, P. W. Airasian, K. A

Conference Session

STEM Issues

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony E. Sparkling, Purdue University; Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Aayushi Sinha, Purdue University; Trenton Thomas Hasser, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

, and B. F. Bigelow, “Factors Impacting Hispanic High School Students and How to Best Reach Them for the Careers in the Construction Industry,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 82–98, 2016.[3] C. L. Menches and D. M. Abraham, “Women in Construction—Tapping the Untapped Resource to Meet Future Demands,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 133, no. 9, pp. 701–707, 2007.[4] V. Francis, “What influences professional women’s career advancement in construction?,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 254–275, 2017.[5] V. Francis and A. Prosser, “Career Counselors’ Perceptions of Construction as an Occupational Choice,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 59–71, 2012.[6] W. Ahmed

Conference Session

Transfer and Transitions

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Surendra K. Gupta, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Franz Allen Foltz, Rochester Institute of Technology; James E Moon, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Roy W Melton, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Michael Kuhl, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Daniel P. Johnson, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); James Lee, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Rob Garrick, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

mostinteresting results from this survey came in the section concerning their 2-year programs as theysupport the need of the VTAB grant. Most of the students always planned to go to a 4-yearschool after completing their 2-year program (22 out of 23 respondents or 96% of the secondcohort, which was almost identical to the 22 out of 24 respondents or 92% for the first cohort).Question #5 of the online survey asked, “What were your main reasons for enrolling in the 2-Year school instead of a 4-Year college or university? (Check all that apply): (a) Academicreasons, (b) Financial reasons, (c) Personal reasons, and (d) Other reasons.” Figure 1 presents abar chart of responses to this question from each of the two cohorts.What were your main reasons for

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Mathematics in the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Claudia Morello, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Mathematics

. Long is a native of Dayton, OH. He is a proud graduate of Dayton Public Schools and Wright STEPP - Wright State University’s Science, Technology, and Engineering Preparatory Program (STEPP). Dr. Long’s research interests include: (a) students’ technology use, (b) diversity and inclusion, as well as (c) student retention and success, with a particular focus on students in STEM fields. He has helped to lead research, funded by the NCAA Innovations in Research and Practice Grant, to improve the well- being of the student-athlete. Dr. Long has also assisted with research, funded by NSF, to study factors that broaden minority student participation and success in STEM fields. He has conducted and published research

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Edward E. Anderson, Texas Tech University; John Richard Schumacher, Texas Tech University; Hani Dulli; David Lamp, Texas Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

their curricula.3.2 MaterialsThe materials consisted of two forms (Form A and Form B) of a paper-pencil survey consistingof 22 5-point Likert questions concerning strategies and confidence while solving word problems(Q3-Q24), followed by ten background questions (Q25-Q35). The five Likert options wereNever, Rarely, Sometimes, Most of the Time, Always. The five Likert options for Question 25(Familiar) and Question 26 (Interest) were Not at All, Marginally, Somewhat, Very, Extremely.The questions are shown in Table 1. Form A and Form B differed only in the random order inwhich the 22 questions were presented. The background questions were always presented at theend of the survey and in the same order on both forms. Written instructions at the top

Conference Session

Key Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession - and ASCE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Horst Brandes, University of Hawaii; Eric L. Flicker, Pennoni Associates Inc.; Kelly Dooley P.E., American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

acceptable graduate-level or upper-level undergraduate courses in a specializedtechnical area and/or professional practice area related to civil engineering.” In response, Policy465 was modified in 2010 to include similar language, calling for: a. a baccalaureate degree in civil engineering b. a master’s degree in engineering, or no less that 30 coordinated graduate or upper level undergraduate technical and/or professional practice credits or the equivalent agency/organization/professional society courses which have been reviewed and approved as providing equal academic quality and rigor with at least 50 percent being engineering in nature c. appropriate experience based upon broad technical and professional practice

Conference Session

SED Technical Session: Systems Thinking

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cassandra M. Degen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University; Marsha Lovett, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

] Rehmann, C. R., Rover, D. T., Laingen, M., Mickelson, S. K., and Brumm, T. J., 2011,"Introducing systems thinking to the Engineer of 2020," ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.[9] Yurtseven, M. K., 2000, "Teaching Systems Thinking to Industrial Engineering Students,"International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, pp. 655-659.[10] Jain, R., Sheppard, K., McGrath, E., and Gallois, B., 2009, "Promoting systems thinking inengineering and pre-engineering students," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin,TX.[11] Monat, J., and Gannon, T., 2018, "Applying Systems Thinking to Engineering and Design,"Systems, 6(3), p. 34.[12] Simoni, M., Andrijcic, E., Kline, B., and Bernal, A., 2016, "Helping

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Quiles-Ramos, Virginia Tech; Ellen K. Foster, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Donna M Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

engineering education practices through interdisciplinary research and scholarship. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 6.Bennett, J. B. (1998). Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism, and the Common Good. Oryx Press: Phoenix, AZ.Cech, E. A. (2013). Ideological wage inequalities? The technical/social dualism and the gender wage gap in engineering. Social Forces, 91(4), 1147-1182.DiMaggio, P. & Garip, F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 93-118.Faulkner, W. (2000). Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering. Social studies of science, 30(5), 759-792.Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities

Collection

2019 CIEC

Authors

Paul McPherson; Margaret Phillips; Kyle Reiter

Session ETD 355[10] M. Phillips, M. Fosmire, and P. B. McPherson, “Standards are everywhere: A freely available introductory online educational program on standardization for product development,” Stand. Eng., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1– 6, 2018.[11] M. Phillips and S. Huber, “Standards Resources for Engineering and Technology,” Issues Sci. Technol. Librariansh., no. 87, 2017.Biographical informationPAUL MCPHERSONAs an Assistant Professor of Practice in the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue University, Paul teachesboth mechanical design and quality control courses. Having recognized the importance of technical standards inindustry, Paul has integrated technical standards into curricula for seven years. He is a co

Conference Session

PCEE Resource Exchange

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina Anlynette Alston, Rice University; Carolyn Nichol, Rice University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

waterproofing materials on their hydrophobic testing sheet.3. Students will devise two ways to waterproof their chosen material. Students must develop a written plan for both methods. Students must modify and label at least two approaches Material A and Material B.4. Students will engineer and modify their 2 surfaces.5. Teams will then observe and diagram the drop profile/contact angle of a drop of water on their modified surface. a. Place a drop of water on the surface. b. Look at the drop from the side and sketch the drop profile or your worksheet. *Additional steps on full online versionWrap UpStudents will reflect upon their designs and test results. They will choose a spokesperson to communicate their results and futureimprovements