fourteenstudents enrolled in an upper-level undergraduate course (Introduction to Industrial Controls)offered to both Electrical (as ECET 30201) and Mechanical Engineering Technology (as MET28400) students at a large research-focused university in the Midwestern United States. In the 14respondents to the project reflection, eight accessed the course from within the United States andeight were located internationally. The nature-inspired podcast creation curriculum was implemented over an 8-weeksemester in the form of six steps that occurred concurrently with the regularly scheduled weeklytopic lectures and laboratory activities for the course. In general, the project flow guided studentsthrough researching their topic from multiple perspectives
(Unigraphics NX) into the curriculum ofstrategically selected academic partners worldwide. Michigan Tech was one of only twoU.S. universities selected for the initial four academic program partner sites. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference 1Today NX is the key CAD/CAM/CAE software used in our mechanical engineeringcurriculum and utilized in our laboratories [1]. It is integrated throughout our curriculumbeginning with the first year, to learn solid modeling using NX. Sophomore students useNX in the lab portion of the course “Integrated Design and Manufacturing” to create thetool paths to produce a designed part. Junior students use NX in the Product Realization Iand II courses. Senior students use NX in
strong appreciation for other cultures and their diversity4. Additional skills cited include acommitment to team work, good communication skills, ethical standards, ability to thinkcritically, and flexibility that allows for accommodating rapid change4. Professional organizations such as National Academy of Engineering (NAE) suggest theundergraduate curriculum should be amended so that international experiences, development ofcultural competencies, and foreign language skills become integral components2 and would leadto the development of a global engineer who possesses appropriate competencies for practice in aprofessional setting with a global reach. Foreign travel experiences and courses tailored to teachthese skills have been
(STEM) education is an effective catalyst toengage students in science & engineering careers. STEM continues to support the long-term goalof preparing students for life-long careers that promise a competitive edge in the job market.However, STEM program development is often challenging. Wu-Rorrer [1] argues that “STEMremains vaguely defined, and the strategies to successfully integrate it into the currenteducational system remain elusive”, inferring that a school’s STEM program is amorphous.Furthermore, STEM programs need more work than before with recent pressure to promoteinclusivity [2] and a solid career path [3] in a stable environment [4]. To better solve thisdilemma, there remains an aspect of STEM programs that is overlooked – the
graduates (52%) considered theirwritten and oral communication skills to be strong [6]. In a parallel survey, only 9% of industryrepresentatives considered the communication skills of recent mechanical engineering graduatesto be strong. These results suggest that student and recent graduate perceptions ofcommunication on the job are not aligned with actual expectations.There are several strategies that programs have developed in an attempt to remedy thisdisconnect [7]. In many programs, there has been a push towards integration of communicationacross the curriculum, where communication skills are emphasized in a broader range ofengineering courses. Additionally, some engineering programs have developed partnerships withEnglish, communication or
is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won a couple of teaching awards in 2014 and 2016 from University of Waterloo. Her students regard her as an innovative teacher who introduced new ideas to the classroom. Such ideas in- clude using ”props” to increase students’ understanding of the materials, as well as using new technology such as i-clickers and IF-AT cards. Dr. Al-Hammoud also organized a bridge-building contest in one of her courses where she worked with other professors in the department to integrate the
Texas at Dallas. He joined San Francisco State University in Fall 2018 as an assistant professor in Mechanical Engineering for the School of Engineering. His research focuses on 1) designing lightweight, low-cost wearable robotic systems for people of disability and 2) developing novel control schemes that provide individuals with human-like motion using wearable robotics as part of their active daily living. Mechatronics and robotics education is another primary research focus he has been involved in to enhance project-based curriculum with evidence-based strategies to train the next generation of diverse engineers in this field. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
-Physical Systems (CPS) Linda Laird, Nicholas Bowen Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken 07030, USA linda.laird@stevens.edu nicholas.bowen@stevens.edu Abstract— In the fall of 2015, Stevens Institute of Technology welcomed the first freshmen into a newly launched Software Engineering Undergraduate Program based largely on the most recent ACM and IEEE-CS guidelines for undergraduate software engineering programs [1]. This is the first such program in the US that also has an ABET accredited general engineering curriculum. Students will receive a B.E. in Software
interventions.Mr. Muhammad Faiz Shams, Museum of Science Muhammad Shams is a Research Associate who has been with the Museum of Science, Engineering is Elementary team for almost 2 years. He graduated from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth with a Bachelors of Science in Mathematics. Prior to his time with EiE, Muhammad worked as an undergrad- uate researcher in the field of applied numerical analysis. Muhammad assists the team with quantitative analysis, paper writing, and database management.Jonathan D Hertel, EiE/Museum of Science Jonathan manages the Examining the Efficacy of Engineering is Elementary (E4) project (an NSF-funded study of the efficacy of the EiE curriculum), overseeing and organizing a research effort
engineering or technology. A National Association for Researchand Teaching article provides an overview of engineering education to date, and the stepsnecessary for successful integration of engineering in the new NGSS. 2 They suggest a need formore training and new instructional resources to provide opportunities to engage students inSTEM learning; however they caution that “effective, equitable, and accessible teaching andlearning” require “careful planning and implementation”.There have been several nation-wide engineering curriculum program (Engineering isElementary (EiE), Project Lead the Way (PLTW), Lego Engineering, etc.) as well as university-led initiatives in local schools3,4,5 which have brought engineering to K-12 students
sums.The rigor of analog signals and systems, with its considerable dependence on integral calculus,was then pushed into the term following DSP.What Was ExpectedIt was expected that student performance, as measured by their course grades, in the analogsignals and systems course would improve slightly, having been introduced to concepts such assignal spectra, sampling, sinusoidal steady-state system response using superposition, anddiscrete Fourier series and transforms. The data below, however, indicate a slight decrease instudent grades in the years where DSP is now taught previous to analog signals and systems.A decrease in DSP-only grades because of changing DSP from an elective course to a requiredone might be expected, so that is not the
reflected the culmination of the efforts of several engineeringeducators who had benefited from the European, more theoretical approach to engineering.(Seely5 quotes Walker6 as writing, “They taught us elegant theory: vector diagrams . . . ,hyperbolic functions . . . , and even triple integrals.”) The rapid and widespread acceptance of theGrinter report was accelerated by the Soviet Union’s 1957 launch of Sputnik.The tenor of the times thus very much dictated an analytical, science-based approach toengineering education. By way of contrast, were one to start anew in the 21st century, the designof an engineering curriculum might be posed as a problem in engineering design. After all, toparaphrase a wonderful observation about knowledge offered by
of electrical system component and analysisof mechanical system components that was taught by as many as four instructors. In short, thiscourse was what Clausing12 states a freshman course should not be; “a hodgepodge of peripheraltopics.”With the introduction of the new curriculum in the Fall of 2007, the engineering graphics contentbecame a separate two-hour course and the remaining content with the exception of Excel wascollapsed into the three-hour Introduction to Engineering course. With the creation of the newcourse, an effort was made to greatly reduce the “hodgepodge of peripheral topics.” This wasaccomplished for the most part by integrating the topics with the robot project. As an example,the old course taught project management
, Montana State UniversityMrs. Elaine Marie Westbrook, Montana State University Elaine Westbrook received a B.S. in Chemistry from Kennesaw State University in 1993. After a decade in industry, she turned her attention to education and taught secondary science for the following decade. In 2014, she received a Masters in Science Education from Montana State University. She is currently a doctoral student in the Education department at Montana State and researches gender differences of informal STEM education in rural areas.Dr. Nick Lux Lux, Montana State University Dr. Nicholas Lux has is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education. His teaching and research interests are in the
. That made necessary for higher education institutions to seek ways to providestudents the knowledge and skills immediately needed, as observed by Levine and Van Pelt [15].Certificates and micro-credentials are how institutions are addressing that requirement.3. CurriculumThe integration of various streams like mathematics, science, and technology into the STEMpedagogy is an inevitable development for both students and educators in the 21st century. Thisapproach requires adequate knowledge of the field in order to formulate the integration ofvarious streams of study [16].STEM education is an experiential learning pedagogy in which the application of knowledge andskills are integrated through in-context projects or problems focused on
current need to movebeyond traditional theory-based pedagogy used in teaching humanities to engineering studentsand create a learning environment that aligns with engineering students' preferences.This paper details our efforts at Plaksha University, an engineering university in Punjab, India toeffectively integrate humanities into the engineering curriculum. Our initial attempt, a one-creditcourse titled “Re-imagining Technology and Society (RTS),” employed a theory-based lecturedelivery pedagogy. However, this approach fell short in capturing the interest of engineeringstudents.Thus, incorporating the feedback from our previous course and replacing our pedagogy with aPBL approach, we implemented a redesigned interdisciplinary course titled
D ia g ra m sFigure 1: Assessment and Evaluation of Teachers and Students in VaNTH ProjectsAssessments of Affective ChangeThis is a highly-used method that relies on surveys or interviews to determine the attitudes andperceptions of the subjects. We have used surveys to examine the views of students regardingparticular courses and have measured changes in HPL content in the courses3. This has beenextended to teachers’ perceptions and has also been used with students to measure theirperceptions of the profession of BME and the maturation of their career goals as they movethrough the curriculum. These surveys have also contained items reflective of desired ABEToutcomes. The surveys are also being used to measure the time progress of change in
Page 1.277.5 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings3. Nagle, Edward “What a Graduate of an Associate Degree in Manufacturing Engineering Technology Program Should Know” Proceeding of 1994 ASEE Annual Conference PP 2393-23954. Wilczynski, V “Integrating Engineering Design Across the Curriculum: Results from the Trenches” Proceeding of 1994 ASEE Annual Conference PP 1877-18815. Brice, C. W., “Design of a New Electromechanical Systems Instructional Laboratory”, IEEE, May 1, 1991, v6, n2, pg 8726. Tillman, Tracy “A Two Course Sequence for Teaching Concurrent Engineering and Lean Production Manufacturing” Proceeding of 1994 ASEE Annual Conference PP 271-2737. Tavora, Carlos J. “A Laboratory Design
explicit connectionsamong related and supporting content and learning outcomes. An explicit plan identifies ways in which theintegration of CDIO skills and multidisciplinary connections are to be made, for example, by mappingCDIO learning outcomes to courses and co-curricular activities that make up the curriculum.Rationale: The teaching of personal, interpersonal and product and system building skills should not beconsidered an addition to an already full curriculum, but an integral part of it. To reach the intendedlearning outcomes in both disciplinary and personal, interpersonal, and product and system building skills,the curriculum and learning experiences have to make dual use of available time. Faculty play an activerole in designing the
strain, the Wheatstone bridge was connected to an oscilloscope sothat the change in voltage could be viewed and measured when the strain gage is deflected. Thismodule allowed mechanical and electrical engineering students to learn concepts simultaneouslyfrom two very distinct fields of study. A student survey was developed and measured highstudent engagement in the topic of both circuits and Wheatstone bridge systems.IntroductionThis paper describes a pair of laboratory modules that students encounter in the mechanicalengineering curriculum. The two laboratory modules have been developed to help scaffoldknowledge and increase engagement in a circuits laboratory. The first module includes a bendingbeam with a strain gage that has been documented
Digital Design I. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2004.9. K. Kramer and D. Maxwell, Projects with applications to Wireless Communications – An Innovative Approach to the Digital Design Course. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2004.10. W. A. Chren and B. G. Zomberg. Programmable logic course development in an engineering curriculum. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, pages 1154 1158, 1993.11. R. Coowar. Designing with field programmable gate arrays. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, pages 853 859, 1995.12. D.W. Horning. Integration of digital
traditional Figure 1. A traditional view of EE vs. CE.courses (circuits, devices, communication, control,signal processing, power, electromagnetics, etc.). Italso became clear that CE is something separate from computer science (CS) and could notsimply be absorbed into the CS curriculum. Nevertheless, the close relationship between CE andcertain traditional sub-disciplines in EE (not to mention the often non-intellectual reasons fordefining academic boundaries) made it natural at many universities for CE to become a programin the EE department.The reasons for EE departments turning into ECE departments are clear. The question iswhether maintaining ECE as simply an umbrella for two distinct
integrating engineering design into the K-12science curriculum. This is accomplished by raising engineering design to the same level asscientific inquiry. As a result, engineering design experience is gradually becoming a vitalcomponent of K-12 education, especially at the high school level. The process of initiatingand completing an engineering design project requires students to engage both in analyticalreasoning, active creation, and testing of solutions. One must ensure that engineering designprojects are engaging for all students, particularly those from demographics that areunderserved, underperforming, or underrepresented in the STEM fields. Well-craftedengineering design projects can increase students’ interest in STEM and their self-efficacy
development of theDSTR robot as a collaborative design developed by theMobile Integrated Solutions Laboratory (MISL) at TexasA&M University and ASEP 4X4 Inc. Texas Instruments hasbeen a major partner in the integration of the controlelectronics, and Texas Space Technology Applications andResearch (T STAR) LLC has played a significant role in thepropagation of the DSTR robot as an adaptable appliedresearch/education/STEM outreach platform. The paper willpresent examples of the strong industry-academic Fig. 1 DSTR Computer Modelrelationships that allow the DSTR robot to be utilized in amultitude of experiential learning environments. In addition The DSTR Robot was designed by a number ofto a number of STEM
curriculum showed that energyconcepts are indeed fragmented into disciplinary silos (Chen, Scheff, Fields, Pelletier, &Faux, 2014). This means that students cover the same energy concepts in differentclasses, but learning does not necessarily build on prior knowledge and it is notconnected to other content areas. Because current curricula do not do a sufficient job ofintegrating energy across the K12 science disciplines, additional work needs to be done todevelop curriculum that covers multiple science disciplines, including biology, earthscience, physical science, and chemistry. An ideal bioenergy curriculum would teachstudents core concepts of the field from the various disciplinary perspectives, as well aspresent the material in a learning
hardware design engineer, from 1997- 2002, and by vLogix as chief hardware design engineer, from 2002-2004. In 2009, Alaraje was awarded the Golden Jubilee by the College of Engi- neering at Assiut University, in Egypt. He has served as an ABET/IEEE-TAC evaluator for electrical engineering technology and computer engineering technology programs. Dr. Alaraje is a 2013-2014 Fulbright scholarship recipient at Qatar University, where he taught courses on Embedded Systems. Ad- ditionally, Dr. Alaraje is recipient of an NSF award for a digital logic design curriculum revision in collaboration with College of Lake County in Illinois, and NSF award in collaboration with University of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College
the Engineering GoldShirt Program at CU to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier students not admitted through the standard admissions process; findings are very encouraging, and the program is being adapted at several other engineering colleges. Dr. Sullivan led the 2004 launch of ASEE’s Pre- College Division, was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Denise W. Carlson, University of Colorado Boulder Carlson is involved with a broad range of program implementation initiatives through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of
) EGR345: Dynamic System Modeling and Control* C (AVR), MATLAB EGR450: Manufacturing Control Systems PLC EGR474: Systems Integration C * Discussed as part of the mechanical engineering courses.Evolution of Pr ogr amming Instr uctionIn this section we describe the evolution of programming instruction for our undergraduateengineering students over the last 6 years.The Curriculum in 1999With our common course thread in place in 1999, all engineering students were exposed toprogramming. All freshman engineering students were required to take CS162 (ComputerScience I), an introductory programming course. This course assumed
of the Advanced Integrated Manufacturing Center (AIM Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationCenter) located in Dayton, Ohio and operated jointly by Sinclair Community College and theUniversity of Dayton. The AIM Center offers numerous services to educators and manufacturingenterprises to improve instruction and to upgrade manufacturing systems.Services Provided by the Resource CenterThe resource center offers a variety of services to manufacturing educators, including: o An extensive, Internet-based clearinghouse database of information pertinent to manufacturing education obtained from
uponfeedback received in the previous year’s assessment cycle.Goals: In early fall 2017 the SE Curriculum and Assessment Manager conducted an in-depthquality assurance review of the legacy assessment architecture. The review includedexamination of: • the alignment of defined student performance criteria with program (ABET Criterion 3) Student Outcomes • the alignment of student assessment data artifacts with the performance criteria they were intended to support • assessment data collection and reporting mechanisms completed by course directors and teaching faculty each semester • assessment program continual improvement process • semester and annual results archiving and reporting methodsThe legacy