): Page 18.2.3 a. Learning objectives b. Hands-on activities and interactive exercises2015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form MM edits Page 2 of 6 WORKSHOP PROPOSAL FORM 2015 Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education “Authentic Engineering: Representing & Emphasizing the E in STEM” Presented by Dassault Systems Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M. Sheraton Seattle | Seattle | WA c. Materials that participants can take with them d. Practical application for teachers and outreach staffIn this session participants will be
Conceptual Learning. 31 International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports.9. McPherson, M. N., & Guthrie, B. M. (1991) In J. D. Wilkerson (Ed.) The implementation and evaluation of a computer assisted learning program in undergraduate biomechanics. Proceedings of the Third National Symposium on Teaching Kinesiology and Biomechanics in Sports. 73-76.10. Knudson, D., Bauer, J., & Bahamonde, R. (2009) Correlates of learning in introductory biomechanics”. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, .499-504.11. Hsieh, C., & Knudson, D. (2008) Student factors related to learning in biomechanics”. Sports Biomechanics, 7(3), 398-402.12. Hsieh, C., Smith, J.D., Bohne, M., & Knudson, D. (2010) Factors related to students’ learning of
2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conference Can Real-life Projects in Engineering Classes Result in Improved Interest and Performance in Clean Energy Careers? Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Diane Schilder, Christos Zahopoulos Northeastern University/Evaluation Analysis Solutions, Inc. / Northeastern UniversityAbstractWith funding from the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center, Northeastern University has beenoffering the Early College Experience (ECE) program to Boston Public high school seniors withthe goal of increasing their interest in Clean Energy careers. The ECE program has provided highschool students the opportunity to take a college-level Engineering Design course that
., “Schemas versus mental models in human memory,” In Modelling Cognition edited by P. Morris, Wiley, NewYork, pp. 187-197, 19873. Katona, G., 1901-1981. Organizing and memorizing; studies in the psychology of learning and teaching, New York, Columbia university press, 1940.4. Davis, K., Improving Motivation and Knowledge Retention with Repeatable Low-Stakes Quizzing, Compendium of Technical Papers of the 2009 Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Austin, Texas, June 14-17, 2009.5. Handlesman, J., D. Ebert-May, R. Beichner, P. Burns, A. Chang, R. DeHaan, J. Gentile, S. Lauffer, J. Steward, S. M. Tilghman, and W. B. Wood, “Scientific Teaching,” Science, 304 (5670), pp. 521-522, 2004.6
Paper ID #11996Engineering Leadership Assessment to Action: Development Leadership Pro-files for Academic SuccessMr. Joseph Louis, Purdue University Joseph Louis is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Civil Engineering at Purdue University and is working as a graduate research assistant for Purdue University’s Engineering Leadership Minor. He received his B.Tech. in Civil Engineering from the National Institute of Technology Trichy India, and a M.S. in Civil Engineering from Purdue University.Mr. Amadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amadin Osagiede, a native of Londonderry, New Hampshire and originally from
orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 26.1073.14References1. Nerad, M. (2004). The PhD in the US: Criticisms, Facts, and Remedies. Higher Education Policy, 17(2), 183–199.2. Wendler, C., Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., Millett, C., Rock, J., Bell, N., & McAllister, P. (2010). The Path Forward: The Future of Graduate Education in the United States. Educational Testing … (p. 64). Princeton, NJ.3. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career. J
control of workhazards, and (b) interpretation of safety regulations [. In construction safety classes, students areoften asked to demonstrate their hazard recognition abilities by taking and critiquing on-site Page 26.1675.3images, or reporting a job site visit. Visits to construction sites are unique experiences thatcannot be completely replaced by other learning methods. However, they come with a number ofconstraints (sometimes even safety hazards) and cannot be arranged as often as needed [12].Many of the key technical principles that students should learn can be illustrated through casestudies [20]. Normally, these cases can help students
study, variograms were estimated for each collapse criterion and collapse related soilparameters (Table 1) using a discrete number of values obtained from test data at incrementaldistances corresponding to sampling locations throughout the area. These variograms (Table 3) arethen used in conjunction with ordinary kriging to estimate values of the parameters at un-sampledlocations. Indicator kriging6 was then utilized to produce contour plots of estimated probabilityand associated kriging variance for each parameter in each data set.Results and discussionResults of analyses showing probability contour of high collapse potential with estimation varianceare shown are in Fig 6 (a) and 6(b). The shaded zones show areas where there is a 60%-80
, CA, 1999. http://www.ecpsystems.com[3] Manual for Model 220 Industrial Emulator/Servo Trainer, Educational Control Products, Bell Canyon, CA, 1999. http://www.ecpsystems.com[4] Manual for Model 750 Control Moment Gyroscope, Educational Control Products, Bell Canyon, CA, 1999. http://www.ecpsystems.com[5] Manual for Model A51 Inverted Pendulum Accessory, Educational Control Products, Bell Canyon, CA, 2002. http://www.ecpsystems.com[6] Burchet, B., “Four Hardware Experiments for Advanced Dynamics and Control,” Proceedings of the ASEE 2006 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2006.[7] Liaw, B., and Voiculescu, I., “An Integral Analytical-Numerical-Experimental Pedagogy for a System Dynamics and
. Available as of Feb 2, 2015 from: http://www.abet.org/etac- criteria-2014-2015/4 Oakley, B., D.M. Hanna, Z. Kuzmyn, and R.M. Felder, “Best Practices Involving Teamwork in the Classroom: Results from a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 50, No. 3, 266–272 (2007).5 Millis, B.J. and P.G.Cottell, Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty, Oryx Press, (1998).6 Delson, N.J., “Increasing team motivation in engineering design courses,” International Journal of Engineering Education 17(4-5): 359-66 (2001)7 Baker, D.F. “Peer Assessment in Small Groups: A Comparison of Methods.” Journal of Management Education, Vol. 32, No. 2, 183–209 (2008).8 Saavedra, R. and S.K. Kwun
twoapproaches.Mobile App ArchitectureThis section presents the architecture of the mobile App to be used as part of teaching the variousaspects of home water management. Our intent is to use a highly interactive and game–likeapproach, where the 3 Es of sustainability – Environment, Economics and Equity aredemonstrated. Students use this approach to quantify conservation of water and other resources aswell – e.g. energy. The approach used on a desktop in another course has received very favorablefeedback from the students. Page 26.160.14The mobile App is interactive with game–like features. It has three main components – (a)computation/evaluation engine, (b
feedback on ideas H, J Real-life •Professors provide students with feedback on submitted work that can help problems improve the design. •Students participate in every aspect of the design including research, ideation, detailed design, analysis, fabrication, testing, and documentation. Integrated •The first two years of the design program combines math and science with Theoretical & engineering specific courses. A, B, K Experimental •Each design project requires analysis to verify the device at each stage of the Learning in a
. and Steinberg, R.N. “Teaching physics: Figuring out what works,” Physics Today , 52, 24-30 (January 1999). 2. Redish, E. F. “ Building a science of teaching physics,” Am. J. Physics, Vol. 67, 562-573 (July, 1999). 3. Voltaire Mallari Mistades, How Do Education Students Learn Physics? US-China Education Review B 4, 457-466 (2011). 4. Elby, A. “Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics,” 69, 54-64 (2001). 5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_education#Goals_of_physics_education_research_.28PER.29 (2014) 6. Perkins, K. K., Adams, W. K., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D., and Wieman, C. E. “Correlating student beliefs with student learning using the Colorado
. Based on session notes, topics ofdiscussion included program development and implementation, the definition of an“entrepreneurial mindset,” strategies for affecting change in large organizations, and manyothers.For example, in the session co-organized with students from the UIF program (Session B,Appendix A), two main threads were offered for discussion by attendees: (i) the potentialeffects of introducing I&E opportunities early on in the pathway of engineering students; and(ii) the potential role of students as change agents who can foster and accelerate theintroduction of I&E in engineering education.These two threads appeared later in the AHA exercise. Here, attendees delved into five topicareas to gain a more thorough understanding
. 1618. 1996. [32] C. DelgadoGaitan, The power of community: Mobilizing for family and schooling. Landham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2001. [33] W.A. Smih, P.G. Altbach, and K. Lometey, The racial crisis in American higher education: continuing challenges for the twentyfirst century. Rev. ed SUNY series, Frontiers in Education. Albany, NY: Statue University of New York Press. 2002. [34] E. Allworth, and B. Hesketh, "Constructoriented biodata: Capturing changerelated and contextually relevant future performance". International Journal of Selection and Assessment 7: p. 97 111. 1999. [35] E.D. Pulakos, et al. "Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance
an interactive pedagogical process.On the other hand, the impact of Gamification in education has been recently investigated andstudied theoretically by educators. Researchers13 addressed that before conducting a certain Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova UniversityGamification method in education, one should be aware of the target users and the properties ofthe users in the classroom. In their study, the players are categorized into the following types: a)player b) socializer c) free spirit d) achiever e) philanthropist13. A certain method should beconsidered for each type of player. Moreover, a gamification system should be designed andimplemented based on the course material14. A lot of
Paper ID #13816Online Statics: Teaching the Masses in the New FrontierProf. Carisa H Ramming P.E., Oklahoma State University Carisa Ramming is a graduate of Oklahoma State University where she obtained degrees in Architec- tural Engineering and Civil Engineering Construction Management. She worked in industry for six years as licensed engineer and structural consultant for Wallace Engineering in Tulsa, OK before returning to Oklahoma State as a visiting faculty member in the School of Architecture. In 2009, Professor Ram- ming joined the faculty full time as an assistant professor of architectural engineering. Since that
this recombination takes place via an impurity level within the band gap8 inQW active layer.Fig. 4 Illustration of Recombination process and Photon Emission in a) Direct band gap and b) in an indirect band gap semiconductor.9The QW layers can be constructed to enhance the concentration of carriers and hence a largeryield of recombination to emit larger quantities of photons. Fig. 5 shows a typical quantum wellstructure10. As an example a structure consisting of a 10 nm wide GaAs quantum wellembedded between two Al0.1Ga0.9As barriers are shown. The conduction band offset is assumedto be 0.3 eV, the effective mass is assumed to be the mass of GaAs (0.067 m0) in both materials.The grid resolution is 0.5 nm
Paper ID #12959Stimulating Active Learning in Hydrology Using Research-Driven, Web-basedLearning ModulesDr. Emad Habib, University of Louisiana at Lafayette Dr. Emad Habib is a Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. His research interests are in Hydrology, Water Resources, Rainfall Remote Sensing, Water Management, Coastal Hydrology, and Advances in Hydrology Education ResearchMadeleine Bodin, University of Louisiana, Lafayette MADELEINE BODIN is a Ph.D. student in the Systems Engineering program at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. She earned her B.S. degree from the University
model is utilized in this study. Figures 2(a) and 2(b) presents the hysteresis shape of aSDOF structure using the generalized Bouc-Wen model [7], respectively. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education 41 Figure 2. Hysteretic behavior using the generalized Bouc-Wen ModelFor the CiPair program, the experimental substructure is 25% of total stiffness. The naturalfrequencies of the structure that are going to be analyzed are 0.25 Hz and 1 Hz. Both stiffnessand strength degradation are
industry standard pump sizing procedures.For example, the ASPE Design Handbook [13] and ASHRAE Handbook [14] both haveestablished methods for recirculation pump sizing.Figure 1 shows the circuit solver TRV device. The manufacturer identifies problems with thecurrent hot water delivery systems: (a) water flows to the path of least resistance; (b) manybuildings require multiple branches off the how water supply line; (c) hot water use is hyper-dynamic, so the path of least resistance constantly changes; (d) manual flow control valvescannot efficiently resolve these issues [15]. The manufacturer’s solution that to install a circuitsolver on each hot water supply branch line immediately downstream of the last run-out to a hottop. Figure 2 shows the
variationwith engineering faculty. The percentage change from original control included for thesame faculty along with the standard deviation over all literature types. Spring 2014 Spring 2014 Fall 2014 Fall 2014 Control Test Modified Test Modified Test (Instructor A) (Instructor A) (Instructor B) (Instructor C) Multimedia 1.11 0.67 (-40%) 2.25 2.40 Monographs 1.11 1.33 (+20%) 1.25 1.00 Articles 0.94 1.22 (+29%) 0.25 0.30 Grey Literature 0.67
experiences fromthe summer Academy and the lesson plans developed therein, so as to help inform and attractother teachers to such opportunities. The plans are to post on-line the lesson plans developed by Page 26.1605.2participants in the Academy. This would make them available for worldwide access and helpbroaden the program’s reach and impacts.Review of relevant literature Research has identified five core features of best-practices for teacher professionaldevelopment Academies. These include: (a) content focus, (b) active learning, (c) coherence, (d)duration, and (e) collective participation. Content focus is defined by pedagogy and
shrinking resources andcontinuing budget crises.This paper is a description of how a small Hispanic-serving community college in the SanFrancisco Bay Area developed effective partnerships with other institutions of higher educationand industry partners in order to create opportunities for underrepresented community collegestudents to excel in engineering. These partnerships led to programs that have increased theinterest, entry, retention and success in engineering fields among minority students. Among theseprograms are: a) a summer engineering institute – a two-week residential summer camp forsophomore and junior high school students; b) a ten-week summer research internship programfor community college engineering students; c) a two-day summer
. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. 2. American Society for Engineering Education. (2007). Profiles of engineering & engineering technology colleges 2006. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education. 3. Brown, S. V. & Clewell, B. C. (1998, January). Project talent flow: The non-SEM field choices of Black and Latino undergraduates with the aptitude for science, engineering and mathematics careers. Final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. 4. Camara, W. J. & Schimdt, A. E. (1999). Group differences in standardized testing and social stratification. New York: College Board. 5. Campbell, Jr., G., Denes, R., & Morrison, C. (Eds.), Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and
Paper ID #11298Learning from Experiences: Examining Self-Reflection in Engineering De-sign CoursesJennifer Wegner, University of Michigan College of Engineering Jennifer Wegner is an Assistant Director in Engineering Student Affairs at the University of Michigan, with responsibilities including student organization development, leading unit strategic objectives, and supporting university and college co-curricular initiatives. Her teaching and facilitation experiences in- clude a mentorship/leadership course, LeaderShape R , first year seminars, and a university course on social psychology in residence settings. She is a
universityengineering programs, may be used across STEM disciplines. Participants will learn and practicethe techniques, consider examples of how teachers of the Engineer Your World high schoolengineering course have used these techniques in their non-engineering courses, and work insmall groups to identify opportunities to incorporate the techniques into their own STEMclassrooms.Workshop Description. Please provide a detailed description of the proposed workshop that, atminimum, explicitly addresses the following (maximum 4,000 characters): a. Learning objectives Page 18.7.3 b. Hands-on activities and interactive exercises c. Materials
for world's poor. Journal Sentinel.8. Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy ofManagement Journal, 50(1), 25-32.9. Riley, D. (2008). Chapter 4. Toward a More Socially Just Engineering. In Engineering and social justice (p. 111).San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool.10. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.11. Bullough, R. (2001). Guidelines for Quality in Autobiographical forms of Self-Study Research. Education andEducational Research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13-21.12. Kar, K., & Chambers, R. (2008). Handbook on community-led total sanitation. London: Plan UK.13. Hariharan, B. (2011
(maximum 4,000 characters): a. Learning objectives Page 18.3.3 b. Hands-on activities and interactive exercises c. Materials that participants can take with them2015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form-haas Page 2 of 6 WORKSHOP PROPOSAL FORM 2015 Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education “Authentic Engineering: Representing & Emphasizing the E in STEM” Presented by Dassault Systems Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M. Sheraton
18.19.3minimum, explicitly addresses the following (maximum 4,000 characters): a. Learning objectives2015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-LinkEngineering 1 22 15.docx Page 2 of 6 WORKSHOP PROPOSAL FORM 2015 Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education “Authentic Engineering: Representing & Emphasizing the E in STEM” Presented by Dassault Systems Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M. Sheraton Seattle | Seattle | WA b. Hands-on activities and interactive exercises c. Materials that participants can take