course, the majority hadno preference, signifying that they were not strongly in favor of the summer course. However,the grade distributions showed that they in fact performed better in the summer format.When considering the future, since summer offerings seem to have definite positive potential interms of student performance, progression and learning, the intention is to encourage thecontinued and increased offering of such courses. Further, since these are core foundationalcourses within the program, the real measure of their success should be gauged by tracking theperformance of these specific students in their direct follow-on courses, and not solely via theirperformance in the summer course alone; a tracking plan is being implemented for
to Tjahjono and Ball, Six Sigmacan be thought of in one of four ways: (1) “a set of statistical tools”, (2) “an operationalphilosophy of management”, (3) a “business culture”, and (4) “an analysis methodology” (p.6-7). The interviewees made reference to the fourth way of thinking about Six Sigma. “Kumar etal. (2007) argued that Six Sigma is an extension to quality improvement initiatives such as theTotal Quality Management (TQM) because of the similarities between the Six Sigma method ofDesign, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control (DMAIC) and the Deming’s PDCA (Plan, Do,Check, and Act).”(Tjahjono et al., 2010, p. 7).Daniel, Ronald and Matt, three out of the five interviewees used Six Sigma methodology in dailyproblem solving
asked to follow.Example 2 (Traditional Circuits I – Not Calculus Ready). This design is commonly found inengineering programs that include electrical circuits. The assumption in this case, however, is thatstudents are not prepared for Calculus. The common remedy is to simply prepend a Precalculuscourse to the pattern provided in Example 1. The learning outcomes are the same as those providedin Example 1. The design pattern itself is shown in Figure 3, with the course crucialities showninside of each node.Remark 1. The math starting point in this pattern, Precalculus, is actually an extremely commonstaring point for many freshman, although it rarely appears on the degrees plans provided to thesestudents. At our institution, the majority of
funded MIST Space Vehicle Mission Planning Laboratory at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. In 2010, he joined Eastern Michigan University as an Associate Dean in the College of Technology and currently is a Professor in the School of Engineer- ing Technology. He has an extensive experience in curriculum and laboratory design and development. Dr. Eydgahi has served as a member of the Board of Directors for Tau Alpha Pi, as a member of Advi- sory and Editorial boards for many International Journals in Engineering and Technology, as a member of review panel for NASA and Department of Education, as a regional and chapter chairman of IEEE, SME, and ASEE, and as a session chair and as a member of scientific and
them to drawconclusions at multiple levels of analysis: 1) the underlying biophysical substrata of the cognitive systemand 2) how students are experiencing and regulating their emergent emotional states. Similar to the Lorenz system example, Hilpert and colleagues (2013, 2014) have used differentialequation modeling to produce simulations of how students plan for a future career in engineering as theyenter young adulthood. Their work is an example of how dynamic modeling can be used to examinestudents planning, self-regulation, and problem solving. They integrate interviews, surveys, and studentdrawings of timelines of their lives to produce dynamic models for how students’ goals shift with regardto 1) what they value in the future
typical engineering identities. For example, studentsdiscussed the breakdown of their assumptions about the popular “nerd” and “builder” stereotypesof engineers. One student discussed the differences between their previous beliefs of engineers as“typically non-social people who were only proficient at math and science” and those they holdas a result of participating in STEP, which included constructively using criticism and effectivelycommunicating ideas. Another student discussed their prior belief about engineers as “glorifiedfactory workers,” but, through the course and participation in STEP, came to see engineers as“dynamic problem solvers” who engage in “careful planning and out of the box problemsolving.” Additionally, students shared
remainder of the summer to further developtheir project plans, or fulfill any prior research commitments they may have. When the academicyear starts, SRR convenes occasional meetings, approximately 5 times per term. In the fall term,these generally consist of further instruction and outside speakers. For example, at the firstmeeting in fall Dr. Bourgeois provided a workshop on Design Thinking aimed at developingprojects in SRR. Other talks included sessions on writing for a general audience given by Dr.Jessica Baron, Communications Coordinator and Director of Media and Engagement for theHistory of Science Society; a talk on working in the public policy space by Dr. MelindaGormley, then a AAAS fellow at EPA; and a talk by a member of the Templeton
education that is explicitly socio-technical in nature.We plan to develop a transformative, inclusive approach to teaching energy as a model for howto adopt culturally-sustaining pedagogies within engineering. We have selected energy, as it is afoundational topic across multiple engineering disciplines, relevant to students’ lived 2experiences, and has important social ramifications. We are targeting a class in the second yearto provide students with a grounding in CSP early in their engineering education so that theymight use these mindsets moving forward. Many students often first see energy concepts in“Introduction to Thermodynamics.” With its grounding in 18th century power cycles and
- and Long-term Education Reform and Development Plan(2010-2020)’ has identified ‘adhering to the people-centered approach and promoting quality-oriented education’ as the ‘strategic theme’ of China’s educational reform and development[1].” “‘Quality’ refers to the relatively stable psychological quality gradually formed byinternalization of knowledge through influences of education and social environment on thebasis of human nature [2].” “Quality-oriented education is designed to promote students’comprehensive development and improve China’s national educational level by enhancing thequality of each educated person, who would accept education in ideology, morality, culture,science, professional skills, as well as physical and mental quality [2
students experience work in diverse teams. Concurrent with the 2016presidential election and during the collection of interview data as a part of this larger study, ashift occurred in the national discourse around diversity. As such, we sought to understand howthis shift in the national discourse did or did not influence engineering students in STEMclassrooms. As a part of acknowledging the changing sociopolitical discourse occuring on anational scale in our own research, we included additional interview questions related to studentsattitudes about recent national events while conducting our planned research on students’attitudes about diversity. We felt that this shift in the research plan was warranted to capture howstudent attitudes may be
with each instructionalclass periods consisting of 45 minutes of one-sided discourse with the instructor teaching from aPowerPoint presentation, followed by up to 5 minutes of multiple choice iClicker questions onthe material just covered (as a note, instructional class periods are considered any class periodnot devoted to examinations or group presentations). The significant time, effort, and planning required to restructure an entire course fromtraditional lecture-based to “flipped” can be prohibitive (or at least discouraging) for someuniversity instructors who may already have a full workload [15], [18]–[21]. In a “flipped” or“inverted” class, instructional content is delivered to students out of class (typically throughvideo
influenced theoutcomes for students, and that international experiences tended to be more intense [23]. In ourcomparison, the China program provided more cultural intensity, but both programs seem tohave provided research intensity (i.e., opportunities to be challenged and develop). However, thecultural experience may have outshone the research challenges for the China participants, as theycertainly focused more on those topics during their interviews.Both IRES programs have several more years remaining, and we plan to continue collecting datafrom both programs. As we build up a larger pool of participants across years, we will alsoexplore the results of the pre/post surveys for cultural intelligence that we have administered. Weare curious to see
social capital, and 6. Insufficient collaborative space. 1. Supportive academic advising at UC DavisOne theme that emerged from the focus groups was the helpfulness of department academicadvisors at UC Davis. The positive impact of these advisors was brought up on five uniqueoccasions throughout the three focus groups. The students described that the advisors werehelpful for staying on track for course and university requirements. UC Davis departmentadvisors work with only one to three majors, and therefore have the knowledge to suggest coursesequences and help plan degree requirements. In one of the focus groups, a student shared howtheir advisor guided them through the process of appealing a grade with an instructor andprovided useful
sessions suchas panels, round tables, workshops and training sessions such as Safe Zone training. The ADChas a vision, mission and published strategic plan, [2] and is an entity to which authors candirectly submit papers.The development of, and institutionalization of the Best Diversity Paper award within ASEE wasa major undertaking that required drafting of the process for soliciting and identifying bestpapers, judging them on a consistent rubric, and disseminating the top papers. The ASEEDiversity Committee crafted a proposal, vetted it internally, worked with ASEE IT staff tocustomize the paper handling system, Monolith, and then vetted with the ASEE Board ofDirectors. The ASEE Board of Directors approved the award and institutionalized it as
general plan as was used for Calculus I. We then present the results ofapplying the full toolkit to the new Calculus II course. Pass rate and GPA improvements inCalculus II were evident immediately after scale up in the spring of 2016. Sufficient time hasnow passed so that we can apply the full set of assessment tools built for Calculus I to measurethe effectiveness of the Calculus II transformation on academic performance in post-requisitecoursework and on student retention in STEM. Page 1 of 151.0 IntroductionThe grade earned in mathematics courses is critical when considering student retention inengineering and in STEM majors. For example, the work by Budny
pharmaceutical, to everydaymanufactured goods [14].There are many articles in the engineering education literature that focus on manufacturingeducation. An article published in 2015 discussed the implications of having a manufacturinginternship or co-op experience on industrial engineering students. The perceptions of thestudents changed significantly with regards to working in the manufacturing sector upongraduation [15]. The “four pillars of manufacturing knowledge” was developed and ismaintained by the Society for Manufacturing Engineers [16]. In a 2014 paper, Ermer presentedthe four pillars of manufacturing knowledge in the education plan for a mechanical engineeringconcentration of a general engineering program, specifically in the manufacturing
rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the details of the QuestionFormulation Technique and its use in our study. Section 3 presents our proposed approach for thespecific problem identified in our overall project. Section 4 presents and discusses the empiricaldata mining results obtained. Section 5 provides a summary of our paper with a plan for futurework.2. The Question Formulation TechniqueThe ability to formulate salient questions is a critical life skill that enables the student to moredeeply engage with the content being learned. Questions serve the purpose of making clear andconcrete that which is unknown or misunderstood by the student. By making the unknownconcrete, a pathway for exploration, engagement and
surveyed in this study and in the literature,increased exposure to material, the ability to start and stop a video that is available for reviewanytime, the ability to work additional problems, the ability to take responsibility for the learningand work with peers, and the ability to directly engage with the instructor in a group settingimproves the learning environment. However, it is important to carefully plan and execute theeffort. To accomplish this, it is critical that the pre-lecture technology, in-class activities, and theinstructor are effective and able to keep the students engaged.Research DesignThis study investigates the impacts of a Partially Flipped Classroom (PFC) instructional model ina junior level geotechnical engineering course
restate, defend, apply, produce, categorize, hypothesize, identify, locate, criticize, interrelate, dramatize, draw, prioritize, produce, plan, recite, state, recommend, paraphrase, solve, prepare, distinguish, classify, develop, design, recognize
6 in v1.0 (DI = 0.71, rpb = 0.28) in which we changed the representation used for theanswer choices as discussed previously. Again we see the USU result for this question (DI =0.71, rpb = 0.42) to be within acceptable ranges, so the WCC statistics seem likely skewed by thesmall sample size.The last question of concern regarding the statistics is question 10. The statistics fall outsidedesirable ranges for both WCC (DI = 0.28, rpb = -0.07) and USU (DI = 0.10, rpb = 0.17). Wemodified the problematic item 12 in v1.0 to develop this question, but it still appears to be verydifficult for the students and performance does not correlate well with their overall score on thetest. We plan further revisions of this item to reduce complexity. Student
-requisites, it is expected to be the first semester courseand Fundamentals of Engineering II the second semester course for a regular (on-schedule)freshman. Some students coming in with lower mathematics background start with engineeringcurriculum in the spring semester (off-schedule) instead of autumn. Also, some transfer studentsend up taking the Fundamentals of Engineering I in their spring semester. The first semestercourse introduces topics such as problem solving, engineering design process, technicalcommunication, ethics in engineering, teamwork and engineering tools that aid in criticalthinking, planning and data analysis. Three major components of this course are: Data analysis inExcel, Programming in MATLAB and Design Project. Because of
enterprising andinnovative university vary between the two models [11].MethodologyTo answer our question we adopted a qualitative exploratory approach [12]. The data is based onsemi-structured interviews with actors that are part of the support systems for entrepreneurshipeducation in five engineering schools in Chile: Universidad de Chile (UChile), PontificiaUniversidad Católica de Chile (PUC), Universidad de Santiago (USACH), Universidad AdolfoIbáñez (UAI) and Universidad de of Talca (UTalca). The selection criteria prioritized thevariability of Ingeniería 2030 schools. The sample considers one university from each of theselected projects. Each Ingeniería 2030 project commits to transform engineering in Chilefollowing a different strategic plan, but
engineeringfield. Given the utility of situated learning theory in our study findings, we suggest thatresearchers consider this theory of learning when choosing study participants and interviewdiscussion questions.ConclusionsWhile the small-sample, qualitative nature of this study limits the conclusions we can drawacross the entire TERM community, this study serves as a starting point for educationresearchers and practitioners who wish to improve the educational experiences of studentsinterested in TERM. Future work from our group plans to assess the curriculum available forstudents interested in TERM at the University of Michigan. We plan to evaluate the alignment ofcoursework and co-curricular experiences offered there with the concepts and skills
Acculturative Stress Components and Their Relationship with Depression Among International Students in China. Stress and Health, vol.32, pp.524-532, Dec. 2016.[18] W. Wen, D. Hu, and J. Hao, “International students’ experiences in China: Does the planned reverse mobility work?” International Journal of Educational Development, vol.61, pp.204-212, July. 2018.[19] X. J. Ding, “Exploring the experiences of international students in China,” Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 20, pp. 319-338, Apr. 2016.[20] M. Tian and J. A. Lowe, “Intercultural identity and intercultural experiences of American students in China,” Journal of Studies in International Education, vol.18, pp.281-297, July. 2014.[21] H. C. Sheu
focused upon utilizing the concepts andequations in problems or applications.Each of the Advanced sections received the same level and method of instruction during eachlesson. The only alteration was the addition of the historical references into the lesson plan for theAdvanced intervention group A1 (see Table 2).All of the students in the second-semester course completed nine laboratory experiments in formalgroups and one in-lab writing event. Each lab group submitted a report on each experiment andthe report consisted of a results, analysis, and conclusion sections. All of the experimentsexamined physics concepts that were part of the course material. In the writing event, studentswere tasked with analyzing and discussing provided data in a two
program and allow students to explore before committing to a specific plan of study.For the new computer programming course, the content pairs the sensors and actuatorscommonly utilized by a variety of engineers with the programming skills needed to collect andinterpret data. These skills carry over to the team design project that involves programming,sensors, actuators, construction and testing of a complete system. The programming skillscarried into the sophomore level courses have been well received by some departments and lessthan satisfactory to other departments which has led to more deliberate independentprogramming assignments. In this paper, we describe the implementation of in a new coursesequence for ~900 students per year and
they go about their study preparation with use of the cheat-sheet option; (3)what did they think the benefit would be in using a cheat-sheet; and, (4) how do they think otherswill behave relative to academic integrity if a cheat-sheet were not allowed. The followingdetailed questions were posed in the survey. Questions Q1 through Q7 were used to evaluate study preparation given the authorized cheat- sheet option was available. Responses include: (a) always, (b) sometimes, and (c) rarely. 1. I plan adequate study time for each exam. 2. I keep my course materials organized and in a logical order. 3. I study with a group from my class. 4. I prepare potential test questions from themes, central topics, old exams
)Figure 3. Student self-assessment survey responses (n = 17) before and after reading the “Data Analysis”and “Uncertainty” comics in a Transport I Laboratory course, as previously reported and reprinted withpermission of ASEE.57 In order to assess student understanding, students finished the Transport Laboratory I course witha design project, for which they developed an experimental proposal to address one of the NationalAcademy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges. For their proposed study, students were required todetermine a purpose, design an experiment and analysis, and describe their plan for limitingmeasurement uncertainty. This proposal was submitted as a written report evaluated by the instructor. The instructor compared
24.2%In addition, all students who indicated a willingness to be interviewed were contacted, and fourinterviews were conducted. Interview questions asked them about choosing to major inengineering, their current career plans, their plans to use their engineering skills in volunteering,the main things they took from the class, how (if at all) it changed their thinking, how they thinkabout ethics, and if they thought the skills and information from their general education courseswould be useful in their careers.Survey data was analyzed to see if survey responses in any areas changed significantly betweenthe pre- and post-surveys using paired sample t-tests. Results were also analyzed, usingindependent sample t-tests, to see if groups of students
times per week with each instructionalclass periods consisting of 45 minutes of one-sided discourse with the instructor teaching from aPowerPoint presentation, followed by up to 5 minutes of multiple choice iClicker questions onthe material just covered (as a note, instructional class periods are considered any class periodnot devoted to examinations or group presentations). The significant time, effort, and planning required to restructure an entire course fromtraditional lecture-based to “flipped” can be prohibitive (or at least discouraging) for someuniversity instructors who may already have a full workload [15], [18]–[21]. In a “flipped” or“inverted” class, instructional content is delivered to students out of class (typically