-189, 2003.[16] A. R. Carberry and A. F. McKenna, "Engineering student's conceptions of model uses in design," in 2011 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, REES 2011, 2011.[17] R. Lesh, M. Hoover, and A. Kelly, "Equity, assessment, and thinking mathematically: Principles for the design of model-eliciting activities," Developments in school mathematics education around the world, vol. 3, pp. 104-130, 1993.[18] O. B. J. Daniel K. Howe, "Developing an Interactive Computer Program to Enhance Student Learning of Dynamical Systems," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[19] A. J. Magana, "Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Education: A Learning Progression," Journal of
capstone projects include designing surgical instruments for externalstakeholders and building a high speed fully electric motorcycle for educational demonstrations.Study Design and Data CollectionIn Spring 2018, all 67 junior engineering students from two course sections were given ahomework assignment that included evaluating their capstone projects with our sustainabledesign rubric (see Appendix A for the rubric). Each student belonged to one of fifteen capstoneteams (see Appendix B for topic list) and was assigned to evaluate their projects against a subsetof rubric criteria (approximately two-thirds of the rubric) This was done to promote meaningfulparticipation in the assignment by reducing total workload. A subset of criteria was
repairs: 1. Unregulated Power Supply a. Screw terminals connecting the power supply subcomponents were found loose, potentially causing unstable voltages and currents from high-resistance connections. All screw terminals were tightened. b. Lugs used to connect the Rectifiers to the screw terminals were filled with solder instead of crimped, with broken solder joints found. The Rectifiers were replaced and new terminals were crimped to the new rectifier leads. 2. BeagleBone Black and Probotix Breakout Board a. The existing BeagleBone was found to be unresponsive and directories were empty, despite handling a SSH connection through PuTTY and WinSCP. This
switch through the SIO interface. 4. Change the switch input and monitor the LED behavior. a. If the switch is open, the LED will turn ON. b. However, if the switch is closed, the LED will turn OFF.After assembling the circuit and successfully testing the SIO module functionality using the switchand the LED, it is required to monitor the transmitted signal between the master and the slave asfollows. 1. Connect channel 1 and 9 from the MSO to the master and slave PICs serial clock respectively to monitor the system clock. 2. Connect channel 2 and 10 from the MSO to the master serial output and the slave serial input respectively to monitor the SIO signals when turning on/off the switch. 3
/ [Accessed: March 14, 2019].[17] K. Brouwer, T. Cottam, C. LiVolsi and S Pratt, “Eye in the Sky – Drone Detection & Tracking System”, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://vsgc.odu.edu/acrpdesigncompetition/wp- content/uploads/sites/3/2018/11/Runway_First-Place_URI_Nassersharif_Bahram.pdf [Accessed: January 14, 2019].[18] B. Blumberg, A. Johnson, A. Norberg and E. Roads, “Twice Repurposed Crumb Rubber as a Jet Fuel Solidifier”, 2014. [Online]. Available http://vsgc.odu.edu/ACRPDesignCompetition/competitionwinners/2014/Environment%20-%20Firs t%20Place.pdf [Accessed: January 14, 2019].[19] S. Gildersleeve, S. Norris, B. Tortorici
-ace.ca [4]. R. J. Marzano, J. S. Marzano, and D. Pickering, “Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher ASCD” 2003. [5]. W. L. Sanders, S.P. Wright, and S.P. Horn, “Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation,” Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 11(1), 57-67, 1997. [6]. O. Mango, “Ipad use and student engagement in the classroom,” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(1), 53-57, 2015. [7]. B. O'Sullivan-Donnell, “Students' personal mobile devices in the classroom: A case study of a BYOT district” Doctoral dissertation, College of Professional Studies, Northeastern University
-framework [Accessed December 11, 2019].[4] J. Dewey, “How we think,” 1910. [Online]. Available: http://rci.rutgers.edu/~tripmcc/phil/dewey-hwt-pt1-selections.pdf [Accessed December 7, 2019].[5] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 1956.[6] Resource Area for Teaching, “Bridging the engagement gap with hands-on teaching,” 2013.[Online]. Available: from http://www.raft.net/public/pdfs/case-for-hands-on-learning.pdf [AccessedDecember 8, 2019].[7] P. Goertz, “10 signs of a 21st century classroom,” Edutopia: George Lucas EducationalFoundation, February 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.edutopia.org/discussion/10-signs-21st-century-classroom [Accessed December 7, 2019].[8] K. Gary, “Project-Based Learning,” IEEE
. Bibliography: 1. C. Alvarado and Z. Dodds, “Women in CS: an evaluation of three promising practices,” in Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education , 2010, pp. 57–61. 2. W. Bares and B. Manaris and R. McCauley, “Gender equity in computer science through computing in the arts – a sixyear longitudinal study”, in Computer Science Education , 28:3, 2018, pp. 191210. 3. Barker, L. J., GarvinDoxas, K., & Roberts, E. (2005), “What can computer science learn from a fine arts approach to teaching?”, in Proceeding of the 36th ACM technical
and B. K. Hofer, McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. (12th ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006.[3] Worldwide CDIO Initiative. www.cdio.org[4] P. Lynch, C. de Vries and D. Lewis, “Integrating an effective first year seminar into a freshman engineering design course.” First Year Engineering Experience Conference. Daytona Beach, FL 2017.[5] G. Lemons et al, "The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design," Design Studies, vol. 31, (3), pp. 288-309, 2010.[6] C. Dym et al, "Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, (1), pp. 103-120, 2005.[7] R. M. Abdulaal, A. M. Al-Bahi, A. Y. Soliman & F. I
Paper ID #26919Meeting Workforce Demand through Industrial Partnership: A Case in LouisianaDr. Nabin Sapkota, Northwestern State University of Louisiana Nabin Sapkota is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Northwestern State University. He received a B. E. degree in Production/Industrial Engineering from the Regional En- gineering College, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India and a M.S. and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Central Florida (Orlando, FL, USA). He has a diverse expertise in the areas of Operations Research, Simulation, Quality Engineering, and Nonlinear
read miss (ex), the current state will be moved toExclusive state. For read miss (sh), the current state will be movedto Shared state. For write miss (local), it will be moved toModified state.Figure 7 shows the flowchart for the Snoopy cache coherencyprotocol, which is a conventional protocol, and the SimpleSimulator already has this protocol as a default one. The red boxesin Figure 7 have the ported codes for MESI protocol with Snoopy.The red boxes mean: 1) Check the Status bit whether it is Modifiedor Exclusive. If then, the MESI will do ‘UPDATE LRU’; 2) Dotedbox ‘b’ is for ‘STATUS BIT is EXCLUSIVE,’ when the fetchedinstruction is ‘read miss and not found in other threads’; and 3)Doted box ‘c’ is for the case that the instruction is ‘read
Paper ID #25262Curating Tweets: A Framework for Using Twitter for Workplace LearningHieu-Trung Le, George Mason University Hieu-Trung Le is pursuing his PhD in Information Technology at George Mason University. He is cur- rently a cybersecurity architect at a large organization, with expertise in leading IT and security engi- neering implementation, risk management, vulnerability assessment, and ethical hacking. He provides consulting services for both the federal and commercial sectors and served as the subject matter expert for information security domains. His research focuses on engineering education, using social
Paper ID #26286Depoliticization as a Mechanism of Gender Inequality among EngineeringFacultyDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan Erin Cech joined the department of sociology at the University of Michigan as an assistant professor in 2016. Prior to that she was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University and was on faculty at Rice University. She earned her Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of California, San Diego. Cech’s research seeks to uncover seemingly benign cultural mechanisms of inequality reproduction—particularly around cultural logics in popular explanations
initiation of the Coastal Engineering concentration of the PhD Engineeringdegree program described in this paper as well as supported the preponderance of preparationand presentation of the paper. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research andDevelopment Center (ERDC) is gratefully acknowledged for (a) their Education PartnershipAgreement and for partnering with the Coastal Resilience Center of Excellence on the researchinvestigations mentioned herein, and (b) for partially supporting preparation of this paper in theauthor’s volunteer position of Director Emeritus, ERDC. Dr. Samuel Brody and Dr. WilliamMerrell, Texas A&M University at Galveston are gratefully acknowledged for their leadershipand partnership on the NSF PIRE investigations
Paper ID #25714A Connected Course Approach for Introduction to Engineering Problem Solv-ingDr. Anthony Ferrar, Temple University Tony Ferrar is obsessed with student success. He focuses on preparing students for rewarding careers through pedagogical innovation and incorporating professional development into educational experiences. Anthony received his BS, MS, and PhD in mechanical engineering from Virginia Tech, where his research revolved around air-breathing propulsion. As a graduate student he contributed to Virginia Tech’s Gradu- ate Education Development Institute, Faculty Development Institute, and Networked Learning
Paper ID #28357Design and Fabrication of a 50mm Gun Launched Hybrid ProjectileMr. Saul Henderson, University of the District of Columbia Saul Henderson is a first-year Master’s student within the Electrical Engineering department at the Uni- versity of the District of Columbia (UDC). Prior to joining the Master’s program in August 2019, Saul has gained over 6 years of valuable experience and soft skills in STEM research, design and informal education. Starting out at UDC as an undergraduate Electrical Engineering student in the Fall of 2012, he has gained 5 years of education experience as a student educator at the
Paper ID #268553-D Printed Metal and Plastic Propeller Design and Manufacturing for Small-scale Underwater ThrustersDr. Byul Hur, Texas A&M University Dr. B. Hur received his B.S. degree in Electronics Engineering from Yonsei University, in Seoul, Korea, in 2000, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, in 2007 and 2011, respectively. In 2017, he joined the faculty of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. USA, where he is currently an Assistant Professor. He worked as a postdoctoral associate from 2011 to 2016 at the University
Paper ID #27132Impact of Research Experience Programs on National and International Un-dergraduate Engineering StudentsDr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 & a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, worked at Argonne National Lab, 1996-1997, taught at Chicago State University, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in Aerospace Engi- neering @ Texas A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using spectral and lattice Boltzmann methods for studying
pre-engineeringprogram. What is the drop-out rate? Are there specific disciplines that pre-engineeringstudents enter? What is the ultimate successful graduation rate?The GEE 103 course should be developed to better gauge success in the pre-engineeringprogram. Class exercises need to be more frequent with better accountability from students toreflect academic expectations in an introductory engineering course. Though these exerciseswill not have academic rigor, they should be better structured to substantiate success andfailure rates. Further work will need to be done to develop a working protocol to predictsuccess for students in pre-engineering.References[1] T. A. Lacey, B. Wright, “Occupational Employment Projections to 2018,” Monthly
Paper ID #25200Monitoring and Controlling a Construction Project in the ClassroomCol. Brad Wambeke P.E., United States Military Academy Colonel Brad Wambeke is the Civil Engineering Division Director at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from South Dakota State University; M.S. from the University of Min- nesota; and Ph.D. from North Carolina State University. He is a member of ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His primary research interests include construction engineering, lean construction, and engineering education.Major Todd Mainwaring, United States Military
]. Accredited programs must have documented student outcomes that preparegraduates to attain the program educational objectives. The student outcomes are outcomes (a)through (k) plus any additional outcomes that may be articulated by the program. Table 4: Mapping ABET outcomes with 21st-century skills 21st Century ABET Outcomes Skills for Success (a) an ability to apply knowledge of 2. Numeracy mathematics, science, and engineering 3. Scientific Literacy (b) an ability to design and conduct 7. Critical Thinking/Problem Solving
of Engineering Education, 100(1), 151-185.[2] Trevelyan, J. (2010). Reconstructing engineering from practice. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 175-195.[3] Trevelyan, James. (2007). Technical coordination in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 191-204.[4] Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C.B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 139-151.[5] Newstetter, Wendy C, & Svinicki, Marilla D. (2014). Learning theories for engineering education practice. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 29-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.[6
design in a step-by-step fashion. An excerpt of the guided study is shown inFigure 5. The remainder of the guided study includes additional practice problems. Figure 5. A Guided Study Application and Creation QuestionOther topics covered in guided studies were: models and architectures, reverse engineering,functional dependencies, normal forms, normalization, physical database design, and B+trees.4. Evaluation of ImpactThe impact of adding guided studies to a flipped course can be gauged in a few different ways:completion rate (Zingaro et al. 2013, Garcia 2018) and student satisfaction (Maher et al. 2013)are two metrics that have been used in previous studies. Completion rates for all 10 guidedstudies were nearly 100% for the
mathematics and science education: a literature review,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 11, no. 2, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674[2] Afterschool Alliance. “STEM Learning in Afterschool: An Analysis of Impact and Outcomes,” STEM and Afterschool, 2011. Washington, D.C.: Afterschool Alliance. 1616 H Street NW Suite 820, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-347-1002; Fax: 202-347-2092; e-mail: info@afterschoolalliance.org; Web site: http://afterschoolalliance.org.[3] S. Friesen, C. Sarr, A. Park, C. Marcotte, T. Hampshire, B. Martin, … J. Martin ,”Focus On Inquiry,” Calgary: Galileo Education Network, 2015. Retrieved from http://inquiry.galileo.org/[4] M.S. Donovan, and J.D. Bransford
. Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, (35)3, 104-108.[16] Simon, B., Kinnunen, P., Porter, L. & Zazkis, D. (2010). Experience report: CS1 for majors with media computation. Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. 214-218.[17] Letterman, M. & Dugan, K. (2004). Team teaching a cross-disciplinary honors course: Preparation and development. College Teaching, 52(2), 76-79. Retrieved from https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/sites/default/files/basic-page-supplementary-materials- files/team_teaching.pdf
when thestudent, under stress, was asked to complete a similar problem in an exam environment.A typical process of assigning homework is shown in Figure 1a. The steps are straight-forward;the instructor assigns a set of homework problems and the student is given a set amount of timeto complete these problems before submitting to the instructor to grade. The instructor reviewsthe homework set and then returns to the student with a score based on the correctness of thesolutions provided.Figure 1: a) homework grading process (typical); b) homework self-grading process (by student)By comparison, the implementation of student self-grading (see Figure 1b) for this studyrequired several additional steps. The rationale for these steps will be
. 761, 2007.[29] P. A. Daempfle, "An Analysis of the High Attrition Rates among First Year College Science, Math, and Engineering Majors," Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 37-52, 2003.[30] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, "Leaving Engineering: A Multi- Year Single Institution Study," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6- 27, 2012.[31] L. J. Shuman, C. Delaney, H. Wolfe, A. Scalise, and M. Besterfield-Sacre, "Engineering attrition: Student characteristics and educational initiatives," in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, 1999, pp. 1-12.[32] A. Somech and A. Drach-Zahavy
, “Staying In Engineering: Effects Of A Hands On,Team Based, First Year Projects Course On Student Retention,” 2003 Annual Conference,Nashville, Tennessee, June 2003. https://peer.asee.org/11855[15] B. Tiwari, P. Nair, and S. Barua, “Effectiveness of Freshman Level Multi-disciplinaryHands-on Projects in Increasing Student Retention Rate and Reducing Graduation Time forEngineering Students in a Public Comprehensive University,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2018. https://peer.asee.org/30360[16] B.E. Johnson and J.W. Morphew, “An Analysis of Recipe-Based Instruction in anIntroductory Fluid Mechanics Laboratory”, 123rd Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition,New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26–29, 2016.[17] E.W. Jassim
the project team to design the new teaching modules that are student-centered and informed by the HPL framework [11]. Meanwhile students will learn how to usethe tools and gain confidence to become “makers” in the engineering community.How People Learn (HPL) Framework: Research has shown that an ideal learning environmentis characterized as (a) knowledge-centered, (b) learner-centered, (c) assessment-centered, and (d)community-centered [11]. Evidence-based pedagogies are often the ones that are student-centered, and learner-oriented.Maker Movement: As explained at techopedia.com, the maker movement is “primarily the namegiven to the increasing number of people employing do-it-yourself (DIY) and do-it-with-others(DIWO) techniques and processes
Regulator ePWMCH Inverter Slip V/Hz ePWMCL limiter profile A P eQEP B Fr 120 ωr I