, “Impact of Faculty Development Workshops on Instructional Faculty at Hispanic-serving Institutions,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32931. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32931.[8] H. Bradbury, The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2015. doi: 10.4135/9781473921290.[9] T. Vilkinas and G. Cartan, “The integrated competing values framework: Its spatial configuration,” Journal of Management Development, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 505–521, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1108/02621710610670092.[10] R. Dempsey, “Teachers as Leaders: Towards a conceptual framework,” Teaching education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 113–122, 1992.[11] S. P
“traditional” first-year students [9], [10]. Strategies to address thesebarriers such as fostering a cohort based learning community, building a sense of belonging andeffective mentorship are not financial in nature but have emerged as equally important.Acknowledgement: ASSETS is funded by the National Science Foundation – DUE Award#174169References[1] T.B. McNair, S. Albertine, M.A. Cooper, N. McDonald, and T. Major Jr. Becoming astudent-ready college: A new culture of leadership for student success. John Wiley & Sons 2016.[2] T.B. McNair, “Become a Student-Ready Institution,”. Leadership Exchange, 16 (1), 20-25.2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.leadershipexchange-digital.com. [Accessed February 6,2022].[3] K.A. Harvey, “Looking Through
. programs. Academe, 86(6):44, 2000.[12] David Feil-Seifer, Kerstin S. Haring, Silvia Rossi, Alan R. Wagner, and Tom Williams. Where to next? the impact of covid-19 on human-robot interaction research. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 10(1), June 2020. doi: 10.1145/3405450.[13] Sarah Ketchen Lipson, Sasha Zhou, Blake Wagner III, Katie Beck, and Daniel Eisenberg. Major differences: Variations in undergraduate and graduate student mental health and treatment utilization across academic disciplines. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 30(1):23–41, 2016. doi: 10.1080/87568225.2016.1105657.[14] Sarah Jane Bork, Anu Tuladhar, and Joi-Lynn Mondisa. Board 134: Methods for conducting a scoping literature
Ilumoka is the program manager.References:[1] S. Brown, D. Montfort, N. Perova-Mello, B. Lutz, A. Berger, A., and R. Streveler, 2018,"Framework Theory of Conceptual Change to Interpret Undergraduate Engineering Students'Explanations About Mechanics of Materials Concepts," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.107, No. 1, pp. 113-139, 2018.[2] B.L. Newberry, “Hands-On Learning in Engineering Mechanics using Layered BeamDesign,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN, June 22-25, 2003.[3] R. Sullivan, and M. Rais-Rohani, “Design and Application of a Beam Testing System forExperiential Learning in Mechanics of Materials,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Pittsburgh, PA, June 22 – 25, 2008.[4] K. Lulay, H.E Dillon, K.E. Eifler, T.A
: https://as.cornell.edu/news/hyperbolic-crochet-goes-viral10 Howell, Michelle E., Christine S. Booth, Sharmin M. Sikich, Tomáš Helikar, Rebecca L. Roston, Brian A. Couch, and Karin van Dijk. “Student understanding of DNA structure–function relationships improves from using 3D learning modules with dynamic 3D printed models.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 47, no. 3 (2019): 303-317.11 Wright, Leslie Kate, Paulina Cortez, Margaret A. Franzen, and Dina L. Newman. "Teaching meiosis with the DNA triangle framework: A classroom activity that changes how students think about chromosomes." Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 50, no. 1 (2022): 44-54.12 Jancaríková, Katerina, and Antonín Jancarík. "Teaching
Sherer. Moving Beyond Active Learning to EngineeringLearning: An Approach to Course Design and Enactment. 2018. ASEE Zone IVconference, Boulder, CO. March 25-27, 2018.GP Wiggins & J McTighe. Understanding by design. (2007) Princeton, NJ: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).SE Zappe, S Cutler, SA Spiegel, D Jordan, & M Sanders (submitted 2022). Lessons Learned -Conducting an External Evaluation of a STEM Teaching and Learning Center (Lessons LearnedPaper #1 of 2). Paper submitted to the annual meeting of the American Society for EngineeringEducation, Minneapolis, MN. Lessons learned: Findings from an External Evaluation of a STEM Teaching and Learning Center 6
feels that FERL is a winning combination foreveryone that truly embodies the educational concepts of culturally sensitive design and servicelearning. This faculty feel this unique program better prepares future officers and civil engineersto meet challenges both in the classroom and in practice, and that others could considerestablishing a similar program.References:[1] Vander Schaaf, Reid, and Ronald Welch. "Using Summer Programs to Excite Interest inEngineering." In ASEE 2003 Annual Conference, pp. 8-1259. 2003.[2] Buchholtz, Sean, and Reid Vander Schaaf. "Shaping the Battlefield to Increase Enrollmentsin Civil Engineering." In ASEE 2003 Annual Conference, pp. 8-1012. 2003.[3] Jenkins, S. Rod, James B. Pocock, Patrick D. Zuraski, Ronald B
effective options for developingdebugging and troubleshooting skills [7].DE can be an intimidating course for applied Engineering Technology (ET) and ComputerSystem Technology (CST) students for a variety of reasons. For example, students from bothmajors reported that they did not see the relevance and connection to their major(s) and futurecareer path. Additionally, many students reported that the course was more challenging thanother courses on end-of-course evaluations, and overall grades were often reflective of theseconcerns. DE is required for CST majors and is an elective for ET students. The ET and CSTprograms have different expected program outcomes; however, the DE course is expected toaddress the goals of each program. To accommodate
).[2] “NAE Website - Activities, Projects & Initiatives.” https://www.nae.edu/default.aspx?id=20676&areas-of- interest=6_21&listsortby=Object.Name&listsortdir=ascending (accessed Feb. 03, 2022).[3] “About the American Nuclear Society -- ANS.” https://www.ans.org/about/ (accessed Feb. 03, 2022).[4] J. Krupczak et al., “A Framework for Developing Courses on Engineering and Technology for Non-Engineers,” 2008.[5] “Majority Supports Use of Atomic Bomb on Japan in WWII.” https://news.gallup.com/poll/17677/majority-supports-use-atomic-bomb-japan-wwii.aspx (accessed Feb. 03, 2022).[6] F. Kertesz, “The Language of Nuclear Science,” 1968.[7] A. S. Bisconti, “Changing public attitudes
example, since the preference differences of industry employers’ specific focus areasis not explored in the current survey, researchers may want to adapt the resume rubrics from [2]and survey design from our study to explore these relationships.References[1] J. Berglund, “The Great Divide: Some worry of a gap between what is being taught inAmerican university undergraduate BME programs and the job market,” IEEE Pulse, vol. 6, no.2, pp. 42–45, 2015.[2] T. McCarty and S. C. R. Furtney, “Development of Quantitative Methodologies forAnalyzing Biomedical Engineering Resumes And Their Use In Career Pathway Alignment,” inASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, July, 2021. Appendix A: Survey Outline Based on the current
the first workshop and collaboratively develop acoherent set of pilot projects to conduct over the summer. We will use the outcomes from theseprojects as a foundation to reach out to the broader engineering education community about theaffordances of secondary data analysis and best practices for conducting this type of work.Acknowledgement:This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantEEC-8060753.References[1] A. Johri, S. Yang, M. Vorvoreanu, and K. Madhavan, "Perceptions and Practices of Data Sharing in Engineering Education," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 2, p. n2, 2016.[2] L. Perrier, E. Blondal, and H. MacDonald, "The views, perspectives, and experiences of
. “Universities across Virginia Cancel on- Campus Classes to Limit Spread of Coronavirus.” dailypress.com. Daily Press, March 12, 2020. https://www.dailypress.com/news/health/dp-nw-coronavirus-college-preparations- 20200311-z477ideuc5fifodxnxi32pta6y-story.html. 2. Bao, Wei. "COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University." Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, no. 2 (2020): 113-115. 3. Cao, Wenjun, Ziwei Fang, Guoqiang Hou, Mei Han, Xinrong Xu, Jiaxin Dong, and Jianzhong Zheng. "The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China." Psychiatry research (2020): 112934. 4. Horn, Michael. “COVID-19's Ultimate Impact on Online Learning: The Good and the
and Research, vol. 1, S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, and V. L. Vignoles Eds. New York: Springer, 2011, ch. 6, pp. 117-145.[8] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.
sets or interests that are best suited to their lab(s). • We are working on a compact that lays out expectations for both mentors and for mentees. For example, REU participants must attend all scheduled events. • REU participants will have more structured interactions with graduate students in our program through special panels and/or social events.References1. Seyhan, A.A. and C.J. Carini, Are innovation and new technologies in precision medicine paving a new era in patients centric care? 2019. 17(1): p. 114.2. Alexander, A., et al., Scanning the future of medical imaging. 2019. 16(4): p. 501-507.3. Asai, D.J. and C. Bauerle, From HHMI: Doubling down on diversity. 2016. 15(3): p. fe6.4. Page, S.E., The
employmentlandscape. The specific innovation involves providing as an alternative to the current practice (inCarnegie R1 and R2 institutions) of externally peer- reviewed publication(s), with an alternatecapstone requirement: the development of a patentable technology as the capstone event. Yet, theexternal peer-review aspect is preserved, thus maintaining the academic rigor of the PhD programs.These changes are being piloted and tested in a Pathways to Entrepreneurship (PAtENT)program, implemented in multiple STEM departments (Mechanical Engineering, CivilEngineering, Physics and Optical Science, and Chemistry) across the University of North Carolinaat Charlotte (UNCC). The PAtENT program has four overarching goals: 1) to develop an alternateroadmap for
community and having the opportunity to engagein mentoring activities with their peers and their mentors. Within the current study, it wasrecognized that mentees are excited to persist in their current STEM fields and look forward tograduating to pursue a STEM career.Funding Acknowledgement This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1912205. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References 1) Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 2) Bandura, A. (1997
course assignments, projects, assessments, and lab reportsfrom earlier offerings of the course. References[1] A. H. Sapci and H. A. Sapci, "Teaching hands-on informatics skills to future healthinformaticians: a competency framework proposal and analysis of health care informaticscurricula," JMIR Medical Informatics, vol. 8, (1), pp. e15748, 2020.[2] American Medical Informatics Association. Informatics: Research and Practice. 2022:https://amia.org/about-amia/why-informatics/informatics-research-and-practice.[3] S. Ly, F. Runacres and P. Poon, "Journey mapping as a novel approach to healthcare: aqualitative mixed methods study in palliative care," BMC Health Services Research, vol. 21, (1),pp. 915
: http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/mfg-fab.nsf/eng/00201.html[3] W. Poole, “New Program Proposal: Bachelor of Applied Science in ManufacturingEngineering.” University of British Columbia, Faculty of Applied Science, 2018.[4] C. J. Sielmann, “Questionnaire for Evaluation of an Engineering Program – Exhibit 1,Submitted by: University of British Columbia, Manufacturing Engineering Program.” CanadianAccreditation Board, 2021.[5] C. Sielmann, C. Keulen, and S.-F. Hu, “Multi-Campus Teaching In A CanadianEngineering Context: Assessing Presence Using The Coi Survey,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc.CEEA, 2021.[6] R. Hjelsvold and A. Bahmani, “Challenges in repurposing single-campus courses tomulti-campus settings,” Læring Om Læring, vol. 3, no. 1, 2019
characteristics," Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol 3(2), Dec. 2007 [9] K. Nguyen, J.E. Husman, M.J. Borrego, O. Shekhar, "Students' Expectations, Types of Instruction, and Instructor Strategies Predicting Student Response to Active Learning." AERA Online Paper Repository, 2017 [10] M. Gettinger, "Time allocated and time spent relative to time needed for learning as determinants of achievement." Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 77(1), 1985 [11] M. Gettinger "Learning time and retention differences between nondisabled students and students with learning disabilities." Learning Disability Quarterly, vol. 14.3, pgs. 179-189, 1991 [12] L. Deslauriers, L. S. McCarty, K. Miller, K
International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, San Diego, CA, November 2013. 4. L. Guessous, Q. Zou, B. Sangeorzan, L. Smith, L. Yang, X. Wang, J.D. Schall, G. Barber and M. Latcha,“ AERIM Automotive-themed REU Program : Organization, Activities, Outcomes and Lessons Learned,” Paper AC 2001-1309, 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, June 2011. 5. E. Seymour, A.-B Hunter, S. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, T. "Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates: first findings from a three-year study," Sci. Educ., 88, pp. 493-594, 2004. 6. A.W. Astin, What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass., 1993.7. E. T. Pascarella
Scholarship, vol. 11, pp. 1-9, Jan. 2014.[4] American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). “Considerations for COVID- 19 preparedness and response in U.S. schools of nursing,” AACN, March 20, 2020 [Online]. Available: https://www.aacnnursing.org/News-Information/COVID- 19/AACN-Recommendations [Accessed October 1, 2021][5] N. R. Wijesorriya, V. Mishra, P. L. P. Brand & B. K. Rubin, B. K. (2020). “COVID-19 andtelehealth, education, and research adaptions,” Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, vol. 35, pp 38-42, Sept. 2020.[6] C. M. Rutledge, K. Kott, P. A. Schweickert, R. Poston, C. Fowler & T. S. Haney,“Telehealth and eHealth in nurse practitioner training: Current perspectives,” Advances in Medical Education and
Engineering Courses," 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Meeting, 2021.[11] M. Torres and V. González, “Work in Progress: Online Electrical Engineering Laboratories Sessions: Analysis, Challenges, and Border Environment", 2021 ASEE Annual Conference. Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-online-electrical-engineering-laboratories- sessions-analysis-challenges-and-border-environment [Accessed: January 25,2022].[12] S. Dhawan, "Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19-19 Crisis," Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 5-22, June 2020.[13] L. Mishra, T. Gupta, and A. Shree, "Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19-19 pandemic," International Journal of
,Satisfaction with Instructional Materials , and Satisfaction with Research Mentorship on s 5-pointLikert scales (1~5, 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). The complete survey items areincluded in the appendix.Table 1. Measurement Scales Scale (Category) # of Items Scale ML Knowledge 11 1~5: 1= Not at all informed, 5= Very (Information) informed ML Skill 8 1~5, 1 = Not Skillful at all, 5= Very Skillful Overall/General Skill 14 1~5, 1 = Not Skillful at all, 5= Very Skillful Confidence 7 1~5, 1= Not Confident at all, 5=Very
replacement cost. A fine is handed down to the user whodamaged or returned a kit with missing part(s). A replacement fee will be assessed for any kitthat is not returned. Those notes are listed under the loan policies on the inside cover of the kit.Another challenge is introducing new library staff to Arduino due to common turnover in theuser services (circulation) department. To resolve this, the engineering librarian hosts quarterlyworkshops for training new and interested library staff on Arduino kits. This workshop toucheson the checkout policy for the Arduino kits, when to replenish them, and navigating through theArduino libguide.ConclusionThe process of introducing Arduino Library Kits for checkout appears to be off to a great startwith
53: Where did you study abroad? How was this experience? Question 54: I participated in undergraduate research with a faculty member for at least one semester. Question 55: Please select all of the BME workshops you attended at least once. If one of the workshops was selected for Question 55: Free-text response: Question 56: Please share how the workshop(s) were or were not helpful to you so we can improve them. Are there other topics we should cover in workshops? Question 57: Did you use the ECAC’s services during your time as an undergraduate? If “Yes” is selected for
. 573-577, 2013.[4] S. Subhash, and E.A. Cudney, “Gamified Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 87, pp. 192-206, 2018.[5] T. A/L Rajendran, and P.M. Shah, “Students perception of Gamification: The Use of Kahoot,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 773-783, 2020.[6] A. Manzano-Leon, P. Camacho-Lazarraga, M.A. Guerrero-Puerta, L. Guerrero-Puerta, A. Alias, J.M. Aguilar-Parra, and R. Trigueros, “Development and Validation of a Questionnaire on Motivation for Cooperative Playful Learning Strategies,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1-10, 2021.
Figure 10. It was clear that the tensile strengthis linearly proportional with the percentage infill of the specimen. area (m2) Figure 9 Sample tensile specimen datasheet for specimen XT95-1 Tough Force, strain, and stress data with blue data bars (left). Stress-Strain plot (top right). Elastic portion of the Stress-Strain plot (middle right). Modulus of elasticity (E) & ultimate tensile strength (S u). Figure 10 Ultimate Tensile Strength variation with percentage infill for PLA.2. Impact TestResults from the PLA tough specimens can be seen below in the form of a table and scatter plot.The scatter plot helps visually see the linear correlation between infill percentage and specimentoughness
isexpected to use transfer learning to customize one or more pre-trained neural networks fornew classes. The new network(s) should be able to distinguish at least two new classes thatare not included in the pre-trained networks. Heavy coding is not required for this project,but each student needs to learn how to collect their own database and write proper code tore-train the existing network using transfer learning.The deliverable of the project is a working image classifier that can work on Linux,Windows, or Mac OS. Each student also needs to prepare a final project report that includesthe motivation, the implementation details, the achieved goals and discovered issues, alongwith a 10-minutes PowerPoint presentation to explain their project in the
making the rightdecision on the best model to teach the thermodynamics and fluid mechanics, the results of thisstudy will be shared and discussed with the department curriculum committee.References1 W. Dempster, C.K. Lee, J.T. Boyle, “Teaching of Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics using Interactive Learning Methods in Large Classes”, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Quebec Canada, June 16-19, 20022 D. Boettner, S. Norberg, R. Melnyk, J. Highley, M. Rounds, and A. Ö. Arnas, “Teaching the Fundamentals of Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics through an Integrated Systems Approach,” Proceedings of the International Mechanical
; Mantzavinou, A. (2018) Design thinking in development engineering education: a case study oncreating prosthetic and assistive technologies for the developing world. Development Engineering, 3, 166-74.11 Wurdinger, S., Haar, J., Hugg, R., & Bezon, J. (2007). A qualitative study using project-based learning in a main-stream middle school. Improving Schools, 10(2), 150–161.12 Boaler, J. (1998). Alternative approaches to teaching, learning and assessing mathematics. Evaluation and Pro-gram Planning, 21(2), 129–141.Marjorie Letitia Hubbard, PhDDr. Marjorie Letitia Hubbard is a member of the engineering and research faculty at the NorthCarolina School of Science and Math (NCSSM) in Durham, North Carolina. As an engineeringinstructor at NCSSM, Dr