Protocol (CDOP): A quantitative method for characterizing teacher discourse moves in undergraduate STEM learning environments,” PloS One, vol. 14, no. 7, 2019.[6] L. Yang, “Research on Flipped Classroom Online Teaching Under the Background of Epidemic Situation,” International Journal of Education and Economics, vol 3, no. 1, pp. 44-50, 2020.[7] N. J. Washuta, P. Bass, and E. K. Bierman, “Doing the Backflip: Using Classroom Technology to Adapt a Flipped Class to the HyFlex Teaching Model,” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/36992[8] P. R. Griesemer, “Delivering a Hyflex Statics Course in a Flipped Classroom Model
of context and storytelling in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an National Science Foundation (NSF) Early CAREER Award entitled “CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and “Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments grant “Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.” He was named one of ASEE PRISM’s “20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017. Jordan co- developed the STEAM Labs™ program to
and T. G. Southerton, “Teaching robotics by building autonomous mobile robots using the arduino,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–23103, 2014, https://peer.asee.org/23103. [4] M. D. Bedillion, K. H. Muci-Kuchler, and W. M. Nikshi, “An arduino-based hardware plat- form for a mechanical engineering sophomore design course,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–29774, 2018, https://peer.asee.org/29774. [5] M. Daugherity, “Introducing programming and problem solving with arduino-based labo- ratories,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–33016, 2019, https://strategy.asee.org/33016. [6] “Tinkercad,” https://www.tinkercad.com/. [7] “Discord
Grades,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[7] J. Riera, M. Ardid, J. A. Gomez-Tejedor, A. Vidaurre, and J. M. Meseguer-Duenas, “Students’ Perception of Auto-Scored Online Exams in Blended Assessment: Feedback for Improvement,” Educ. XX1, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 79–103, 2018.[8] E. Gehringer, “Online Vs. On Paper Exams,” in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010, p. 15.927.1-19.[9] E. F. Gehringer, A. Menon, and G. Wang, “Tools for Detecting Plagiarism in Online Exams,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021.[10] O. R. Harmon and J. Lambrinos, “Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat?,” J. Econ. Educ., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2008.[11] A. Nigam, R
asmall class supported their individual progress. The feedback that students would be interested incovering additional material and pursuing prep courses for other topics also supports that theyfound these experiences beneficial.Lessons LearnedAcross the 9 iterations of prep course delivery from 2017 to 2021, the following lessons (andtheir subsequent program revisions) were made that may be of interest to instructors aiming todevelop their own learning-in-advance courses: • From Fall 2017 to Spring 2019, course quizzes were given at the start of each lecture with students having 10 minutes of in-class time to complete. However, this reduced the amount of course time to cover content. Therefore, to increase time dedicated for in
Military Academy and an MS and PhD from the University of Michigan. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Saftner spent five years as an engineer officer in the US Army and serving in Missouri, Colorado, Kuwait, and Iraq. His areas of research include beneficial reuse of waste soil material, geotechnical site investigation and characterization, and teaching and learning in engineering education. He currently serves as his Department's Head, an American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) Mentor, and the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Civil Engineering Division Freshman Director.Chris Swan (Dean of Undergraduate Education and Associate Professor) Chris
Impact the Students’ Experience?,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32309. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32309. [3] D. K. Sobek, “Teaching Systematic Layout Planning Using a Problem-Solving Studio Approach,” IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings, pp. 1–6, 2020. [4] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. [5] W. Birch, “Towards a model for problem-based learning,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 73–82, Jan. 1986, doi: 10.1080/03075078612331378471. [6] S
objectives.References[1] Cech, Erin, “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think about Social Injustices,” in Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, New York: Springer, 2013, pp. 67–84.[2] R. Loweth, S. R. Daly, L. Paborsky, S. L. Hoffman, and S. J. Skerlos, “‘You Could Take “Social” Out of Engineering and Be Just Fine’: An Exploration of Engineering Students’ Beliefs About the Social Aspects of Engineering Work,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/you-could-take-social-out-of-engineering-and-be-just-fine-an-explor
level [15, 16].Our project team comprises faculty members from Environmental and Civil Engineering,Chemical and Biological Engineering, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, History andPhilosophy, Political Science, and English. Together, these multidisciplinary facultybrainstormed and discussed the specific knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes desired in asuccessful undergraduate engineering student, without regard to existing course content. Weutilized key references to guide development of the integrated environmental engineeringeducational outcomes. These included: • The seven ABET program outcomes (2019) [17] define requirements for accredited engineering programs and emphasize project-based learning for problem solving and
alloys for nuclear power systems. She joined the School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering at Oregon State University as an Assistant Professor in 2013 and was promoted to Associate Professor in 2019. In 2019 she was awarded the Dean’s Professorship and was also appointed as the Materials Science Interdisciplinary Graduate Program Director. Dr. Tucker has an active research group focused on degradation of materials in extreme environments and alloy development. Her research efforts leverage both modeling and experimental approaches to gain fundamental understanding of materials performance.Milo Koretsky Milo Koretsky (he/him/his) is the McDonnell Family Bridge Professor holding a joint appointment in
roles including Faculty Director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program (2014-2017), Director of the Environmental Engineering program (2006-2010), and ABET Assessment Coordinator for the CEAE Department (2008-2018). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and
educational partnerships with industry benefit students and companies: the clinic program, November 2019, Forbes Magazine.5. Marosi, K., Steinburst, B., Increasing the Retention of Under-Represented Students in Engineering Through Connections with an Industry Advisory Committee, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2012 265.769.1 25.769.6.6. Washington, A., Burge, L., Mejias, M., Jean-Pierre, K., Knox, Q., Improving Undergraduate Student Performance in Computer Science at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) through Industry Partnerships February 2015 Pages 203–206 https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677277.7. Seymour E, Hunter A-B, Laursen SL, DeAntoni T. Establishing the benefits of research experiences for
the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic [28],[29], enrollment has increased at UTD compared to pre-pandemic levels. However, six-yeargraduation rates within ECS remain lower than the university’s average and nationalundergraduate engineering program averages [9].2.2 Exploration of institutional level data and senior exit surveysECS conducted a retention study in Fall 2020 in order to assess current and historical degreeattainment trends and uncover factors that may be hindering students from making degreeprogress. This study has currently examined institutional student data (e.g., enrollment, degreeattainment, math placement, GPA, grades) from 2011 to present and 2019-2020 Senior ExitSurveys. The results of this ongoing analysis indicate the potential
Engineering and Technology. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2020-2021”. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020-2021/#GC3 (accessed Feb. 09, 2022).[2] D. Kember, J. McKay, K. Sinclair, and F. K. Y. Wong, “A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Educ., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 369–379, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1080/02602930701293355.[3] N. Siewiorek, L. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and K. Santelli, “Engineering, reflection and lifelong learning,” in ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Louisville, KY, USA, Jun. 20-23, 2010, pp. 15.499.1
– Part II," in 126th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, 2019.[9] M. C. Lovett, "Making Exams Worth More Than the Grade," in Using Reflection and Metacognition to Improve Student Learning: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy, Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2013, pp. 18-48.[10] C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, New York, NY: Random House, 2006.[11] K. A. Sethares and M. E. Asselin, "Use of Exam Wrapper Metacognitive Strategy to Promote Student Self-Assessment of Learning: An Integrative Review," Nurse Educator, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 37-41, 2022.[12] M. S. Schuler and J. Chung, "Exam Wrapper Use and Metacognition in a Fundamentals Course: Perceptions
2019ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 15-19, 2019. American Society forEngineering Education, 2019.[5] B. Peterson and A. Clark, “PRISM: A Simple Simulation For Introduction Of AssemblyLanguage And Computer Architecture,” in Proceedings of 2010 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 20-23, 2010. American Society for Engineering Education,2010.[6] M. W. Redekopp and G. Ragusa, “Evaluating Flipped Classroom Strategies and Tools forComputer Engineering,” in Proceedings of 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013. American Society for Engineering Education, 2013.[7] F. Yildiz, R. R. Pecen, and K. L. Coogler, “An Industry Related Project-BasedMicrocontroller Course
interactions (FSI): Learn more” [Online]. Available: https://www.engageengineering.org/fsi/whyitworks/learnmore#1[15] C. A. McDonough, “Mentoring early engineering students: Faculty-student interaction as an indicator of climate perception,” Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI, USA, 2016.[16] K. Pakala, D. Bairaktarova, and S. Schauer, “Happy hours are a godsend” In Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, 2019.[17] M. Stickel, S. Hari, and Q. Liu, “The effect of the inverted classroom teaching approach on student/faculty interaction and students’ self-efficacy,” In Proc. of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2014.[18] A. L. Pawley
narrativescripts that are member-checked with participants to ensure narrative accuracy and participantcomfort with the information to be shared. The scripts are then anonymized by the research teamand re-recorded by student actors. We contact faculty to distribute a Narrative DisseminationSurvey (NDS) with embedded audio student narratives, and we assess their influence onincreasing faculty inclusive understandings (see Section 5. Future Work). Finally, we disseminatethe audio narratives through outlets such as podcasts, YouTube, and the American Society forEngineering Education Commission for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ASEE CDEI) website,and we publish written analyses (traditional dissemination) of student narratives to provideinsight into
for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Abstract ASEE 2022 Conference- International Track Developing Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) projects in Engineering EducationBackground: With increasing awareness of the importance of undergraduate students having aglobal experience, institutions and educators have teamed up to provide opportunities forstudents to collaborate with their peers around the globe. Collaborative Online InternationalLearning (COIL) is not new, but it has recently gained traction because of the pandemic, as apromising pedagogical method to deepen the global engagement of students without requiringtravel abroad
ASEE National Engineering Technology Teaching Award and Fredrick J. Berger Award winner.Shawna Thomas (Instructional Assistant Professor)John Michael Moore (Instructional Assistant Professor) (Texas A&MUniversity) Dr. Michael Moore is an instructional assistant professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University. Michael teaches C++ programming, Human Computer Interaction, and a course he developed on Accessible Computing. Michael worked as a certified sign language interpreter while pursuing his graduate degrees. Those experiences working with the Deaf community have motivated his interest in equity for people with disabilities. He now works to be an ally, advocates that
Teaching International, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 374–385, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214.[5] A. Pagano, S. Shehab, and L. Liebenberg, “WIP: Introducing Students to Human-Centered Design in a Design for Manufacturability Course,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Conference, 2020, p. 12.[6] “EAC-Criteria-2020-2021.pdf.”[7] R. Buchanan, “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking,” Design Issues, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 5– 21, 1992.[8] M. Meinel, T. T. Eismann, C. V. Baccarella, S. K. Fixson, and K.-I. Voigt, “Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study,” European Management Journal, p. S0263237320300232, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.emj
Engineering, Industrial and Systems Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. She is an Associate Research Professor and the Assessment and Instructional Support Specialist in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. Her primary research interest include faculty development, the peer review process, the doctoral experience, and the adoption of evidence-based teaching strategies. She is currently serving as the ASEE Educational Research and Methods division Vice Chair of Programs for ASEE 2022.Sam Spiegel Dr. Spiegel is Assistant Vice President for Online Education and was the founding Director, Trefny Innovative Instruction Center at the Colorado School of
, IPv6 Hall of Fame 2019 inductee, and a technology expert for the European Commission. His research focuses on next generation infrastructures and IOT. Dr. Popoviciu completed his Executive MBA at Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dr. Popoviciu is currently an assistant professor at East Carolina University's College of Engineering and Technology, where he teaches and participates in cyberinfrastructure research.Colby Lee Sawyer Colby Sawyer, East Carolina University – Software Developer © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comEnabling Generic Sensing Devices to use LoRa
infrastructure specifically focused on sustainable infrastructure and its cost. Other research interests include engineering education topics. She has been a member of ASEE since 2015 and is currently serving as Program Chair of the Architectural Engineering Division and is the Construction Division Chair.Sanjeev Adhikari Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He completed a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management, from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with 20 years of the academic
processes, Machine Design, Renewable Energy and Additive Manufacturing. His current research interests include Robotics, CIM, Sustainable Manufacturing, Micro Machining, Additive Machining and Engineering & Technology Education. He has published several papers, in these areas, in various national & international conferences and journals. He has worked in heavy and light manufacturing industries manufacturing pumps, motors, and CNC machine tools in the areas of system design, production planning and control and manufacturing. Edinbarough also served in paramilitary forces and in the Indian Air Force. He is a Life Member of the ISTE, a senior life member of the IE (India), a member of the ASEE & SME, and a licensed
’´evaluation evaluation de programme,” 2019, retrieved February 10, 2020 from https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjpe/issue/view/5106/pdf 49.McGill, Snow, et al ASEE 2022 [7] U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Statistics., “Elm application,” 2021, retrieved July 12, 2021 from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/elm.asp. [8] J. Ritchie-Dunham, “From a theory of change to a theory of impact resilience,” 2021, retrieved July 12, 2021 from https://jimritchiedunham.wordpress.com/2016/03/21/from-a- theory-of-change-to-a-theory-of-impact-resilience/. [9] E. Roberts, “A history of capacity challenges in computer science,” Retrieved June
efficacy among engineering TA's," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[6] J. E. Stice, R. M. Felder, D. R. Woods and A. Rugarcia, "The future of engineering education IV," Chemial Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 118-127, 2000.[7] N. T. Buswell, Swimming upstream: Pathways of new engineering faculty at non-R1 institutions, Purdue University, 2017.[8] A. E. Austin, "Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context," The Review of Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 119-144, 2002.[9] A. E. Austin and M. McDaniels, "Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles," J. C. Smart, Higher
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Survey year Figure 3: Course workload over time, as perceived by students. Higher scores indicate more work. 3.0 is equivalent to an “average” course, 5.0 is a “high