interested in approaches that contribute to a more expansive understanding of engineering in sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical consciousness in engineering practice, and the development and implementation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education. He received the NSF CAREER Award for his work on conocimiento in engineering spaces. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reimagining Energy Year 4: Lessons LearnedOverviewThis National Science Foundation (NSF) project focuses on the development of a new, requiredenergy course, “An Integrated Approach to Energy,” for second-year
Paper ID #37255Work-In-Progress: Measuring Systemic Educational Wellnessusing the Eco-STEM Educational Ecosystem Health SurveyCorin L. Bowen (Postdoctoral Researcher) Corin (Corey) Bowen (she/her/hers) is a postdoctoral researcher in the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology at California State University, Los Angeles, where she is working on the NSF-funded Eco-STEM project. Her engineering education research focuses on structural oppression in engineering systems, organizing for equitable change, and developing an agenda of Engineering for the Common Good. She conferred her Ph.D. in aerospace
drawing the failure paths or identifying where onthe tension member or connection the limit states would apply.To assist in student comprehension, the authors have participated in an undergraduate mentoredresearch project focused on creating a series of steel connection test samples, with each samplefailing in one of the possible limit states outlined in the AISC 360-16 Specification for StructuralSteel Buildings. Limit states include yielding, fracture, block shear, bolt shear, shear tearout andbolt bearing. A spreadsheet that determines the controlling limit state, CAD drawings, and videosof each test sample are available for use in Steel Design courses.MotivationIn introductory steel design courses, numerous limit states must be covered to
for the Department of Sustainability at Central Carolina Community College in Pittsboro, North Carolina. He has been with CCCC since 2006 serving as a curriculum developer and instructor prior to taking the position as Department Chair. Andrew also served as the Director for the North Carolina Community College System’s Energy Curriculum Improvement Project (Energy CIP) from 2010 to 2012. Andrew is currently involved in two National Science Foundation funded projects. He serves as the Principle Investigator for a National Science Foundation project focused on training technicians for jobs in High Performance Construction trades. He is also a Co-Principle Investigator for the CREATE (Center for Renewable Energy Advanced
Nations General Assembly, 2010), which is acompelling guiding principle for engineering projects related to water (See also Wyndham andHarris, 2014). Finally, it should be noted that whereas human rights approaches could differ intheir conceptualization, some common principles can be distinguished; these include universality,the interdependence of rights, accountability, participation, non-discrimination, and empowerment(Sano & Hansen, 2006). All such principles are well-aligned with the principles of engineering forhuman rights, presented in the next section.Previous efforts to Incorporate Human Rights into Engineering Education The discussion of Human Rights in the context of engineering has been increasing in thepast decade. A
sciences(AMDS). The scales were developed as part of a larger National Science Foundation (NSF) fundedproject with the goal of creating a set of online courses and modules about AMDS. These coursesand modules are intended to be completed by a variety of learners, including community-collegestudents, 4-year university students, industry professionals, and informal learners who are lookingto advance their skills. The scales will ultimately be used as measures to gauge the impact of theinstructional activities being created as part of the NSF project. This paper will describe how thescales were developed and provide information on preliminary psychometric properties andvalidity evidence. We anticipate that individuals interested in how to assess the
REU, USDA REEU, and ED MSEIP projects. He received his doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering from Texas Tech University in 2009.David RamirezTushar Sinha (Associate Professor)Francisco Haces Haces FernandezChristine Reiser Robbins (Associate Professor of Anthropology)Marisol PirozzoloMohammad Omar AzayzehAlberto Anthony Aguirre (student)Danielle Maynard Danielle Maynard is a master's student studying environmental engineering at Texas A&M-Kingsville. She graduated with her undergraduate degree in civil engineering at Texas Tech University in May 2021. She is interested in flood modeling, risk analysis and assessment, and mitigation via low impact development strategies.Yara Green-Jordanjianhong Ren (Professor)Mariee
staff collaborates with university-wide programs topromote STEM education and contribute to the university’s quality enhancement plan (QEP). Thepaper shares details regarding faculty and student involvement, the development of preparatorycourses, institution-wide resources, and student outcomes from the project with the academiccommunity.IntroductionThe STEM Center at SHSU seeks to increase the number and quality of STEM graduates byestablishing a strong foundation for learning using innovative teaching practices, supportingstudents in finding research and internship opportunities, and building lifelong skills needed foradvancement and leadership in STEM careers. In 2012, the President’s Council of Advisors onScience and Technology (PCAST
Paper ID #37013Employer and Student Mismatch in Early-Career SkillDevelopmentAlyson Grace Eggleston Dr. Alyson Eggleston is a cognitive linguist specializing in the impact our speech has on the way we think and solve problems. She is the founding Director of Technical Communication at The Citadel, and has developed a project-based technical communication course that serves over 14 STEM majors and several degree programs in the social sciences. She is also acting Residential Fellow for the Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching, Learning, and Distance Education, and in this role regularly mentors faculty
also can support researcher profiles. So far, 37 institutions haveadopted Esploro [1]. Although Digital Measures has some similar features in managing facultyresearch activities, Esploro is the product which the University Libraries has been activelyinvolved in product development. The following two subsections would be a narrative of theUniversity Libraries partnership with Esploro’s vender, Ex Libris, and the project establishmentof College of Engineering faculty profiles.University Libraries’ Partnership with Ex LibrisIn November 2018, the University Libraries signed on with Ex Libris as an early adopter ofEsploro, having previously been a development partner for the product, beginning June 2017.We formed an implementation team consisting
undergraduate student studying Aerospace and Mechanical engineering. I contribute to two separate research projects and participate in multiple student organizations. My interest include flight dynamics, aircraft design, propulsions (aircraft and rocketry), and bringing positive opportunities to others.Antonio Garcia (Associate Dean of Engineering) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Engineering Education Enrichment (e3) Initiative: A Co-Curricular Program Intended to Improve Persistence and Career Success for Low-Income and First-Generation Engineering StudentsAbstract
of mathematical models in design and analysis [3]. In professional practice, engineersneed to make numerous decisions in order to mathematize an object or system into a model andto evaluate their decisions or the model’s outputs. Research has shown expertise to be animportant component of engineering judgment [3], [4]. While this means that students cannotpossess complete engineering judgment by the end of their undergraduate education, we stillbelieve that students need to begin engaging in this kind of decision-making early in theireducation. This will allow students to better connect their engineering science courses with theiropen-ended capstone design projects, project teams, and their future engineering career.Our research team has
in engineering education and graduate student success, and has been recognized as a Master Facilitator by the National Research Mentor Network. She is also co-PI for two NSF-funded projects that enhance graduate student success: one is a professional development program offering training in communication, teamwork, leadership, and mentoring skills for interdisciplinary work; the other is a joint effort with Spelman College (a historically black institution serving women) to expand opportunities and increase diversity in STEM by developing a five-year BS+MS program. Dr. Luchini-Colbry also volunteers as the Director of the Engineering Futures Program of Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, which provides
study also carries out a statistical analysis of 5-year student performance based on weekly Labs, Projects and Mid-Terms using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The result shows the existence of differences in the yearly average performance of students. Post Hoc Tukey’s pairwise multiple comparison tests reveals consistency in performance up to the period of the semester where possible dropouts would have occurred. Students’ delay in tackling challenging projects also accounts for the significant differences in the mean scores.IntroductionTime plays an important role in decision making in every human endeavor – from personal tobusiness/management decisions. In these, the education sector is not left out. Hence, it is
institutional structures todetermine how teaching can span across disciplines and minimize the silo effect of academicdepartments/individual courses.To address these concerns, a National Science Foundation Improving Undergraduate STEMEducation project team is working toward developing a transformed, authenticallytransdisciplinary, and scalable educational model [referred to as the Mission, Meaning, Making(M3) model] for undergraduate learning focused on democratizing the practice of innovation. Toachieve this task, the project team is testing and refining a model to guide the transformation oftraditional undergraduate learning experiences to span academics silos. This educational modelinvolves a) co-teaching and co-learning from faculty and students
computer science courses; this resulted in an overallimprovement in student opinion toward programming and Jupyter notebooks. These studiessuggest that introducing computational tools can serve as a focal point for an effectivemodernization of a linear algebra course, while also providing a foundation for students’ futurecomputational endeavors.The present project proposed a new linear algebra course, called the Computational course in thefollowing, targeted to freshmen and sophomores and including the use of modern computationaltools such as Python. The specific objectives were the following: (1) establish a strongerintegration of basic programming knowledge into the general engineering curriculum; (2)introduce computational exercises that solve
(NSF)Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program in 2017 (furtherdescribed in Grohs et al. [10]). The partnership was initiated by researchers at Virginia Tech, alarge, R1, land-grant institution situated in Appalachia and involved middle school teachers andindustry partners working in three counties near the institution (two in Appalachia and onebordering Appalachia per the defined map from the Appalachian Regional Commission). Thepartnership focused on connecting teachers and working engineers in each county to integrateengineering into existing science curriculum as a way to expose students to engineering whilestill meeting the required state standards of learning. The project initially started working
organized by professional organizations [6]. Examples of largenationwide competitions include the Human Powered Vehicle Challenge sponsored by theAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineering [7], the Concrete Canoe Competition sponsored bythe American Society of Civil Engineering [8] and IEEEXtreme Coding Competition by theInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers [9]. The American Society for Composites hasbeen holding a global student simulation challenge to encourage students to take up careers inaerospace fields [10]. Some of these large national competitions requires a significant amount ofinstitutional support in terms of both spaces for construction and costs for the project and travel[11]. Other ways to promote CBL is through a
practice and teach biomimetics.Jeffrey H Rosen (Program Director)Julia Varnedoe (Research Associate II) Julia Varnedoe is a Research Associate II for the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC) at Georgia Tech. She works with the curriculum development team to create innovative programs that address the needs of students and teachers in the K-12 community. Current projects include the NSF funded BIRDEE (Biologically Inspired Design for Engineering Education) curriculum, STEM-ID, and K-12 InVenture Prize. Prior to joining Georgia Tech, she had a successful career in marketing communications for Delta Air Lines, and has spent the past 14 years as an educator. Varnedoe graduated with a B.S
toattract a multidisciplinary group of students to inspire discussion and different ways ofthinking around the political, cultural, and technical components of a near-zerocarbon energy future. We demonstrate that students not only learned the material, but also gaineda greater appreciation for the climate crisis and how to engineer for sustainability. Coursecontent and structure was aimed to be as interactive as possible, including extensive in-classdiscussion activities as well as two large group projects where students presented their findingsto the class. We intentionally incorporated content and student activities on social equity,environmental justice, and the unequal impacts of a changing climate. Assessment was viastudent course evaluations
fivecompetencies that prepare them to solve these challenges. Most incoming scholars lackexperience in identifying specific research mentors. This program assists with that task. Throughthe first competency, also known as talent, the scholars engage in hands-on projects to helpdesign innovative solutions through deep immersion in an academically rigorous environment.This paper describes the improvement efforts post COVID-19 to the course goals, structures,designs, and targeted recruitment efforts for the GCSP during the face-to-face and online coursedelivery, focusing on engineering research and introducing interested students to how to identifya research topic and choose a mentor. In addition, it includes reflections and insights gainedfrom the course
-question surveyabout team development stages, followed by qualitative analysis of team-based written artifacts.Available written artifacts included the following: a team contract, developed by the team during Week 4 of the semester; a CATME® peer review, administered online during Weeks 7 and 8; team-based commentary about the results of the team development survey, noting similarities and differences among team members’ results, as part of a project and team status update submitted during Week 12; team-based commentary about additional progress toward team development since Week 12, as part of the final project and team status update submitted during Week 15, and a final CATME® peer review
andresources that they bring to the school and community [9].The Program: IMAGINE Family STEM NightsIMAGINE Family STEM Nights engages underrepresented 5th-8th graders and their families inenriching engineering design projects and discussions. This initiative began with a collaborativepartnership between the University of Illinois’ Grainger College of Engineering, and thecommunity-impact organization, DREAAM which serves predominantly Black and low-incomeyouth. Informed by the theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy [10], this initiative providesopportunities for students to bring their full selves to the STEM learning, providing opportunitiesfor choice and self-expression, appreciation of cultural contributions and assets, and criticalawareness of
Paper ID #37855FUTURE OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING,MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, AND MACHINISTROLES FOR INDUSTRY 4.0Erin Peiffer Erin Peiffer is Research Manager with Engineering for Change (E4C) where she supports an international cohort of Fellows completing research and design projects at the intersection of engineering, sustainability, and global development with partners across academic institutions, non-profits, multilateral organizations, private sector businesses, and government agencies. Erin graduated from the University of Dayton with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2017 and a M.S. in Renewable and
newpedagogies and course materials. For graduate students, we developed an engineering coursefocused on engineering and science writing practices and pedagogies.This paper focuses on one key finding from our analysis: discussions about writing practicesinvolving people from different disciplines often involve irregular and sporadic bumpinessthrough which foundational changes can emerge. We call this phenomenon discursiveturbulence. In our experience, signs of discursive turbulence include affective intensity and co-existing contradictory beliefs. We share four examples to illustrate ways in which discursiveturbulence appears, drawn from people with varying degrees and types of engagement with ourtransdisciplinary work: i) project team members, ii) a
the transfer outcomes from two-year to four-year schools. This grantprovides scholarship support for two cohorts of students, one starting their engineering studies inFall 2020 and the other starting their engineering studies in Fall 2021. Each cohort was to becomprised of 40 students including 20 students at ECU and 20 students divided among the threepartnering community colleges. In addition to supporting student scholarships, this grantsupported the establishment of new student support mechanisms and enhancement of existingsupport systems on each campus. This project involved the creation of a faculty mentoringprogram, designing a summer bridge program, establishing a textbook lending library, andenhancing activities for students in a
A. Middlebrooks Award from the Geo-Institute, Collingwood Prize from ASCE, National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, U.S. Society of Dams Scholarship, and Dwight D. Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship twice. Dr. Ajmera has delivered over 20 invited presentations. As an Assistant Professor, she has supervised over 100 high school, community college, undergraduate and graduate students on various research projects. She serves as President of the North Dakota Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers and a Councilor in the Engineering Division of the Council on Undergraduate Research and serves as their representative for the National Conferences on Undergraduate Research (NCUR) Oversight
Paper ID #38294Breaking Boundaries: An Organized Revolution for theProfessional Formation of Electrical EngineersChris S Ferekides (Associate Professor) Chris S. Ferekides received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of South Florida. He has been a faculty member in the Electrical Engineering Department since 1992. He is currently service as the department chair, and is the principal investigator of a NSF Funded RED Project that addresses the professional formation of electrical engineering students. His research is in the areas of electronic materials with a focus on photovoltaics.Carol
Expanding Structural Engineering Education through Virtual RealityAbstractStructural Engineering is an abstract field of study that relies heavily on students’ ability tovisualize. Due to the scale of structural projects (e.g. bridges, buildings), it is not possible toprovide students hands-on experiences manipulating and handling structural elements. Bringingstudents to the construction site is one of the most effective ways of reinforcing the subject matteras well as instilling a sense of awe and motivation for academic progress. However, the schedulingof field trips is very difficult due to students’ academic and work schedules along with changes insite access due to COVID-19. San Francisco State University’s Virtual Reality EngineeringProgram
faculty to assess leadership development. As many capstone courses have a goalof transitioning students from an educational setting to an industry one [11][12], leadership iswell-situated as an outcome of this course. Of the varying departments who teach capstonedesign, mechanical engineering has a tradition of having students work on projects identified byindustry or community project sponsors, creating an authentic learning experience that is idealfor development of leadership skills [13].BackgroundUniversity students gain leadership skills through a myriad of experiences from pre-college andthroughout their college curricular and extracurricular involvement [14][15]. In a largequantitative study, Schell et al. found three college experiences