.7. Acknowledgements The author thanks the reviewers for several important comments that led to severalspecific improvements, and to Mr. Martinson who carefully reviewed the paper and providedvery useful suggestions. Special thanks to Dr. Brittanney Adelmann, the Calculus class instructorwho allowed to remotely present the material to students, and to assess the presentation using ananonymous questionnaire. Special thanks to Mr. Juan Yepes for his help in visualizing theassessment results.8. References[1] T. Goldfinch, A. L. Carew, and T.J. McCarthy, “Improving Learning in EngineeringMechanics: The Significance of Understanding Causes of Poor Performance,” in Proceedings ofthe 2008 AAEE Conference, 2008.[2] S. Baker and L. Talley
Director of Qeexo Week 8 - 15 Term Project (& ML Contest) Providing technical seminar and remote Q&A ▪ Topic selection - presentation sessions by engineering staff of Qeexo in ▪ Hands-on project development technical areas such as SW Installation and ▪ Final presentation Issue Resolutions.Term Project Description(s)Class term projects requested students to search for and choose project topics which could applyembedded ML to solve the relevant engineering problem(s). Term projects included three mainparts: Part I – ML Project Planning/Framing, Part II – ML Project Implementation, and Part III –Report and Presentation. Along with the course schedule, the major project
Activities Druing the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advances in Engineering Education, 2020. 8(4).[7] Benabdallah, G., et al. Remote learners, home makers: How digital fabrication was taught online during a pandemic. in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2021.[8] Boll, S., et al., Making, together, alone: Experiences from teaching a hardware-oriented course remotely. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2020. 19(04): p. 35-41.[9] Galaleldin, M., et al., The impact of makerspaces on engineering education. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2016.[10] Vossoughi, S., P.K. Hooper, and M. Escude, Making Through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward
-x.[9] S. Yu and C. Levesque-Bristol, “A cross-classified path analysis of the self-determination theory model on the situational, individual and classroom levels in college education,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, no. March, p. 101857, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101857.[10] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 54–67, 2000, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.[11] H. J. Cho, C. Levesque-Bristol, and M. Yough, “How autonomy-supportive learning environments promote Asian international students’ academic adjustment: a self- determination theory perspective,” Learn. Environ. Res
College of Technology)Diana Samaroo Diana Samaroo is a Professor in the Chemistry Department at NYC College of Technology in Brooklyn, New York. She has experience in curricular and program development, as well as administration as the Chairperson of the Chemistry Department for numerous years. She has mentored undergraduates under the support of Emerging and Honors Scholars program, CUNY Service Corps, Louis-Stokes for Alliance Minority Participation (LS-AMP) and the Black Male Initiative programs. She serves as co-PI on several federal grants, which include NSF S-STEM and NSF HSI-IUSE grants. With a doctoral degree in Biochemistry, Dr. Samaroo’s research interests include drug discovery, therapeutics and
italics in lists are used to indicate direct quotations from theidentified source.References[1] P.-D. Shen, T.-H. Lee, and C.-W. Tsai, “Applying Web-Enabled Problem-Based Learning and Self-Regulated Learning to Enhance Computing Skills of Taiwan’s Vocational Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study of a Short-Term Module,” Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2007.[2] C.-W. Tsai, T.-H. Lee, and P.-D. Shen, “Developing long-term computing skills among low-achieving students via web-enabled problem-based learning and self-regulated learning,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 121–132, May 2013, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2012.760873.[3] E. M. Al-Madi, S. L. Celur, and M. Nasim, “Effectiveness
mediator and serves as an ignitertowards behaviors and actions to counter the HC [2]. SA is considered an outcome of theframework where an action (negative, positive, or none) is taken [2]. Out of these, HCA isconsidered the most important factor, in that without its initiating role, no messages orinformation transmitted by a system, structure, or individual(s) can be intercepted or uncovered.We argue that the “task of enabling people to understand what motivates such interference isperhaps even more important” [17, p. 177] than identifying the interference itself. An early study was conducted by Villanueva et al., [6] to explore the perspectives of over200 undergraduate students, graduate students, and faculty when asked about their
identified as a tool of high potential in improving the learning process, as can be used from students to review topics, answer questions on parts that might missed in real time and deepen their understanding through repetition.References[1] S. Asgari, J. Trajkovic, M. Rahmani, W. Zhang, R. C. Lo, and A. Sciortino, "An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 4, p. e0250041, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250041.[2] C. Wang, Z. Cheng, X.-G. Yue, and M. McAleer, "Risk Management of COVID-19 by Universities in China," Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 13, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.3390/jrfm13020036.[3] Z. H. Khan and M. I. Abid
(2), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000360[3] C. E. Holles (ed.), Nature and Human Values: A Student Guidebook, 4th Edition. Plymouth, MI: Hayden-McNeil, 2018.[4] Southern Poverty Law Center, Garrett Hardin, [Online]. Available: https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/garrett-hardin[5] J. Solomon, “The Witness.” [Film]. New York: Five More Minutes Production, 2015.[6] S. Woodson, “Introduction to Ethics.” [Lecture]. Golden, CO. Colorado School of Mines, 2020.[7] M. Sandel, “Are There Some Things That Money Shouldn’t Be Able to Buy?” Oxford, England: Oxford Union, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMg9Gjz8PKs[8] M. Sandel, “Justice
, M. K. et al. Making a Difference in Science Education The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs. Am Educ Res J 50, 683–713 (2013). 2. Lopatto, D., Creating effective undergraduate research programs in science: the transformation from student to scientist (eds. Taraban, R. & Blanton, R. L.) 112–132 (Teachers College Press, 2008).3. Lopatto, D., Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions and Active Learning. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 297–306 (2007).4. S. H. Russell et al., “Benefits of undergraduate research experiences,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5824, pp. 548-549, Apr., 2007.5. M. C. Linn et al., “Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities,” Science, vol. 347, no. 6222
researchexperience(s). These results reveal a highly favorable opinion of the overall student experience.The level of satisfaction was the most positive indicator, with 85% of respondents expressingthat they were very satisfied with this experience. Across all three questions, just one responseindicated a negative opinion of summer research as a learning experience. As shown in Table 5,one respondent selected “Well, it was better than working just for a salary, but I don't think Ilearned a lot.”Table 3. Student Expectations of Research Experience Q: Think about the expectations you had about the research experience before it began. Use the scale below to evaluate your current feelings. The experience was worse than I expected
and Investment Attraction”(ISPCBC 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press.McGunagle, D. and Zizka, L. (2020) Employability skills for 21st-century STEM students: theemployers' perspective. Higher education, skills and work-based learning.Morse, S., Morse, A., Uddameri, V. and Ernst, D. (2015) The Impact of Reducing Numerical Methodsand Program Courses on Undergraduate Peformance. Computers in Education Journal, ASEE, pp.82-89.NAE. (2017) NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering. National Academy of Engineering Press.Available online: https://www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=187214 (Access date 02/15/2022).Nginx (2022) – Nginx Reverse Proxy Documentation - https://docs.nginx.com/nginx/admin-guide/web-server/reverse-proxy
with respect to student-instructorinteractions in the course.Students across all sections on average agreed with the statement, “I felt that my lab instructor(s)wanted me to succeed.” In the ASP lab section, all respondents (100%) agreed with thisstatement, compared with 76% of ASP-General students and 87% of non-ASP students. Thissuggests that while the course instructors have been effective across the board in communicatingtheir support of students, this was particularly true in the ASP lab.In addition, students in the ASP lab sections were more likely to agree with the statement “I feltvalued as an individual in lab section,” with 91% agreeing with this statement, compared withonly 31% of ASP-General students and 63% among non-ASP students
. The criteria for a student to be admitted to the program include the high schoolgrade point average, proficiency in English (TOEFL), the score on the UDEM entrance exam, and an interview for theverification of interest and explanation of the honors program. Admitted students are asked to submit a letter signed bytheir parents in which they must commit to supporting their children when they go to NUT, because they must pay tuitionthere (which is coincidentally very similar to UDEM´s tuition).The first Japanese language teachers arrived in fall 2007. NUT also sent special Japanese language computers, books,dictionaries, and instrumentation for the program.During spring 2008, NUT asked UDEM to receive two graduate students from NUT (one from the
, Austria.Eric Christian Menard Eric Menard is an undergraduate automotive engineering student at the University of Applied Sciences Joanneum Graz. He is partaking in the formula student program to develop electric racing vehicles. Previously he was a student at the higher technical institute Lastenstraße in Carinthia (Austria) where he graduated in the field of electrical engineering.Robert Poetsch Robert Poetsch is currently studying Automotive Engineering at the University of Applied Sciences Joanneum in Graz. Before this he graduated in electronics and IT from the Higher Technical College in Mödling.Christian J. Steinmann Christian Steinmann is manager of HM&S IT-Consulting and provides services for Automotive SPiCE
optimization and refinement is an ongoing process andwe hope that by sharing our early findings and thought processes that we can spark criticalconversations about better ways to understand student experiences and learning related to socialjustice and engineering. ReferencesAjzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., … Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59–64.Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.Cech, E. A. (2013). Ideological wage
andtechnicians with SCADA knowledge and expertise to advance the clean energy sector.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation Department of UndergraduateEducation Award #s 1600934, 1901852, and 2000714. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. A. Boyer. SCADA: Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition. International Society ofAutomation, 2009.[2] D. Bailey, and E. Wright. Practical SCADA for industry. Elsevier, 2003.[3]. C. Dumitru and A. Gligor. SCADA Based Software for Renewable Energy ManagementSystem. Procedia Economics and Finance, volume 3, pages 262–267
yearprevious also did not show an increase in average response to these two questions.Despite the lack of gains in student self-efficacy, there did seem to be positive impact fromparticipation in the dual enrollment courses in terms of the students’ perception of the impact ofthe courses and in career interest. In response to the retrospective statement on the end-of-coursesurvey, “My iDRAW course(s) have helped prepare me for college,” the average studentresponse was 3.87, where 4 corresponds to Agree and 3 to Neutral. The students’ averageresponse to the statement, “My iDRAW course(s) have increased my interest in a STEM career,”was 3.6, which also indicates a modest positive impact. Comparing the pre- and post-surveyresponses to the related
Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India (2001). Dr. Nandy had served as a Co-Principal Investigator of an NSF S-STEM Project, and as the Principal- Investigator of an NSF IUSE project. Dr. Nandy is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), and American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Highly Integrated and Successful Approach to Program Development and Implementation of Accreditation Strategies for an Engineering Technology ProgramAbstractThe accreditation strategies and efforts are often completely disregarded or overlooked
multipleattempts to complete any given assessment, largely due to the high bar required of them beforemastery was awarded, but that overall grades were nearly identical to those under the traditionalcourse model. This indicated that the new framework was not impacting the grade distribution but wasbolstering student learning. It was also demonstrated that scores on daily work tasks, despite being aminimal contribution to the course grade, were nonetheless strongly correlated with the overall grade(Pearson Correlation = 0.827, N = 84). Additional work is needed to determine causality in thisrelationship. Finally, student perceptions of the course were presented along with somecontextualization and interpretation from the instructors.References 1. S. A
education through problem definition,” U. St. Thomas LJ, 5, 2008.[4] N. N. Kellam, S. G. Karen and J. Walther, "Narrative Analysis in Engineering Education Research: Exploring Ways of Constructing Narratives to Have Resonance with the Reader and Critical Research Implications," Association for Engineering Education - Engineering Library Division Papers, pp. 26.1184.1-26.1184.20, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24521.[5] S. Secules, A. Gupta, A. Elby, and E. Tanu, "Supporting the Narrative Agency of a Marginalized Engineering Student," J Eng Educ, vol. 107, (2), pp. 186-218, 2018.[6] A. L. Pawley and C. M. L. Phillips, “From the mouths of students: Two illustrations of narrative analysis to
contributing factor to my ongoing success and enrollment. I know that I’ll go onto have a successful career and give back to my local communities and the greater society as awhole because of the care and support I have received. I look forward to being in a positionwhen I may pay the favor forwards to others.Student 2’s narrative also highlights the benefits of having a “campground of community” andspecifically describes the community as including faculty, staff, clients from industry projects,alumni mentors, and peers. Additionally, this student included an awareness that they are also acontributor to the “campground of community” for other students. Through these thoughts, thestudent emphasized receiving support in all parts of their whole self
pedagogy: “Organized! Materials are handed out on time! Instructions are helpful and accurate!” “In my opinion, all features of this course were the best because everything is connected tightly with each other. Lectures give you a heads up to understand the project(s), activities, and assignments that we will be doing in the current and next week.” “This course is organized well.”Additionally, more in-person, guided work sessions are offered. One example is an in-personworkshop with ECE’s Academic Advisors the week before the ECE Roadmap is due, a majorassignment that guides students through the development of a four-year academic planincorporating thread selection, course planning, co-curricular interests, and
. Ehlert, H. B. Brotherton, C. E. Brawner, and M. K. Orr, “Revisiting the Definition of Overpersistence,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2021, no. 1745347, pp. 1–8.[3] M. K. Orr, K. M. Ehlert, M. Rucks, and M. Desselles, “Towards the Development of a Revised Decision-Making Competency Instrument,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[4] K. M. Ehlert, M. L. Rucks, B. A. Martin, M. Desselles, S. J. Grigg, and M. K. Orr, “Expanding and Refining a Decision-Making Competency Inventory for Undergraduate Engineering Students,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2019.[5] H. B. Brotherton, J. Manning, and M. K. Orr
Paper ID #38392CAREER: Disrupting the Status Quo Regarding Who Gets tobe an Engineer -- Insights from Year 1Jeremi S London (Assistant Professor) Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech Chair of ASEE's CDEI during the Year of Impact on Racial EquityBrianna McIntyre Dr. Brianna Benedict McIntyre is a research associate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She earned her Bachelor's and Master's of Science in Industrial and Systems Engineering from North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Her research focuses on understanding how hybrid spaces influence
are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] PricewaterhouseCoopers, “Blind spots,” PwC. [Online]. Available:https://www.pwc.com/us/en/about-us/blind-spots.html.
) parent, starter of crochet projects, lecturerTrevion S Henderson (Assistant Professor) Trevion Henderson is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and STEM Education at Tufts University.Rebecca L Matz (Research Scientist) Becky Matz is a Research Scientist on the Research & Development team at the Center for Academic Innovation at the University of Michigan. She directs and supports research projects across CAI’s portfolio of educational technologies. Becky has research experience in assessing the efficacy of software tools that support student learning and success, analyzing quantitative equity disparities in STEM courses across institutions, and developing interdisciplinary activities for introductory
outcomes of lab report writing but therewere areas of concern that could be improved upon to help current and future students presenttheir findings more professionally and efficiently.ECE 411 is an outlier in that only Outcome 8 (appropriate genre conventions) is included in labassignments. This is likely because all ECE 411’s labs are assigned from a lab manual providedby the manufacturer of the equipment used by the students in the lab. The instructor providesminimal additional guidance.3.3 Analysis of lab report assessmentsEach lab course’s lab instructional materials were analyzed to investigate how the student labreports are evaluated. As in Section 3.2, we use the nine lab report writing outcomes in Table 4for the analysis. Table 11 presents