Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Technical Session 1: Library Services

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qianjin Zhang, The University of Iowa; Kari Kozak, The University of Iowa; James Cox, The University of Iowa; Sara Scheib, The University of Iowa; Wendy Robertson, The University of Iowa; Amanda Bartel, The University of Iowa

/esploro-research-services-platform/esploro-customer-community/ (accessed March 21, 2022).[2] A. Martin-Martin, M. Thelwall, E. Orduna-Malea, and E. D. Lopez-Cozar, "Google Scholar,Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: Amultidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations," (in English), Scientometrics, vol. 126,no. 1, pp. 871-906, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4.[3] S. Ritchie, K. Banyas, and C. Sevin, "A comparison of selected bibliographic database searchretrieval for agricultural information," Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no. 93,2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.29173/istl48.[4] E. D. Lopez-Cozar, E. Orduna-Malea, and A. Martin-Martin, "Google Scholar as a

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauri Olivier, Villanova University; Megan Kempf; Rick Stumpf, Villanova University

, passions, ideas they might have, etc.What is one thing is they have learned so far that they want to learn more about--something thathas struck them as interesting and engaging.Ask them how their teamwork is going: what step are they on in the workbook? What chapter(s)did they read in the course textbook? Any updates on their project idea?Ask them if they have any questions for you (as alluded to above, this should be a part of everyteam meeting).Snip of course schedule for Weeks 1-4:References[1] J. E. Wilbanks, "Mentoring and Entrepreneurship: Examining the Potential for Entrepreneurship Education and for Aspiring New Entrepreneurs," Journal of Small Business Strategy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 93-101, 2015.[2] E. St-Jean, "Mentor functions for

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Demos and Interactives

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brendan Smith, Loyola Marymount University

*,” 1996.[2] I. Uyanik and B. Catalbas, “A low-cost feedback control systems laboratory setup via Arduino–Simulink interface,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 718–726, May 2018, doi: 10.1002/cae.21917.[3] G. C. Goodwin, A. M. Medioli, W. Sher, L. B. Vlacic, and J. S. Welsh, “Emulation-based virtual laboratories: A low-cost alternative to physical experiments in control engineering education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 48–55, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TE.2010.2043434.[4] N. Nise et al., Control Systems Engineering 7th Edition, vol. 7th. 2014.[5] K. Ogata and J. W. Brewer, “Modern Control Engineering,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - Innovative Teaching Strategies II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ariful Bhuiyan; Jana Willis; Roberto Dugnani; Felipe Trujillo-Wheeler, University of Houston - Clear Lake

integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment,” Computers & Education, (2001), 163-178, 37Perkins, Katherine; Adams, Wendy; Dubson, Michael; Finkelstein, Noah; Finkelstein, Noah ; Reid, Sam; Wieman, Carl ; LeMaster, Ron , “PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics,” The Physics Teacher, (2006), 18-23, 44(1)Pratt, Clara C ; McGuigan, William M ; Katzev, Aphra R ,“Measuring program outcomes: using retrospective pretest methodology,” The American Journal of Evaluation, (2000), 341- 349, 21(3)Rockwell, S. Kay , Kohn, Harriet , “Post-Then-Pre Evaluation,” Journal of Extension, (1989), 19-21, 27(2)Samia Khan, Samia, “New Pedagogies on Teaching Science with

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corinne Mowrey, University of Dayton; Raymond Smith, East Carolina University; Henry Lester, University of Dayton; Khalid Zouhri, University of Dayton; Jacob Cress, University of Dayton; Carson Running, University of Dayton; Kayla Nulph, University of Dayton

how different question types influenced both time to complete an examand exam performance by classifying each problem on every exam according to the followingfive question types.• Calculation – questions that require the student to calculate a value as the solution to the problem.• Multiple Choice & True/False – questions that offer the student the ability to select the correct answer(s) from a defined list.• Short Answer – questions that require the student to explain a concept, describe a scenario, or set up a problem without solving it.• Software – questions that require the student to solve a problem using software taught as part of the course. For this analysis, the software used in exams was Microsoft Excel.• Drawing

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 4 - Global South Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rodrigo Martinez-Duarte; Magda Guerra-Ayala; Jaime Molina-Verdugo, ITESO University

program.References1. Holland, S.; Gaston, K.; Gomes, J. Critical success factors for cross-functional teamwork in new product development. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2000, 2, 231–259, doi:10.1111/1468- 2370.00040.2. Mengoni, M.; Germani, M.; Peruzzini, M.; Mandolini, M. Supporting virtual teamwork in Collaborative Product Development. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 2011, 15, 90–114, doi:10.1504/IJPD.2011.043663.3. Glick, N.D. The relationship between cross cultural experience and training, and leader effectiveness in the US Foreign Service. Int. J. Cross Cult. Manag. 2002, 2, 339–356, doi:10.1177/147059580223004.4. Culture at Work, The value of intercultural skills in the workplace; 2013;5. What is COIL Available online: https

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Denise Simmons, University of Florida

the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, J. C. Smart, Ed. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2006, pp. 397–456.[9] A. K. Bragg, “The socialization process in higher education,” Am. Assoc. for Higher Ed., Washington, DC, ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 7, 1976.[10] S. K. Gardner, “Faculty perspectives on doctoral student socialization in five disciplines,” International Journal of Doctoral Studies, vol. 5, pp. 39–53, 2010.[11] J. C. Weidman, D. J. Twale, and E. L. Stein, Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students in Higher Education: A Perilous Passage? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2001.[12] J. C. Weidman and E. L. Stein

Conference Session

Remediation and Curricular Changes to Improve Student Learning and Outcomes

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allen Guest, Clemson University; Jason Brown

All African All URMa in American in All Females a All URM in Calculus I, Calculus I, in Calculus Calculus I, Fall 2017 Fall 2017 I, Fall 2017 Population Fall 2017 with SAT with SAT with SAT Final Final Final Final Dependent Variable Average Average Average Average Independent PWE PWE PWE Variable(s) PWE SAT (M+V) SAT (M+V) SAT (M+V) Regression

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - Assessment/Evaluation

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Dean; Gunnar Tamm, United States Military Academy; Jacob Reddington, United States Military Academy; Frederick Davidson, United States Military Academy; Michael Osmon

. 30, no. 3, pp. 566-575, 2014.[7] M. Evans and J. Hanus, "In Pursuit of Teaching Excellence in The Classroom Instructor Summer Workshop At West Point," in 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM, 2001.[8] A. Ericsson and R. Pool, Peak: Secrets From The New Science of Expertise, Boston: Mariner Books, 2017.[9] S. Khan, "Let's Teach For Mastery--Not Test Scores," in TED Talks Live, 2015.[10] "Best National Liberal Arts Colleges: US States Military Academy," US News, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/west-point-2893/academics. [Accessed 11 February 2022].

Conference Session

Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lina Battestilli, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Matthew Zahn, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Sarah Heckman, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

seeking to the use of learning strategies394 and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of educational psychology, 83(2):221,395 1991.396 [8] D. Wu and S. R. Hiltz. Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous397 Learning Networks, 8 2:139–152, 2004.398 [9] Natalie K. Person, Arthur C. Graesser, Joseph P. Magliano, and Roger J. Kreuz. Inferring what the student399 knows in one-to-one tutoring: The role of students questions and answers. Learning and Individual Differences,400 6 2:205–229, 1994.401 [10] Brenda Cantwell Wilson and Sharon Shrock. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science402 course: A study of twelve

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dira Delpech, The Ohio State University; Emily Dringenberg, The Ohio State University

those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References [1] Q. Clark and L. Esters, "Federally Funded Programs Are Not Enough to Diversify the STEMWorkforce," 2018.[2] D. G. M. a. E. B. Chubin, “Diversifying the engineering workforce, “Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 94, no. 1, pp.73-86., 2005.[3] B. L. Yoder, "Engineering by the numbers," in American Society for Engineering Education,2017.[4] National Science Board, "Science and Engineering Indicators 2018," National ScienceFoundation (NSB-2018-2), Arlington, VA., 2018.[5] Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 155-179.[6] Grifski, J., Dringenberg, E., & Delpech, D. M. (2021, July). Thinking as

Conference Session

Bringing Engineering Leadership Pedagogy to Life!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olivier de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John Feiler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Kyra Tan-Tiongco, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Reza Rahaman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Christian de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2019 he is the Faculty Co-Director of the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program, and since 2021 the Apollo Program Professor of Astronautics at MIT.John M. Feiler (Engineering Leadership Specialist)Kyra Tan-Tiongco (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Reza S Rahaman (Industry Co-Director, Gordon Engineering LeadershipProgram) Reza Rahaman is the Bernard M Gordon Industry Co-Director and Senior Lecturer for the MIT Technical Leadership and Communication Programs - the Undergraduate Practice Opportunities Program (UPOP), the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program (GEL), the Graduate Engineering Leadership Program (GradEL), and the School of Engineering Communication Lab. Dr. Rahaman returned to

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 10: Empathy and Human-centered Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Johanna Okerlund, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; David Wilson, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Celine Latulipe, University of Manitoba

shouldbe wary of how early technical STEM courses may impact students' approaches to projects lateron and should look for opportunities to let students bring in pieces of their identity or otherinterests. For example, an RPI assignment lets students tell creative stories with alternate endingsto practice branching or Fiesler et al.'s CS1 assignment asks students to write a program to makedecisions about a list of college applicants [32, 33].Considerations for readings and HCD topics-- While the students' responses to the first HCDreading assignment were more tech-centric than HCD-aligned, their responses to later readingassignments were more balanced. This shows that shifting a perspective takes time and it isworthwhile to have multiple

Conference Session

PCEE Session 12: STEM, Technology, and Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Dare, Florida International University; Joshua Ellis, Florida International University; Mark Rouleau; Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Elizabeth Ring-Whalen

; Castellan, 1988) to analyze the means of our originalitem scores (scaled 0-3) across science content area and grade-level to determine the extent towhich these different classroom types differed in terms of the degree (or level of rigor) to which agiven item was implemented. This second analysis allowed us to expand our understanding fromthe crosstab analysis to consider the degree to which each item was present in a given context. Wealso conducted post-hoc Dunn tests (Siegel & Castellan, 1988) when item mean differences werefound to be statistically significant to identify the item level(s) in which these differences occurred. Findings and DiscussionDue to the exploratory nature of our work, the following

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Innovative Changes to the Typical Civil Engineering Coursework.

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Welker, Villanova University; Virginia Smith, Villanova University; Kristin Sample-Lord, Villanova University; Shweta Shrestha, Villanova University

gone from zero EOP outcomes addressed to twenty addressed andseven assessed across multiple years. The next phase will be to carefully review where the gapsare in the curriculum and determine what targeted efforts can be made to increase adoption andintegration of the framework.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by a grant from The Lemelson Foundation.References [1] M. Robinson and K. Sutterer, “Integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula” Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, Nashville, TN, USA, June 22- 25, 2003, https://peer.asee.org/12190. [2] S. Burian, “Teaching sustainability and sustainable engineering practice in the civil engineering curriculum,” Proceedings of the Annual

Conference Session

ERM: Persistence and Attrition in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joyce Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Amanda Griffith

., Reed, T., Imbrie, P., & Reid, K. (2014). Research-Informed Policy Change: ARetrospective on Engineering Admissions. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 274-301.Jacob, B. A., Lefgren, L. (2004). Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-discontinuity analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 226–244Lagerlof, J.N.M., and A. J. Seltzer. (2007). “The Effects of Remedial Mathematics on theLearning of Economics: A Natural Experiment.” Working Paper.Legewie, J. & DiPrete, T.A. (2014). The high school environment and the gender gap in scienceand engineering. Sociology of Education, 1-22.Lord, S., Ohland, M. W., Layton, R. A., & Camacho, M. M. (2019). Beyond pipeline andpathways: Ecosystem metrics. Journal of

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Schulz, Georgia Institute of Technology; Cassandra Shriver; Benjamin Seleb, Georgia Institute of Technology; Caroline Greiner, Georgia Institute of Technology; David Hu, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Margaret Zhang, Georgia Institute of Technology; Nima Jadali, Georgia Institute of Technology; Anika Patka, Georgia Institute of Technology

Approach to MeetingSustainable Development Goals. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education,2022References [1] Oded Berger-Tal and Jose´ J. Lahoz-Monfort. Conservation technology: The next generation. Conservation Letters, 11(6):e12458, 2018. [2] Gerardo Ceballos, Paul R. Ehrlich, Anthony D. Barnosky, Andre´s Garc´ıa, Robert M. Pringle, and Todd M. Palmer. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5):e1400253, 2015. [3] Jenna Mueller, Mary Dotson, Jennifer Dietzel, Jenna Peters, Gabriela Asturias, Amelia Cheatham, Marlee Krieger, Baishakhi Taylor, Sherryl Broverman, and Nirmala Ramanujam. Using human-centered design to connect engineering

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division ASCE Liaison Committee - Accreditation and Curriculums - What Changes Are Occurring?

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sami Alshurafa; Laura Wieserman, University of Pittsburgh; Hanan Alhayek; Khaled Hussein

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hui Shen, Ohio Northern University; Joshua Gargac, Ohio Northern University

Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Paper No. AC 2010-925 7ASEE 2022 Paper, Minneapolis, MN, June 22, 2022 (Submission 22; April 10, 2022)[4] C. Carroll, S. A. Sell, and M. B. Sabick, “Introduction to Entrepreneurial-minded Learningfor Faculty of Foundational STEM Courses Using the KEEN Framework”, 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Paper #18279[5] https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/618AppendixIn this appendix, the tasks of each module are briefly introduced and student video samples areused to illustrate how each module works in the following sections.Module 1 Tasks: Atomic structure of engineering

Conference Session

Joint Session: Entrepreneurially-Minded Learning in the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Gibbons

an Innovating Curriculum with an EntrepreneurialMindset workshop organized by KEEN. The feedback and support provided by workshop facilitatorsAndy Gerhart, Glenn Gaudette, and Brad Dennis, and the ongoing coaching of Heather Dillon wasinstrumental to this work. The current version of this project was developed with funding from anEngineering Unleashed Fellowship from KEEN.References[1] Hart Research Association, “Falling short? College learning and career success,” 2015.[2] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. Jossey- Bass, 2016.[3] R. Marra, D. Jonassen, B. Palmer, and S. Luft, “Why Problem-Based Learning Works: Theoretical Foundations.,” J. Excell. Coll. Teach., 2014.[4] M. Besterfield-Sacre

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Decision Making, Problem-Based Projects, Role-Play, and a Nontraditional Project Theme

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashish Hingle, George Mason University; Aditya Johri, George Mason University; Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University - Rayen School of Engineering

of information. He is often preoccupied with issues of surveillance and newlimits on privacy due to technology.References[1] C. E. Harris Jr., M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00216.x.[2] B. Newberry, “The dilemma of ethics in engineering education,” SCI ENG ETHICS, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 343–351, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8.[3] C. Fiesler, N. Garrett, and N. Beard, “What Do We Teach When We Teach Tech Ethics?: A Syllabi Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Portland OR USA, Feb. 2020, pp. 289–295. doi

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 5: Remote, Hands-On Laboratories

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Ragland, University of Georgia; Beshoy Morkos, University of Georgia; Andrew Jackson, University of Georgia; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia; Fred Beyette; Dominik May

Oct. 23, 2021).[6] D. A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2013.[7] M. Thüring and S. Mahlke, “Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction,” International Journal of Psychology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 253–264, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1080/00207590701396674.[8] T. de Jong, M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia, “Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education,” Science, vol. 340, no. 6130, pp. 305–308, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1126/science.1230579.[9] D. May, “Cross Reality Spaces in Engineering Education – Online Laboratories for Supporting International Student Collaboration in Merging Realities,” International Journal of Online and

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 1: Looking at Study Abroad through an enhanced lens

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meredith Blumthal; Luis Rodriguez; James Stubbins, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Brian Woodard, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Gretchen Forman, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Molly Goldstein, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Hannah Dougherty, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Ernest-John Ignacio, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Dawn Owens, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

., Walters, R., Fernández-Frey, M., Ramírez, M.,Rosado Casanova, B., Heemstra, J., Marshall, A.-M., & Rodríguez, L. F. (2022). Compound[ing]Disasters in Puerto Rico: Pathways for Virtual Transdisciplinary Collaboration to EnhanceCommunity Resilience, manuscript in review Global Environmental ChangeWarnick, G., et al. 2008. Globalization: A new frontier for capstone courses. Proceedings of the2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Pittsburg, PA: ASEE.McKim CA. The Value of Mixed Methods Research: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of MixedMethods Research. 2017;11(2):202-222. doi:10.1177/1558689815607096Paschal, C. B., & Crist, I. S., & Rowe, C. J. (2017, June), Strategies for Successfully IncreasingEngineering Study Abroad

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Iezzi, University of Michigan; Paul Chao, University of Michigan; Kyle Bushick, University of Michigan; Joshua Cooper, University of Michigan; Tathya Shinde, University of Michigan; Timothy Chambers, University of Michigan; Duncan Greeley, University of Michigan

through food and cooking,” Matter, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 2578–2581, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.005.[4] E. A. Nevenglosky, C. Cale, and S. P. Aguilar, “Barriers to Effective Curriculum Implementation,” Res. High. Educ. J., vol. 36, p. 31, Jan. 2019.[5] National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Design, Selection, and Implementation of Instructional Materials for the Next Generation Science Standards: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018. doi: 10.17226/25001.Appendix A – Pre-COVID Materials OutreachPre-COVID Materials OutreachFor “off-campus” outreach, we worked with local teachers to understand the topics they werecovering and how our efforts could complement

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Admissions, Transfer Pathways, and Major Selection

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marcela Cárdenas, Universidad Andres Bello; Maria Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello

-07052016000400017.[10] F. Kri, F. Gil, M. González, & C. Lamatta, “Ranking de Notas como predictor de éxito en la educación superior. Caso de estudio USACH,” Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Tech Memo. Consejo Nacional de Educación CNED, dec. 2013.[11] D. Contreras, S. Gallegos, & F. Meneses, “Determinantes de desempeño universitario: ¿importa la habilidad relativa?”, Cal Edu, n.o 30, p. 18, apr. 2009, doi: 10.31619/caledu.n30.172.[12] F. Gil, R. Paredes & I. Sánchez, “El ranking de las notas: inclusión con excelencia”, Centro de políticas públicas de la UC, vol. 8, nº 60, pp. 1-19, may. 2013.[13] C. Pérez, L. Ortiz & P. Parra, “Prueba de Selección Universitaria, rendimiento en

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 4: Student Experience & Competencies

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob Vaughn, Texas Tech University; Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Sheima Khatib, Texas Tech University

and J. A. Dantzler, “Mathematical problem solving forengineering students,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2005.[3] J. A. Livingston, “Metacognition: An Overview,” ERIC Institute of Education Sciences,2003. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED474273. [Accessed Feb. 5, 2022].[4] S. J. Grigg and L. C. Benson, “A coding scheme for analyzing problem-solving processes offirst-year engineering students,” European Journal of Engineering Educations, vol. 39-6, pp.617-635, Mar. 2014.[5] F. Anseel, F. Lievens and E. Schollaert. “Reflection as a strategy to enhance taskperformance after feedback,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.110-1, pp. 23-35

Conference Session

PCEE Session 3: Robotics and Design Competitions

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Deters, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Jeffrey Coppola; Ralph Coppola

overview,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 902, pp. 437–447, 2014.[4] R. W. Deters, B. Terwilliger, S. Kleinke, R. K. Coppola, and J. Coppola, “Ten years of the real world design challenge,” in AIAA SciTech Forum, 2018, AIAA Paper 2018-0050.

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session: Pedogogy and Training

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Srikanth Gururajan, Saint Louis University; Samantha Carlowicz; Justin Fantroy, Saint Louis University; haochen rong, Saint Louis University; Claire Schuessler, Saint Louis University

choice, and three of those six must be in a non-engineering department.This means an aerospace engineering student has only 2-3 courses in which they can specializein an area of their interest, assuming a course in the area of interest to the student is offered in thesemester(s) they take their electives.It is worth noting that the maximum number of credits a student can take without “overloading”is 18, so the maximum number of courses a student could take is about 48, allowing potential formore specialized coursework. Further, some students come into the institution with credits thatcan be applied to some required classes or electives, resulting in more potential for specializedcoursework. It may be worth quantifying in future research how many

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Resch, University of Florida; Patriel Stapleton, University of Florida; Benjamin Rheault, University of Florida; Amy Wu, University of Florida; Christina Gardner-McCune, University of Florida

, NY, USA. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1315803.1315812, 2006, 38–45.[13] D. L. Reinholz, “Developing mathematical practices through reflection cycles,”Mathematics Education Research Journal vol 28, no 3 2016, 441–451.[14] M Meneske, S. Anwar, and Z.G. Akdemir, “How Do Different Reflection Prompts AffectEngineering Students’ Academic Performance and Engagement?” in The Journal ofExperimental Education vol 1 no 19, 2020.[15] Ng Sook Han, Ho Ket Li, Lee Choy Sin, and Keng Pei Sin, “The evaluation of students’written reflection on the learning of general chemistry lab experiment,” in MOJES: MalaysianOnline Journal of Educational Sciences vol 2 no 4, 2014, pp 45–52.[16] R. B. Kline, Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A guide to

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 3, Nature and Environment)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marilyn Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology

and an enhancedlearning environment.Problem DefinitionOne of the first steps in introducing a case study is clearly defining the problem and its context,followed by determining a goal for the analysis, identifying key facts and relevant data, andproposing viable solutions [51]. As the literature indicates, incorporating case studies is a form ofactive learning that engages the students via narrative, which “put[s] [students] squarely in theshoes of real people wrestling with real dilemmas” [52]. Cases also allow students to exercise themoral imagination, which is the ability to view a situation from a variety of perspectives anddiscover new “mental models” for decision making [53].In the complex case of Everest pollution, students will need