Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Omar Ashour, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Ashley Seamon, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Christian Lopez, Lafayette College; Sabahattin Ozden; Daniell DiFrancesca, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Conrad Tucker, Carnegie Mellon University

devise a solution(s) to improve the performance of the system. • Devise an inventory policy that minimizes the total annual inventory cost of raw material.For more information about the system and related concepts, the reader is referred to [15].3.2 CourseThe game was implemented in the second course of Operations Research (IE 425: StochasticModeling in Operations Research) in the IE curriculum at Penn State University, The BehrendCollege. The course introduces Poisson processes, Markov chains, queueing theory, inventorytheory, and dynamic programming. The course applies these models to manufacturing andservice systems. It is a required IE course that is taken by the upper-level students in thedepartment. The main topics

Conference Session

ERM: ERM Medley Session!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Watts, Clemson University; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Evan Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Rebecca Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

mentors and mentees used atleast 50% of the time in their responses on the Pre-SPR; however, only mentors used this codein both their responses to the weaknesses and 200-word justification. Mentors cited fiveadditional codes in common (C-1N, C-2N, C 3N*, M-5N*, and S-2P). Mentees had noadditional shared alignment of codes in the Pre-SPR.At the end of the peer mentoring program, mentors and mentees were more aligned in theirreviews of the Post-SPR manuscript. Both mentors and mentees used three codes (C-2N, C-4N,and E-3P) in at least 50% of their Post-SPR responses. Additionally, mentors and menteesconverged on their use of C-4N in both the weaknesses and the 200-word justification. Mentorshad one additional code (C-3N), and mentees had two

Conference Session

ERM: Problem Solving and Conceptual Understanding

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rakhi Batra, The Ohio State University; Syedah Atiq, The Ohio State University

, the total time of fixation is called fixation duration.Fixation duration is associated with the attention being paid to the stimulus. The longer theduration, the more interesting or complex is the stimulus [28]. A saccade is a rapid movement ofthe eye between fixations, it helps to understand the viewing pattern of the person on the screen[23]. A scan path is a combination of saccades and fixations. It is described as a path formed bythe directed sequence of saccades between fixations [28]. The eye movement metrics are usuallymeasured for part(s) of the screen (such as a section of code) where the researcher wants to observea person’s behavior. The selected part of the screen is known as the area of interest (AOI) [23].Another metric that is

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shawn Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Cecilia La Place, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

Paper ID #37984Adapting Hackathon-Honed Skills Toward SoftwareEngineering CapstoneCecilia La Place (Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus) Cecilia La Place is a third-year Ph.D. student at Arizona State University (ASU) studying Engineering Education Systems & Design. She has received her M.S./B.S. in Software Engineering through an accelerated program at ASU. She organizes, attends, and studies hackathons as informal learning environments that hold the potential to empower students of any and all backgrounds.Shawn S. Jordan (Associate Professor) Shawn Jordan is an associate professor of engineering in

Conference Session

LEES 1: Critical Humanities and Serious Play

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kendall Teichert, Trine University

source material in the early stages of the design process. Resultsfrom these changes were promising in regard to student motivation, engagement, and perception.Based on a participant survey, the percentage of responding students that fully completed theassignment to engage with the source(s) rose from 11% in the original implementation to 45% inthe current project implementation, and the percentage that engaged with 20% or less of thesource(s) fell from 22% to 5%. Additionally, in the original project only 15% of students statedthey at least “agreed” to enjoying the novel assigned, whereas in the current work 59% at least“agreed” to enjoying the source material chosen. Although a limited sample size, these and otherfindings capture the

Conference Session

Computers in Education 6 - Best of CoED

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Autar Kaw, University of South Florida; Ali Yalcin, University of South Florida; Rafael Braga Gomes, University of South Florida; Luis Serrano; Yingyan Lou, Arizona State University; Andrew Scott, Alabama A&M University; Renee Clark, University of Pittsburgh

,” Journal of Computers in Education, Vol. 8, pp. 365–394, 2021.R. Clark and A. Kaw, “Adaptive Learning in a Numerical Methods Course for Engineers: Evaluation in Blended andFlipped Classrooms,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 28(1), pp. 62-79, 2020.College and University Classroom Environment Inventory, https://case.edu/ucite/sites/case.edu.ucite/files/2018-02/College-and-University-Classroom-Environment-Inventory.pdf (accessed April 25, 2022).C. Finelli, K. Nguyen, M. DeMonbrun, M. Borrego, M. Prince, J. Husman, C. Henderson, P. Shekhar, and C.Waters, “Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning: Strategies for Instructors,” Journal of College ScienceTeaching, Vol. 47(5), pp. 80-91, 2018.S. Freeman, S. Eddy, M. McDonough, M

Conference Session

Assessment in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Liberatore, The University of Toledo; Kayla Chapman

maintained many years beyond thecompetition of the funded project supported by the National Science Foundation.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank contributions from Alex Edgcomb and numerous teaching assistants. Thismaterial is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. This work was completed within the framework of University of ToledoIRB protocols 2011808 and 202214.DisclaimerOne of the authors may receive royalties from sales of the zyBook detailed in this paper.References[1] A. Edgcomb, F. Vahid, R. Lysecky, A

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5: Design and Robotics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lakshmy Mohandas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Wonki Lee, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

1beginning of achievement goal theory, the theory mainly emphasized the difference betweenmastery goals and performance goals. According to [8], mastery goals had higher educationalbenefits compared to performance goals. In 1990's a few researchers bought a new perspective tothe goal theory, where they emphasized the importance of both mastery and performance goals[13]. This change in perspective led to the start of a debate in the field related goal theory. Butgroup of researchers still believed that performance-avoidance goal was related to negativeeffects. Relevant LiteraturesDebate: Multiple Goal Theory Multiple goal theory is considered as the new perspective of achievement goal theory,where

Conference Session

Understanding Inclusivity and Equity in STEM Contexts: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grenmarie Agresar, University of Michigan; John Callewaert, University of Michigan; Steve Skerlos, University of Michigan; Joanna Millunchick, University of Michigan

objectives.References[1] Cech, Erin, “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think about Social Injustices,” in Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, New York: Springer, 2013, pp. 67–84.[2] R. Loweth, S. R. Daly, L. Paborsky, S. L. Hoffman, and S. J. Skerlos, “‘You Could Take “Social” Out of Engineering and Be Just Fine’: An Exploration of Engineering Students’ Beliefs About the Social Aspects of Engineering Work,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/you-could-take-social-out-of-engineering-and-be-just-fine-an-explor

Conference Session

Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mia Taylor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Danny Mathieson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Leanna House, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Chris North

helped me to design a better shelter.” and “Using math makes using Andromedaeasier.”, with respective means of x¯ = 7.93 and x¯ = 4.20. The statement with the most variabilityin responses is “Using math makes using Andromeda easier.” (s = 2.68). The statement with theleast amount of variability is “Analyzing data with Andromeda fun.” (s = 1.74). The statement“Using Andromeda allowed me to understand the raw data.” received relatively high responses x = 7.87), while the statement “I know what is meant by the term high­dimensional data.”(¯received the second­lowest average (¯ x = 6.90).Figure 3. Survey responses after the shelter assignment. The mean (¯ x) and standard deviation (s)for each survey question is provided with a visual count of

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 6: Monitoring, Evaluating and Research

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammed K. Faris, University of Mosul / Iraq; Charles Pierce, University of South Carolina; Muwafaq Awad; Inthuorn Sasanakul

the questionnaire, each respondent rated 20 items under “Choose the response that bestdescribes the perception of the institution where you are currently working.” and, in a separatequestion, “Choose the response that best describes the perception of the institution where youearned your Ph.D.” Phrasing of each item is identical for both questions and includes reverseditems. Examples include In this institution, people value new ideas; My supervisor(s) listen(s)attentively; and Newly hired employees in this institution receive adequate training. Responsesutilized the same five-option Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree, and numericalratings were assigned as shown in Table 1.The results of perceived institutional differences

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Minichiello, Utah State University; Hannah Wilkinson, Utah State University

presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25933[2] National Science Foundation. Veterans’ education for engineering and science. Report of the NSF Workshop on Enhancing the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Benefit. McLean, VA, April 13, 2009.[3] H. Wilkinson and A. Minichiello, "A narrative review of the empirical literature on U.S. military students in engineering education," Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN., 2022: American Society of Engineering Education.[4] F. M. Connelly and D. J. Clandinin, “Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry,” Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 2–14, Jun. 1990.[5] G. A. Phillips and Y. S. Lincoln

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tripp Shealy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; John Gero, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Paulo Ignacio Jr., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

courses on sustainable engineering design, human behavior and infrastructure systems, and adaptive reuse.John S Gero (Dr)Paulo Ignacio Jr. PhD student at Virginia Tech. Working with Dr. Tripp Shealy. Passionate about human performance and wellbeing in the built environment. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The neurocognition of engineering students designing: A preliminary study exploring problem framing and the use of concept mappingAbstractNeuroimaging provides a relatively new approach for advancing engineering education byexploring changes in neurocognition from educational interventions. The

Conference Session

Professional Skills and Community Building in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico; Abhaya Datye, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Sang Han, University of New Mexico; Catherine Hubka, University of New Mexico; Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Susannah Davis, University of New Mexico

leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era," The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 298-318, 2007, doi: 0.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002.[11] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1991.[12] E. Wenger, R. A. McDermott, and W. Snyder, Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard business press, 2002.[13] American Association for the Advancement of Science, Levers for Change: An assessment of progress on changing STEM instruction. AAAS, 2019.[14] S. Freeman et al., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics," Proceedings of the

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Technical Session 6: Diversity

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Prosser, Arizona State University

: February 7, 2022].[4] J. B. Napp and A. Sabharwal, “Academic libraries and the strategic vision for diversity in higher education,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32024. [Accessed: February 7, 2022].[5] R. Koury, J. L. Semenza, and S. Shropshire, “A survey of diversity and inclusiveness initiatives at Carnegie Doctoral Research Institutions libraries,” Library Management, vol. 40, no. 1/2, pp. 23-33, 2019.[6] D. Fife, M. N. Stephens, A. Lyons, and M. Huang, “Leader responsibility for diversity, equity, inclusion & justice in academic libraries: An exploratory study,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 47

Conference Session

ETD Technical Session 6 - Curriculum and Programs III

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Pouneh Abbasian, Texas A&M University

knowledge, digital skills, interdisciplinary knowledge, and problem-solving areneeded for the technological category.References[1] L. Sakurada, C. A. S. Geraldes, F. P. Fernandes, J. Pontes, and P. Leitão, "Analysis of New Job Profiles for the Factory of the Future," in Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi- Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, (Studies in Computational Intelligence, 2021, ch. Chapter 18, pp. 262-273.[2] S. klaus, "The Fourth Industrial Revolution," 2016.[3] S. Weyer, Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M. and Gorecky, D., , "Towards Industry 4.0 - Standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems," Ifac-Papersonline, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 579-584

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 12: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Miguel Andrés Guerra, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Jacoba Ubidia; MariaEmilia Mariño; Francisco Jativa Valverde

WELL-EDUCATED WORKFORCE IS KEY TO STATE PROSPERITY,” p. 14, 2013.[2] E. M. King and M. A. Hill, Women’s Education in Developing Countries: Barriers, Benefits, and Policies. World Bank Publications, 1997.[3] W. W. McMahon, Education and Development: Measuring the Social Benefits. Clarendon Press, 2000.[4] M. Munir Kayani, R. A. Akbar, S. Faisal, A. Kayani, and M. Amin Ghuman, “Analysis of Socio-Economic Benefits of Education in Developing Countries: A Example of Pakistan,” Bull. Educ. Res., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 75–92, Dec. 2017.[5] A. Almeida Del Savio, K. Galantini, and A. Pachas, “Exploring the Relationship between Mental Health-Related Problems and Undergraduate Student Dropout: A Case Study within a Civil

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Teamwork, Reflection, and Wellness

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Constantine Mukasa, Northeastern University

of TEAMMATES Student assessment Team Recipient CC PC Diff Ratings Received 1 S#1 E E 0 E, E, E 1 S#2 E E 0 E, E, E 1 S#3 E E 0 E, E, E 1 S#4 E E 0 E, E, E 2 S#1 E E -5% -5% E, E -6%, E -9% 2 S#2 E E -5% -5% E, E -6%, E -9% 2 S#3 E +22% E +6% -16% E +18%, E, E 2 S#4 E -7% E +4% 11% E +13%, E, EIn this study

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Gomes; Bilge Celik; Yewande Abraham, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET)

Paper ID #37612Employers’ Perception of Student Employability in theConstruction Management Industry using Resume Analysisand Analytic Hierarchy ProcessJonathan Robert Gomes RWUBilge Gokhan CelikYewande S Abraham (Dr) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Employers’ Perception of Student Employability in the ConstructionManagement Industry using Résumé Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process AbstractIn recent years, there has been a significant increase in college-level programs offering degreesin Construction Management (CM) and

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madhumi Mitra, University of Maryland Eastern Shore; Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland Eastern Shore; Will Klein

Engineering Education, 2022situations; and displaying empathy by perceiving the current challenges of the pandemic, and theextent the underrepresented populations are disproportionately affected.6.0 AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the Maryland Space Grant Consortium (MDSGC) for fundingthe research and summer internship and travel scholarship to Mr. William Klein.7.0 References 1. Ravindra, K., Singh, T., Vardhan, S., Shrivastava, A., Singh, S., Kumar, P., & Mor, S. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic: What can we learn for better air quality and human health?.Journal of infection and public health, 15(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.12.001 2. Chang, H. H., Meyerhoefer, C. D., & Yang, F. A. (2021

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah Huvard, New Mexico State University; Hengameh Bayat, New Mexico State University; Sandra M. Way, New Mexico State University; Catherine Brewer, New Mexico State University; Addison Miller; Antonio Garcia, New Mexico State University

,” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–171, May 2015, doi: 10.1037/aca0000008.[3] J. Rosendale and L. Wilkie, “Scaling workforce development: using MOOCs to reduce costs and narrow the skills gap,” Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 18–21, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/DLO-11-2019-0258.[4] S. Senel, D. Yalcin, and O. Yildirim, “Accreditation For Academic Quality,” in International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference, 2008, pp. SGEM, 2, 627.[5] S. Pew, “Andragogy and pedagogy as foundational theory for student motivation in higher education,” InSight: a collection of faculty scholarship, vol. 2, pp. 14–25, 2007, [Online

Conference Session

PCEE Session 13: Equity in P-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Lilly, University of Virginia; Anne McAlister, University of Virginia; Jennifer Chiu, University of Virginia

), Impact of Elementary School Teachers' Enacted Engineering Design-Based Science Instruction on Student Learning (Fundamental) Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. https:/doi.org/10.18260/p.25540Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C. P., Brennan, R. T., Kelly, G. J., Tunis, C. S. A., & Gentry, C. A. (2020). The impact of engineering curriculum design principles on elementary students’ engineering and science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 423-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21601Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Driven by beliefs: Understanding challenges physical science teachers face when

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan McSpedon, Rice University; Margaret Beier, Rice University; Brittany Bradford, Rice University; Michael Wolf

: Learners, contexts, and cultures. She is a fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychologists (SIOP) and a fellow of the Association for Psychological Science (APS).Brittany Bradford Research Analyst, OpenStax, Rice University © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The development of collegiate STEM self-efficacy: A longitudinal study of first-year studentsAbstractThis NSF S-STEM Grantee poster examines the longitudinal impact the Rice Emerging ScholarsProgram (RESP), Rice University’s comprehensive science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) summer bridge program, has on student

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brittany Fasy; Joseph Chipps, Montana State University - Bozeman; Stacey Hancock, Montana State University - Bozeman; Aayushi Dangol; Kristin Searle, Utah State University; Colby Tofel-Grehl, Utah State University; Aubrey Rogowski, Utah State University; Mengying Jiang, Utah State University

seventh and eigth grades (e.g., by expanding on the use and types of communication protocols).Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. NSF DRL 2031795 (MSU) and DRL 2031279 (USU). Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s)and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] The art of storytelling: Background information for teachers. [Online]. Available: https://mhs.mt.gov/education/IEFA/BackgroundInformation.pdf [2] The art of storytelling: Plains indian persectives. [Online]. Available: https://mhs.mt.gov/education/PictographicArt [3] Montana cs standards

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Rachel Mosier, Oklahoma State University

discussed.” While comments about the most importantconcepts included “acknowledging in what order tasks are to be done.” and “That the order inwhich things are done on a job site affects how the job gets done and how fast.”ConclusionA general contracting company was an integral part of the research that determined the learningexperiences among two student groups enrolled in the same semester for s BIM course. The firststudent group took the course online synchronous, whereas the second group took the same contentin the same semester in a face-to-face (F2F) environment. The study used an online surveymethodology in which the students in the two groups were asked various questions at the end ofthe semester to assess the perceptional differences in

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shichao Liu, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Yichen Li, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Soroush Farzin

environments, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 355–385, 1997.[2] A. Alda, E. R. Bass, G. Chedd, C. Constantinou, C. O’Connell, and H. Schneider, “Raising the bar: employers’ views on college learning in the wake of the economic downturn,” Stony Brook University. School of Journalism., 2009, Accessed: Jan. 09, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A79927[3] S. Vassigh, “Hybrid Technologies for Interdisciplinary Education,” J Civil Environ Eng, vol. 05, no. 06, 2016, doi: 10.4172/2165-784X.1000201.[4] P. Milgram and F. Kishino, “A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays,” IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 1321–1329, Dec. 1994.[5] M. Billinghurst, “Augmented reality in education,” New

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noemi Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University; Russell Meier, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Deborah Trytten, University of Oklahoma; Mark Weichold, Texas A&M University; Janie Moore, Texas A&M University

curriculum design so that theresulting curriculum supports the inclusion of any student lacking prior computing privilege. Thebroader impact is an informed academy preparing an inclusive community of diverse engineersto solve today‟s engineering problems through computational thinking and computer-assisteddesign.AcknowledgementsThis work is possible through the support of the NSF:RFE award #1917359 “CollaborativeResearch in Improving Computational Thinking in the Formation of Engineers, A Multi-Institutional Initiative.”Bibliography[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 – 2022 | ABET.” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2021-2022/ (accessed Jul. 09, 2021

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Matthew Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Richard Layton; Marisa Orr, Clemson University; Russell Long, Purdue Engineering Education; Joe Roy, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE); Hayaam Osman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Catherine Brawner

, 2022[3] https://midfield.online/policy-summary/ Date Accessed January 20, 2022[4] R. Layton, R. Long, and M. Ohland, midfielddata: Sample of MIDFIELD Student Unit Record Data. R package version 0.1.3, 2018. https://github.com/MIDFIELDR/midfielddata[5] R. Layton, R. Long, and M. Ohland (2018). midfieldr: Tools for Studying MIDFIELD Student Unit Record Data in R. https://github.com/MIDFIELDR/midfieldr, https://engineering.purdue.edu/MIDFIELD.[6] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, M. K. Orr, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Workshop: Engaging with MIDFIELD Data,” 2021 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Long Beach, CA, July 26, 2021.[7] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Long, M. K. Orr, and R. A. Layton

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katrina Donovan, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Jon Kellar, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Paula Jensen, Texas Tech University; Michael West, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Stuart Kellogg, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Paper ID #38319IMPLEMENTING CURRICULAR AND CO-CURRICULAR BEST PRACTICES TO INCREASE ANDRETAIN FEMALE ENGINEERSKatrina Donovan (Lecturer)Jon J Kellar (Professor)Paula H Jensen (Ph.D. Candidate) Paula Holmes Jensen is a Ph.D. Candidate at Texas Tech University and was the Co-PI of the NSF S-STEM grant Culture and Attitude at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SD Mines). She taught at SD Mines for ten years and is now pursuing her Ph.D. in Systems and Engineering Management at Texas Tech University full-time. Her research interests are in Engineering Education and Lean Six Sigma in the service industry. She also

Conference Session

Technology Integration in Manufacturing Curriculum

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technical University; Marshall Norris, Tennessee Technological University; Mithila Rajeshirke, Tennessee Technological University; Orkhan Huseynov, Tennessee Technological University; Suhas Alkunte, Tennessee Technological University; Mohammad Alshaikh Ali, Tennessee Technological University; Joji Jeevan Kumar Dasari, Tennessee Technological University; Zhicheng Zhang, Tennessee Technological University

by manufacturingeducators and students. The knowledge blocks covered by this paper were collected by a diversegroup of educators who hold positions in educational organizations. CM was provided as anexample in searching the capabilities of these systems but it is clear that the platforms reportedhere contain a high number of topics in current advanced manufacturing practices. In the future,the plan is to add more information from the practitioners of these systems with a qualitative andquantitative survey tool.References[1] “COVID-19 Pandemic.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic (accessed Feb. 03, 2022).[2] D. Masato and S. Johnston, “Project-Based Teaching of a Manufacturing Class During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” J