arecollected at the due date of the assigned section(s).Students from five cohorts at a public research university generated the data presented here.Cohorts during the Spring semester of 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 included 98, 98, 94, 66,and 57 students, respectively. Students withdrawing from the course were not included in theanalysis, which differs from some previous work [25]. The majority of the students were in theirfirst year (freshman) majoring in either chemical engineering or environmental engineering. Thedata are presented in aggregate for one or more cohorts, which may be a limitation as thediversity of the individual learner is lost. The modality of the 2018, 2019, and 2022 cohorts wasin person. The 2020 cohort was partially in
Competency standard for professional engineers," Engineers Australia, 2019. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/publications/stage-1-competency-standard- professional-engineers[3] R. Lawrence, "The promotion of future opportunities and possibilities for engineering graduates," Australian Council of Engineering Deans, 2020. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aced.edu.au/downloads/Engineering%202035%20report.pdf[4] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, "Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science," in 2011 Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2011: IEEE, pp. F1C-1- F1C-5.[5] J. Burdett, "Making groups work: University students
significance of teachers’ Well-being and the use of faculty developmentprograms. Nevertheless, there lies the need for a basic approach to address the Well-being ofteachers. In regards to this review study, there are heterogenous range of programs thatsupports the Well-being of teachers.References[1] Guerriero, S. (ed.) (2017), Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris.[2] Williams, K.C. and Williams, C.C. (2011) “Five key ingredients for improving student motivation,” Research in Higher Education Journal.[3] Schleicher, A. (2018), Valuing our Teachers and Raising their Status: How Communities Can Help, International Summit on the Teaching
participation of students, faculty, and staff in a visit from the public school. Overthe course of several planning meetings, the team outlined a rotation schedule that achieved 3main objectives: (1) Provide exposure to the campus infrastructure; (2) Engage in hands-onactivities related to civil and/or environmental engineering; and (3) Interact with college studentsthat may have shared their identities and experiences. Table 1 presents an overview of theschedule outlined.Table 1: Outreach Event Schedule Time Agenda Topic Speaker(s) Location CEE Chair Architectural Building 10:00 AM Welcome and Introductions
administration of the pre/post surveys and Dr. DavidDelaine for his insight on intervention design.ReferencesR.D. Austin, G.P. Pisano, “Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage: Why you should embrace it in your workforce,” Harvard Business Review. May-June issue, 2017.A. Bolhari & S. Tillema. 2022. Enhancing Engineering Students’ Innovation Self-Efficacy through Design of K-12 STEM Projects Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/40763J. Buckley, A. Trauth, S.B. Grajeda, and D. Roberts, “Gender and racial disparities in students’ self-confidence on team-based engineering design projects,” presented ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.S. Y., Chyung, A
timepoints: beginning of Batch 1’s firstsemester (September 2022), end of Batch 1’s first semester (December 2022), and start of Batch2’s first semester (January 2023). They will be referred to as pre-survey (2022), post-survey(2022), and pre-survey (2023) in this paper, respectively. Note that the data from Batch 1includes both Engineering and Non-Engineering students, as all students were required to takethe Principles of Design course, whereas data from Batch 2 only includes Engineering students,as their survey was administered as part of the Introduction to Engineering course. Based on anintention to not overburden the students, each construct was captured using a set of three to sixquestions, hence a total of nine to thirteen Likert scale
ofstakeholder awareness skills and identify the area(s) of development (gaps). The results provide us withinsights to develop effective teaching strategies to address these gaps.Study participants were tasked to complete a scenario-based assessment proposed by Grohs, et al. [1] thatfocuses on systems thinking and problem-solving as engineers by responding to a scenario that addressedtechnical and social contexts. The activity focuses on participants’ responses to a given scenario and theprompts intended to guide respondents in a systems-thinking approach. Data were collected electronicallyand analyzed using qualitative coding methods by applying the assessment tool rubric to evaluate studentresponses using systems thinking constructs from the framework
this way, futurework will allow for development of targeted interventions aimed at improving help seeking in theundergraduate engineering student population.References[1] S. K. Lipson, E. G. Lattie, and D. Eisenberg, "Increased Rates of Mental Health Service Utilization by U.S. College Students: 10-Year Population-Level Trends (2007–2017)," Psychiatric Services, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 60-63, 2019/01/01 2018, doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800332.[2] D. Eisenberg et al., "The Health Minds Study: 2014 Data Report," 2014.[3] D. Eisenberg, Lipson, S. K., Heinze, J., Zhou, S., Talaski, A., & Patterson, A, "The Healthy Minds Study: 2021 Winter/Spring Data Report.," 2021.[4] D. Eisenberg, M. F. Downs, E. Golberstein, and
. Madon, and S. Lustig, “Graduate student mental health: Needs assessment and utilization of counseling services,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 247–266, 2006.[4] S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner III, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, “Major Differences: Variations in Undergraduate and Graduate Student Mental Health and Treatment Utilization Across Academic Disciplines,” Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23–41, 2016.[5] K. Beddoes and A. Danowitz, “In Their Own Words: How Aspects of Engineering Education Undermine Students’ Mental Health,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[6] K. J. Jensen and K. J. Cross
forcedchange.AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF 2027471and 2105156). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. of the Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014.doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111[2] G. D. Kuh, J. Kinzie, J. A. Buckley, B. K. Bridges, and J. C. Hayek. “What matters to student success: A review of the literature,” National
assessment tools and managing the data from the five institutions. The authors wantto thank Dr. Brandy Blake from Georgia Institute of Technology for her great consulting.References:[1] N. H. Hensel, “Characteristics of Excellence in Undergraduate Research.,” 2012.[2] S. E. Zappe, S. L. Cutler, and L. Gase, “A Systematic Review of the Impacts of Entrepreneurial Support Programs in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Fields,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–31, 2023.[3] A. Olson, D. Melton, and M. Johnson, “KEEN Top Resources: The basics of EM in a single card,” Engineering Unleashed, Oct. 07, 2020.[4] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers. Cham
institutions are beginning toimplement technical interview practices into the classroom as assignments, group projects,warm-ups, class exercises, and dedicating a class to the topic. For instance, literature shows thatexposing students to technical interview exercises in their Data Structure course(s) is one of themost effective methods. One reason being that students are exposed to the process early on but itbecomes natural for them to think as interviewees based on the construct of these particularcourses. Likewise, literature suggests that introducing the technical interview process early in astudent’s computational development could better gauge the overall effectiveness of thisemployed initiative. Yet, the number of studies that reflect such
-racial-and-ethnic-diversity/[5] J. Bhuyan, F. Wu, C. Thomas, K. Koong, J. W. Hur, and C.-H. Wang, "Aerial drone: Aneffective tool to teach information technology and cybersecurity through project-based learningto minority high school students in the US," TechTrends, vol. 64, pp. 899-910, April 2020.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00502-7.[6] C. Brathwaite and J. Vernon, "GlobalCUNY: The NYC Louis Stokes alliance model forinternational research experiences for minority students," in 2019 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo.,Tampa, FL., June 2019, DOI: 10.18260/1-2-32876.[7] C. Demetry and S. Sontgerath, "A middle school engineering outreach program for girlsyields STEM undergraduates," in 2017 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Columbus, OH, June 2017,DOI
at launch and deployment. Once the Cansat is deployed from the rocket, the Cansat shall descend using a parachute at a rate of 15 m/s. At 400 meters, the Cansat shall deploy a giant parachute to reduce the descent rate to 5 m/s. At 300 meters, the Cansat shall release a tethered payload to 10 meters in 20 seconds. During that time, the payload shall maintain the orientation of a video camera pointing in the south direction. The video camera shall be pointed 45 degrees downward to assure the terrain is in the video. (CanSat 2021-22 Competition Guide).Considering the CanSat mission overview, student teams were tasked to identify and categorizethe system stakeholders into groups. This entailed students' teams
promoting institutional adaptation to climate change in Pakistan. ˜ University at Buffalo, The State University of New YorkMatilde Luz S´anchez-Pena, Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on the development of cultures of care and well-being in engineering education spaces, assessing gains in institutional efforts to advance equity and inclusion, and the use of data science for training socially responsible engineers.Mr. Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University Ahmed Ashraf Butt is
textbooks?” LIBER Q. vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2019. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10266[2] R. S. Jhangiani, and S. Jhangiani, “Investigating the perceptions, use, and impact of open textbooks: A survey of post-secondary students in British Columbia,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. vol. 18, no. 4, Jun. 2017. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3012[3] H. Delgado, M. Delgado, and J. Hilton III, “On the efficacy of open educational resources: Parametric and nonparametric analyses of a university calculus class,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. vol. 20, no. 1, Feb. 2019. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3892[4] C. Cooney, “What impacts do oer have on students? Students share their experiences with a
).[3] U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development andOffice of the Under Secretary, “Advancing Diversity and Inclusion In Higher Education,” 2016.[4] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology,” American Society of Engineering Education, Washington, DC, 2021.[5] Q. Ketchum, “Indigenizing ASABE: Why We Should, and How We Can,” ResourceMagazine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 19–22, 2021.[6] G. S. May and D. E. Chubin, “A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success forUnderrepresented Minority Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 1, pp.27–39, 2003, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00735.x.[7] A. Rattan, K. Savani, M. Komarraju, M. M
8 or 7 1[1] B. Moulding et al., Science and Engineering for grades 6-12 : investigation and design at the center, 2019.[2] National Academy of Engineering. Committee on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education., Standards for K-12 engineering education? NationalAcademies Press, 2010.[3] S. Järvelä and K. A. Renninger, “Designing for learning: Interest, motivation, and engagement,” in The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences,Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 668–685. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.040.[4] E. A. Patall, H. Cooper, and S. R. Wynn, “The Effectiveness and Relative Importance of Choice in the Classroom,” J Educ Psychol, vol. 102, no. 4, pp
, 15(3), 279–303.Asimakopoulos, G., Hernández, V., & Peña Miguel, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial intention of engineering students: The role of social norms and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Sustainability, 11(16), 4314.Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. FreemanBandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.Barbosa, S., Gerhardt, M., & Kickul, J. (2007). The role of
: studentsenjoy going class; students know exactly what has to be done; and faculty letting students decide some ofthe success metrics. As for computer modeling, key climate factors include: the level of in class instructorreal-time support and instructors giving ample opportunity for students to pursue their class interests.Keywords: Classroom Climate, Psychosocial, Active Learning, Design, Modeling, Student AchievementClassroom Environments and Active Learning In education literature, it has been documented that student learning gains can be enhanced byintroducing more active learning environments [1]. From the mid-1990’s to the present, many researchershave experimented with classroom environments that have varied technology support
graduate degree. In the future, I hope to obtain a masterˆa C™s deLaura E. Cruz, The Pennylvania State University Laura Cruz (Ph.D, UC Berkeley 2001) is an Associate Research Professor for Teaching & Learning Schol- arship with the Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence at Penn State. She previously served as the director of two Centers for Teaching and Learni ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Hands-Off: Perceptions of Biomedical Engineering Technology Internships under a Global PandemicAbstractInternships are an integral component of bio-medical engineering programs, as they providestudents with hands-on experience working in real-world settings. To fully
Accessibility and Universal De- sign for Learning. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wyoming (Laramie, Wyoming). He is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). He is the recip- ient of David S. Taylor Service to Students Award and Golden Apple Award from Boise State University. He is also the recipient of ASEE Pacific Northwest Section (PNW) Outstanding Teaching Award, ASEE Mechanical Engineering division’s Outstanding New Educator Award and several course design awards. He serves as the campus representative (ASEE) for Boise State University and as the Chair for the ASEE PNW Section. His academic research interests include innovative teaching and learning strategies
also a founder ofDaniel Lapsley, University of Notre DameDr. Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Dr. Kerry Meyers holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (B.S. & M.S. Mechanical Engineering) and is specifically focused on programs that influence studentˆa C™s experience, affect retention rates, and the factors that determine the overall long term succesEmily C. LaPorteKhalid Oladeji Bello, University of Louisville Khalid Bello is a PhD student at University of Louisville. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Replicating the Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem: First Year FindingsIntroductionWith transition to the knowledge-based
& Trusted(DART) through seed grant number 22-EPS4-0028 under NSF grant number OIA-1946391,MathWorks Curriculum Development Support program, and the Engineering Research andInnovation Seed Funding (ERISF) program at the University of Arkansas.References[1] S. L. Brunton, B. R. Noack, and P. Koumoutsakos, “Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics,” Annu Rev Fluid Mech, vol. 52, pp. 477–508, 2020, doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214.[2] G. Novati, H. L. de Laroussilhe, and P. Koumoutsakos, “Automating turbulence modelling by multi-agent reinforcement learning,” Nat Mach Intell, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-00272-0.[3] P. Roy Chowdhury, C. Reynolds, A. Garrett, T. Feng, S. P. Adiga, and X
valuable.References[i] “Listing of Online Engineering Programs Accredited by ABET,” [Online]. Available at:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/find-programs/. J. Starks, F. R. Hendrickson, F. Hadi, M. J. Traum, “Miniaturized Inexpensive Hands-On Fluid Mechanics[ii]Laboratory Kits for Remote On-Line Learning,” Proceedings of the 124 th American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE) Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25 - 28, 2017.[iii] M. J. Traum, F. Hadi, “A Miniaturized Circular Hydraulic Jump for Remote On -Line Fluid Mechanics Instruction,”Journal of Online Engineering Education, Vol. 10, No. 1, Article 3, June 2019. M. J. Traum, S. R. Niemi, P. Collins, M. Q. Jenkins, S. R. Putnam, C. M
are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Cocco, S. (2006). “Student leadership development: the contribution of project-basedlearning.” Master’s thesis. Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC.[2] UVU. (2023). https://www.uvu.edu/otl/resources/group_work/pbl.html. Accessed: February2, 2023.[3] Phyllis C. B., Elliot S., Ronald W. M., Joseph S. K., Mark G. & Annemarie P. (1991).“Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning.”Educational Psychologist, 26:3-4, 369-398, DOI: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139.[4] PBLWorks. (2023). https://www.pblworks.org/why-project-based-learning. Accessed:February 12, 2023.[5] Chrysochoou, M. Syharat, C
Stephanie Ashley Damas is currently a graduate student at Clemson University studying to get her Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her area of interest is Diversity and Inclusion in Engineering. She holds a bachelorˆa C™s degree in electrical engiGabriella TorresDr. Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles Corin (Corey) Bowen is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education, housed in the Department of Civil Engineering at California State University - Los Angeles. Her engineering education research focuses on structural oppression in engineering systems, organizing for equitable change, and developing an agenda of Engineering for the Common Good. She teaches structural mechanics and
assignedgroups.Giving our UGTAs the opportunity to reflect on their social positionalities served as a platformto discuss inclusive leadership and teaching [15, 16, 23]. For the remainder of the time, theUGTAs were asked to reflect and discuss several prompts, including: 4. In reviewing the principles of inclusive leadership, which principle would I identify as a strength and where I feel the most comfortable? 4 5. Are there specific times where I felt this was affirmed? 6. Which principle(s) would I identify as an area of growth? 7. What actions can I take to grow in this principle?The day following the workshops, all UGTAs reconvened to share
Paper ID #39397Energizing the Engineering Pipeline through Agrivoltaics CitizenScience: Curriculum ShareDr. Michelle Jordan, Arizona State University Michelle Jordan is as associate professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. She also serves as the Education Director for the QESST Engineering Research Center. Michelleˆa C™s program of research focuses on social interactJanet M. AnkrumMelany CoatesCheryl CarswellAndrew CentanniMs. Mia Delarosa Mia DeLaRosa received her BA in in Elementary Education from Arizona State University in 2004. She went on to receive her Masters in Educational
. In the upcoming study, one of two prompts (anequation or a worked example relating to centroids and their calculation) will be provided infuture think aloud interviews to determine which prompt improves student problem solvingsuccess.AcknowledgementsSupport for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation under Award No.2301341. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Research work was conducted under institutional IRB protocols, IRB#1965654.References1. ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020 – 2021 | ABET,” ABET, 2021. https://www.abet.org/accreditation