. In 2007, electricity purchasedfrom the local utility company accounted for 74% of the campus energy usage. Since theuniversity does not have direct control over which fuel is being used to provide this neededelectricity and since Congress is currently debating “Cap and Trade” legislation, it behooves theuniversity to take a serious look at its energy conservation practices. Recommendations to the university administration include the following: (1) line-itemthe energy cost to students as a part of their bills, (2) increase the rate of replacing olderequipment with high-efficiency units, (3) develop a plan for becoming carbon-neutral by aspecified date in the future, and (4) sponsor a project which integrates environmental, business
. Page 22.599.2ABET, Inc., has been the recognized accreditor for college and university programs in appliedscience, computing, engineering, and technology for more than 75 years. Among the purposes ofABET, Inc. (ABET) are two that relate to accreditation. ABET intends to 1) organize and carryout a comprehensive process of accreditation of pertinent programs leading to degrees, and assistacademic institutions in planning their educational programs, and 2) promote the intellectualdevelopment of those interested in applied science, computing, engineering, and technologyprofessions (ABET Policy, 2008). The Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) evaluatesand accredits individual degree programs with the word “engineering” in their title
specific topics such as chemistry and physics. Other includes ideas that did not follow acommon theme, some examples are know how to read floor plans, welding, and understandingmaterials. Page 22.601.7 Question 4 25 Percentage of Responses 20 15 10 5 0 Test
adultlearning theories of Knowles and Lawler, the experiential learning theory of Kolb, therecommendations of the Veterans’ Education for Engineering and Science workshop report, andthe recommendations developed from a case study completed by the University of KentuckyMilitary Veterans of America. The three focus areas of our approach are: 1) Recruitment andSupport Constructs, 2) Transition, and 3) Integration of Technical Experience. Recruitment andRetention strategies include development of “dummy proof” advertising and structuredcurriculum plans which incorporate BCTCblue+, a transfer/dual enrollment program betweenBCTC and UK that includes advising, guaranteed admission, UK courses at BCTC tuition rates,and more. This program offers pathways for
needed for America to compete in the diverse globaleconomy. This outreach effort has been designed and implemented with the aim of instillingan interest in computer science, engineering and entrepreneurship among the futureinnovators of America.LEAD-SEI’s three-week core curriculum consists of a team-based research project andcomputer science. These components allow groups to develop innovative solutions,products/prototypes, business plans and technology driven presentations to address real worldproblems; including the global challenges of the 21st century. In addition to theaforementioned, participants learn the scope of the different engineering fields fromUniversity professors and graduate students. Beyond discovering computer science
Engineering (CSE). Offered throughout the fall andspring semesters, EOE FIGs assist students with building a support network that includes peers,upper division students, faculty, and professional engineers. Each FIG consists of 20 to 25 firstyear engineering students, one FIG Academic Tutor, two FIG Engineering Peer Leaders, and oneFIG Facilitator. The participants in each FIG cohort share a class schedule that includes at leasttwo to four courses in common which are also applicable to their engineering degree plan. Oneof these courses is a small, one-hour weekly FIG seminar designed to help students get to knoweach other, improve study skills, and develop strategies for academic success. The weeklyseminar is hosted by EOE staff members and upper
current trends in local industries; (2)providing students with the course examples and experiential learning that help ensure studentreadiness to meet the needs of the industries in which they plan to become employed becausetheir instructors are engaged with the industries in which they plan to become employed; (3)helping the College equip labs with the latest materials and equipment needed to provide currentand relevant training with commitment and assistance from these same local industries; (4)receiving awards and discounts from manufacturers selling equipment to our local industries andour labs because we are training students in the same technologies our industries are using; (5)helping local industries save money by reducing their training
education including teaching with technology, assessing teaching and learningand teaching and learning through diversity. In addition, participants work on their teachingportfolios and develop a teaching-as-research project plan for later implementation. In line withthe CIRTL pillars, this program develops a short-term, but intensive, learning communityatmosphere while exposing participants to the teaching-as-research and learning-through-diversity concepts. Evaluation of the program indicates that it is very well-received byparticipants with 94% agreeing that they would recommend the institute to a friend. In addition,nearly 60% of participants agreed that they both understood how to develop a teaching portfolioand had outlined an effective
description languages, and only 40% of the four-year are planning tointroduce hardware description languages in the near future [3].Clearly, electrical engineering technology programs are far behind in teaching the skills thatrepresent current and future industry needs. As a result, the School of Technology is stepping upto this challenge by developing and introducing curriculum in hardware description languagesand programmable logic design. The major objectives of this curriculum shift are to give the Page 22.333.3students in the Electrical Engineering Technology program the opportunity to learn andexperience logic design using FPGA that is in line
objective analysis of the design process in a global context in order to enhance usability, influence perception, and increase appeal relative to cultural standards. At the conclusion of the RSAP travel abroad experience, students will be able to: identify and annunciate properly five basic phrases in the native language of the country visited demonstrate an ability to plan, execute, and lead three critical aspects of a study abroad visit evaluate their experiences in the study abroad program for improvement in key areas of leadership, communication and cultural awareness.The focus of this paper is on the steps
appropriate modifications in order to prepare the students for ethical issues they will face in their engineering practice. (2) The authors have been developing ethics modules that could be integrated into two undergraduate engineering courses: (1) transportation engineering and (2) intelligent transportation systems. (3) The authors plan to submit an NSF TUES grant for this effort.Bibliograpy Page 22.385.51.Gilbert, L. D. 1973. The changing work ethic and rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation, 39 (4).2.Miller, P. F. & Coady, W. T. (1989). Teaching the ethics of work. Vocational Education Journal, 64
ethics.The laboratory component consists of five laboratories where students analyze an automobilelighting system to reinforce fundamental principles, use a breadboard to create a circuit with anoperational amplifier, and assemble a radio from a kit. In addition, a laboratory where studentsdesign and build a functional product with attention to aesthetics has been introduced to exercisetheir creativity. The creative process is marked by progression through various stages such asbrainstorming, forming a construction plan, drawing schematic representations of the product,and implementation of the design. This project is motivated by the need for creative thought inengineering undergraduate students to enable enhanced product design. Each semester
assessed, and will support futurecomponents of the project (identification of error patterns and assessing effects of priorknowledge). This overall project plan is summarized in Figure 1.Figure 1. Summary of project plan and evaluation plan components: inputs, outputs, outcomes,and evaluation methods.In-class Data CollectionTablet PC software called MuseInk® has been developed by one of our research team membersas a means for collecting digital Ink data. The software allows students to work problems on aTablet PC, and stores the digital Ink in such a way it can be played back, annotated and queried.Students work through problems much as they would with pen and paper, with the added benefit
of exercises have been developed so far, which basically consist of building 3Dmodels with cubes:• Type 1: Coping 3D Model. This consists of copying the proposed 3D model (as seen on Figure 3).• Type 2: Three views. This consists of building a 3D model using three orthogonal views, front, top and right. To develop this project we used the first angle projection, the ISO standard primarily used in Europe with three standard views: front view, top view and right view (see Figure 4).Figure 3. Type 1: (a) Screen 1: suggested task (b) Screen 2: 3D plan where the student solves the taskFigure 4. Type 1: (a) Screen 1: suggested task (b) Screen 2: 3D plan where the student solves
short, open -endedenergy questions, to better discern any improvement.AcknowledgmentsThe United States Department of Energy (DE-FG02-04ER63821) and the CACHECorporation are acknowledged for partial support of this project.Bibliography 1. Energy Policy Act of 2005, August 2005, available online at: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ058.109.pdf, accessed January 2011. 2. Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan: Planned Program Activities for 2005-2015, Technical Plan – Education, April 2009, available online at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/mypp/pdfs/education.pdf, accessed January 2011. 3. J. M
worked during the summer. Note that we had one studentworking directly with the development team, the automation (or test) team, and build team. - Automation Tool for Smart Regression (iAutomate) As part of a broader “continuous integration” project3, two Texas A&M summer interns were assigned to a project on Smart Regression, while a third intern was fully dedicated to the Test team. This project was well planned by the Cisco team even before students arrived. As part of the automation and testing, a large suite of testcases are included in each regression. Thus, when there are changes in the new software code for the call manager, all these testcases must be run. However, due to the large
scheduling conflicts among themselves. Each student team must develop and presentfor approval a project proposal. The proposal outlines specific objectives, required resources,time-table of project execution, roles and responsibilities. Team effectiveness is also judged bythe timely completion of project deliverables. The project execution plan is the basis ofassessment. Fig. 5 shows such an execution plan. Informal project updates occur on a weeklybasis. A formal mid-term project status update is part of the course grade. Final projectpresentation and reporting occur at the semester end. This requirement aims at improving writingand presentation skills.Tasks Dates1: Software Training2: Proposal3: Initial Simulation4: Individual
collectiondevelopment goals will be to grow our electronic collections.The New Science and Engineering Building Our university is a new campus, relative to many universities in the state. However, it isgrowing rapidly, especially in the sciences. In the last five years, our university opened twomulti-disciplinary science and engineering buildings. The newest building, the AppliedEngineering and Technology Building, opened for occupancy in Fall 2009 and officially inSpring 2010; our library opened few months later, in May. In the original plans for the building, a laboratory space was built where our library isnow. The architects and builders outfitted the room with various lab specifications, including aneye-wash station, a multitude of power
methodology. The coretopics are assessed through theoretical questions including true/false questions, shortanswers, and algorithm simulations. Table 2 shows the comparison of student scores oncore topics in Fall 2008 and Fall 2010 course offerings, respectively. From the table, theimprovement on student scores is tremendous. The D&F rate has dropped from 50% to21%. Even though with the limited number of samples we cannot simply conclude thatthe practice-oriented approach is the mere contributor to this improvement, without anydoubt, the hands-on experiments do help students digest the core theoretical data miningconcepts. In future, we plan to develop a detailed assessment rubric to evaluate theeffectiveness of course delivery systematically
servicedevelopment, testing and alternative energy product certifications with an emphasis on theelectrical and electronic systems. The SES program helps prepare you to take the Alternative-Energy Integrator Certification examinations offered by the Electronics Technicians Association,International.” The SES degree program sequence plan is provided in Table 1. The certification componentof the program description is explained in the next section.Table 1. SES program sequence plan.2. Designing a curriculum for assessment The faculty agreed unanimously the new program should not be designed for installers, butrather designers who possess a great breadth of knowledge that embellishes their expertise inelectronics. It was also decided that external
Electrical orComputer Engineering) or a Biomedical Sciences minor (through Mechanical Engineering) 1;both options offer students an opportunity to take coursework and some laboratory work in thebiomedical area well into their plan of study. Implementing a full scale biomedical engineeringprogram is not feasible without significant additional recourses or an affiliated medical school.There is little opportunity to work in a laboratory setting on projects related to biomedicalengineering in the first year of study, as is the case for most if not all engineering programs.Engineering faculty met with faculty from the Department of Nursing while pursuingopportunities for undergraduate student research projects and, together, an undergraduateresearch and
plan that would help determine the extent to which thistechnology was changing the nature of teaching and learning. The plan was designed incollaboration with representatives from the School of Education at Virginia Tech.Conceptual FrameworkThe assessment approach tied to this initiative is informed by best practices and includesthe fundamental qualities of a comprehensive assessment program, including the idea thatthe evaluation, reporting, and use of results are an ongoing, cyclical process. This processis intended to be a transparent, public process involving many different stakeholders andit is designed to understand and improve student learning. The methodology uses asystematic process to collect and analyze data. Results are then used to
BOLD/GoldShirt studentsin Andrews Hall. These mentors have collaborated with other student leaders in the hall as wellas BOLD team leaders to introduce new culturally diverse activities. The cultural relevance ofthe artwork in of Andrews Hall became an issue on the radar to address. Student mentorsselected artwork for study lounges and common areas which reflect the cultures of students whoreside there. Other activities, such as a Mardi Gras celebration, are planned for the springsemester. These enhancements to the appearance of and activities in Andrews Hall will create amore welcoming environment for diverse students and an opportunity to share diverse cultureswith all students in Andrews Hall.Peer Mentoring ProgramA new peer mentoring
beginwith a summary of our comprehensive evaluation and research plan, followed by an overview ofapplicant and participant demographics. We then discuss the two different approaches used toarrange research placements in China, including some benefits and drawbacks for each. The nextseries of sections focus on program evaluation, starting with overall program evaluation based onparticipant feedback, and ratings and evaluations of the participants by their host supervisors. Wethen turn to evaluation results for the major program components, including the orientation and Page 22.950.4re-entry programs. In the final sections of the paper we discuss
Planning, University of Iowa, 2010 Page 22.1007.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Learning to Live with Floods: Pedagogical Advantages of a Thematic Short Course Centered on International ExposureAbstractThe increasingly global nature of all fields of engineering has created new pressures on educatorsto provide valuable international experience to their respective engineering students. The rigorsof the highly demanding engineering curriculum that prevent enrollment in study abroadprograms have been circumvented by the application of a short-term model that
to their grading performance on actual students’ solution. Samples of past TA feedback on students’ solutions was added to the PD slides to provided discussion points on what not to write for feedback while providing examples from expert feedback.5. Analysis of TAs solutions. During post-training, the PR provided an analysis of TA training assessments in comparison to experts’. In the analysis, each TA is ranked with where they stood in applying the MEA Rubric in comparison to their peers.B. Preparation ExperienceThe PR used the following model to prepare TA training: plan, rehearse and refine. The trainingpreparation tries to emulate the actual experience of faculty when preparing for actualclassrooms instructions. The PR
skills. As a result, the faculty developed a specific plan for introducing, teaching,reinforcing, and assessing these important civil engineering professional skills. Page 22.1632.3 Table 1: Acheivement of Outcome (l) Outcome (l) an ability to explain basic concepts in management, business, public policy, and leadership First Assessment: CIV 358-Project Management, Fall 2009, 15 students Minimum Measurement Performance Criteria
. Page 22.1489.7The process generally followed a curriculum design flow23 , beginning by establishing high- levelobjectives. These objectives included: ● Enhance design and innovation capacity required in both academic and industrial settings ● Project based, with appropriate scaffolding in early years to develop project management, design process, teaming, communications skills ● Include plans for graduate attribute assessment, required by the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB)5 ● Includes the majority of the CEAB accreditation units required in engineering design ● Ensure structure is designed to allow future multidisciplinary projects ● Encourage professional behaviour and skills ● Utilize
empower indigenous communities to leverage wildlife and naturalresources for self-determined development in Africa.User-centered design (UCD) grounds the design process in information about the people whowill use the product4. UCD processes focus on users through the planning, design anddevelopment of a product. The showcase focused on attempting to understand the context of useand the specific requirements to develop technology-based solutions that address some of thechallenges faced by the Maasai and Himba tribes in Kenya/Tanzania and Namibia respectively.The explicit goal was to teach students to unravel the sticky information related to the context ofthe problem5 because that step is critical in the design of meaningful, innovative, and
engagement with the design activities in coursework. Page 22.1316.7Local Inquiry Questions that can help those involved with teaching and curriculum developmentbetter understand students’ conceptions of design and issues of confidence:Variability/Commonality: How are students in your college of engineering similar to oneanother? How are they different from one another? How well do faculty and policy makers onyour campus understand similarity and variability in your students’ motivation, background,interests, learning challenges, confidence, and future plans?Designing in Context: Do your graduates have the design skills they need? Do your