-build method also had a statistically significant effect onconstruction time at less than the 0.0001 level. The results indicate that, at least for the sampleprojects, construction time was significantly lower when design-build delivery method was used.By converting the value of the intercept and assigned values of delivery methods to theirexponentials (EXP), the model for estimating actual construction time in South India may beexpressed as follows:TIME = 2.354*COSTβ1*EXP(DBB)-0.094*EXP(DB)-0.661 Eqn. (4)While using the equation, the method(s) not adopted for delivery of construction should beremoved.ConclusionsThe results of the study indicate that the project cost and financing methods have a
), 33-46.7. Stage, F.K. and P. Kloosterman. (1995). "Gender, Beliefs, and Achievement in Remedial College-Level Mathematics." The Journal of Higher Education, 66(3), 294-311.8. Chapman, L. (2010). "Dealing with Maths Anxiety: How Do You Teach Mathematics in a Geography Department?" Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(2), 205-213.9. Merisotis, J.P. and R.A. Phipps. (2000). "Remedial Education in Colleges and Universities: What's Really Going On?" The Review of Higher Eduation, 24(1), 67-85.10. Hudspeth, M.C. (1978). "Teach Remedial Mathematics at Our University?" The Journal of General Eduation, 30(2), 117-128.11. Trenholm, S. (2006). "A Study on the Efficacy of Computer-Mediated Developmental Math
: Instructors are directed to the ABET Compliance Tracking System (ACTS) site to find: The list of performance criteria that are assigned to their course(s) The assessment form and directions on how to complete the assessment This is typically done at the pre-semester faculty retreat and continues into the first department meeting of the semester if necessary. This ensures that every instructor is aware of what and how he/she needs to assess. B. During Semester: All instructors are reminded that they need to document their course’s assigned performance criteria and to enter this information into ACTS. These reminders are made periodically at bi-weekly faculty meetings. C. End of Semester: Instructors complete assessment
. 58, 858-867.21. Thornton, 1996 forthcoming22. Thornton, R., & Sokoloff, D. (1998). Assessing Student Learning of Newton's Laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66, Issue 4, 338-352.23. S. Ramlo, 2002 forthcoming24. Steif, P. (2004). Initial Data from a Statics Concept Inventory. Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.25. Steif, P.S., and Dantzler, J.A. (2008). A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis. Journal of Engineering Education.26. Morris and Kraige 198527. Hestenes and Wells 1992 -- Hestenes, David, Wells, & Malcolm (1992). A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher
of part time has been unequal as part time are having biggerdistribution either in STEM related field or in Non-STEM related field. Table 2 Estimated Number of Faculty (1,000’s) of instructional faculty and staff by employment status in public 2-year colleges Fall 20031 All Disciplines STEM Full-Time Part-Time Full-Time Part-Time Male 63.6 124.5 18.4 31.4 Female 61.9 120.7 9.2 15.9 Page
Style Index: A Replication and Extension”. British Journal of Management.13 Entwistle, N.J. and Tait, H. (1996). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh.14 Amabile, T., Hill, K.G., Hennessey, B.A., and Tighe, E.M. (1994). “The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychological Association, 66 (5).15 Khatena, J. and Torrance, E.P. (1998) Khatena Torrance Creative Perception Inventory: Instruction Manual, Scholastic Testing Service, Inc. Bensenville, IL.16 Dasgupta, S. (1994). Creativity in invention and
in the early2000’s Kansas was the epicenter for renewed evolution debates related to K-12 curriculumchanges. Science standards were changed to reflect “Intelligent Design” for 2 years before beingrescinded in 2005).The 2009 Transportation Conference survey results showed that contact with local (county andcity) officials (30%) was double that with state officials. However, consistent with statepercentages, fewer than 10% of the respondents had contact with local school board officials.In June 2010, the authors co-presented to the KSPE Annual Meeting using similar content to the2006 ASEE Midwest Section presentation. However, the entire morning of the conference wasfocused on legislative issues and the final presentation of the morning was
, plus the emphatic support by the Page 22.175.3government, was sufficient for all parties to make the decision to go ahead with the initiative.Why Jalisco, Mexico?The Jalisco State Council of Science and Technology (COECYTJAL)’s vision is to succeedin making Jalisco an innovation and knowledge-generating hub through articulated,organized and complementary collaboration initiatives between the various public and privateinstitutions and players in the state4. To achieve this vision, they promote scientific andtechnology initiatives that are aligned with the social needs of Jalisco, aiming for continuousand sustainable development. The state
, which also differs from many other engineering andscience disciplines. These characteristics together paint optics as a much more interdisciplinaryfield, which also relies heavily on and provides technology to a wide variety of fields such aschemistry, materials science and engineering, nano-science, physics, electrical engineering, andmedical areas.[1] Bunch, R. M., C. Joenathan, A. Siahmakoun (2003). From Optics to Optical Engineering: 20 Years of OpticsEducation at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Proceedings from Education[2] Joenathan, C. R. B., S. Granieri (2005). Optical Engineering Education with Curriculum Mapping for ABETAccreditation. Proceedings from Education and Tranining in Optics and Photonics. in Optics and Photonics.[3
become a reality it is necessary to identify: 1) how students are thinking about Page 22.204.2engineering and 2) how their beliefs change over time. Since much of the previous research hasfocused on secondary levels, it is time that we take what has been learned and begin to determineat which stage(s) in the students’ development conceptions and beliefs are being generated. Forexample, if we know that female and minority students are shying away from engineering whenthey come out of high school because of lack of understanding about the profession, then it isvital to determine at what point they formulate these beliefs and implement
format dominates theseen. Students listen, take notes, and are allowed to ask questions at the end of the lecture orduring office hours. There seem to be less interest (by most of the faculty interviewed) in the Page 22.811.6process by which the course content is delivered during the lecture period, and more of aconcern whether the rate of delivery would allow the instructor to finish the course on time. Theviews expressed by the faculty and the impression(s) arrived at by the author, leads one tobelieve that it is highly unlikely that new more effective teaching-learning strategies would bedeployed any time soon, unless drastic measures are
of Science Resource Statistics (2007). S&E degrees, by race/ethnicityof participants: 1995-2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.3. National Science Foundation (2008). Statistical report on women, minorities and persons with disabilities inscience and engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/start.htm4. Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. BoulderCO: Westview Press.5. Fennema, E. (1998). What affirmative action has contributed to educational research. Educational Researcher,27(9):5-7.6. Hurtado, S., Cabrera, N.L., Lin, M.H., Arellano, L., and Espinosa, L.L. (2009). Diversifying science:Underrepresented student experiences in structured research
AC 2011-705: MULTIPLAYER ON-LINE ROLE PLAYING GAME STYLEGRADING IN A PROJECT BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TECH-NOLOGY CAPSTONE COURSEJames N. Long, Oregon Institute of Technology James Long is an associate professor in software engineering technology. Courses and interest are Soft- ware Engineering Project Course, Computer Networks, Operating Systems, Embedded Systems and ap- plications. James is the program director for the Embedded Systems Engineering Technology program.Linda Sue Young, Oregon Institute of Technology Professor Linda S. Young has taught at the Oregon Institute of Technology since 1983. She earned her Ph.D. in Rhetoric and Composition from the University of Washington in 1997, and has a master’s degree
not for profit boards. His interests include the integration of faith in all types and aspects of business including engineering and architecture, and the use of business in international community development.Tyler Scott Helmus, Calvin College TYLER S. HELMUS is a student currently enrolled in Calvin College’s engineering program. He expects to graduate in 2012 and hopes to attend graduate school after. research interests include robotics and control systems.Steven H. VanderLeest, Calvin College STEVEN H. VANDERLEEST is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College, Vice-President of Re- search & Development at DornerWorks, Ltd., and partner at squishLogic LLC. He obtained the M.S.E.E. from Michigan
enhance students’ critical thinkingskills. This researcher included some of the strategies learned from her literature review in herintervention classes. I included class discussions, debates, role plays, and collaborative learning.Each time I introduced a new critical thinking methodology, I had the students apply the conceptin class. Summary of Critical Thinking Pedagogy Pedagogy Researcher(s) 1. In-class active learning exercises Tsui, (1998, 1999) 2. Class discussions, debates, role plays, Braxton, Milem, & Sullivan, (2000); Paul & collaborative learning
multi-disciplinary design. (4) Provide a platform where student performance against the ABET general criteria for engineering programs (3 a-k )14 and civil engineering program specific criteria can be assessed (basically BOK I now and BOK II in the future).The senior design experience was tailored to ensure coverage of the appropriate programmaterial – items (1) – (3) in the above list suggests this. In some ways, constructing theappropriate assessment vehicle(s) was a more considerable challenge. The open-endednature of realistic design does not always lend itself to concrete assessmentmethodologies. So the creation of a time effective assessment scheme that forces anexperience that includes coverage of all outcomes to include
own words I will immediately attempt to find the I will underline the important solution to the problem words, list down facts and knowledge that I know, and identify concept/s that I need to learn. When a conflict arise I will accept my friends’ point of view I will keep thinking about the during problem to avoid prolong the discussion matter
UNC Charlotte in 2010 as Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and researcher in the Energy Production and Infrastructure Center (EPIC).S. Gary Teng, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. S. Gary Teng is Professor and Director of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management Program and Center for Lean Logistics & Engineered Systems at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He holds B.E., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering. Dr. Teng is a Professional Engineer in the State of Wisconsin and an ASQ-certified Quality Engineer and Reliability Engineer. His research interests are in engineering system design and analysis, lean systems design & implementation, Lean
schedule of lamp replacement so that students learn the practical meaning of ‘ratedlamp life’. To support Habitat’s sustainability goals, luminaire maintenance is achievable by thehomeowner without assistance of an electrical contractor.Recycling options for fluorescent lamps are also addressed in consumer education. Studentresearch of LEED requirements indicates that this educational component contributes to theLEED prerequisite for ‘Guidance on occupant activities and choices, including….lightingselection’13. This is part of the documentation included in an operations and maintenance manualprovided to the homeowner(s) satisfying the LEED Education of the Homeowner or Tenant
Department at the University of Wyoming wascontacted by one of our alumnus in the Spring of 2008 concerning development of an industrialcontrols course. The alumni had graduated in the early 1980’s developed a highly successfulindustrial control company that provided service to the chemical, mining, oil, petrochemical, gas,and automotive industries [1]. The alumnus was interested in supporting the development of acourse that emphasized the design of programmable logic controller (PLC) based systems vital toa wide range of industries and to support the ongoing demand for engineers educated inindustrial control concepts and applications. Further, the alumnus pledged financial support todevelop a physical laboratory and the required instrumentation to
Illinois School Report Card. Lincoln Junior High School. http: //www.lasalleschools.net/files/filesystem/Lincoln Junior High Report Card.pdf.16. Center for Nanoscale Chemical-Electrical-Mechanical Manufacturing Systems. http://www.nano- cemms.illinois.edu.17. National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity Education Foundation. Stereotypes turn girls off to math and science. www.stemequitypipeline.org/_documents/MythstcchCopywr.pressversion1.pdf.18. Clason, D. L. and Dormody, T.J. Analyzing data measured by individual likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education. 35:4. 1994. pp. 31-35. http://pubs.tamu.edu/jae/pdf/Vol35/35-4-31.pdf. Jamison. S. Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education: Blackwell
of:_______________ Reviewer:_____________ Item Check CommentsStyle/Grammar/StyleSentences are complete _____ ________________________________No repetition within abstract & LOT _____ ________________________________ASTM # included in methodology _____ ________________________________Sentences don’t begin with #s/symbols _____ ________________________________Numbers < 10 written in words ____ ________________________________0 placed before decimal _____ ________________________________Professional language (not colloquial
the material? The paradigm illustrated in Figure 2 will help in considering the origin of the properties. 4. a. Identify class of materials that should meet those properties b. Select 5-10 candidate materials from a database or other sources 5. Select equation(s) and calculate changes to material performance for each alternative 6. Does material need to be processed to achieve the desired properties? 6a. If yes, develop material processing necessary to meet the desired/required material properties. 7. Examine candidate materials in greater detail 8. Determine pros and cons for candidate materials 9. Develop argument in favor of final choice
. Page 22.822.106 Treisman, U. 1992. Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the Lives of Minority Mathematics Students inCollege. College Mathematics Journal 23(5), pp. 362-372.7 Wilson, D. 2008. Does it Matter? Psychological Sense of Community & Belonging in Engineering Education.Frontiers in Education 2008.8 Johnson, D.W., Johnson, D.T. & Smith, K.A. 1998. Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, 2ndEd. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.9 Hausfather, S. J. 1996. Vygotsky and schooling: Creating a social context for learning. Action in TeacherEducation. (18) 1-10.10 Jones, D.W. 1996. Empowering teams in the classroom can work. Journal for Quality and Participation, 19(1),80-86.11 Schmidt, L., Schmidt, J
. American Association of University Women. 2000. Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC. AAUW Educational Foundation.11. CIO Insight: Strategies for IT Business Leaders, Women in IT: Where Girls Aren’t, April 2007. Available on-line at http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2110749,00.asp12. Daley, W. Speech of U.S. Commerce Secretary. Delivered at 1998 National Information Technology Workforce Convocation, Berkeley, California, January 12, 1998.13. Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D., and Leifer, L.J., “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning”, J. Engineering Education, pp. 103 – 120, January 2005.14. Conley, C. H., Ressler, S. J., Lenox, T. A., and Samples, J. W., “Teaching
each of thefollowing questions. a. ______________________ b. ______________________ c. ______________________Rate the members of your team (including yourself) for each of the following statements. You do not need to write theindividual names for each question, but make sure the letter for each individual corresponds to the letter for the individualidentified above (keep the same order). 1) Followed all of the agreed upon rules. (1 to 5: 1 strongly disagree –– 5 strongly agree) a. _______ b. _______ c. _______ 2) Attended lab(s) for this assignment. (Yes or No) If no, indicate how much notice was given to team members. a. _______ ________How much notice