25 (17.2%) 27 (18.6%) 42 (29.0%) 51 (35.2%) 2.18 (1.10)Short collaborative active learning activities in lecture, 22 (15.0%) 30 (20.4%) 45 (30.6%) 50 (34.0%) 2.16 (1.06)such as working in pairs on a problemDiscuss sociotechnical issues, such as climate change 13 (9.0%) 39 (27.1%) 50 (34.7%) 42 (29.2%) 2.16 (0.95)or internet security, to contextualize course contentIn-class demonstrations for other purposes 18 (12.9%) 28 (20.0%) 50 (35.7%) 44 (31.4%) 2.14 (1.01)Labs, designed to strengthen experimental skills 31 (21.4%) 22 (15.2%) 26 (17.9%) 66 (45.5%) 2.12 (1.21)Laboratory reports
an undergraduate he studied hardware, software, and chemical engineering. He ultimately received his Ph.D. from Oregon State University in Chemical Engineering. He is currently interested in the development of technology to study and promote STEM learning.Dr. Debra May Gilbuena, Unaffiliated Debra Gilbuena has an M.BA, an M.S, and four years of industrial experience including a position in sensor development. Sensor development is also an area in which she holds a patent. She has engineering education research focused on student learning in virtual laboratories and the diffusion of educational interventions and practices.Dr. Jeffrey A Nason, Oregon State University Jeff Nason is an associate professor of
Importance Satisfaction 1 Industrial Engineering courses at SIUE 2.94 2.19 2 Industrial Engineering courses at ITU 2.81 1.69 2 Industrial Engineering facilities at SIUE 2.81 2.56 3 Industrial Engineering technical elective choices at ITU 2.75 1.56 4 Industrial Engineering technical elective choices at SIUE 2.69 1.50 5 Industrial Engineering laboratories at SIUE 2.56 1.93 6 General Engineering courses at SIUE 2.12 2.13 7 General Education courses at SIUE
twoareas namely (i) those that have “simulations” and (ii) those that have “authenticinvolvement.” Simulations consist of contrived situations that are carefully designedto meet selected learning objectives and are under close faculty control. The authenticinvolvement activities expose the student to real situations with totally open-endedprojects, although the faculty may influence the selection of the situations and setperformance criteria to assure that positive learning objectives are met. Authenticinvolvements use outside clients while simulations use experimental laboratories,guided design, or case studies. In an article in 2006, Davis et al. [6] defines “thepurpose of the capstone engineering design course is to provide students
, 2004), “distributed cognition” (Hutchins, 1995), or “situated cognition” (Lave,1988; Lave and Wenger, 1991), and the cognitive-ethnographic methods we apply follow fromthat approach. In real-world scenarios, such as engineering design, much of the work isperformed by groups of individuals interacting with each other, mediated by tools and artifacts;thus, an adequate account of the moral judgments in engineering requires that we examine thegroup as the appropriate unit of analysis, not individuals considering hypothetical or historicalcases by themselves in the classroom or laboratory. Furthermore, we move from analyzing theindividual, where we can really only see the input and output of the cognitive process and haveto infer the structure of
their teaching. The changes coveredfour aspects: course syllabus, classroom discussion, assignments, and exams, which arediscussed in detail below.Course syllabus.Compared to their pre-workshop syllabi, participants’ revised syllabi were more focused ondetails related to the importance of academic integrity and university rules. Doug explained howhe modified his syllabus to clarify expectations for specific aspects of his course: I went from one line to a whole page, very, very clearly spelling out for the different aspects of the courses. And these courses that I teach have laboratory work, they have lectures, they have homework, they have exams, they have everything. I carefully spelled out what the expectations were
day the students were given a brief lecture showing how engineers use thetechnologies they were working with and were introduced to the state of the art including videoclips from work being done by researchers at various universities and tours of laboratories atECU. They then had to put this knowledge together to build a robot that could navigate a linedcircular path while determining how far it had traveled along that line, avoid running into otherrobots on the line, and determine what the depth was of some artificial terrain designed tosimulate the ocean floor. The students worked in pairs and in some cases groups of three toaccomplish the daily tasks
Learning and Development, Prentice Hall.18. Abdulwahed, M. and Nagy, Z. K. (2009), Applying Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle for Laboratory Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98: 283-294. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01025.x19. Sharp, J. E., Harb, J. N. and Terry, R. E. (1997), Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn in Engineering Classes. Journal of Engineering Education, 86: 93-101. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00271.x20. Stice, J. E. (1987), Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning. Engineering Education, 77.21. Brown, A. O. (2004), Undergraduate Finite Element Instruction using Commercial Finite Element Software Tutorials and the Kolb Learning Cycle. Proceedings of the
courses in thermodynamics, heat transfer, energy systems laboratory, cryogenics, and vacuum technology.Mr. David J Gagnon, University of Wisconsin - Madison David J. Gagnon (University of Wisconsin, Madison) is a Discovery Fellow and program director of the Mobile Learning Lab in the Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery at University of Wisconsin, Madison. He directs a team of educational researchers, software engineers, artists and storytellers that explore the inter- sections of learning science and media design, specializing in mobile media, video games and simulation. David is also the Director of the ARIS project, a free and open tool that allows anyone to produce mo- bile games, stories and tours. He is also active
qualitative examination of graduate advising relationships: The advisee perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(2), 178.8. McCuen, R.H., Akar, G., Gifford, I.A., & Srikantaiah, D. (2009). Recommendations for improving graduate adviser-advisee communication. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135(4), 153-160.9. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.10. Raoul Tan, T. L. & Potocnik, D. (2006). Are you experienced? Junior scientists should make the most of opportunities to develop skills outside the laboratory.” EMBO Reports. 7, pp. 961–964.11. Tomazou, E. M
Institute of Technology in 2000. Currently, she serves on the Editorial Board of the Springer Wireless Networks Journal and formerly on the editorial boards of IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing and Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks Journal. Her engineering education research interests are the status of under- represented minority groups and women in engineering as well as the impact of online learning on student proficiency in engineering laboratory courses. Page 26.862.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 How the Pathway to Engineering Affects Diversity in the
. Marzano, R., & Heflebower, T. (2012). Teaching & Assessing 21st Century Skills. Bloomington, INI: Marzano Research Laboratory.2. Wulf, W. (2006). Diversity in Engineering. Women in Engineering ProActive Network.3. Kimrey, J. (2013, July 26). Engineering futures are always bright. (Chron) Retrieved January 03, 2013, from http://www.chron.com/jobs/article/Engineering-futures-are-always-bright-4688904.php4. M. Knight and C. Cunningham, "Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a Tool to Investigate Students Ideas about Engineers and Engineering," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2004.5. Fussell Policastro, E. (2009, April). Engineers can change the world. (InTech) Retrieved January 03, 2014, from
challenges identified in a recent report by theNational Research Council 8.According with the conclusions of the Frontiers in Chemical Engineering project a newcurriculum that is to incorporate Multi-scale aspects should 6: • Integrate all organizing principles and basic supportive sciences throughout the educational sequence and should move from simple to complex • Be consistently infused with relevant and demonstrative laboratory experiences • Provide opportunities for teaming experiences and use of communications skills (written, oral, graphic) • Address different learning styles • The curriculum should be consistently infused with relevant and demonstrative examples
engineers for 2020 and beyond. Available from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/7126/7639.aspx4 Merriam, S., & Bierema, L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.5 Arkes, J. (1999). What do educational credentials signal and why do employers value credentials? Economics of Education Review, 18, 133-1416 Morell, L. (2012). Engineering education in the 21st century: Roles, opportunities, and challenges. Hewlett Packard Laboratories. Available from http://luenymorell.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/morell- eng-edu-in-21st-cent-roles-opport-and-challenges.pdf7 Young, J. (2012). Badges earned online
Paper ID #12397A First-Year Project-Based Design Course with Management Simulation andGame-Based Learning ElementsMr. Daniel D. Anastasio, University of Connecticut Daniel Anastasio received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009. He is pursuing a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering at the University of Connecticut while acting as a co- instructor for the chemical engineering capstone laboratory and the first-year foundations of engineering course. His research interests include osmotically driven membrane separations and engineering peda- gogy.Ms. Malgorzata Chwatko, University of
process and design educational and research programs that bring the concepts of innovation and entrepreneurship into the classroom and the research laboratory. Dr. Christodoulatos is leading the implementation of academic entrepreneurship through the creation of innovative curric- ula and overseeing the commercialization of the Institute’s intellectual property. He has been teaching and performing research since 1988 and has managed over a hundred and fifty major research projects exceeding $30M. Dr. Christodoulatos has developed and delivered entrepreneurship curricula and special- ized innovation and entrepreneurship workshops for faculty, administration and technical entrepreneurs in Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan. He
undergraduate computer engineering students is not at all clear.This is in part due to the nature of the discipline, which has continually changing technology andorganization. In this paper, we describe a project-based computer engineering curriculum, whichcomplements more traditional lectures and laboratory courses. We compare this curriculum withcurricula from other small universities in the US. We show how our curriculum is in agreementwith a mixed-mode approach that combines projects with traditional techniques. An assessmentof student outcomes is presented and successes and limitations are discussed.Critical issues in engineering educationIn 2003, Mills and Treagust2 summarized the critical issues in engineering education asidentified by
ool_opens_new_makerspace University of Colorado http://www.colorado.edu/envd/resources/c12A CINC Boulder inc University of Colorado12B ITLL http://itll.colorado.edu/about_us Boulder http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/esc/desi gnlabs/ Unified Projects13 Dartmouth College http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/esc/ Laboratory https://engineering.dartmouth.edu/safety
students in allsections of the course. As the instructors at UM note, not all faculty have access to an on-campuseducational theater group. Even so, we were inspired enough to make our own presentation. Ourintroduction to engineering course is divided into a portion that is team-based, a weekly lecture,and a portion that is conducted in a more traditional laboratory-and-recitation format. Thecourse’s instructional team itself is team-based, which means we value the power of teams at thesame time that we incorporate ideas from a wide range of sources. It seemed to us that even aneffort that was not supported by an educational theater group would be beneficial to initiating aconversation about teamwork.A. Literature ReviewAlthough much of the
teamwork in their courses throughassignments and laboratory experience. By sharing ideas with classmates, students develop abetter understanding of the concepts being taught while keeping each other accountable. Page 26.120.10McDonald (27) also explained that, in cooperative learning, students work together to maximizeboth their own learning and group members learning. Collaboration improves not only thestudent’s knowledge and memory but also his/her confidence in both themselves and the class. Aclass of junior electronic students were divided into groups of two to four students. Thesestudents kept journals throughout the semester on their
manufacturing activities at Yale’s academic makerspace. His professional interests in Mechanical Engi- neering are in the areas of data acquisition/analysis and mechanical design. He is the Co-Chair of the Executive Advisory Board of the FIRST Foundation and is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechan- ical Engineering. Previously, he was the Dean of Engineering at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy and has had fellowships at the MIT Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, the Harvard School of Public Health and with the American Council on Education. He has also served as the Vice President of Public Awareness for the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and was the 2001 Baccalaureate College Professor of the Year by the Carnegie
classroom sessions.The following elements of the re-designed course were consistent with previous semesters. Theinteractive response system was used during lectures. However, the questions in the re-designedcourse were largely conceptual and less calculation-based questions were incorporated. The sametextbook has been used since Fall 2013; individual homework assignments were dueapproximately semi-weekly and incorporated online exercises for concept mastery and problemsrequiring multi-step solutions with detailed calculations. The exam style (discussed previously)and difficulty was consistent with previous semesters, to the extent possible. Since Fall 2013, thecourse has incorporated laboratory demonstrations and required student lab reports with
methods improves theresults.To date, the instructional approaches described above have been used only by one instructor.Our plan for broader implementation is to incorporate these approaches into an interactivecomputer-based tutorial, so that other instructors can easily assign such work without having toheavily revise their lecture approaches. The interactive tutorial could incorporate simulated or“virtual” laboratory experiments, where students could gain “hands-on” experience related to theideas we are presenting. This tutorial will be incorporated into our existing Circuit Tutorsoftware package,13-15 which we plan to distribute through a textbook publisher at some point toensure its sustainability.6. Conclusions
Sustainability Practices, en- ergy management of Data Centers and to establish Sustainable strategies for enterprises. He is an Affiliate Researcher at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, focusing on the energy efficiency of IT Equipment in a Data Centers. As a means of promoting student-centric learning, Prof. Radhakr- ishnan has successfully introduced games in to his sustainability classes where students demonstrate the 3s of sustainability, namely, Environment, Economics and Equity, through games. Students learn about conservation (energy, water, waste, equity, etc.) through games and quantifying the results. He has pub- lished papers on this subject and presented them in conferences. Before his teaching
Women < Men Medium Laboratory, Research, and Studio Space Women < Men Eldercare Policies Women < Men Stop the Clock Policies Women < Men Page 26.162.7RIT included an additional question: How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the quality of the long-range career map/plan that you have created? Of the 404 respondents to this particular question (thisexcludes the 18 who did not respond), 52% of men and 55% of women respondents were very satisfiedor satisfied with the quality of
that the team confronted a varietyof challenges, many of which are common to faculty and students seeking to pursue research ordesign endeavors in a small college. We now provide a more detailed explanation of thechallenges of the experience, explaining how they applied to this case in particular:-Small college facilities: Compared to large research universities, the laboratory space,equipment, and other resources were quite limited.-Limited budget: In line with the above, financial resources were modest as well.-Multidisciplinary team and project: With a professor of electrical engineering mentoring astudent with a mechanical engineering concentration, both student and instructor would need tobranch out beyond their comfort zone to tackle the
heart of our e-pedagogy is to provide opportunities for learners to think about new questions or work with newinformation. An effective way to increase the likelihood of this kind of thinking is to havelearners write about their ideas, which occurs throughout the Rio’s Brain learning adventure. Page 26.475.7Figure 3: Sample screenshots from the introductory graphic novel in the Rio’s Brainlearning adventure. They show Rio coming to Sadina’s house for help; Rio telling thebackstory of his camping trip; Rio telling about falling off a cliff; Rio in bed in theSCARE laboratory; Rio looking at his own brain in a vat; and Rio and Sadina
Elliott Tew. Becoming experts: measuring attitude development in introductory computer science. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 183–188. ACM, 2013.17 Arlene Fink and Mark S. Litwin. How to measure survey reliability and validity, volume 7. Sage, 1995.18 John Hill, Curtis A. Carver Jr., Jeffrey W. Humphries, and Udo W. Pooch. Using an isolated network laboratory to teach advanced networks and security. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, volume 33, pages 36–40. ACM, 2001.19 Robert W. Lent, Steven D. Brown, and Kevin C. Larkin. Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of counseling psychology, 33(3):265, 1986.20 Celia Paulsen, Ernest McDuffie