26.1050.3subject-area curricula 26; teachers need pedagogical models and experience with integratingengineering into their curricula 27, and research strongly supports CDB professional developmentas an effective model to improve teacher content knowledge and practice26.C. Purpose of StudyThe purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a CDB professional developmentprogram in improving K-12 teachers’ understanding of engineering subject-matter, self-efficacyin engineering curriculum design, and proficiency with integrating engineering design strategiesin project-based engineering units. We asked the following research questions: (1) What effectdid a CDB professional development have on teachers engineering subject-matter knowledge?(2) What
Paper ID #11198Starting with the a-ha: An integrated introduction to solid and fluid mechan-icsDr. Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College Jenn Stroud Rossmann is Associate Professor and Department Head of Mechanical Engineering at Lafayette College. She earned her BS in mechanical engineering and the PhD in applied physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Lafayette, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College. Her scholarly interests include the fluid dynamics of blood in vessels affected by atherosclerosis and aneurysm, the cultural history of engineering, and the aerodynamics of sports
Paper ID #12271Application of Active Learning Techniques in Undergraduate Civil Engineer-ing CurriculumDr. Dimitra Michalaka, The Citadel Dr. Dimitra Michalaka is an Assistant Professor at the department of civil and environmental engineering at The Citadel. Dr. Michalaka received her undergraduate diploma in civil engineering from the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), after which she entered into the transportation engineering grad- uate program at UF. She graduated with a Master’s of Science in May 2009 and with a Ph.D. in August 2012. Her research is primarily focused on traffic operations, congestion
Paper ID #11725Developing Leaders by Putting Students in the Curriculum Development DriverSeatMiss Yazmin Montoya, LEADMr. Aaron Eduardo Pacheco Rimada, University of Texas at El PasoErwin Delgado, Univerity of Texas at El PasoIsaiah Nathaniel Webb,Dr. Meagan R. Vaughan, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Meagan R. Vaughan received her PhD from The University of Texas at Austin where her research focused on the design of a low-cost, volume adjustable prosthetic socket. Now an Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, she is helping develop a new Engineering Leadership Program to help students to bridge the gap
Paper ID #12723Integrating Entrepreneurship into Capstone Design: An Exploration of Fac-ulty Perceptions and PracticesMs. Victoria Matthew, VentureWell Victoria Matthew is Senior Program Officer for Faculty Development at VentureWell, where she plays a lead role in the Pathways to Innovation Program, Epicenter’s faculty development and engagement strategy. She designs in-person and online convenings, engages experts, and curates content that foster the Pathways faculty goals of integrating entrepreneurship and innovation into undergraduate engineering. Prior to joining VentureWell, Victoria worked for over a decade in
called ‘Construct for Practice’ (C4P) in an effort toprovide students with context-rich experiences. In addition to merging the topic-specific content,the C4P laboratory is co-convened among sophomore, junior and senior levels to facilitate theincorporation of design and project management functions into the building process. Theresulting laboratory is both horizontally integrated (among topics) and vertically integrated(among roles). Now, after four complete semesters of implementation, graduates of the CMprogram have experienced the complete cycle of the laboratory. This paper describes how thelaboratory curriculum has developed over time, presenting a summary of lessons learned, costsassociated with the laboratory and recommendations for
Paper ID #11353Modular Integrated Stackable Layer (MISL): An Academic-Public SectorPartnership for Rapid Prototyping and DevelopmentDr. Joseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M University Joseph A. Morgan has over 20 years of military and industry experience in electronics and communica- tions systems engineering. He joined the Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Department in 1989 and has served as the Program Director of the Electronics and Telecommunications Programs and as the Associate Department Head for Operations. He has served as Director of Engineering and Chief Technology Officer in the private sector and
important element of the newengineering curriculum. Educators have devoted more time to producing an engineer that has notonly the required skills, but also societal and global awareness. Service learning projects connecttraditional classroom teaching with real world needs on a local or even global scale. Projectbased learning stimulates the process of collaborative problem solving, a skill that has beenidentified as important for the future engineer. Additionally, student interest in service learninghas created institutional momentum for integration with traditional subjects. There are other Page 26.601.3benefits to service learning; one can
together to more fully address morecomplex design problems.There is a diverse set of engineering design experiences, skills and knowledge that pre-collegestudents acquire. As students matriculate, one of the main skills that engineering collegegraduates obtain from their education is the ability to efficiently and effectively solve a problem[17] . When students with pre-college engineering exposure enter the college engineeringclassroom, they may experience the tension of trying to reconcile previous experiences withthose taught in college [1]. Regardless of their previous experience, there has been an increasingfocus on encouraging design exploration and reducing fixation [18] while also teaching students tobetter integrate mathematical
wider exploration of global climate change. Taken as a whole, the ethics assignments andreflective engagement of students produced gains in critical thinking and reflective action, alongwith resistance from some students policing disciplinary boundaries of the course, opening spacefor motivating conversations about the syllabus in the context of the larger engineering program.The presentation concludes with some lessons learned related to design of assignments,motivation of social justice topics, scaffolding for specific social justice concepts andterminology that may be new to students, challenges of transforming an over packed curriculum
. Page 26.866.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Humanizing Signals and Systems: A Reflective AccountAbstract:In this paper, I authentically and reflectively depict my journey as an engineering educatordelving in the challenge of integrating technical content of a continuous-time signals and systemsclass with the social, value-laden realities that encompass such concepts. I refer to this particularchallenge as humanizing the technical content of signals and systems. Specifically, I describe thesignals and systems course and how I structured content and assessment plans to create space forhuman values. Additionally, I critically examine how some barriers that worked against myefforts
practice but to engineering and engineeringtechnology education as well.Past reports and studies have been prepared by the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE), the National Academy of Engineers and the American Society Civil Engineers (ASCE)discussed that the changes are needed for improvement of engineering education. Numerousstudies revealed that the engineering curriculum of today still does not provide the foundationnecessary to ensure the engineer’s success in the 21st century. In the past, the skills workersacquired would serve them well for decades. In the 21st century, however, an engineer’s successor a company’s success will be measured against how well they can adapt to new conditions andtechnologies. Thus to remain
Electrical Engineering CurriculumAbstractThis paper presents findings from an impact study of a lower division student experience withinan undergraduate electrical engineering curriculum. This experience, culminating in the secondyear of the curriculum, is integrated across multiple first and second year courses and includeselements commonly found in senior-level capstone project courses. An introductoryprogramming course utilizing an embedded platform is the first course in the sequence. Thefinal course in the sequence requires students to design, build, and test an autonomous mobilerobot. Through a series of milestones, students systematically complete both the hardware andembedded software tasks required for the project. The final milestone
Coursework Page 26.1249.2 Preparing Students for Industry by Integrating Commercial Software into CourseworkAbstractThe “automation” of engineering tasks has been an issue in engineering education since at leastthe time of the first handheld calculator. Whether or not to require the use of “trig tables” is anargument settled long ago, but the role of software in engineering education continues to be atopic of discussion.This paper presents one model that addresses this topic from the development of the textbook allthe way through the delivery of the student experience by individual faculty members. In thiscase, text book authors partnered successfully with an
Innovation & Entrepreneurship Course Sequence Abstract A pilot program at Stevens Institute of Technology is described to integrate senior-year capstoneengineering design with a two-semester course sequence that addresses innovation andentrepreneurship (I&E), these topics representing an evolving core thread in the curriculum toaddress the demands of 21st Century careers. The pilot has specifically addressed the challengesof doing this with multidisciplinary design projects. The pilot team comprised experiencedcapstone design coordinators from several disciplines together with faculty members who teachentrepreneurship. Separate multidisciplinary sections of the two-semester senior capstone designcourse had a lead faculty coordinator with
Human-Robot Interaction course for graduate students with pre-requisite skills in linearalgebra, MATLAB, Simulink, and Digital Signal Processing7. This course focused on aninvestigation on human-robot interaction and prosthetic control. There was a specific focus onadvanced man-machine interface including neural signal processing, electromyography, andmotion tracking interfaces for controlling and receiving feedback from robotic devices. Therewas an exploration of human physiology and anatomy, signal processing, intent determination,communications between the human and the device. The labs were completed by using theVirtual Integration Environment (VIE) and with robotic devices. All of the programming wascompleted in MATLAB and Simulink. The
2.0.SPIRIT 2.0 set out to capitalize upon the creativity and ingenuity of the teachers who had beensuccessfully trained in the SPIRIT project to develop an extensive middle school curriculum for Page 26.460.3teaching STEM concepts. 6 The curriculum was based upon problem-based activities with theCEENBoT™, and produced over 300 free lessons and led to a large statewide K-12 roboticsshowcase, the Nebraska Robotics Expo.7,8 The CEENBoT™ also came to replace the TekBot inthe vertical integration model in the department as well. Each entering freshman received partsto built a CEENBoT in their first CEEN course. Students owned their CEENBoT and took
methods of attaining compliance with this criteria. This work shows 2 differentmethods of complying with the criteria within large public universities with undergraduatestudent populations in excess of 700 each. One method places emphasis on integrating safetythroughout the entire core curriculum within mini design projects mainly through student self-learning. The topics are then reinforced within the capstone courses during senior year. Thesecond method places emphasis on distributing safety topics among the unit operations andsenior design courses supplemented by an elective course in Chemical Process Safety. Repeatedemphasis of safety alongside technical content results in a relatively strong connection to thecontext of chemical process
with computational simulation in the classroom, we extendpractices in curriculum development to propose an integration method that will assist faculty ineffectively incorporating research-grade simulations into their existing courses.IntroductionNanotechnology is a rapidly growing area of research1, therefore training students to understandatomic level principles and have the skills necessary to work in nanotechnology-related projectsis critical in all fields of engineering and part of a multidisciplinary engineering education2. Yet,the growing body of research related to nanotechnology education has consistently found thatstudents struggle with concepts at the nano-scale3–6. Simulation tools developed for research canprovide deep insight into
fundamental computer science knowledge to high school teachers. Goal 3 Help high school teachers address their curriculum standards. Goal 4 Train high school teachers to integrate modern pedagogical tools with their teaching. Goal 5 Acquaint high school teachers with cutting-edge computing technologies. Goal 6 Establish networking among high school teachers and university educators. Goal 7 Attract minorities to the computing field.The seven goals above are adapted from those of our 2013 workshop. A few modifications weremade based upon the surveys collected from the 2013 workshop. For instance in 2013, severalhigh school teachers mentioned that they always met technical difficulties when they
Paper ID #12303Assessing the Impact of Engineering Outreach Frequency on Middle-schoolStudents’ Interest in EngineeringDr. Joyce Blandino, Virginia Military Institute Dr. Joyce Blandino received her Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute. Prior to that, she taught in the Biology Department at Washington and Lee University. Before that, she was a faculty at James Madison University.Dr. Jon-Michael Hardin, Virginia Military Institute Jon-Michael Hardin, Ph.D. Professor and Department
Paper ID #13633Sparkfun Inventor’s Kit with Arduino - Curriculum ExchangeMr. Brian Huang, Sparkfun Electronics Brian Huang is an Education Engineer for SparkFun Electronics, a cutting edge open-source hardware and electronics education company. Brian started his career in engineering with wireless transport tech- nologies for ADC Telecommunications in Minneapolis, MN. While working at ADC, Brian volunteered at the Science Museum of Minnesota and quickly discovered a passion for teaching and working with students - especially in an environment that fostered and supported the ”wow” factor associated with in- quiry and
introducing only one or two new concepts. We layer the activities so that students are introduced gradually to concepts around computer science and programming. The Digital Sandbox has 5 LEDs prewired, an integrated RGB (Red, Green, Blue) LED, and multiple sensors to allow students to interact with hardware by writing their own control software. The complete curriculum and activities are available online in two formats one which is designed using ArduBlock, a graphical programming environment and, one using the traditional textbased Arduino programming environment. These links are provided above. In addition, we are excited to share an alternative, free, online simulation environment of the same board. This virtual simulation allows all
, educational agencies and organizations.Dr. Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech Jeremy V. Ernst is an associate professor in the School of Education at Virginia Tech. He currently teaches graduate courses in STEM education foundations and contemporary issues in Integrative STEM Education. He is also a Fellow of the Institute for Creativity Arts and Technology at Virginia Tech. Jeremy specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has curriculum research and development experiences in technology, engineering, and design education.Dr. Vincent William DeLuca, North Carolina State University V. William DeLuca, Ed.D. Dr. DeLuca
resistance may be student perceptionof writing as an audience-driven performance rather than perceiving writing as part of criticalthinking and creation of social action4. In data- and content-focused fields and disciplines, suchas those in STEM, it is difficult to integrate different forms and genres of writing into upper-levelundergraduate courses due to time constraints and concerns about coverage. Writing is seen as aseparate intellectual process because there are a limited number of courses taken as corerequirements from Humanities and Social Sciences, and many courses and writing programs donot demonstrate overt connections to STEM epistemologies. Although practicing STEM facultystress the importance of writing as part of their own careers
. Page 26.1699.11[8] NKIP Advisory Committe for Continuing Education, "Industry Partnership Survey - Northern Kentucky," Burlington, KY, 2013.[9] M. Torres and M. Sadat-Hossieny, "Modifying the Curriculum of an Engineering Technology Program to meet the Needs of Local Manufacturing Consortium.," in 2014 IAJC/ISAM Joint International Conference, Orlando FL, 2014.[10] R. Case, "The Anatomy of Curricular Integration," Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 215-224, 1991.[11] NKU, "Undergraduate Catalog - Engineering Technology Majors," [Online]. Available: http://nkuonline.nku.edu/smartcatalog/engineering-technology-majors.htm.[12] C. Nygaard, T. Hojtl and M. Hermansen, "Learning-based
assessment methodologies, etc.) to further enrich the learning experience infuture offerings.Summary and ConclusionsThis paper documented the need for introducing sustainability related courses in the CivilEngineering curricula and the steps taken at our institution to research, develop, and pilot testsuch a course in fall semester 2014. The new course demonstrated a successful integration ofsustainability concepts within a Civil Engineering curriculum. The pilot course combinedknowledge and expertise in transportation and environmental engineering disciplines andfostered a successful interaction between faculty members and students with interests in these
curriculum experience applying systemsengineering concepts in a two sequence senior capstone design course. Even though some programshave introduced systems engineering concepts in freshman or sophomore courses, there is noevidence of continuity in multiple courses in every year across the curriculum, with students gettingseldom systems engineering exposure in course during the first three years of their curriculum.The paper discusses the developed modules that will give students an initial exposure to the field ofsystems engineering as it applies to aerospace vehicles, while students in freshman year experiencenon-aerospace engineering projects as well. Students will learn key topics related to aircraft design,spacecraft and mission design
Paper ID #13493Innovating Engineering Curriculum for First-Year RetentionMs. Elisabeth A. Chapman, Clarkson University Ms. Chapman is an Instructor and Advisor (First Year Engineering Studies Majors) in the Wallace H. Coulter School of Engineering, Clarkson University in Potsdam, NY.Miss Elisabeth Maria Wultsch, Clarkson University Instructor/Advisor Clarkson University Potsdam NYDr. Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University Jan DeWaters is an Assistant Professor in the Wallace H. Coulter School of Engineering at Clarkson Uni- versity, in Potsdam, New York. She teaches introductory courses on energy issues and energy systems, and
of the ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd is a TEES Research Professor in the Office of Engineering Academic and Student Affairs at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. He was an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award