Paper ID #23222Teaching Undergraduate Manufacturing in a Flipped ClassroomDr. Dawn Wendell, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Dawn Wendell is an engineer whose past projects range from BattleBots robots to medical devices, for which she holds several patents. She received four degrees from MIT including a PhD in Mechanical Engineering. She worked as a fluid mechanics researcher in Paris, France before returning to MIT as Assistant Director of Admissions. Currently Dr. Wendell works as a Senior Lecturer in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering teaching design, manufacturing, and instrumentation
effective for a time;however, they did not address changes in technology or on-line resources that have more recentlybecome available and widely used. Moreover, the scenario-based videos were limited in scope toa single course in a single engineering discipline which restricted their overall utility across thecurriculum. Recent observations by the authors and input from current undergraduate studentsidentified new scenarios that needed to be addressed, including cheating in laboratory courses,cheating in project-based courses, and cheating on exams. Student Conduct professionals furtheroffered suggestions on the commentary provided by the video’s narrator to establish context forthe scenarios. This work in progress presents the updated set of
boxes, antennas and light and heavy fabricated structures, for communication, TV telecast, natural disasters management and Telemedicine application. Dr PS, designed and manufactured various types of antenna’s weighing from 200 pounds to 100,000 pounds. He was also actively involved in configuring the antenna controls and selection of motor and motor controllers. Dr PS, has advised more than 40 senior/capstone projects. One of his project won the national award from Airforce Research Laboratory in spring 2017. Project was on ”Design of the Load Carrying Vehicle (LCV)”- The project solution is a fully electric, autonomous, all terrain, load carrying vehicle. c American Society for
. During this time, Christina discovered a love for research, prompting her to pursue a Ph.D. She is a recipient of both a Graduate School Recruitment Fellowship and a Texas New Scholar’s Fellowship. She is a member of the National Science Teachers As- sociation, and currently serves as the STEM Education representative to the Graduate Student Assembly at UT.Dr. Todd L. Hutner, University of Texas, AustinDr. Richard H. Crawford P.E., University of Texas, Austin Dr. Richard H. Crawford is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and is the Temple Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow No. 3. He is also Director of the Design Projects program in Mechanical Engineering. He received his BSME
concepts using the Azelis line of construction additives and admixes for the mortar and concrete industry. Previously, Jessica worked as the principal scientist for the startup construction consulting company Concrete Process and Science (CPS). Before joining CPS Jessica was the Senior Scientist for CalStar Products a masonry products company specializing in the use of supplementary cementitious materials. Early in her career she performed numerous research projects for the Federal Highway Administration and through the University of Wisconsin-Madison including the use of nanomaterials for use in construction materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
aforementioned IDI, based on Bennett’s Developmental Model ofIntercultural Sensitivity (DMIS) [11], can be used to evaluate where an individual falls on adevelopmental continuum [3]. The IDI has been used widely for research, training, andevaluation purposes in the international education field, including in large-scale national studieslike the Georgetown Consortium Project [12] and multiple engineering education studies [8-9].Another class of “hybrid” instruments purport to combine the compositional and developmentalapproaches. For instance, the Global Perspectives Inventory (GPI) is comprised of six scales thatcover three dimensions: cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal, i.e., “thinking, being, andrelating” [13-14]. These scales and dimensions
Paper ID #23029CATME or ITP Metrics? Which One Should I Use for Design Team Develop-ment and Assessment?Prof. Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is an Industrial Professor in Chemical Process Design In the Depart- ment of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds a M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education. Her current research focuses on the application of blended and active learning to design teaching and learning, student assessment, and continuous course improvement techniques. She managed and was a key contributor to a two-year pilot project to
course work applicable to all streams as well as three hands-on team-based design projects representing each of the available streams, each student selects andenters one of the streams, often making a fine-grained selection of speciality after year two.Participants made reference to this process in their interviews, and some of them modifiedtheir selections in light of their experiences.How this process was experienced is of interest to us. For this group of students, adaptingto the style of teaching—and the way of learning promoted by the institute and thecollege—required some adjustment. They described their first year tutors as extremelyhelpful and supportive—as people they frequently visited with questions. All the womenin the sample stayed
Virginia. Dr. Irving was co-principal investigator on the Connected Classrooms in Promoting Achievement in Mathematics and Science project supported by the Institute of Education Sciences and an NSF funded Track 2: GK-12, Optimization and Institutionalization of the Science Fel- lows Supporting Teachers (SFST) Program. She is former chair of the Chair of the Columbus Section of The American Chemical Society and is a member of NARST, ASTE, ACS and NSTA. Current projects include being principal investigator on the ENABLE STEM NSF Noyce grant and two ITQ funded En- gineering is Elementary projects, as well as work on effective and appropriate use of modeling in middle and secondary school classrooms
Education Excellence Award.Dr. Tonia A. Dousay, University of Idaho Tonia A. Dousay is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Idaho and a Google Certified Innovator. She has more than 15 years of instructional design and eLearning project management experience. Tonia’s teaching and research focus on design-based learning activities and the knowledge and skills acquired and reinforced through these opportunities. Makerspaces currently serve as the hub of her research, creating an engaging environment to play with robotics, 3D printing, 3D modeling, and mo- bileography for K20 learners. Where some areas of education focus on STEM-learning, Tonia emphasizes STEAM-learning, giving attention to art
-year programs. It provides transfer students scholarships for tuition to attend sophomore-levelEngineering or Computer Science courses they have yet to complete. In year 4 of this grant, atotal of 499 students participated in our grant activities: 24 in Activity 1 during summer 2017, 44in Activity 2 during summer and fall in 2017, and 431 in Activity 3 during fall 2016 and spring2017. Also, activity 1, recruited and trained 22 mentors, tutors, and resident advisors, and activity4 also had 10 mentors. Additionally, in activity 5, 11 students have been involved so far in thebridge to engineering program and additional efforts are being made to recruit more.IntroductionThe goal of this project is to establish a sustainable ecosystem of success in
, intellegent transportation sysytems, and database systems for large projects. His research projects are funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT), and the UAE Research Foundation.Dr. John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. John D. Carpinelli is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology and Associate Director of its Institute for Teaching Excellence. He has served as coordinator of activities at NJIT for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and as a member of the Coalition’s Governing Board. He previously chaired NJIT’s Excellence in Teaching Awards Committee and is Past Chair of the
the Graduate Reference Curriculum for Systems Engineering (GRCSE). Before joining Stevens, Henry spent nine years with the Aeronautical De- velopment Agency, Ministry of Defense, India, working on aircraft design, aerodynamics, performance, optimization, and project management of the Air Force and Navy versions of the Indian light combat air- craft. He was also actively involved in promoting systems engineering among the aerospace community in India.Dr. Charles Daniel Turnitsa, Regent UniversityProf. Cheryl Beauchamp, Regent University Current Position: Chair, Engineering and Computer Science Department of the College of Arts & Science, Regent Univer- sity, Virginia Beach, Virginia Education: •Ph.D
and as a project management consultant. Her research contributes to the advancement of labor and personnel issues in engineering broadly and specifically in the construction industry through two research areas: untangling the complex relationship between activities people become involved in — operationalized as engagement — and the technical and professional out- comes gained — operationalized as competencies. The broader impact of this work lies in achieving and sustaining productive, diverse and inclusive project organizations composed of engaged, competent peo- ple. Dr. Simmons’ research is supported by awards from NSF, including a CAREER award. She oversees the Simmons Research Lab (www.denisersimmons.com
continue his 15 year career in the video game industry. In recent years, Marty has taught adjunct in the game programs for the Art Institute and the University of Utah. In 2012 realized his goal and joined the Digital Media Department at Utah Valley University using his skills in the design, pre-production, and production phases of the video game and animation industries, his hope is to work closely with the other faculty to help the UVU students grow and stand above students from other schools and programs, ultimately making a difference in the highly competitive entertainment industry. Notable Projects: Top Gear Rally 2, Tiger Woods Golf, Nerf N Strike and N-Strike Elite, Monopoly Streets, Sims 3 Pets for the 3DS
Paper ID #22769Assessment of a Peer Mentoring Program to Build Capacity for Course De-velopment and DeliveryDr. Steven J. Burian, University of Utah Dr. Steve Burian is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Utah. He served as the first co-Director of Sustainability Curriculum Development, and is currently the Project Di- rector of the USAID-funded U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Water, the Associate Director of the Global Change and Sustainability Center, and the Founding Director of the Water Center – all at the University of Utah. His research group has contributed new
University of Central Florida (Orlando, Fl, USA). He has diverse expertise in human-computer interaction, quality engineering, and simulating human-machine systems. He previously worked on projects related to transfer of training in advanced human-machine systems, usability evaluation of everyday products and services, and research in multimodal systems and virtual environments. His current research inter- ests include virtual reality applications in manufacturing, multimodal interaction design, audio interfaces, advanced usability evaluation techniques, simulating complex human-machine systems, and advanced ap- plication of statistical techniques. Dr. Ahmad is a Certified Simulation Analyst and a Certified Six Sigma
Performance Management, the Journal of Computer Information Systems, the International Journal of Project Organization & Manage- ment, Transportation Journal, the International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management and the International Journal of Production Economics. His practical professional experience and research training are great assets as we work to understand the profound impact of soft skills and professional skills in the workplace. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Surprisingly Broad Range of Professional Skills Required for EngineersRobert Graham, Lecturer, Center for Leadership Education, Johns Hopkins
Paper ID #21338Quantifying Differences Between Professional Expert Engineers and Engi-neering Students Designing: Empirical Foundations for Improved Engineer-ing EducationProf. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas of research include engineering design
measures have started totaper in recent years [2]. To meet current and future workforce demands for more STEMprofessionals in the United States, we must be creative about how to move beyond this ceilingeffect; and, great potential exists among the growing population of students who begin theirpursuit of a higher education at institutions other than 4-year public/private colleges [11].The purpose of this research project is to increase understanding of engineering transfer studentsand their experiences at both sending and receiving institutions. Research sites include four ofthe top ten producers of U.S. Hispanic/Latino engineers; the framework of transfer studentcapital was used to organize the project’s data collection and analytical plan (Figure
, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of the (Engineers in Technical Humanitarian Opportunities of Service-Learning) for approximately ten years. She has incorporated service-learning projects into her classes and laboratories since she started teaching in 2000. Her research interests include community engaged learning and pedagogy, K-12 outreach, biomaterials and materials testing and analysis.Dr. M. Suzanne Franco, Wright State University Professor of Statistics and Research, Program Director for EdD in Organizational Studies, in the Leader- ship Studies in Education and Organizations Department, College of Education and Human Services.Dr. Leanne
research interests in the area of system improvement via quality improvement methods especially in the area of applied statistics, statistical process control, and design of experiments. Dr. Perry consults, instructs, and collaborates on quality improvement projects with representatives from biotech, health care, defense, and traditional manufacturing institutions. He has been an instructor for the Six Sigma Black belt training at the Six Sigma Institute for three years. He is a UCSD Certified Six-Sigma Master Black-Belt and an ASQ Certified Quality Engineer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Developing Changemaking Engineers – Year
and algorithm knowledge in a facial featuredetection and image processing application. This project is a Science Technology Engineeringand Math (STEM) extensive module and includes research analysis and activity components.Existing work focuses on teaching algorithms to students using interactive tools and games [3, 4,7]. This work lets students learn face detection algorithms using a library. Furthermore, studentslearn how to use the Dlib, Yattag, Cv, Numpy, Tkinter classes in Python along with thealgorithmic details. This application enriches school curriculum by adding machine/softwareinteractions and digital image processing. After completing the module activities, students areevaluated on basic understanding of face detection
individual subjects, and apply and integrate the previouslearning in a new context. The framework consists of a series of sound- and video-themebased lab experiments and projects [7,8], whose complexities and abstraction levelsgradually grow with the progress of curriculum. The lab framework covers both hardware and software aspects of computer systems and theexperiments are done in the SoC (system on a chip) context [14], in which a system contains ageneral-purpose processor for “housekeeping” tasks and hardware accelerators for computation-intensive tasks. The commercial SoC platforms are too complex and use the proprietary andencrypted bus interconnect and IP (intellectual property) cores. A simple, open, and vendor-neutral SoC platform is
Assessing Competencies in an Undergraduate Reinforced Concrete Design CourseAbstract:Traditional grading can be a common source of frustration for engineering faculty. Allocatingpoints consistently for partially correct work is a constant struggle and leaves something to bedesired. The lines between different grades certainly become grayed, and it seems possible that astudent can receive a passing grade in a course without ever answering a single problemcorrectly. Specification grading is a novel approach to grading that provides solutions to some ofthe common frustrations with traditional grading. Specification grading requires instructors todefine assignment, project, test, or even course level specifications. These
. She advises MS and senior project students at Cal Poly and actively supports several student clubs in- cluding: Women in Software and Hardware (by attending the Grace Hopper Conference) and the Indian Student Association (by serving as the faculty advisor). While at UC Santa Cruz, Theresa developed an innovative course in social networks, which served as an engaging introduction to graph theory and game theory concepts for students from across the university. Theresa’s research interests center around computer science theory and algorithms with emphasis on ap- plications throughout computer science and across disciplines. Specific areas of interest include: graph theoretic algorithms, approximation algorithms
the materials, before delving into the underlying science to understand why the chosenmaterials have properties that would make them suitable for the required applications. Theauthors’ idea was that the desire to succeed in the project would motivate the students to delvedeeper to understand the science behind the materials’ properties.Table I. The effect of changing the delivery sequence of the course contents Total # Maximum # Class Sections # Students Year Students per Class Size per year Dropping Class
engineering faculty experiences and perceptions utilizingthe Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) as part of larger long-term project aimed at improving teaching and learning in the College of Engineering at our hostinstitution. The current project can be viewed as consisting of four phases. The first phaseinvolved the assembly of our research team and our collaborative project design and selection ofa case study methodology to study a bounded system (i.e., teaching and learning in the Collegeof Engineering). Participants were selected employing purposeful criterion-based maximumvariation sampling within the College to serve as peer observers or instructors. Both groups(observers and instructors) attended orientation sessions
description for this course is “Introduction to writing for the engineering and engineeringtechnology professions. Definitions, descriptions, presentations, reports, manuals, and proposalsare covered. Reader-centered, process-driven writing and presentation skills are developedcentered on the engineering professions” [21] .Vertical IntegrationA vertical integration of projects in different courses in order to improve the evaluation of thestudents’ knowledge of the subject matter, as well as help facilitate the ABET assessment process[22] is proposed, and it is being gradually implemented [23]. The existing program capstonecourse EGT417 (Senior Project in Engineering Technology) is being used as the class where thestudents will conclude and present
in semesters past [2]. Technological tools rangefrom software, which provides students with a virtual tool helping students to observe andvisualize multiple concepts taught in lecture, to physical tools that can be used to providestudents with an interactive device that students can observe and learn from. Having studentsdesign and build physical technological tools as a form of a school project or summer internshipalso exposes them to real-life engineering applications [3]. This work presents the use of aphysical technological tool, which can be used in education to help reinforce and expand high-school and undergraduate engineering education.BackgroundHands-on technological tools have been used in education for many years. In 2009, a micro