compression, tension, or axial force andflexure and (ii) bolted or welded connections. Students develop a familiarity with the strengthand serviceability requirements of AISC 360 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings [1] thatis utilized in structural engineering design practice. Traditional methods of steel design lectureinvolve instruction on the failure modes and design criteria for an individual member orconnection type in isolation without exposing students to the systems-level perspective of howthese components are integrated into a building structure.This introduction section explores innovations in the context of these types of traditionalstructural steel design courses within the groupings of: project-based learning, computersimulation
, stricter government safety or environmental regulations also need to bemet. There are many examples, like cars and home appliances, that reflect this challengingscenario. Consequently, industry needs mechanical engineering graduates that have the necessaryknowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) to successfully participate in the design and developmentof complex products or systems.The fact that companies need engineering graduates with a good foundation in the process todesign and develop products and systems is reflected in the new ABET accreditation criteria [1]and in references such as the Engineering Competency Model that was jointly developed byAmerican Association of Engineering Societies (AAES) and the United States Department ofLabor (DOL
data on the extent of video viewing(coverage) of pre-class videos in three flipped undergraduate engineering courses (numericalmethods for engineers, fluid mechanics and engineering statics) as an initial step towardsimproving engagement with pre-class resources.Literature ReviewWhile the literature on flipped classes is extensive [1]-[3], studies on student engagement withpre-class materials are fewer, especially those related to viewing of pre-class videos designed toprimarily substitute (not supplement or review) traditional in-class lectures and instructor-ledproblem-solving sessions. Initial studies on engagement with pre-class videos were based onstudent self-reports that suffer from usual self-reporting biases and only recently have
implementation and outcomes of educational interventions at the K-12 and collegiate levels. She received her MS and Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2013, respectively. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 External representation design- for-sustainability intervention in engineering graphics courseIntroductionIntroduction to Engineering Graphics and Visualization is a freshman-engineering coursein many universities. In 1999, when Georgia Tech converted from quarter to semestercurricula, the College of Engineering created a three credit hour introductory engineeringgraphics course for undergraduates [1]. The fifteen-week course included
HistoryThe transition from high school to college can be difficult for many students, causing many todrop out of school. The first discussions of retention in higher education go back to the 1930s,but early research on this topic was focused mainly on why students fail instead of why theysucceed [1]. Vincent Tinto is credited with bringing this subject to the forefront and examiningother non-academic factors as to why students drop out of college [2]. Using this data, manyuniversities and colleges have implemented programs to assist students and improve retention,such as bridge camps, specialized introductory courses, tutoring and learning centers, andmentoring programs, to name a few [3]. Universities first started offering bridge camps overthree
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Facilitating Collaborative Engineering Analysis Problem Solving in Immersive Virtual Reality1. IntroductionThough immersive virtual reality technology has existed for over half a century, early hardwarewas inaccessible for the vast majority of potential applications due to cost and issues thatincluded significant discomfort and nausea [1]. Fortunately, the latest generations of immersivevirtual reality equipment have largely mitigated many of these issues through more responsivesensing and display as well as the incorporating of several decades of usability research intoapplication and interface design [2]. As a result, there has been a notable rise in the
freshmen at the institution, with lessaccess to student supports such as housing, orientation, retention efforts, or scholarships, as theytransition to the four-year institution [1]. Transfer students also have fewer opportunities toparticipate in high-impact learning experiences such as undergraduate research and internshipsthan first-time freshmen [2]. STEM transfer students can have challenges as they adjust tocampus life [3], [4], including course credit loss [5], which can delay graduation or lead toattrition, perception of lack of advisor support or misinformation [6], or perception of “stigma”as a transfer student [3]. Providing resources, supports, and access to select activities in the earlytransfer period thus is a critical time to
science students decide differently from their peers in other disciplines when facingcomputing ethics dilemmas. This study expands on previous research on ethical decision makingamong computing majors. The findings of this research have important implications for researchand practice. For example, it examines the arguments from previous literature regarding thedifferences of ethical decision making among different professions. Moreover, it will haveimportant implications for design of ethics courses in undergraduate level.The data is collected from two groups of students in a large Midwestern University: (1) 33computer science undergraduate students enrolled in a course on computing professional ethics,and (2) 40 undergraduate students enrolled
fields has studied textbook utilization, authentic real-worldproblems, problem-based learning strategies, and representation engagement [1]–[9]. Additionalproblem-solving research has compared novices (students) and experts (engineeringpractitioners) to understand the differences in their problem-solving behaviors [10]–[14]. Themajority of this research has focused on how problems are solved and what resources orrepresentations are used to solve them. Some anecdotal evidence can be found in research thatstarts to uncover reasons for why decisions are made during problem solving [15]. Additionally,recent related research with engineering practitioners has focused on the reasons particularproblem-solving decisions are made [16], [17]. However
Interest Levels of Male versus Female Students going into STEM Fields (Evaluation)IntroductionThe fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, also known as STEM, haveexperienced rapid growth in terms of their importance and the demand for qualified graduates[1]. STEM careers provide an essential driving force behind new innovations and growth in theUnited States. STEM fields have seen a job growth rate three times that of non-STEM careers,and are continuing to grow [2]. Despite efforts to increase the number of STEM graduates, TheUnited States is struggling to supply enough qualified workers to fulfill these demands. TheUnited States is facing a problem as students’ interest, and therefore literacy in STEM has
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Faculty embrace collaborative learning techniques: Sustaining pedagogical changeIntroduction Faculty development in teaching for university is often scattered and not supported in acoordinated way by science, technology, engineering, and mathematics departmentadministrators [1], [2]. For many years Professional Learning Communities (PLC) have been acommon practice in the K-12 teaching community and they provide means for teachers to learn,share, and encourage each other to develop and test new pedagogies [3]. More recently,practitioners of higher education have adopted a similar community professional developmentmodel to assist university teaching development and encourage
inspiring and empowering K-12 female students to pursue STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) majors and careers. Created in 2013, theFemineer® Program enhances the College of Engineering’s commitment to support underservedpopulations by recruiting and graduating increased numbers of historically underrepresentedstudents. Research has shown that men outnumber women in the STEM field. According to theNational Science Foundation, 20.5% of Engineering Bachelor degrees were awarded to women in2004 and 19.8% were awarded in 2014 [1]. This data has shown that women are earning lessEngineering Bachelor degrees and there has not been much progress since 2004. The Femineer®Program wants to fix this problem by giving K-12 girls access
2016, theconcept of engineering education accreditation which emphasizes student-centered,outcome-based education (OBE) and continuous improvement, has been more widelyrecognized and promoted [1][2]. Practical teaching, especially field practice teaching, isconsidered to be an important part of engineering education [3][4] and plays a crucialrole in cultivating students' ability to combine theory with practice, think independentlyand communicate, work in a team as well as solve complex problems, and in improvingstudents' sense of social responsibility and interests in engineering [5][6][7].Compared to common practice teaching course, field practice teaching courses(especially those involving the accommodation at the site of practice
1“Plug and Chug” of specification equations is not design. Letting students have thisimpression is doing them a huge disservice.Teaching is tricky business. How one teaches structural design has some particularly impactfulconsequences. Students expect to learn the specifications (or codes) but over emphasizing thecode may leave students without a deeper understanding of the mechanics and structuralbehaviors involved in structural design. There must be a balance between teaching the code andbehavior because many students likely have become programmed, trudging through many mathand science courses, to solve problems in a very methodical fashion of reading a prompt,recognizing the method or formula to use, and arriving at the single correct
Joseph A. Untener University of DaytonIntroductionThe Department of Engineering Technology at the University of Dayton (UD) is in the thirteenthyear of a successful 3+1 program with Shanghai Normal University (SNU) in China. Thisinnovative partnership brings together students from a public institution from one side of theglobe, in one of the most urbanized cities in the world, with students in a private Catholic schoolin the Midwest of the United States. Both groups benefit from this internationalization ofengineering education.The internationalizing of engineering education has been a goal of nearly every university formore than a decade. The National Academy of Engineering, for example, produced reports inthe
asthe development of an engineering identity has been positively linked to persistence in engineering [1-7].Uncovering the traits and experiences that lead to the development of a stronger engineering identitycould aid in the creation of new strategies in the education and retention of engineering students that arespecifically targeted to each of the individual disciplines.Researchers collected data at a large, public research institution in the southeastern United States, using amodified version of the SaGE survey. Adjustments were made to the SaGE survey to allow for thecollection of additional information on underlying identities (namely math, chemistry, and biology) inaddition to Physics. The same survey format was utilized with the
college students (FGCS) face considerable obstacles to college success,including a lack of role models in the family, a lack of familial mentoring and support, a lack offamiliarity with the college climate, and, generally, lower socioeconomic status [1-6]. They tendto be less academically prepared for college, and English is not their native language for a higherproportion than of continuing-generation college students (CGCS) [3]. However, in many ways,recent research suggests that FGCS are very similar to CGCS. They respond to the same factorsencouraging college persistence and success [7-8], and often demonstrate considerable “grit” inpursuing their undergraduate careers (9), a factor instrumental in undergraduate achievement.Indeed, Boone and
space race, engineering education in theU.S. was reformed. In 1955 the ASEE "Grinter report" on evaluation of engineering educationemphasized the importance of graphical expression, including sketching, as a means for creativethinking, spatial visualization, and the ability to convey ideas [1]. However, with the advent ofcomputer aided design (CAD) in the 1970's, free-hand sketching was eliminated from thecurriculum in most undergraduate engineering programs in North America [2], [3].Much of the current literature in representational competence is in science education rather thanengineering education, especially in chemistry and physics. In the engineering education literature,studies that show improved ability in CAD oriented engineering
pointed at their wayof looking at reality and at their own professional identity. It pointed at the difficulties ofgeneral courses to offer educational methods that were interpreted differently from studentgroups of different departments. And it pointed at differences at basic competences needed todive into deep learning and to be motivated by what is offered by the course. Solutions arediscussed.IntroductionFuture engineers are not only expected to have technical knowledge, skills, and abilities, butalso a foundation in professional and ethical practices [1]. One important challenge foreducators is that students show large differences in how they perceive courses and what theireducational needs are [2]. In this article we focus on a large first
hydraulic vibration machine at IIT Madras, for Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), Tumba. In US he worked for the R&D departments of Computer, ATM and Railway Industry. He then resumed teaching at several US academic institutions. He spent two summers at NASA Kennedy Space Center as a research fellow. He received awards for academic, teaching and research excellence. His teaching experience ranges from KG to PG. After his return to India, Dr. Malladi taught his favorite subject ”Engineering Mechanics” at a few en- gineering institutions and found a need to 1. simplify the subject 2. create a new genre of class books to facilitate active reading and learning and 3. reform academic assessment for the sure
Efficient) Teaching (Work in Progress)IntroductionThe paper is the result of a Faculty Learning Community (FLC) [1] within the college ofengineering at the University of Delaware. The FLC was initiated, with the help of a $4k grantfrom the University’s Center for Teaching and Learning, to create a series of short guides oneffective teaching practices that distill the literature on various topics into actionable steps anyfaculty member (particularly new faculty) can implement. The FLC consisted of members fromall departments within the college of engineering and a single colleague from the college ofeducation with expertise in professional development (7 members total). All
different professors taught sections EngineeringStatics in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering with no common syllabus or commonassignments. Drop, withdraw, fail (DWF) rates varied from 2% to 78% – students picked theircourse section based on grade expectation. Over the years between 2005 and 2013, I taught moreand more of the offered sections, effectively reducing course drift and enforcing a common set oflearning objectives.Figure 1. Total Enrollment in Statics Total as taughtinby Enrollment Howard Statics, Fall and Spring Author's sections, Other faculty's
, Aerospace Engineering,IntroductionPersistence, retention and academic achievement in higher education are influenced by a complexinteraction between self-efficacy, motivation and engagement. Bandura [1] defined perceived self-efficacy as “belief in one’s capabilities to organize, and execute the courses of action required toproduce given attainments, the perception to do tasks and achieve goals”. Bandura and Locke [2]observed a strong relation between self-efficacy and performance in general. A meta-analysis of114 studies by Stajkovic and Luthans [3] found a strong correlation between self-efficacy andwork-related performance. A review of literature [4] on self-efficacy and academic performancepublished between 2003-15 indicated a moderate
receive timely feedback from students.Many helpful feedbacks were received this way. Many students commented that interactiveactivities such as group discussion made them focused on materials which otherwise would makethem sleepy. Another feedback from students was that they would like the videos to be short.The eight to twelve minutes recommended by Abeysekera and Dawson 1 and Ronchetti22 seem tobe too long for our students. Majority students wanted five minutes or less. This will be a factorwhen the next modules are developed.It was noticed that the second flipped module contains three videos with total time of 20 minutes,these videos were created using the recorded lecture captured in the previous semester. Thecaptured lecture lasted about 45
of the need for targeted faculty development in the implementation of active-learning methodologies to insure the method has the intended effect on student learning andengagement.Introduction:Teaching methods are known to affect student performance in a course. The meta-analysis of225 studies on active-learning by Freeman, et al [1] found students in STEM courses taught withextensive lecturing are 1.5 times more likely to fail, earn a D, or withdraw from the course thanstudents taught with active-learning methods in the same STEM course subject. A second meta-analysis of engineering and technology education journal articles confirmed that small-group andcollaborative learning pedagogies increased student performance by close to a half a
management skills andconstruction related expertise with the aim of finishing a building construction project on time.The pedagogy includes traditional lecture, group learning, hands-on assignments, teamdiscussion and presentation, reading pertinent literature, case studies and independent learning.BIM is a process-oriented approach that emphasizes on learning BIM as a revolutionaryconstruction management process and its impacts on the success of projects.The course structure includes several learning modules and each module consists of fourdifferent sessions as follows: 1. Introductory oral presentation accompanied by exclusive studying materials; 2. Lab 1: Teaching Assistant leading a hands-on-exercise tutorial by a well-defined procedure
with students through outreach events andprograms to increase student awareness of library resources, with the primary goal of fosteringacademic success and lifelong learning. [1] At Syracuse University, approximately 25% of thegraduate students are STEM majors, making it a high priority for the STEM Librarian to findnew and effective avenues for connecting with them. However, attempts to connect graduatestudents to these resources have been hindered by a lack of understanding for how to reach andcommunicate with graduate students, an absence of regularized funding to host events, andinsufficient data regarding graduate students professional development needs and interests. TheSTEM Librarian’s traditional interactions with graduate students
.Changes in industry trends are the primary cause for the addition of different areas in the ChemEcurriculum such as the need for large-scale production of commodities chemicals, productdevelopment, pharmaceuticals, and bioengineering [1]. However, there are many hurdles tocompletely invigorate the ChemE curriculum. Some examples may include accreditation, coursecredit limits, maintaining consistency with the rest of the universities, among others. Manyengineering disciplines have addressed these challenges by adding non-traditional learningexperiences such as research experiences, cooperative learning, project-based learning, servicelearning, and experiential learning [2].Conventional wisdom advocates that engineering student’s involvement in
narrow and implicit due to lack of support in development of research designskills, and professional identity and socialization4, 1. Wenger5 reminds us that “meaningfullearning in social contexts requires both participation and reification to be in interplay” (p. 1),but REU participants likely lack opportunities afforded to graduate students to more legitimatelyparticipate in the community, given their relative inexperience and contracted timeframe.While the challenges of attracting, retaining, and educating engineers are well-recognized6,engineering researchers are divided in their beliefs about effective ways to socialize REUstudents into the engineering field. Sadler, Burgin, McKinney and Ponjuan7 call for moreexplication of concepts, others
University, a mid-size Mid-Atlantic public university, we set out to foster anEntrepreneurial Mindset in our first-year engineering students by modifying the ProductArchaeology framework that was first developed by K. Lewis, et al. [1]. In our implementation,we allowed student teams to choose from a bank of products and guided them through the fourphases of product archaeology (preparation, excavation, evaluation, and explanation). For theevaluation phase, each team developed and executed three or more qualitative experiments fortheir product. At the conclusion of the project, students wrote a report that addressed the fourphases of product archaeology, including the results of their quantitative experiments. Eachreport was graded using an