be most important to view.I have not yet begun to use Panopto.1. I have not yet viewed anything on Panopto. So while I have to conduct a survey on it. It ishard to either criticize or compliment it. 2. The class is not necessarily very difficult but theway the course material is set viz-a-viz the questions that get asked in the quizzes; leaves a lot tobe desired. The text book the course uses fails to explain plainly enough C Language for anyonestudying alone to understand and master what they learn. 3. The instructor needs to do a betterjob explaining what is coming. Because the way these surveys tests and quizzes were set; therewas no explanation to the students as to what was in them. I believe tests and quizzes are ameasure of one's
GSA CAD Standards: http://www.gsa.gov/gsa/cm_attachments/GSA_DOCUMENT/CAD_standards_R2NY1-k_0Z5RDZ-i34K- pR.pdf 12 Jongeling, R. (2006). A process model for work-flow management in construction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden. 13 Foster, L. L. (2008). Legal issues and risks associated with Building Information Modeling technology (Unpublished masters thesis). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. 14 Kiviniemi, A., Tarandi, V., Karlshøj, J., Bell, H., & Karud, O. J. (2008). Review of the development and implementation of IFC compatible BIM (Erabuild Report): The Research Council of Norway. Statsbygg, Norway. 15 Khemlani, L., Timerman
after they have mastered course material, PBL students learn course material in theprocess of solving a problem. In PBL, the problem itself drives the learning. Students are activeparticipants in their own learning, placed into a problem situation where problem parameters arenot well defined and more than one outcome is possible.PBL usually involves four steps: problem analysis, self-directed learning, brainstormingdiscussions, and solution testing (see Figure 1). In the first step, students are presented with aproblem and asked to identify what is known and unknown and if any constraints apply. Afterworking together to analyze the problem and its requirements, students then create their ownplan for acquiring the knowledge necessary to solve
Materials, and Aerospace Structures Page 15.245.1 Courses. She received her Bachelor of Arts degree in Mathematics from Cornell University in 1978, and both her Master of Science in 1981 and Doctor of Science in 1988 from the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. After graduation, Dr. Bowden spent 10 years working in the aerospace industry for a number of© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 different companies including American Composites Company, American Rocket Company, and AEC-Able Engineering. Dr. Bowden is currently
Dean/FIGs Director Author affiliations, UW-Madison: Technical Communication Program: http://tc.engr.wisc.edu/ Master of Engineering in Professional Practice: http://mepp.engr.wisc.edu/ Page 15.1075.11Appendix A. Handout for freshman engineering students at summer registration. Studentslearn about the FIG program and the options for FIG classes for their first semester on campus insummer registration. Better communication point has made it easier for students to know whatto expect in their options. Space Exploration EPD155 Freshman Engineering Technical Writing course
between students’ conception of force and the common errors that they make in solving problem in Statics? Methods The study described in this paper looked at the interviews from three male civil andmechanical engineering seniors. Seniors were used in this study because it was assumed that theyhad already mastered these fundamental concepts and also should know how to solve theseproblems. Students were asked to think aloud as they solved a problem based on the targetconcepts of free body diagram (FBD) and equilibrium 13. Materials The students were asked to solve a problem taken from an early version of the Statics
inquiry-based, hands-on learning goal, the Center’s Project Development Team(PDT) proposed a new instructional systems design model during the summer of 1995 [15, 16]. Anessential element of the design is the use of a transfer activity that allows the students toreinforce and extend competencies mastered in previous learning tasks to a new problem solvingcontext. Transfer is defined as “the ability to perform an acquired skill in new, unfamiliarsituations” [5]. The purpose of the transfer activity is to provide integration of the competenciesintroduced through the module's previous learning events and to provide an opportunity to applythe learned skills to a real world problem. The real world problem is based on a virtual company,a macrocontext
project that included equipping new Environmental Engineering laboratoriesfor advance heavy metal analysis. Ms. Pfaff continued on into graduate studies at CWRU anddid her thesis research on lead soil contamination around Cleveland’s Master Metals site. Thiswork led to an assessment of soil extraction techniques and the development of a screeningextraction method (the CWRU 1N HCl, 2h Hr. Ex.) that is still in use today (Pfaff and Jennings,1996). The work also identified near surface soil lead contamination as high as 23,750 mg/kg.The current standard of “child contact” residential soil is 400 mg/kg (USEPA, 2001), so valueslike 23,750 mg/kg represent profound contamination and serious health risk. The work of Ms. Pfaff and other graduate
. Page 9.753.11 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2004, American Society for Engineering EducationDERAN HANESIAN received his B. ChE. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering degrees from Cornell University in 1952and 1961 respectively. He was employed at DuPont and then started teaching at NJIT in 1963 and served as Chairmanof the Department of Chemical Engineering, Chemistry and Environmental Science from 1975-1988. He is the recipientof numerous awards and in October 2000, he was designated in the inaugural group of five MASTER TEACHERS atNJIT. He is a Fellow and Emeritus Member (52 years) in the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and a
race and sex differences, professional choice cannot be fully addressed throughcurrent occupational choice theories. In this paper, we address the problem of gender and racedynamics in Information Technology-related fields. This study evaluates the distribution offamily-background, educational, family, and employment characteristics by gender and race.We use these characteristics to evaluate the determinants of job satisfaction among highlyeducated IT-eligible workers.Data and analysisGeorgia Tech is the only institution that ranks in the top 10 in graduating women and minoritiesin all engineering degree categories--bachelors, masters, and doctorate. Because of itsspecialization in technical education, Georgia Tech’s extensive alumni database
Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, Biloxi, Mississippi, November 6-9, 1999.10. Duff, J.M. (1990). Teaching engineering graphics as a body of knowledge. Proceedings of the 44th Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, Tempe, Arizona, 1990.11. Cumberland, R. R. (2001). The foundation of a progressive engineering graphics curriculum: A directed project report. Unpublished masters thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette.12. Gredler, M. E. (2001). Information Processing Theories. In Learning and instruction: Theory in to practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for
Validation.Ms. Lisa A Nutt, Robert Morris UniversityDr. Tony Lee Kerzmann, Robert Morris University Tony Kerzmann received both a Bachelor of Arts in Physics from Duquesne University and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2004. After graduating, Tony Kerzmann enrolled in graduate school at the University of Pittsburgh where he graduated with a Master in Science and a Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering, in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Currently, he is an assistant professor at Robert Morris University, where his research goals include, hybrid concen- trating photovoltaic systems, energy system life cycle assessment, sustainable product development, and active
programming, we found that the success of this course was primarily due to the motivationand commitment shown by the students. To allow students more time to dig deeper into thesesubject areas and master them with more hands-on examples, for the next offering of the coursewe plan to separate the course into two courses - one covering basic electrical concepts andanalog devices and the second one covering digital and computing systems. Fundamentals of Electricity and Electronics Digital Electronics and Computing SystemsOur hope is that students will either take both courses as a series or take one of the twodepending on their comfort level and their expected use of the material in their own curriculum
experience - can be facilitated by achieving the second goal - replacingthe traditional lecture with a modern multimedia array of materials which bring a freshperspective to the conceptual, analytical, and procedural aspects of each laboratory assignment.The flexibility of multimedia allows for demonstration of lab technique via video, creation ofsample data sets to practice laboratory data analysis technique, and competency quizzes to insurethe student has mastered each level before moving to the next.Laboratory Course Format -The department offers five laboratory classes for engineering students; one or more of theseclasses is required for majors in three different programs, Electrical Engineering (EE), ComputerEngineering (CompE) and Biomedical
interested in majoring in electrical engineering(and is now working on a degree at a prestigious engineering school) describes his careerinfluence thusly: My brother’s actually becoming – like – he’s going to get his Master Electrician’s License and he kind of got me interested, always talking about that stuff and I just kind of decided that would be a good fit.This mechanism can also work in reverse. If a student does not identify with a vicarious rolemodel in engineering or that model is not successful, then they may decide that a path intoengineering is closed to them. A highly-talented female in physics describes her likelihood ofchoosing a career in engineering: I feel like they’re [engineers] a whole bunch of smart
understanding how a final capstone project has to be done.References: 1. Viswanathan, S. and H. Evans,“ Effective Capstone/Masters Projects – Do’s and Don’ts”, presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, June 12-15, Portland, Oregon, USA (2005). Page 24.453.202. "Guide to Great Chair Design." Guide to Great Chair Design. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2011. 3. "chair history — Chair Blog." Chair Blog — Chairs, Chair Designers and Chair Manufacturers. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2011. .4. http://somaergo.com/content/chairs/SomaCourtReprtr.pdf5. IKEA. (2013). Democratic Design: Design for Everyone. Retrieved from http://www.ikea.com/ms/en_US/about-the
class expert for each of the 13 areas of Materials Science and Engineering that were covered on each of the 13 Wednesdays. We filmed interview with the faculty expert as well as with her or his graduate students. We also filmed “B-roll” of their labs to put in front of the interviews to make the Page 24.469.8 videos more visually interesting. The intent of all of the interviews was to capture the passion that the researchers had for the topics and to show that the topics were so compelling, that it was easily worth 10 hours of the students' time to master the subject. These videos can be found at the website for the 2013
- ogy Program. He directs the statewide program Island Energy InquiryTM , a place-based, inquiry learning curriculum for STEM teachers in grades 5-12. He holds a Master of Arts in Teaching degree (Physics) and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautical Science, with 18 years of expe- rience in engineering management and 19 years as an educator, curriculum developer, and professional development specialist. Page 24.481.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Energy Inquiry: Hands-on, Inquiry Learning Methods to Enhance STEM
goals which will carry into my career. I would like to pursue a Masters in Engineering and work at a prestigious Engineering company once I graduate where I can apply my knowledge of business entrepreneurship to the field of engineering. I also hope to work for a university as an engineering professor and counselor after gaining experience in industry so I can use my education and experience to help new engineering students on their path to graduation. Receiving a scholarship would enable me to spend more time focusing on my academics, community service, and student organizations without the burden of how to pay for my education. The schooling that
is that each module culminates with a collaborativehomework assignment where the students were motivated to publish, validate, and visualize theirmultiscale modeling learning outcomes on Wiki based EVOCD web portal8 with an anticipationof sharing and defending their research findings with other class members, thus facilitating easyassessment of students accomplishments. Through this exercise students demonstrated how theknowledge attained and exchanged from ICME wiki resulted in practicing and publishing thepotential impact of adopting the multiscale modeling paradigm in their diverse research areasrelated to their Master/PhD dissertations.Course organization and curriculaThe interdisciplinary course curriculum described here was designed in
Stormwater Management and En- gineering Education. She received her bachelor of science in Mechanical Engineering from Gonzaga University and a master of science in Civil Engineering from Washington State University. She is also an adjunct member of the Civil Engineering Faculty at Gonzaga University where she teaches Stormwater Management and Senior Design.Dr. Noel E. Bormann P.E., Gonzaga University Professor of Civil Engineering.Dr. Sue L. Niezgoda P.E., Gonzaga University Dr. Niezgoda is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Gonzaga University. She has a doctorate in Civil Engineering from Penn State University and is a registered professional engineer in the state of Wyoming. She conducts research in the
think through for a given circuit. The equation writing problem games have somewhat higher “very• It was fun and very interactive. I liked doing it a lot. useful” ratings than the series-parallel• I needed this repetitive practice to master the application of the concepts in class. exercise.• Explain why some of the series connections work. I didn't understand why some of the less obvious ones were Open-ended student comments and correct in the beginning
. Competence can be related to having a desireto master certain skills, and can promote intrinsic motivation when accompanied by a sense ofautonomy. Competence is also the belief in one’s self-efficacy to meet thechallenges. Relatedness can be thought of as a sense of purpose of pursuing certain actions orbeing connected to others in a social framework. Intrinsic motivation has been linked to variouseducational outcomes across the age span from elementary school to college students [27]. Theresearch findings suggest that intrinsically motivated students are more likely to stay in school[28] , and achieve positive academic performance as measured by standardized achievement testsand by teachers’ ratings [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].Key Features of the
Paper ID #9392Exploring the Effects of Student Course Withdrawals on Time to GraduationDr. Gillian M. Nicholls, University of Alabama, Huntsville Gillian Nicholls is an assistant professor of Industrial & Systems Engineering & Engineering Management and a 2009-2010 Gray Faculty Fellow at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. Her research interests are in applying statistical analysis and optimization to supply chain management, transportation man- agement, and engineering education. She holds the B.S. in Industrial Engineering (Lehigh University), Masters in Business Administration (Penn State University), M.S
educational degree completed: Figure 11 shows the claims for the highest Page 24.598.13degree completed by the survey participants for years 2013, 2007, and 2003. In 2013,56.9% reported the Ph.D. or other doctorate, 38.2% a masters degree; 2.4% abaccalaureate degree; and 2.4% reported that they have only industrial experience. The2013 survey results are similar to 2007 and 2003 survey results; the majority ofparticipants claimed to have a Ph.D. or other doctorate.22. Institutional expectations for conducting research/publications: In 2013, 58.5%respondents reported that they are expected to conduct research, in contrast to 2007(35%) and 2003 (29%). The results
Engineering with a research focus on engineering education. She works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating prepara- tion in mathematics and physics, incorporating experiential activities in the classroom, and introducing multidisciplinary design.Prof. John D. Whitcomb, Texas A&M University John began his career at NASA Langley Research Center in 1974, where he stayed until moving to Texas A&M University in 1989. While employed at NASA, he completed his Masters and PhD degrees at Stanford University and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, respectively. His research has primarily focused on predicting the performance of composite materials subjected to static and
. In some cases, students might review portions of a video several times before class. Other students might use the videos to refresh difficult ideas when preparing for a test. • In-class sessions allow the instructor to more accurately gauge student learning. In a traditional lecture, even with active learning elements, the instructor is in control. Having students work on assignment in-class increases student/teacher interaction and it is easier to understand which concepts students struggle with, and also which topics they mastering easily. The time devoted to these topics can be changed as needed. It is also possible to identify individual students who are struggling and work more closely with
others. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #9682Dr. Craig G Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Craig G. Downing is Department Head and Associate Professor of Engineering Management at Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology. His teaching responsibilities are focused on delivering graduate-level instruction related to Operations and Quality Systems. His interests are rooted in Academic-Industrial partnerships, Process Improvement, and Action Research in Engineering Management. He is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt.Dr. Donald E. Richards, Rose-Hulman Institute
Paper ID #10091Game-Aided Pedagogy to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes and En-gagement in Transportation EngineeringDr. Montasir Abbas P.E., Virginia Tech Dr. Montasir Abbas is an Associate Professor in the Transportation Infrastructure and Systems Engineer- ing at Virginia Tech. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from University of Khartoum, Sudan (1993), a Master of Science in Civil Engineering from University of Nebraska-Lincoln (1997), and a Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering from Purdue University (2001). Dr. Abbas has wide experience as a practicing transportation engineer and a